ML14303A639: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:U.S. Nuclear Regulatory | {{#Wiki_filter:U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions Decommissioning Program: | ||
San Onofre Post Shutdown Activities Report Public Meeting October 27, 2014 Carlsbad, California Larry W. Camper, CEP, REP, CIPM, Director Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery and Waste Programs Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards | San Onofre Post Shutdown Activities Report Public Meeting October 27, 2014 Carlsbad, California Larry W. Camper, CEP, REP, CIPM, Director Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery and Waste Programs Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards | ||
Welcome | |||
* September 30, 2013 Public Meeting | |||
* Meeting Agenda | |||
* Meeting Facilitation and Protocol | |||
* NRC Speakers and Experts | |||
* Public Comments, Questions, and Answers | |||
* Meeting Feedback Forms | |||
* Adjourn at 9 PM 2 | |||
September 30, 2013 Public Meeting | |||
-Government Organizations (NGOs) | * Public Outreach (via staff initiated public meeting) | ||
Responses to Questions from NGOs Fuel Management Decommissioning Timing | * Government to Government Meeting | ||
* Meeting with Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) | |||
* Responses to Questions from NGOs | |||
* Fuel Management | |||
* Decommissioning Timing 3 | |||
SONGS PSDAR Meeting Agenda | |||
- PSDAR Requirements Douglas Broaddus | * Bruce Watson - PSDAR Requirements | ||
- NRC Review of the PSDAR and Licensing Status Ray Kellar | * Douglas Broaddus - NRC Review of the PSDAR and Licensing Status | ||
- Inspection Programs Al Csontos - Spent Fuel Safety Thomas Palmisano | * Ray Kellar - Inspection Programs | ||
- SONGS PSDAR Chip Cameron | * Al Csontos - Spent Fuel Safety | ||
- Public Comment Session Larry Camper - Summary Remarks and | * Thomas Palmisano - SONGS PSDAR | ||
* Chip Cameron - Public Comment Session | |||
* Larry Camper - Summary Remarks and Meeting Closure by 9 PM 4 | |||
NRC Mission | |||
* The NRC licenses and regulates the nation's civilian use of radioactive materials to protect public health and safety, promote the common defense and security, and protect the environment 5 | |||
NEPA | |||
* National Environmental Policy Act | |||
* 10 CFR Part 51, Environmental Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions | |||
* Supplemental Environmental Report | |||
* Environmental Assessment conducted during the license termination process 6 | |||
Decommission (10 CFR 20 Subpart E) | |||
* To remove (as a facility) safely from service and reduce radioactivity to a level that permits: | |||
Release of the property for unrestricted use and termination of the license; or Release of the property under restricted conditions and termination of the license | * Release of the property for unrestricted use and termination of the license; or | ||
* Release of the property under restricted conditions and termination of the license 7 | |||
Release Criteria | |||
* Unrestricted Release | |||
* Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) 25 mrem (0.25 mSv/a) and As Low As is Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) | |||
* Average member of the critical group | |||
* All pathways | |||
* Period of performance - 1000 years | |||
* Restricted release | |||
* 25 mrem (0.25 mSv/a) TEDE and ALARA, with institutional controls in effect | |||
* Legally enforceable institutional controls | |||
* If institutional controls fail, doses do not exceed 1 mSv/a, or 5 mSv/a, under specific circumstances | |||
* Financial assurance - independent third party | |||
* Licensee and NRC public input / outreach requirements 8 | |||
9 NRC Decommissioning Experience 12 10 8 | |||
6 4 | |||
2 0 | |||
1998199920002001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Power Reactors Research Reactors Materials Sites 10 | |||
Transition from Operations to Decommissioning | |||
* Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation continues project management until the Post Shutdown Defueled Technical Specifications are issued | |||
* Transfer of project management responsibilities to the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards | |||
* Inspection Program responsibilities are transferred to the Division of Nuclear Materials Safety from the Division of Reactor Projects | |||
* Support continues from the Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response 11 | |||
The NRC Decommissioning Process - | |||
