ML18068A300: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 7
| page count = 7
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000255/1997013]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.. !' '* . * * Consumers  
{{#Wiki_filter:.. !'
Energy> A CMS Energy Company February 27, 1998 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Consumers Energy>
Commission
* A CMS Energy Company                     Palisades Nuclear Plant 27780 Blue Star Memorial Highway Covert, Ml 49043 Da11/d llt Rogers General Manager - Plant Operations February 27, 1998 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATIN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 - LICENSE DPR PALISADES PLANT REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION DESCRIBED IN INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-255/97013 NRC Inspection Report No. 50-255/97013 dated January 21, 1998, contains a Notice of Violation (NOV) concerning an inadequate procedure which allowed operators to start a primary coolant pump without meeting Technical Specification requirements. The Consumers Energy Company reply to the violation is included in the Attachment to this letter.
ATIN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Palisades
The reply to the violation was requested to be submitted within 30 days from the date of the letter transmitting the violation. Discussion with Bruce Burgess (NRC Region Ill) on l'  l
Nuclear Plant 27780 Blue Star Memorial Highway Covert, Ml 49043 DOCKET 50-255 -LICENSE DPR-20 -PALISADES  
                                                                                                                                        . II ,
PLANT Da11/d llt Rogers General Manager -Plant Operations
January 28, 1998, confirmed that the 30-day requested response could be provided                                         *         .!
REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION  
f within 30 days of receipt of the letter, which was January 28, 1998.
DESCRIBED  
Consumers Energy Company agrees with the violation as written.
IN INSPECTION  
An additional concern regarding the Technical Specification aspects of the event and the lack of a questioning attitude by the operators was expressed in the cover letter for the insp~911Q!1 repor:t. Jha_t concern will be addressed in more detail in a separate submittal.
REPORT NO. 50-255/97013  
9803060419 980227 PDR ADOCK 05000255 G                       PDR 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111
NRC Inspection  
                                                                                                *&&8E37*
Report No. 50-255/97013  
 
dated January 21, 1998, contains a Notice of Violation (NOV) concerning  
2
an inadequate  
 
procedure  
==SUMMARY==
which allowed operators  
OF COMMITMENTS This letter contains one commitment. This commitment is a restatement of the
to start a primary coolant pump without meeting Technical  
  . commitment made previously in Licensee Event Report 97-011, submitted on November 11 , 1997. That commitment is:
Specification  
* System Operating Procedure SOP-1 will be revised to clarify requirements for starting primary coolant pumps when the PCS is solid. This revision will be made prior to the next use of the procedure for this purpose.
requirements.  
David W. Rogers Plant General Manager CC     Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, NRR, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector - Palisades Attachment
The Consumers  
 
Energy Company reply to the violation  
      . - ATTACHMENT CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY PALISADES PLANT DOCKET 50-255 REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION NO. 50-255/97013-01 (DRP) 4 Pages
is included in the Attachment  
 
to this letter. The reply to the violation  
ATTACHMENT
was requested  
* REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION NO. 50-255/97013-01 (DRP)
to be submitted  
NRC NOTICE OF VIOLATION During an NRG inspection from October 18 through December 5, 1997, one violation of NRG requirements was identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRG Enforcement Actions", NUREG 1600, the violation is listed below:
within 30 days from the date of the letter transmitting  
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix 8, Criterion V, "Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings," requires, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.
the violation.  
Contrary to the above, on October 12, 1997, the operations shift started the first primary coolant pump, using System Operating Procedure (SOP)-1, Revision 38, Step 4.3.1.(c)2, a procedure inappropriate to the circumstances in that it allowed using shutdown cooling return temperature (when shutdown cooling is operating), instead of Tccld* which resulted in the operators exceeding the Technical Specifications Tcold primary coolant pump start temperature limits.
Discussion  
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement/).
with Bruce Burgess (NRC Region Ill) on January 28, 1998, confirmed  
CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY RESPONSE Consumers Energy agrees with this violation as 'written.
that the 30-day requested  
 
