ML18065B208: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 5
| page count = 5
}}
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000255/1997018]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:* * .i -A*CMS*Energy  
{{#Wiki_filter:*             -A*CMS*Energy Company                 . Palisades Nuclear Plant 27780 Blue Star Memorial Highway Covert. Ml 49043 Tel: 616 764 2296 Fax: 616 764 2425
Company April 6, 1998 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
                                                                                        ~ J. l'allaluao Site Vice President April 6, 1998 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATIN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 - LICENSE PPR PALISADES PLANT REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION DESCRIBED IN INSPECTION REPORT NO.
Commission
50-255/97018, FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE CORRECTIVE ACTION NRC Inspection Report No. 50-255/97018 contains a Notice of Violation (NOV)
ATIN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 . Palisades  
      *regarding a failure to take adequate corrective action. The Consumers Energy Company reply to the violation is included in the attachment to this letter.
Nuclear Plant 27780 Blue Star Memorial Highway Covert. Ml 49043 DOCKET 50-255 -LICENSE PPR-20 -PALISADES
The reply to the violation was required to be submitted within 30 days from the date of the letter transmitting the violation. Discussion with Bruce Burgess (NRC Region Ill) on .
PLANT Tel: 616 764 2296 Fax: 616 764 2425 J. l'allaluao  
March 9, 1998, confirmed that the 30-day requested response could be provided within 30 days of receipt of the letter, which was March 6, 1998.
Site Vice President  
Consumers Energy Company accepts the violation as written.
REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION
 
DESCRIBED
==SUMMARY==
IN INSPECTION
OF COMMITMENTS This letter contains no new commitments and no revisions to existing commitments.
REPORT NO. 50-255/97018, FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE CORRECTIVE  
(LJ' 4). ~*
ACTION NRC Inspection  
f6..-Thomas J. Palmisano Site Vice President
Report No. 50-255/97018  
                  ---o--:-CC--:- --- ---- - . -
contains a Notice of Violation (NOV) *regarding  
CC ____Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, NRR, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector - Palisades
a failure to take adequate corrective  
* Attachment 9804130319 980406 PDR ADOC~ 05000255 G                                 PDR
action. The Consumers  
.i
Energy Company reply to the violation  
 
is included in the attachment  
ATTACHMENT CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY PALISADES PLANT DOCKET 50-255 REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION DESCRIBED IN INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-255/97018 FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE CORRECTIVE ACTION 3 Pages
to this letter. The reply to the violation  
 
was required to be submitted  
REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION DESCRIBED IN INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-255197018 FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE CORRECTIVE ACTION NRC NOTICE OF VIOLATION During an NRG inspection conducted from December 6, 1997, through January 27, 1998, one violation of NRG requirements was identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRG Enforcement Actions,"
within 30 days from the date of the letter transmitting  
NUREG-1600, the violation is listed below:
the violation.  
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix 8, Criterion XVI, "Co"ec(ive Action," requires, in part,*
Discussion  
that measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality are promptly identified and corrected.
with Bruce Burgess (NRC Region Ill) on . March 9, 1998, confirmed  
Contrary to the above, in 1989, the licensee identified that filter placement downstream of pressure control valves could lead to regulator failure due to air line particulate, a condition adverse to quality. As of March 1997, the licensee had failed to take adequate corrective actions in that CV-3018, Safety Injection Tank Test Line Redundant High Pressure Injection Isolation Valve, failed to reposition during a surveillance due to airline particulate that caused the failure of the valve regulator.
that the 30-day requested  
* This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement 1).
response could be provided within 30 days of receipt of the letter, which was March 6, 1998. Consumers  
CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY REPLY Consumers Energy Company accepts the violation as written. However, the failure of CV-3018 occurred during a post-maintenance test rather than a surveillance test as stated.
Energy Company accepts the violation  
 
as written. SUMMARY OF COMMITMENTS  
===Background===
This letter contains no new commitments  
In a response dated February 20, 1989, to Generic Letter (GL) 88-14, Consumers Energy (then Consumers Power) committed to evaluate a micron filter rating discrepancy related to the High Pressure Air (HPA) filters. An evaluation of this discrepancy and the filter placement location relative to the pressure control valves concluded that the as-built design was acceptable as-is.
and no revisions  
* In September 1996; as a result of a design basis review, a request for a re-evaluation of filter placement lo~atiQRin the HPA System was initiated. In addition, System Health Reports- for the 3rd and 4th quarters of 1996 also discussed the filter location as-built design .
to existing commitments. (LJ' 4). f6..-Thomas  
* 1
J. Palmisano  
 