San Onofre Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report October 27, 2014 Carlsbad, California Bruce A. Watson, CHP Chief, Reactor Decommissioning Branch Office of the Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards | |||
17 Years of Implementing Experience | NRC Decommissioning Regulations | ||
* 10 CFR Part 20 Subpart E License Termination | |||
* 10 CFR Part 50 - Power Reactor License | |||
* 10 CFR Part 72 - Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation License (ISFSI) | |||
* 17 Years of Implementing Experience 13 | |||
San Onofre 2 & 3 Decommissioning Milestones | |||
- SCE certification of permanent cessation of operation for SONGS Units 2 & 3 June 28, 2013 | * June 7, 2013 - SCE certification of permanent cessation of operation for SONGS Units 2 & 3 | ||
- Unit 3 defueled certification July 22, 2013 | * June 28, 2013 - Unit 3 defueled certification | ||
- Unit 2 defueled certification September 23, 2014 - PSDAR submitted NRC issued the public notice for this PSDAR public meeting PSDAR is available in ADAMS at ML14272A121 | * July 22, 2013 - Unit 2 defueled certification | ||
* September 23, 2014 - PSDAR submitted | |||
* NRC issued the public notice for this PSDAR public meeting | |||
* PSDAR is available in ADAMS at ML14272A121 14 | |||
Reactor Decommissioning Options | |||
-lived substance to allow decay until levels permit unrestricted release (not currently available) | * DECON: Equipment, structures, etc. are promptly removed or decontaminated to a level that permits radiological release | ||
Radiological Decommissioning must be completed within 60 years | * SAFSTOR: Plant placed in a safe, stable condition and maintained in that state until it is subsequently decontaminated to levels that permit radiological release | ||
* ENTOMB: Plant is encased in a structurally long-lived substance to allow decay until levels permit unrestricted release (not currently available) | |||
* Radiological Decommissioning must be completed within 60 years 15 | |||
Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Contents (10 CFR 50.82 - Regulatory Guide 1.185) | |||
- Regulatory Guide 1.185) | * A description and schedule for the planned decommissioning activities | ||
A description and schedule for the planned decommissioning activities A site-specific decommissioning cost estimate, including the costs of managing irradiated fuel A discussion that provides the means for concluding that the environmental impacts associated with the decommissioning activities will be bounded by appropriately issued Environmental Impact Statements | * A site-specific decommissioning cost estimate, including the costs of managing irradiated fuel | ||
* A discussion that provides the means for concluding that the environmental impacts associated with the decommissioning activities will be bounded by appropriately issued Environmental Impact Statements 16 | |||
Power Reactor Decommissioning Process - Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report | |||
Licensee may begin major decommissioning activities 90 days after NRC receives the PSDAR | * NRC regulations require that a public meeting be held in the vicinity of the facility to discuss the PSDAR and its contents, as well as to solicit comments | ||
* NRC shall make the PSDAR available for public comment (ADAMS ML14272A121) | |||
* Licensee may begin major decommissioning activities 90 days after NRC receives the PSDAR 17 | |||
The NRC Review Process - | |||
San Onofre PSDAR and Irradiated Fuel Management Plan October 27, 2014 Carlsbad, California Douglas Broaddus, Chief LPL IV-2 and Decommissioning Transition Branch Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
NRCs PSDAR Review Process | |||
* Content requirements in 10 CFR 50.82(a)(4)(i) | |||
* Regulatory Guide 1.185 describes the type of information to be included in a PSDAR | |||
* NRR project manager coordinates technical reviews of the PSDAR | |||
* NRC staff may submit Requests for Additional Information (RAIs) 19 | |||
NRCs PSDAR Review Process: | |||
Evaluation Criteria | Evaluation Criteria | ||
* Does the PSDAR contain the information required by regulation? | |||
* Can the decommissioning be completed as described, and within 60 years? | |||
* Can the decommissioning be completed for the estimated cost? | |||
* Do the decommissioning activities endanger public health and safety or the environment? | |||
20 | |||
NRCs PSDAR Review Process: | |||
Decommissioning Cost Estimate | Decommissioning Cost Estimate | ||