response could be provided * within 30 days of receipt of the letter, which was January  
===Background===
28, 1998. Consumers  
On October 12 1997, plant heatup from a short maintenance outage was in progress.
Energy Company agrees with the violation  
At approximately 1926 hours, with the plant at 250 psia and 130°F, plant prerequisites and checklists had been completed and Primary Coolant Pump (PCP) P-500 was started. Immediately following the pump start, the Primary Coolant System (PCS) pressure started to rise. Anticipating the PCS pressure rise, operators took manual action and limited the pressure to approximately 280 psia. A Low Temperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP) actuation did not occur since the LTOP setpoint at the prevailing PCS temperature was approximately 31 O psia. Because PCS pressure rose to this extent in a solid PCS, it was apparent that heat had been transferred from the steam generator secondary into the PCS, and that Technical Specification 3.1.1.h(2) 1
as written. An additional  
 
concern regarding  
ATTACHMENT REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION NO. 50-255/97013-01 (DRP) had been violated. Technical Specification 3.1.1.h(2) requires that forced circulation (starting of the first primary coolant pump) shall not be initiated unless "... the steam generator secondary temperature is less than or equal to T cold,'' to prevent an overpressurization of the PCS. The magnitude of the PCS pressure rise following start of the pump shows that the steam generator secondary bulk fluid temperature could not have been less than T cold*
the Technical  
The steam generators do not have an installed temperature indicator which can accurately indicate secondary fluid temperature. One method to obtain steam generator secondary side temperature to verify compliance with Technical Specifications is to obtain a contact temperature reading from a secondary handhole cover. While normally adequate, the temperature provided by this method can differ from the bulk average temperature if the secondary side fluid is not adequately mixed.
Specification  
In this event, the temperature measurement obtained by the operators was not representative of the bulk temperature due to stratification.
aspects of the event and the lack of a questioning  
* A similar limitation exists in the measurement of primary coolant temperature when the PCS is on shutdown cooling. Normal T cold indications could be slightly higher than the coldest temperature which may exist in the PCS because shutdown cooling flow does not provide complete mixing in the PCS loops. When primary coolant and shutdown cooling system temperatures are stable, the shutdown cooling return temperature is typically cooler than indicated primary coolant temperatures. Use of this temperature as a lower bound value of T cold is normally viewed as more reliable and conservative than direct Tcold indication. There are times, however, including during this event, when shutdown cooling return temperature is higher than Tcold*
attitude by the operators  
* Operating Procedure SOP-1 does not adequately account for the temperature measurement limitations inherent in the plant design, ~nd can be construed to permit use of shutdown cooling return temperature instead ofTcold to verify compliance with Technical Specifications. The inadequacy of this procedure was the primary cause for the event.
was expressed  
The situation was aggravated, however, because of inadequate questioning by the operating crew. The crew failed to question the significance of Tcold being lower than the shutdown cooling return temperature, and lower than the steam generator hand hole cover contacttemperature; they failed to question the apparent conflict between the procedure's use of shutdown cooling return temperature and the specific wording of the Technical Specifications restriction on pump starting; and they failed to consider 2
in the cover letter for the  
 
repor:t. Jha_t concern will be addressed  
CJ ATTACHMENT
in more detail in a separate submittal.  
* REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION NO. 50-255/97013-01 (DRP) uncertainty that may exist in the steam generator secondary fluid temperature as measured at the handhole cover.
9803060419  
This event was reported to the NRC in Licensee Event Report 97-011, dated November 11, 1997.
980227 PDR ADOCK 05000255 G PDR 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111  
Reasons for Violation The root causes of this violation are as follows.
*&&8E37* l l ' I . I , . ! f 
: 1. System Operating Procedure SOP-1 was inadequate. The procedure did not adequately account for the temperature measurement limitations inherent in the plant design, and can be construed to permit use of shutdown cooling return temperature instead of Tcold to verify compliance with Technical Specifications.
*. * SUMMARY OF COMMITMENTS  
: 2. Inadequate questioning by the operating crew contributed to the event.
This letter contains one commitment.  
The crew failed to challenge the apparent inconsistencies between the procedure and Techni.cal Specifications, and failed to question the accuracy of their temperature indications.
This commitment  
Corrective Action Taken and Results Achieved The following corrective actions have been taken:
is a restatement  
: 1. The Operations Superintendent conducted a critique of this event with licensed operators involved. The emphasis was on compliance with Technical Specifications and making conservative decisions with respect to Technical Specification limits. *
of the . commitment  
: 2. Training on the effects of stratification in the steam generators on PCS temperature was provided to licensed operators. This included the effects when the PCPs are started and also the effects when the steam generators are placed on recirculation or bubbled with Nitrogen.
made previously  
: 3. The Operations Superintendent discussed this event with the operating crews from the standpoint of making conservative decisions when 3
in Licensee Event Report 97-011, submitted  
 