Site Vice President  
REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION DESCRIBED IN INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-255/97018 FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE CORRECTIVE ACTION On March 18, 1997, CV-3018, Safety Injection Tank Test Line Redundant High Pressure Injection Isolation Valve, failed to stroke during post-maintenance testing.
---o--:-CC--:-
The failure to stroke was a result of air line particulate that caused the failure of the pressure control regulator. This event occurred before the completion of the re-evaluation requested in the fall of 1996. The re-evaluation did not receive a high priority since (1) no similar failures had been observed in the past, and (2) valves that could be affected by air line particulate due to the location of the filters downstream of the pressure regulators were either passive or if active, had a nitrogen backup supply which would have assured their ability to operate in the event of failure of the HPA supply.
--------. -CC ____ Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, NRR, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector  
Palisades failed to give the appropriate priority to the re-evaluation of a long standing design deficiency. This failure constitutes inadequate corrective action.
-Palisades  
Reasons for Violation Our evaluation has identified the root cause to be an inadequate sensitivity to a longstanding design deficiency which could adversely affect safety-related equipment.
Attachment  
An over-reliance on past successful HPA System operation and backup design provisions resulted in less than a time!y response to the identified condition.
9804130319  
Corrective Action Taken a*nd Results Achieved The following corrective action has been taken:
980406 PDR  
: 1. This event heightened our sensitivity to the HPA System design and material condition. To increase management visibility to the concerns with the HPA System and to assure timely corrective action, we placed the HPA System in Maintenance Rule Category (a)(1) after the failure of CV-3018. We issued an Action Plan to identify needed upgrades to improve the HPA System and to schedule their implementation. Resources have been allocated and considerable progress has been made in implementing the actions. The HPA System pressure control valves that do not have upstream filters have been cleaned or replaced with the exception of one valve which is scheduled for replacement in 1998.
05000255 G PDR
: 2. Additional emphasis has been placed on the System Health Reports. This event has sensitized management toward the need to address desig-rY deficiencies in a
. . ATTACHMENT  
      *-timely mariner. *
CONSUMERS  
* 2
ENERGY COMPANY PALISADES  
 
PLANT DOCKET 50-255 REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION  
REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION DESCRIBED IN INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-255/97018 FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE CORRECTIVE ACTION Corrective Actions Remaining to Avoid Further Violations The following corrective actions are planned to avoid future violations:
DESCRIBED  
: 1. The pressure control valve which has no filter upstream and which has not been cleaned will be replaced in 1998. This pressure control valve regulates air to CV-3213 (Shutdown Heat Exchanger E-608 Outlet Valve).
IN INSPECTION  
: 2. As described in the previous section, our HPA System Action Plan was issued.
REPORT NO. 50-255/97018  
This plan calls for:
FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE CORRECTIVE  
* The installation of filters upstream of pressure control valves in the HPA System prior to the completion of the 1999 refueling outage,
ACTION -----------3 Pages
* Periodic air pressure readings will be recorded on selected valves (including CV-3018) until upstream filter installation is accomplished,
* * REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION  
* Periodic cleaning, filter element changes, oil adjustments and calibrations have been initiated, and
DESCRIBED  
* Low point drains will be installed in the HPA System during the 1998 refueling outage to support system flushes~
IN INSPECTION  
Date Eull Compliance Will Be Achieved Full compliance has been achieved through the appropriate placement of the HPA System into Maintenance Rule Category (a)(1) and the subsequent development of the Action Plan for the HPA System improvement. These actions place the appropriate
REPORT NO. 50-255197018  
    . emphasis on the correction of the problems known to exist in the HPA System.
FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE CORRECTIVE  
3}}
ACTION NRC NOTICE OF VIOLATION  
During an NRG inspection  
conducted  
from December 6, 1997, through January 27, 1998, one violation  
of NRG requirements  
was identified.  
In accordance  
with the "General Statement  
of Policy and Procedure  
for NRG Enforcement  
Actions," NUREG-1600, the violation  
is listed below: 1 O CFR Part 50, Appendix 8, Criterion  
XVI, "Co"ec(ive  
Action," requires, in part,* that measures shall be established  
to assure that conditions  
adverse to quality are promptly identified  
and corrected.  
Contrary to the above, in 1989, the licensee identified  
that filter placement  
downstream  
of pressure control valves could lead to regulator  
failure due to air line particulate, a condition  
adverse to quality. As of March 1997, the licensee had failed to take adequate corrective  
actions in that CV-3018, Safety Injection  
Tank Test Line Redundant  
High Pressure Injection  
Isolation  
Valve, failed to reposition  
during a surveillance  
due to airline particulate  
that caused the failure of the valve regulator . This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement  
1). CONSUMERS  
ENERGY COMPANY REPLY Consumers  
Energy Company accepts the violation  
as written. However, the failure of CV-3018 occurred during a post-maintenance  
test rather than a surveillance  
test as stated. Background  
In a response dated February 20, 1989, to Generic Letter (GL) 88-14, Consumers  
Energy (then Consumers  
Power) committed  
to evaluate a micron filter rating discrepancy  
related to the High Pressure Air (HPA) filters. An evaluation  
of this discrepancy  
and the filter placement  
location relative to the pressure control valves concluded  
that the as-built design was acceptable  
as-is. * In September  
1996; as a result of a design basis review, a request for a re-evaluation  
of filter placement  
the HPA System was initiated.  
In addition, System Health Reports-for the 3rd and 4th quarters of 1996 also discussed  
the filter location as-built design . 1
* * REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION  
DESCRIBED  
IN INSPECTION  
REPORT NO. 50-255/97018  
FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE CORRECTIVE  
ACTION On March 18, 1997, CV-3018, Safety Injection  
Tank Test Line Redundant  
High Pressure Injection  
Isolation  
Valve, failed to stroke during post-maintenance  
testing. The failure to stroke was a result of air line particulate  
that caused the failure of the pressure control regulator.  
This event occurred before the completion  
of the evaluation  
requested  
in the fall of 1996. The re-evaluation  
did not receive a high priority since (1) no similar failures had been observed in the past, and (2) valves that could be affected by air line particulate  
due to the location of the filters downstream  
of the pressure regulators  
were either passive or if active, had a nitrogen backup supply which would have assured their ability to operate in the event of failure of the HPA supply. Palisades  
failed to give the appropriate  
priority to the re-evaluation  
of a long standing design deficiency.  
This failure constitutes  
inadequate  
corrective  
action. Reasons for Violation  
Our evaluation  
has identified  
the root cause to be an inadequate  
sensitivity  
to a longstanding  
design deficiency  
which could adversely  
affect safety-related  
equipment.  
An over-reliance  
on past successful  
HPA System operation  
and backup design provisions  
resulted in less than a time!y response to the identified  
condition.  
Corrective  
Action Taken a*nd Results Achieved The following  
corrective  
action has been taken: 1. This event heightened  
our sensitivity  
to the HPA System design and material condition.  
To increase management  
visibility  
to the concerns with the HPA System and to assure timely corrective  
action, we placed the HPA System in Maintenance  
Rule Category (a)(1) after the failure of CV-3018. We issued an Action Plan to identify needed upgrades to improve the HPA System and to schedule their implementation.  
Resources  
have been allocated  
and considerable  
progress has been made in implementing  
the actions. The HPA System pressure control valves that do not have upstream filters have been cleaned or replaced with the exception  
of one valve which is scheduled  
for replacement  
in 1998. 2. Additional  
emphasis has been placed on the System Health Reports. This event has sensitized  
management  
toward the need to address desig-rY deficiencies  
in a *-timely mariner. * * 2
. ' * REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION  
DESCRIBED  
IN INSPECTION  
REPORT NO. 50-255/97018  
FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE CORRECTIVE  
ACTION Corrective  
Actions Remaining  
to Avoid Further Violations  
The following corrective actions  
are planned to avoid future violations:  
1. The pressure control valve which has no filter upstream and which has not been cleaned will be replaced in 1998. This pressure control valve regulates  
air to CV-3213 (Shutdown  
Heat Exchanger  
E-608 Outlet Valve). 2. As described  
in the previous section, our HPA System Action Plan was issued. This plan calls for: * The installation  
of filters upstream of pressure control valves in the HPA System prior to the completion  
of the 1999 refueling  
outage, * Periodic air pressure readings will be recorded on selected valves (including  
CV-3018) until upstream filter installation  
is accomplished, * Periodic cleaning, filter element changes, oil adjustments  
and calibrations  
have been initiated, and * Low point drains will be installed  
in the HPA System during the 1998 refueling  
outage to support system  
Date Eull Compliance  
Will Be Achieved Full compliance  
has been achieved through the appropriate  
placement  
of the HPA System into Maintenance  
Rule Category (a)(1) and the subsequent  
development  
of the Action Plan for the HPA System improvement.  
These actions place the appropriate . emphasis on the correction
of the problems known to exist in the HPA System. 3
}}

Latest revision as of 11:21, 3 February 2020

Responds to NRC Ltr Re Violations Note in Insp Rept 50-255/97-18 on 971206-980127.Corrective Actions:Placed High Pressure Air (Hpa) Sys in Maintenance Rule Category (a) & Addl Emphasis Placed on Sys Health Repts
ML18065B208
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/06/1998
From: Thomas J. Palmisano
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
50-255-97-18, NUDOCS 9804130319
Download: ML18065B208 (5)


Text

  • -A*CMS*Energy Company . Palisades Nuclear Plant 27780 Blue Star Memorial Highway Covert. Ml 49043 Tel: 616 764 2296 Fax: 616 764 2425

~ J. l'allaluao Site Vice President April 6, 1998 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATIN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 - LICENSE PPR PALISADES PLANT REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION DESCRIBED IN INSPECTION REPORT NO.

50-255/97018, FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE CORRECTIVE ACTION NRC Inspection Report No. 50-255/97018 contains a Notice of Violation (NOV)

  • regarding a failure to take adequate corrective action. The Consumers Energy Company reply to the violation is included in the attachment to this letter.

The reply to the violation was required to be submitted within 30 days from the date of the letter transmitting the violation. Discussion with Bruce Burgess (NRC Region Ill) on .

March 9, 1998, confirmed that the 30-day requested response could be provided within 30 days of receipt of the letter, which was March 6, 1998.

Consumers Energy Company accepts the violation as written.

SUMMARY

OF COMMITMENTS This letter contains no new commitments and no revisions to existing commitments.

(LJ' 4). ~*

f6..-Thomas J. Palmisano Site Vice President

---o--:-CC--:- --- ---- - . -

CC ____Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, NRR, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector - Palisades

  • Attachment 9804130319 980406 PDR ADOC~ 05000255 G PDR

.i

ATTACHMENT CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY PALISADES PLANT DOCKET 50-255 REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION DESCRIBED IN INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-255/97018 FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE CORRECTIVE ACTION 3 Pages

REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION DESCRIBED IN INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-255197018 FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE CORRECTIVE ACTION NRC NOTICE OF VIOLATION During an NRG inspection conducted from December 6, 1997, through January 27, 1998, one violation of NRG requirements was identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRG Enforcement Actions,"

NUREG-1600, the violation is listed below:

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix 8, Criterion XVI, "Co"ec(ive Action," requires, in part,*

that measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality are promptly identified and corrected.