* Site-specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate | |||
- Reasonable assurance funds are available to perform the radiological cleanup | |||
- If plans are delayed, ensure licensee has a means of adjusting the cost estimate and funding over the storage period | |||
* Decommissioning Cost Estimate (DCE) and funding level are updated annually 21 | |||
NRCs PSDAR Review Process: | |||
Environmental Review / NEPA | Environmental Review / NEPA | ||
* Reasons for concluding that environmental impacts of site-specific decommissioning activities are bounded by previous Environmental Impact Statement(s) | |||
- NUREG-0586, Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement on Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities | |||
- Inspection program 22 | |||
NRCs PSDAR Review Process | |||
* Review considers public comments | |||
* Staff will notify licensee when no additional information is required | |||
- NRC does not approve the PSDAR | |||
- Staff documents NRC review is complete | |||
* Licensee may not begin major decommissioning activities until 90 days after NRC receives the PSDAR, per 10 CFR 50.82(a)(5) 23 | |||
Review of Irradiated Fuel Management Plan (IFMP) | |||
)] Not part of the PSDAR -PSDAR / DCE must address the cost of managing irradiated (spent) fuel | * Licensees are required to submit IFMP within 2 years of permanent cessation of operations [10 CFR 50.54(bb)] | ||
* Not part of the PSDAR | |||
- PSDAR / DCE must address the cost of managing irradiated (spent) fuel | |||
- Not requesting comments on the IFMP | |||
* The IFMP must describe the licensees program for management and funding of all spent fuel activities until transferred to DOE for ultimate disposal in a repository | |||
* Submitted for NRCs review and preliminary approval | |||
* Must comply with the NRC requirements for possession of spent fuel 24 | |||
Other Licensing Actions | |||
* SCE has requested other licensing actions that support its decommissioning plan | |||
- Review of other actions is independent of the PSDAR review | |||
- PSDAR may or may not depend on approval of the requested licensing actions | |||
* NRC staff is not requesting comments on these other licensing actions at this meeting | |||
* Other actions may offer separate opportunity for public involvement or comment | |||
* Comments received on other licensing actions will be handled through the associated regulatory process, as appropriate 25 | |||
NRC Inspection Program for Decommissioning Reactors and Spent Fuel Storage | NRC Inspection Program for Decommissioning Reactors and Spent Fuel Storage n | ||
October 27, 2014 Carlsbad, California Ray Kellar, P.E., Chief Fuels Safety and Decommissioning Branch Region IV, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety | |||
How to safely get from this to | How to safely get from this to this Connecticut Yankee, CT Maine Yankee, ME Trojan, OR San Onofre Unit 1, CA | ||
How NRC Ensures Safety | |||
* Establish and ensure compliance with requirements contained in: | |||
- Regulations | |||
- License Basis Documents (i.e., License Conditions, Technical Specifications) | |||
- Guidance Documents | |||
* Perform licensing reviews and safety evaluations | |||
* NRC inspection and enforcement 28 | |||
Inspection Activities | |||
* Inspections of spent fuel pool safety | |||
Inspections of physical security | * Inspections of decommissioning activities | ||
- Generally scheduled during periods of higher risk activities | |||
- During and after remediation activities, NRC conducts independent radiological measurements to confirm licensee survey methodologies | |||
* Inspections of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) | |||
* Inspections of physical security 29 | |||
Objectives of the NRC Inspection Program | |||
* Objectively verify safe conduct of licensee activities | |||
* Verify adequacy of licensee controls | |||
* Ensure safety problems and violations are promptly identified and corrected, and effective actions are taken to prevent recurrence | |||
* Examine trends in licensee safety performance 30 | |||
Inspection Planning and Reports | |||
* Routine inspection schedule | |||
- Planned about a year in advance | |||
- Coordinated with the program office in NMSS | |||
* Inspection planning and execution | |||
- Inspections may be announced or unannounced | |||
- Inspection Plans | |||
- Inspection Procedures | |||
NRC Enforcement Policy http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0934/ML093480037.pdf | - Exit Meetings | ||
* Issue inspection report | |||