on November 11 , 1997. That commitment  
ATTACHMENT REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION NO. 50-255/97013-01 (DRP) operating the Plant with respect to Technical Specification limits or
is: * System Operating  
* procedural limits. This included lessons learned and advocacy and questioning attitude by all members of the operating shift.
Procedure  
These actions have raised the sensitivity of the operating staff to the need for conservative decisions and questioning of apparent procedure inconsistencies. In addition:
SOP-1 will be revised to clarify requirements  
: 4.     Strategies for primary coolant pump starting have been reviewed to identify necessary procedure clarifications.
for starting primary coolant pumps when the PCS is solid. This revision will be made prior to the next use of the procedure  
Corrective Actions Remaining to Avoid Further Violations System Operating Procedure SOP-1 will be revised to clarify requirements for starting primary coolant pumps when the PCS is solid. This revision will be made prior to the next use of the procedure for this purpose.
for this purpose. David W. Rogers Plant General Manager CC Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, NRR, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector  
Date Full Compliance Will Be Achieved Full compliance will be achieved when System Operating Procedure SOP-1 is revised to provide better guidance for starting primary coolant pumps,
-Palisades  
* 4}}
Attachment  
* . -ATTACHMENT  
CONSUMERS  
ENERGY COMPANY PALISADES  
PLANT DOCKET 50-255 REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION  
NO. 50-255/97013-01 (DRP) 4 Pages
* ATTACHMENT  
REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION  
NO. 50-255/97013-01 (DRP) NRC NOTICE OF VIOLATION  
During an NRG inspection  
from October 18 through December 5, 1997, one violation  
of NRG requirements  
was identified.  
In accordance  
with the "General Statement  
of Policy and Procedure  
for NRG Enforcement  
Actions", NUREG 1600, the violation  
is listed below: 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix 8, Criterion  
V, "Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings," requires, in part, that activities  
affecting  
quality shall be prescribed  
by documented  
instructions, procedures, or drawings of a type appropriate  
to the circumstances  
and shall be accomplished  
in accordance  
with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.  
Contrary to the above, on October 12, 1997, the operations  
shift started the first primary coolant pump, using System Operating  
Procedure (SOP)-1, Revision 38, Step 4.3.1.(c)2, a procedure  
inappropriate  
to the circumstances  
in that it allowed using shutdown cooling return temperature (when shutdown cooling is operating), instead of T ccld* which resulted in the operators  
exceeding  
the Technical  
Specifications  
T cold primary coolant pump start temperature  
limits. This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement/).  
CONSUMERS  
ENERGY COMPANY RESPONSE Consumers  
Energy agrees with this violation  
as 'written.  
Background  
On October 12 1997, plant heatup from a short maintenance  
outage was in progress.  
At approximately  
1926 hours, with the plant at 250 psia and 130°F, plant prerequisites  
and checklists  
had been completed  
and Primary Coolant Pump (PCP) P-500 was started. Immediately  
following  
the pump start, the Primary Coolant System (PCS) pressure started to rise. Anticipating  
the PCS pressure rise, operators  
took manual action and limited the pressure to approximately  
280 psia. A Low Temperature  
Overpressure  
Protection (L TOP) actuation  
did not occur since the L TOP setpoint at the prevailing  
PCS temperature  
was approximately  
31 O psia. Because PCS pressure rose to this extent in a solid PCS, it was apparent that heat had been transferred  
from the steam generator  
secondary  
into the PCS, and that Technical  
Specification  
3.1.1.h(2)  
** ATTACHMENT  
REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION  
NO. 50-255/97013-01 (DRP) had been violated.  
Technical  
Specification  
3.1.1.h(2)  
requires that forced circulation (starting  
of the first primary coolant pump) shall not be initiated  
unless " ... the steam generator  
secondary  
temperature  
is less than or equal to T cold,'' to prevent an overpressurization  
of the PCS. The magnitude  
of the PCS pressure rise following  
start of the pump shows that the steam  
