ML080170194: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:- Page 1 -APPENDIX F - REGION IV WRITTEN EXAMINATION OUTLINE QUALITY REVIEW MATRIXReview Performed by G. Apger (9/12/07)
{{#Wiki_filter:APPENDIX F - REGION IV WRITTEN EXAMINATION OUTLINE QUALITY REVIEW MATRIX Review Performed by G. Apger (9/12/07)
Q#1.LOK (F/H)2.LOD (1-5)3. Psychometric Errors4. Job Content Errors5.
: 1. 2.        3. Psychometric Errors            4. Job Content Errors      5.                          6.
U/E/S 6.Explanation(See below for instructions)
Q#   LOK LOD                                                                                            Explanation (F/H (1-5)                                                                 U/E/S           (See below for instructions)
StemFocus Direct L/U One Ans Min Resp Scope (TS?)Job-Link Minu-tia SROOnly Back-wards See Comments in column#6SGeneric K/A 2.4.30 was listed as rejected due to being less than 2.5 for RO. This is contrary to methodology outlined in the
Stem Direct One      Min    Scope Job- Minu-      SRO  Back-
 
            )
selection process description.While Tier 3 items are specifically identified as not eligible to be pre-screened out, they may be rejected if justified on a case-by-case
Focus  L/U Ans     Resp   (TS?) Link       tia   Only  wards See                                                                                 S  Generic K/A 2.4.30 was listed as rejected Comments                                                                                    due to being less than 2.5 for RO. This is in column                                                                                  contrary to methodology outlined in the
 
    #6                                                                                      selection process description.
basis: ES401 Att.2 See Comments in column#6SWhile the specific K/As are different, it was noted that repeat APE items in Tier 2 Group 1 are very similar to those repeat items in another facility's exam outline which was
While Tier 3 items are specifically identified as not eligible to be pre-screened out, they may be rejected if justified on a case-by-case basis: ES401 Att.2 See                                                                                 S  While the specific K/As are different, it was Comments                                                                                    noted that repeat APE items in Tier 2 Group in column                                                                                  1 are very similar to those repeat items in
 
    #6                                                                                      another facilitys exam outline which was developed using the same program.
developed using the same program.
                                                                                            -AND-Sampled APE items for Tier 2 Group 2 repeat 5 of 24 items from that same facilitys exam.
 
                                                              - Page 1 -}}
-AND-Sampled APE items for Tier 2 Group 2 repeat 5 of 24 items from that same facility's
 
exam.}}

Latest revision as of 21:29, 14 November 2019

Appendix F - Region IV Written Examination Outline Quality Review Matrix
ML080170194
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 01/17/2008
From:
NRC Region 4
To:
Entergy Operations
References
50-382/07-302
Download: ML080170194 (1)
v • d • e


Text

APPENDIX F - REGION IV WRITTEN EXAMINATION OUTLINE QUALITY REVIEW MATRIX Review Performed by G. Apger (9/12/07)

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Errors 4. Job Content Errors 5. 6.

Q# LOK LOD Explanation (F/H (1-5) U/E/S (See below for instructions)

Stem Direct One Min Scope Job- Minu- SRO Back-

)

Focus L/U Ans Resp (TS?) Link tia Only wards See S Generic K/A 2.4.30 was listed as rejected Comments due to being less than 2.5 for RO. This is in column contrary to methodology outlined in the

  1. 6 selection process description.

While Tier 3 items are specifically identified as not eligible to be pre-screened out, they may be rejected if justified on a case-by-case basis: ES401 Att.2 See S While the specific K/As are different, it was Comments noted that repeat APE items in Tier 2 Group in column 1 are very similar to those repeat items in

  1. 6 another facilitys exam outline which was developed using the same program.

-AND-Sampled APE items for Tier 2 Group 2 repeat 5 of 24 items from that same facilitys exam.

- Page 1 -

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML080170194&oldid=2161388"