- 30 day goal for normal inspection reports (post exit) | |||
- 45 day goal for team inspections (post exit) | |||
* NRC Enforcement Policy http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0934/ML093480037.pdf 31 | |||
Post Inspection Activities | |||
-rm/adams.html), use advanced search feature with docket numbers 05000361, 05000362, and 07200041 for SONGS Track and follow up on safety issues | * Prompt inspection debrief with NRC management | ||
* Determination of any significant findings and enforcement related issues | |||
* Issue inspection report Most NRC inspection reports are publicly available. To locate reports, go to ADAMS web page (http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html), use advanced search feature with docket numbers 05000361, 05000362, and 07200041 for SONGS | |||
* Track and follow up on safety issues 32 | |||
NRC Regulation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation October 27, 2014 Carlsbad, California Dr. Aladar A. Csontos, Chief Renewals and Materials Branch Division of Spent Fuel Management Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards | NRC Regulation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation October 27, 2014 Carlsbad, California Dr. Aladar A. Csontos, Chief Renewals and Materials Branch Division of Spent Fuel Management Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards | ||
NMSS / DSFM: Overview | |||
* Licensing, certification and inspection: | |||
- Spent fuel storage facilities | |||
- Spent fuel dry cask storage systems | |||
- Radioactive material transportation packaging | |||
* Coordination with: | |||
- State and federal agencies (most notably DOT) | |||
-Level Radioactive Waste, and Reactor | - Foreign and international regulatory agencies | ||
-Related Greater Than Class C Waste | - Native American tribes | ||
* Applicable regulations: | |||
- 10 CFR Part 71: Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Material | |||
- 10 CFR Part 72: Licensing Requirements for the Independent Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Radioactive Waste, and Reactor-Related Greater Than Class C Waste 34 | |||
Spent Fuel Storage Casks Once the spent fuel has cooled, it is loaded into special canisters which are designed to hold Pressured Water Reactor or Boiling Water Reactor assemblies. Canisters are filled with inert gas, welded, and rigorously tested for leaks. It may then be placed in a cask for storage or transportation. | |||
The canisters can also be stored in above-ground bunkers, each of which, is about the size of a one | The canisters can also be stored in above-ground bunkers, each of which, is about the size of a one-car garage. | ||
-car garage. | |||
Eventually they may be transported elsewhere for storage. | Eventually they may be transported elsewhere for storage. | ||
35 | |||
Status of U.S. ISFSIs 36 | |||
10 CFR Part 72 Regulations | |||
* Review Areas: | |||
- General Design Criteria: | |||
* Off-site radiation dose / subcriticality / confinement | |||
- Quality Assurance - Siting | |||
- Physical Protection - Reporting | |||
- Training and Certification of Personnel | |||
* Technical Review Disciplines: | |||
- Structural - Materials | |||
- Thermal - Confinement | |||
- Criticality - Quality Assurance | |||
- Shielding and Radiation Protection 37 | |||
Storage System Design Review | |||
Off- | * Normal and Off-Normal Conditions | ||
* Accident Conditions and Natural Phenomena: | |||
- Tornado winds/tornado missiles - Earthquakes | |||
- Floods and tsunamis - Fires and explosions | |||
* Technical Reviews: | |||
- Structural: Confinement maintained under all conditions | |||
- | - Criticality: Fuel subcritical under all conditions | ||
- Shielding: Meets off-site radiation dose rate requirements | |||
- Thermal: Cladding protected under normal conditions | |||
- Materials: | |||
* Properties appropriately assumed in evaluations | |||
* Aging effects managed during renewed storage period 38 | |||
Transportation | |||
* Same set of technical discipline reviews as for storage | |||
- Ensure that package meets external dose rate limits | |||
- Ensure fuel remains subcritical | |||
- Ensure containment is maintained | |||
* Normal and accident conditions differ from storage | |||
- Normal transport: | |||
* Vibration | |||
* Small drops and impacts | |||
* Heat and cold | |||
- Postulated Accidents: | |||
* 30-ft. drop on unyielding surface | |||
* Puncture | |||
* Fire | |||
* Water immersion 39 | |||
Storage Renewal Guidance Update | |||
