ML23079A120: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: | {{#Wiki_filter:From: Sujata Goetz Sent: Monday, March 20, 2023 12:45 PM To: Lashley, Phil H Cc: Beck, Andrew | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review for Beaver Valley 1 &2 Exemption from Specific Provisions in 10 CFR 50 Appendix H (EPID: L-2023-LLA-0036_ | Acceptance Review for Beaver Valley 1 &2 Exemption from Specific Provisions in 10 CFR 50 Appendix H (EPID: L-2023-LLA-0036_ | ||
Dear Mr. Lashley By {{letter dated|date=February 14, 2023|text=letter dated February 14, 2023}} (Agencywide Document and Access Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML23045A144, Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp submitted a license amendment request for Beaver Valley Power Station Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The proposed amendment would exempt the licensee from having to submit a summary technical report within 18 months after each capsule is withdrawn. | |||
Dear Mr. Lashley | |||
By {{letter dated|date=February 14, 2023|text=letter dated February 14, 2023}} (Agencywide Document and Access Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML23045A144, Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp submitted a license amendment request for Beaver Valley Power Station Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The proposed amendment would exempt the licensee from having to submit a summary technical report within 18 months after each capsule is withdrawn. | |||
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take 160 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in 12 months from the date of this letter, which would be March 20, 2024. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take 160 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in 12 months from the date of this letter, which would be March 20, 2024. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | ||
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application, and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application, and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me. | If you have any questions, please contact me. | ||
Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11555 Rockville Pike Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL1 Office O8F2 Mailroom O8-B1A Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Washington, DC 20555-0001 (o) 301.415.8004 (f) 301.415.3313 | Sujata Goetz Project Manager, Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11555 Rockville Pike Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL1 Office O8F2 Mailroom O8-B1A Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Washington, DC 20555-0001 | ||
(o) 301.415.8004 (f) 301.415.3313 | |||
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DRMA Email Number: 2006 | |||
Mail Envelope Properties (MN2PR09MB54676F216B651C6C2F57CD2280809) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review for Beaver Valley 1 &2 Exemption from Specific Provisions in 10 CFR 50 Appendix H (EPID L-2023-LLA-0036_ | Acceptance Review for Beaver Valley 1 &2 Exemption from Specific Provisions in 10 CFR 50 Appendix H (EPID L-2023-LLA-0036_ | ||
Sent Date: | Sent Date: 3/20/2023 12:45:11 PM Received Date: 3/20/2023 12:45:00 PM From: Sujata Goetz | ||
Created By: Sujata.Goetz@nrc.gov | |||
Recipients: | |||
"Beck, Andrew" <abeck@energyharbor.com> | "Beck, Andrew" <abeck@energyharbor.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None "Lashley, Phil H" <phlashley@energyharbor.com> | Tracking Status: None "Lashley, Phil H" <phlashley@energyharbor.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | Tracking Status: None | ||
Post Office: MN2PR09MB5467.namprd09.prod.outlook.com | |||
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3069 3/20/2023 12:45:00 PM | |||
Options Priority: Normal Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:}} | |||
Latest revision as of 03:18, 15 November 2024
| ML23079A120 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 03/20/2023 |
| From: | Sujata Goetz NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL1 |
| To: | Lashley P Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp |
| References | |
| L-2023-LLA-0036 | |
| Download: ML23079A120 (3) | |
Text
From: Sujata Goetz Sent: Monday, March 20, 2023 12:45 PM To: Lashley, Phil H Cc: Beck, Andrew
Subject:
Acceptance Review for Beaver Valley 1 &2 Exemption from Specific Provisions in 10 CFR 50 Appendix H (EPID: L-2023-LLA-0036_
Dear Mr. Lashley
By letter dated February 14, 2023 (Agencywide Document and Access Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML23045A144, Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp submitted a license amendment request for Beaver Valley Power Station Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The proposed amendment would exempt the licensee from having to submit a summary technical report within 18 months after each capsule is withdrawn.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take 160 hours0.00185 days <br />0.0444 hours <br />2.645503e-4 weeks <br />6.088e-5 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in 12 months from the date of this letter, which would be March 20, 2024. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application, and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sujata Goetz Project Manager, Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11555 Rockville Pike Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL1 Office O8F2 Mailroom O8-B1A Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Washington, DC 20555-0001
(o) 301.415.8004 (f) 301.415.3313
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DRMA Email Number: 2006
Mail Envelope Properties (MN2PR09MB54676F216B651C6C2F57CD2280809)
Subject:
Acceptance Review for Beaver Valley 1 &2 Exemption from Specific Provisions in 10 CFR 50 Appendix H (EPID L-2023-LLA-0036_
Sent Date: 3/20/2023 12:45:11 PM Received Date: 3/20/2023 12:45:00 PM From: Sujata Goetz
Created By: Sujata.Goetz@nrc.gov
Recipients:
"Beck, Andrew" <abeck@energyharbor.com>
Tracking Status: None "Lashley, Phil H" <phlashley@energyharbor.com>
Tracking Status: None
Post Office: MN2PR09MB5467.namprd09.prod.outlook.com
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3069 3/20/2023 12:45:00 PM
Options Priority: Normal Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: