ML11280A285: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 17, 2011 Mr. R. M. Krich Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority 3R Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 -ACCEPTANCE REVIEW REGARDING THE PROPOSED LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ELIMINATE LICENSE CONDITION 2.G (TAC NO. ME7322) | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 17, 2011 Mr. R. M. Krich Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority 3R Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 -ACCEPTANCE REVIEW REGARDING THE PROPOSED LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ELIMINATE LICENSE CONDITION 2.G (TAC NO. ME7322) | |||
==Dear Mr. Krich:== | ==Dear Mr. Krich:== | ||
By letter dated October 5,2011 (Agencywide Documents and Access Management System Accession No. ML11285A049), Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) submitted a license amendment request for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. The proposed amendment request would eliminate License Condition 2.G requiring reporting of violations of Section 2.C of the operating license. The proposed change is consistent with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)-approved change notice published in the Federal Register on November 4, 2005 (70 FR 67202), announcing the availability of this improvement through the consolidated line item improvement process. The Federal Register Notice included a model safety evaluation and model no significant hazards consideration (NSHC) determination, relating to the elimination of the license condition involving reporting of violations of other requirements (typically in License Conditions 2.C) in the operating license of some commercial nuclear power plants. TVA affirmed the applicability of the model NSHC determination in its application dated October 5, 2011. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the NRC staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. | |||
Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. | By letter dated October 5,2011 (Agencywide Documents and Access Management System Accession No. ML11285A049), Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) submitted a license amendment request for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. The proposed amendment request would eliminate License Condition 2.G requiring reporting of violations of Section 2.C of the operating license. | ||
This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel deSign features, and principal safety considerations. | The proposed change is consistent with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)-approved change notice published in the Federal Register on November 4, 2005 (70 FR 67202), announcing the availability of this improvement through the consolidated line item improvement process. The Federal Register Notice included a model safety evaluation and model no significant hazards consideration (NSHC) determination, relating to the elimination of the license condition involving reporting of violations of other requirements (typically in License Conditions 2.C) in the operating license of some commercial nuclear power plants. TVA affirmed the applicability of the model NSHC determination in its application dated October 5, 2011. | ||
R. M. Krich -2 The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. | The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the NRC staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
If additional information is needed for the NRC staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), | ||
an amendment to the license must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel deSign features, and principal safety considerations. | |||
R. M. Krich -2 The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the NRC staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | |||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-3100. | If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-3100. | ||
G. Lamb, Senior Project Manager p cial Projects Branch . ision of Operating Reactor Licensing ffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-390 cc: Distribution via Listserv R. M. Krich -2 The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. | 11~~?b G. Lamb, Senior Project Manager p cial Projects Branch | ||
If additional information is needed for the NRC staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | . ision of Operating Reactor Licensing ffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-390 cc: Distribution via Listserv | ||
R. M. Krich -2 The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the NRC staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | |||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-3100. | If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-3100. | ||
Sincerely, IRA! | |||
John G. Lamb, Senior Project Manager Special Projects Branch Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-390 cc: Distribution via Listserv NRC Distribution PUBLIC RidsOgcRp Resource LPWB Reading RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsRgn2MailCenter Resource RidsNrrDraAadb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb RidsNrrDraApla Resource RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDorl Resource GBowman. OEDO RidsNrrDorlLp-Wb Resource RHannah. OPA RII RidsNrrPMWattsBar1 Resource RidsNrrDirsltsb Resource RidsNrrLABClayton Resource Accession No'.. ML11280A285 OFFICE DORLlLPWB/PM DORLlLPWB/LA DORLlLPWB/BC NAME .JLamb BClayton SCampbell DATE 10/17/11 10/17111 10/17/11 OFFICIAL RECORD COpy}} | |||
Latest revision as of 13:43, 12 November 2019
| ML11280A285 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Watts Bar  |
| Issue date: | 10/17/2011 |
| From: | John Lamb Watts Bar Special Projects Branch |
| To: | Krich R Tennessee Valley Authority |
| Lamb J | |
| References | |
| TAC ME7322 | |
| Download: ML11280A285 (3) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 17, 2011 Mr. R. M. Krich Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority 3R Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
SUBJECT:
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 -ACCEPTANCE REVIEW REGARDING THE PROPOSED LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ELIMINATE LICENSE CONDITION 2.G (TAC NO. ME7322)
Dear Mr. Krich:
By letter dated October 5,2011 (Agencywide Documents and Access Management System Accession No. ML11285A049), Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) submitted a license amendment request for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. The proposed amendment request would eliminate License Condition 2.G requiring reporting of violations of Section 2.C of the operating license.
The proposed change is consistent with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)-approved change notice published in the Federal Register on November 4, 2005 (70 FR 67202), announcing the availability of this improvement through the consolidated line item improvement process. The Federal Register Notice included a model safety evaluation and model no significant hazards consideration (NSHC) determination, relating to the elimination of the license condition involving reporting of violations of other requirements (typically in License Conditions 2.C) in the operating license of some commercial nuclear power plants. TVA affirmed the applicability of the model NSHC determination in its application dated October 5, 2011.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the NRC staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),
an amendment to the license must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel deSign features, and principal safety considerations.
R. M. Krich -2 The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the NRC staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-3100.
11~~?b G. Lamb, Senior Project Manager p cial Projects Branch
. ision of Operating Reactor Licensing ffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-390 cc: Distribution via Listserv
R. M. Krich -2 The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the NRC staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-3100.
Sincerely, IRA!
John G. Lamb, Senior Project Manager Special Projects Branch Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-390 cc: Distribution via Listserv NRC Distribution PUBLIC RidsOgcRp Resource LPWB Reading RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsRgn2MailCenter Resource RidsNrrDraAadb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb RidsNrrDraApla Resource RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDorl Resource GBowman. OEDO RidsNrrDorlLp-Wb Resource RHannah. OPA RII RidsNrrPMWattsBar1 Resource RidsNrrDirsltsb Resource RidsNrrLABClayton Resource Accession No'.. ML11280A285 OFFICE DORLlLPWB/PM DORLlLPWB/LA DORLlLPWB/BC NAME .JLamb BClayton SCampbell DATE 10/17/11 10/17111 10/17/11 OFFICIAL RECORD COpy