* Established NRC Storage Renewal Strategy Team to review existing regulatory framework and aging management guidance | |||
* Updating guidance found in NUREG-1927, Rev. 1 - Standard Review Plan for Dry Cask Storage Systems Renewals | |||
* Updated Storage Renewal Framework: | |||
- Operations-focused Aging Management | |||
- Learning, Proactive, and Responsive Aging Management | |||
- Aging Management Programs that consider and respond to operating experience and results of confirmatory research | |||
* Develop guidance report: Managing Aging Processes for Storage | |||
- Aging Management Programs to include inspection guidance | |||
- Stakeholder engagement to discuss proposed changes to storage renewal guidance and solicit feedback 40 | |||
Cladding Integrity & Cl Induced Stress Corrosion Cracking | |||
* Over $9M invested in research and staff efforts | |||
- | * Cladding Integrity: | ||
- High burnup fuel is safe for storage and transportation | |||
- NRC confirmatory research activities | |||
- DOE Cask Demonstration Surveillance Project | |||
* Chloride Induced Stress Corrosion Cracking (CISCC): | |||
- Information Notice November 2012, Potential Chloride-Induced Stress Corrosion, Cracking of Austenitic Stainless Steel and Maintenance of Dry Cask Storage System Canisters | |||
- Regulatory Issue Resolution Protocol for CISCC | |||
* NUREG-1927, Rev. 1: | |||
- Specific aging Management Programs 41 | |||
Summary | |||
* Regulations in 10 CFR Parts 71 and 72 assure safety for both storing and transporting spent nuclear fuel: | |||
- Multi-disciplinary technical review | |||
- Confinement maintained under routine and accident scenarios | |||
* Operations-focused Aging Management | |||
* Learning, Proactive, and Responsive Aging Management | |||
* Storage renewal guidance updates underway | |||
- Aging Management Programs | |||
* Creating a stable, predictable, and efficient renewal regulatory framework with clear, open, transparent, and reliable regulatory expectations 42 | |||
Comments and Questions from Members of the Public 43 | |||
Public comments may be submitted online via the federal governments rulemaking website, www.regulations.gov, using Docket ID NRC-2014-0223. | |||
-2014-0223. They may also be mailed to Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: 3WFN A44M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555 | They may also be mailed to Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. | ||
-0001. Comments will be accepted through Dec. 22, and will be posted on www.regulations.gov.}} | Comments will be accepted through Dec. 22, and will be posted on www.regulations.gov. | ||
44}} |
Latest revision as of 21:00, 31 October 2019
ML14303A639 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | San Onofre ![]() |
Issue date: | 10/27/2014 |
From: | Camper L Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery and Waste Programs |
To: | |
Wengert T | |
References | |
Download: ML14303A639 (44) | |
Text
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions Decommissioning Program:
San Onofre Post Shutdown Activities Report Public Meeting October 27, 2014 Carlsbad, California Larry W. Camper, CEP, REP, CIPM, Director Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery and Waste Programs Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
Welcome
- September 30, 2013 Public Meeting
- Meeting Agenda
- Meeting Facilitation and Protocol
- NRC Speakers and Experts
- Public Comments, Questions, and Answers
- Meeting Feedback Forms
- Adjourn at 9 PM 2
September 30, 2013 Public Meeting
- Public Outreach (via staff initiated public meeting)
- Government to Government Meeting
- Meeting with Non-Government Organizations (NGOs)
- Responses to Questions from NGOs
- Fuel Management
- Decommissioning Timing 3
- Bruce Watson - PSDAR Requirements
- Douglas Broaddus - NRC Review of the PSDAR and Licensing Status
- Ray Kellar - Inspection Programs
- Al Csontos - Spent Fuel Safety
- Chip Cameron - Public Comment Session
- Larry Camper - Summary Remarks and Meeting Closure by 9 PM 4
NRC Mission
- The NRC licenses and regulates the nation's civilian use of radioactive materials to protect public health and safety, promote the common defense and security, and protect the environment 5
- National Environmental Policy Act
- 10 CFR Part 51, Environmental Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions
- Supplemental Environmental Report
- Environmental Assessment conducted during the license termination process 6
Decommission (10 CFR 20 Subpart E)