Contrary to the above, in 1989, the licensee identified that filter placement downstream of pressure control valves could lead to regulator failure due to air line particulate, a condition adverse to quality. As of March 1997, the licensee had failed to take adequate corrective actions in that CV-3018, Safety Injection Tank Test Line Redundant High Pressure Injection Isolation Valve, failed to reposition during a surveillance due to airline particulate that caused the failure of the valve regulator.

CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY REPLY Consumers Energy Company accepts the violation as written. However, the failure of CV-3018 occurred during a post-maintenance test rather than a surveillance test as stated.

Background

In a response dated February 20, 1989, to Generic Letter (GL) 88-14, Consumers Energy (then Consumers Power) committed to evaluate a micron filter rating discrepancy related to the High Pressure Air (HPA) filters. An evaluation of this discrepancy and the filter placement location relative to the pressure control valves concluded that the as-built design was acceptable as-is.

  • In September 1996; as a result of a design basis review, a request for a re-evaluation of filter placement lo~atiQRin the HPA System was initiated. In addition, System Health Reports- for the 3rd and 4th quarters of 1996 also discussed the filter location as-built design .
  • 1

REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION DESCRIBED IN INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-255/97018 FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE CORRECTIVE ACTION On March 18, 1997, CV-3018, Safety Injection Tank Test Line Redundant High Pressure Injection Isolation Valve, failed to stroke during post-maintenance testing.

The failure to stroke was a result of air line particulate that caused the failure of the pressure control regulator. This event occurred before the completion of the re-evaluation requested in the fall of 1996. The re-evaluation did not receive a high priority since (1) no similar failures had been observed in the past, and (2) valves that could be affected by air line particulate due to the location of the filters downstream of the pressure regulators were either passive or if active, had a nitrogen backup supply which would have assured their ability to operate in the event of failure of the HPA supply.

Palisades failed to give the appropriate priority to the re-evaluation of a long standing design deficiency. This failure constitutes inadequate corrective action.

Reasons for Violation Our evaluation has identified the root cause to be an inadequate sensitivity to a longstanding design deficiency which could adversely affect safety-related equipment.

An over-reliance on past successful HPA System operation and backup design provisions resulted in less than a time!y response to the identified condition.

Corrective Action Taken a*nd Results Achieved The following corrective action has been taken:

1. This event heightened our sensitivity to the HPA System design and material condition. To increase management visibility to the concerns with the HPA System and to assure timely corrective action, we placed the HPA System in Maintenance Rule Category (a)(1) after the failure of CV-3018. We issued an Action Plan to identify needed upgrades to improve the HPA System and to schedule their implementation. Resources have been allocated and considerable progress has been made in implementing the actions. The HPA System pressure control valves that do not have upstream filters have been cleaned or replaced with the exception of one valve which is scheduled for replacement in 1998.
2. Additional emphasis has been placed on the System Health Reports. This event has sensitized management toward the need to address desig-rY deficiencies in a
  • -timely mariner. *
  • 2

REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION DESCRIBED IN INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-255/97018 FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE CORRECTIVE ACTION Corrective Actions Remaining to Avoid Further Violations The following corrective actions are planned to avoid future violations:

1. The pressure control valve which has no filter upstream and which has not been cleaned will be replaced in 1998. This pressure control valve regulates air to CV-3213 (Shutdown Heat Exchanger E-608 Outlet Valve).
2. As described in the previous section, our HPA System Action Plan was issued.

This plan calls for:

  • The installation of filters upstream of pressure control valves in the HPA System prior to the completion of the 1999 refueling outage,
  • Periodic air pressure readings will be recorded on selected valves (including CV-3018) until upstream filter installation is accomplished,
  • Periodic cleaning, filter element changes, oil adjustments and calibrations have been initiated, and
  • Low point drains will be installed in the HPA System during the 1998 refueling outage to support system flushes~

Date Eull Compliance Will Be Achieved Full compliance has been achieved through the appropriate placement of the HPA System into Maintenance Rule Category (a)(1) and the subsequent development of the Action Plan for the HPA System improvement. These actions place the appropriate

. emphasis on the correction of the problems known to exist in the HPA System.

3