- To remove (as a facility) safely from service and reduce radioactivity to a level that permits:
- Release of the property for unrestricted use and termination of the license; or
- Release of the property under restricted conditions and termination of the license 7
Release Criteria
- Unrestricted Release
- Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) 25 mrem (0.25 mSv/a) and As Low As is Reasonably Achievable (ALARA)
- Average member of the critical group
- All pathways
- Period of performance - 1000 years
- Restricted release
- Legally enforceable institutional controls
- If institutional controls fail, doses do not exceed 1 mSv/a, or 5 mSv/a, under specific circumstances
- Financial assurance - independent third party
- Licensee and NRC public input / outreach requirements 8
9 NRC Decommissioning Experience 12 10 8
6 4
2 0
1998199920002001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Power Reactors Research Reactors Materials Sites 10
Transition from Operations to Decommissioning
- Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation continues project management until the Post Shutdown Defueled Technical Specifications are issued
- Transfer of project management responsibilities to the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
- Inspection Program responsibilities are transferred to the Division of Nuclear Materials Safety from the Division of Reactor Projects
- Support continues from the Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response 11
The NRC Decommissioning Process -
San Onofre Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report October 27, 2014 Carlsbad, California Bruce A. Watson, CHP Chief, Reactor Decommissioning Branch Office of the Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
NRC Decommissioning Regulations
- 10 CFR Part 20 Subpart E License Termination
- 10 CFR Part 50 - Power Reactor License
- 10 CFR Part 72 - Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation License (ISFSI)
- 17 Years of Implementing Experience 13
San Onofre 2 & 3 Decommissioning Milestones
- June 28, 2013 - Unit 3 defueled certification
- July 22, 2013 - Unit 2 defueled certification
- September 23, 2014 - PSDAR submitted
- NRC issued the public notice for this PSDAR public meeting
- PSDAR is available in ADAMS at ML14272A121 14
Reactor Decommissioning Options
- DECON: Equipment, structures, etc. are promptly removed or decontaminated to a level that permits radiological release
- SAFSTOR: Plant placed in a safe, stable condition and maintained in that state until it is subsequently decontaminated to levels that permit radiological release
- ENTOMB: Plant is encased in a structurally long-lived substance to allow decay until levels permit unrestricted release (not currently available)
- Radiological Decommissioning must be completed within 60 years 15
Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Contents (10 CFR 50.82 - Regulatory Guide 1.185)
- A description and schedule for the planned decommissioning activities
- A site-specific decommissioning cost estimate, including the costs of managing irradiated fuel
- A discussion that provides the means for concluding that the environmental impacts associated with the decommissioning activities will be bounded by appropriately issued Environmental Impact Statements 16
Power Reactor Decommissioning Process - Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
- NRC regulations require that a public meeting be held in the vicinity of the facility to discuss the PSDAR and its contents, as well as to solicit comments
- NRC shall make the PSDAR available for public comment (ADAMS ML14272A121)
- Licensee may begin major decommissioning activities 90 days after NRC receives the PSDAR 17
The NRC Review Process -
San Onofre PSDAR and Irradiated Fuel Management Plan October 27, 2014 Carlsbad, California Douglas Broaddus, Chief LPL IV-2 and Decommissioning Transition Branch Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation
NRCs PSDAR Review Process
- Content requirements in 10 CFR 50.82(a)(4)(i)
- Regulatory Guide 1.185 describes the type of information to be included in a PSDAR
- NRC staff may submit Requests for Additional Information (RAIs) 19
NRCs PSDAR Review Process:
Evaluation Criteria
- Does the PSDAR contain the information required by regulation?
- Can the decommissioning be completed as described, and within 60 years?
- Can the decommissioning be completed for the estimated cost?
- Do the decommissioning activities endanger public health and safety or the environment?
20
NRCs PSDAR Review Process:
Decommissioning Cost Estimate
- Site-specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate
- Reasonable assurance funds are available to perform the radiological cleanup
- If plans are delayed, ensure licensee has a means of adjusting the cost estimate and funding over the storage period
- Decommissioning Cost Estimate (DCE) and funding level are updated annually 21
NRCs PSDAR Review Process:
Environmental Review / NEPA
- Reasons for concluding that environmental impacts of site-specific decommissioning activities are bounded by previous Environmental Impact Statement(s)
- NUREG-0586, Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement on Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities
- Inspection program 22
NRCs PSDAR Review Process
- Review considers public comments
- Staff will notify licensee when no additional information is required
- NRC does not approve the PSDAR
- Staff documents NRC review is complete
- Licensee may not begin major decommissioning activities until 90 days after NRC receives the PSDAR, per 10 CFR 50.82(a)(5) 23
Review of Irradiated Fuel Management Plan (IFMP)
- Licensees are required to submit IFMP within 2 years of permanent cessation of operations [10 CFR 50.54(bb)]
- Not part of the PSDAR
- PSDAR / DCE must address the cost of managing irradiated (spent) fuel
- Not requesting comments on the IFMP
- The IFMP must describe the licensees program for management and funding of all spent fuel activities until transferred to DOE for ultimate disposal in a repository
- Submitted for NRCs review and preliminary approval
- Must comply with the NRC requirements for possession of spent fuel 24
Other Licensing Actions
- SCE has requested other licensing actions that support its decommissioning plan
- Review of other actions is independent of the PSDAR review
- PSDAR may or may not depend on approval of the requested licensing actions
- NRC staff is not requesting comments on these other licensing actions at this meeting
- Other actions may offer separate opportunity for public involvement or comment
- Comments received on other licensing actions will be handled through the associated regulatory process, as appropriate 25
NRC Inspection Program for Decommissioning Reactors and Spent Fuel Storage n
October 27, 2014 Carlsbad, California Ray Kellar, P.E., Chief Fuels Safety and Decommissioning Branch Region IV, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety
How to safely get from this to this Connecticut Yankee, CT Maine Yankee, ME Trojan, OR San Onofre Unit 1, CA
How NRC Ensures Safety
- Establish and ensure compliance with requirements contained in:
- Regulations
- License Basis Documents (i.e., License Conditions, Technical Specifications)
- Guidance Documents
- Perform licensing reviews and safety evaluations
- NRC inspection and enforcement 28
Inspection Activities
- Inspections of spent fuel pool safety
- Inspections of decommissioning activities
- Generally scheduled during periods of higher risk activities
- During and after remediation activities, NRC conducts independent radiological measurements to confirm licensee survey methodologies
- Inspections of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)
- Inspections of physical security 29
Objectives of the NRC Inspection Program
- Objectively verify safe conduct of licensee activities
- Verify adequacy of licensee controls
- Ensure safety problems and violations are promptly identified and corrected, and effective actions are taken to prevent recurrence
- Examine trends in licensee safety performance 30
Inspection Planning and Reports
- Routine inspection schedule
- Planned about a year in advance
- Coordinated with the program office in NMSS
- Inspection planning and execution
- Inspections may be announced or unannounced
- Inspection Plans
- Inspection Procedures
- Exit Meetings
- Issue inspection report
- 30 day goal for normal inspection reports (post exit)
- 45 day goal for team inspections (post exit)
Post Inspection Activities
- Prompt inspection debrief with NRC management
- Determination of any significant findings and enforcement related issues
- Issue inspection report Most NRC inspection reports are publicly available. To locate reports, go to ADAMS web page (http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html), use advanced search feature with docket numbers 05000361, 05000362, and 07200041 for SONGS
- Track and follow up on safety issues 32
NRC Regulation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation October 27, 2014 Carlsbad, California Dr. Aladar A. Csontos, Chief Renewals and Materials Branch Division of Spent Fuel Management Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
NMSS / DSFM: Overview
- Licensing, certification and inspection:
- Spent fuel storage facilities
- Spent fuel dry cask storage systems
- Radioactive material transportation packaging
- Coordination with:
- State and federal agencies (most notably DOT)
- Foreign and international regulatory agencies
- Native American tribes
- Applicable regulations:
- 10 CFR Part 71: Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Material
- 10 CFR Part 72: Licensing Requirements for the Independent Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Radioactive Waste, and Reactor-Related Greater Than Class C Waste 34
Spent Fuel Storage Casks Once the spent fuel has cooled, it is loaded into special canisters which are designed to hold Pressured Water Reactor or Boiling Water Reactor assemblies. Canisters are filled with inert gas, welded, and rigorously tested for leaks. It may then be placed in a cask for storage or transportation.
The canisters can also be stored in above-ground bunkers, each of which, is about the size of a one-car garage.
Eventually they may be transported elsewhere for storage.
35
Status of U.S. ISFSIs 36
10 CFR Part 72 Regulations
- Review Areas:
- General Design Criteria:
- Off-site radiation dose / subcriticality / confinement
- Quality Assurance - Siting
- Physical Protection - Reporting
- Training and Certification of Personnel
- Technical Review Disciplines:
- Structural - Materials
- Thermal - Confinement
- Criticality - Quality Assurance
- Shielding and Radiation Protection 37
Storage System Design Review
- Normal and Off-Normal Conditions
- Accident Conditions and Natural Phenomena:
- Tornado winds/tornado missiles - Earthquakes
- Floods and tsunamis - Fires and explosions
- Technical Reviews:
- Structural: Confinement maintained under all conditions
- Criticality: Fuel subcritical under all conditions
- Shielding: Meets off-site radiation dose rate requirements
- Thermal: Cladding protected under normal conditions
- Materials:
- Properties appropriately assumed in evaluations
- Aging effects managed during renewed storage period 38
Transportation
- Same set of technical discipline reviews as for storage
- Ensure that package meets external dose rate limits
- Ensure fuel remains subcritical
- Ensure containment is maintained
- Normal and accident conditions differ from storage
- Normal transport:
- Vibration
- Small drops and impacts
- Heat and cold
- Postulated Accidents:
- 30-ft. drop on unyielding surface
- Puncture
- Fire
- Water immersion 39
Storage Renewal Guidance Update
- Established NRC Storage Renewal Strategy Team to review existing regulatory framework and aging management guidance
- Updating guidance found in NUREG-1927, Rev. 1 - Standard Review Plan for Dry Cask Storage Systems Renewals
- Updated Storage Renewal Framework:
- Operations-focused Aging Management
- Learning, Proactive, and Responsive Aging Management
- Aging Management Programs that consider and respond to operating experience and results of confirmatory research
- Develop guidance report: Managing Aging Processes for Storage
- Aging Management Programs to include inspection guidance
- Stakeholder engagement to discuss proposed changes to storage renewal guidance and solicit feedback 40
Cladding Integrity & Cl Induced Stress Corrosion Cracking
- Over $9M invested in research and staff efforts
- Cladding Integrity:
- High burnup fuel is safe for storage and transportation
- NRC confirmatory research activities
- DOE Cask Demonstration Surveillance Project
- Chloride Induced Stress Corrosion Cracking (CISCC):
- Information Notice November 2012, Potential Chloride-Induced Stress Corrosion, Cracking of Austenitic Stainless Steel and Maintenance of Dry Cask Storage System Canisters
- Regulatory Issue Resolution Protocol for CISCC
- NUREG-1927, Rev. 1:
- Specific aging Management Programs 41
Summary
- Regulations in 10 CFR Parts 71 and 72 assure safety for both storing and transporting spent nuclear fuel:
- Multi-disciplinary technical review
- Confinement maintained under routine and accident scenarios
- Operations-focused Aging Management
- Learning, Proactive, and Responsive Aging Management
- Storage renewal guidance updates underway
- Aging Management Programs
- Creating a stable, predictable, and efficient renewal regulatory framework with clear, open, transparent, and reliable regulatory expectations 42
Comments and Questions from Members of the Public 43
Public comments may be submitted online via the federal governments rulemaking website, www.regulations.gov, using Docket ID NRC-2014-0223.
They may also be mailed to Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Comments will be accepted through Dec. 22, and will be posted on www.regulations.gov.
44