generator  
secondary  
bulk fluid temperature  
could not have been less than T cold* The steam generators  
do not have an installed  
temperature  
indicator  
which can accurately  
indicate secondary  
fluid temperature.  
One method to obtain steam generator  
secondary  
side temperature  
to verify compliance  
with Technical  
Specifications  
is to obtain a contact temperature  
reading from a secondary  
handhole cover. While normally adequate, the temperature  
provided by this method can differ from the bulk average temperature  
if the secondary  
side fluid is not adequately  
mixed. In this event, the temperature  
measurement  
obtained by the operators  
was not representative  
of the bulk temperature  
due to stratification.  
* A similar limitation  
exists in the measurement  
of primary coolant temperature  
when the PCS is on shutdown cooling. Normal T cold indications  
could be slightly higher than the coldest temperature  
which may exist in the PCS because shutdown cooling flow does not provide complete mixing in the PCS loops. When primary coolant and shutdown cooling system temperatures  
are stable, the shutdown cooling return temperature  
is typically  
cooler than indicated  
primary coolant temperatures.  
Use of this temperature  
as a lower bound value of T cold is normally viewed as more reliable and conservative  
than direct T cold indication.  
There are times, however, including  
during this event, when shutdown cooling return temperature  
is higher than T cold* * Operating  
Procedure  
SOP-1 does not adequately  
account for the temperature  
measurement  
limitations  
inherent in the plant design, can be construed  
to permit use of shutdown cooling return temperature  
instead ofT cold to verify compliance  
with Technical  
Specifications.  
The inadequacy  
of this procedure  
was the primary cause for the event. The situation  
was aggravated, however, because of inadequate  
questioning  
by the operating  
crew. The crew failed to question the significance  
of T cold being lower than the shutdown cooling return temperature, and lower than the steam generator  
hand hole cover contacttemperature;  
they failed to question the apparent conflict between the procedure's  
use of shutdown cooling return temperature  
and the specific wording of the Technical  
Specifications  
restriction  
on pump starting;  
and they failed to consider 2
CJ * ATTACHMENT  
REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION  
NO. 50-255/97013-01 (DRP) uncertainty  
that may exist in the steam generator  
secondary  
fluid temperature  
as measured at the handhole cover. This event was reported to the NRC in Licensee Event Report 97-011, dated November 11, 1997. Reasons for Violation  
The root causes of this violation  
are as follows. 1. System Operating  
Procedure  
SOP-1 was inadequate.  
The procedure  
did not adequately  
account for the temperature  
measurement  
limitations  
inherent in the plant design, and can be construed  
to permit use of shutdown cooling return temperature  
instead of T cold to verify compliance  
with Technical  
Specifications.  
2. Inadequate  
questioning  
by the operating  
crew contributed  
to the event. The crew failed to challenge  
the apparent inconsistencies  
between the procedure  
and Techni.cal  
Specifications, and failed to question the accuracy of their temperature  
indications.  
Corrective  
Action Taken and Results Achieved The following  
corrective  
actions have been taken: 1. The Operations  
Superintendent  
conducted  
a critique of this event with licensed operators  
involved.  
The emphasis was on compliance  
with Technical  
Specifications  
and making conservative  
decisions  
with respect to Technical  
Specification  
limits. * 2. Training on the effects of stratification  
in the steam generators  
on PCS temperature  
was provided to licensed operators.  
This included the effects when the PCPs are started and also the effects when the steam generators  
are placed on recirculation  
or bubbled with Nitrogen.  
3. The Operations  
Superintendent  
discussed  
this event with the operating  
crews from the standpoint  
of making conservative  
decisions  
when 3
.. ,,. * ATTACHMENT  
REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION  
NO. 50-255/97013-01 (DRP) operating  
the Plant with respect to Technical  
Specification  
limits or * procedural  
limits. This included lessons learned and advocacy and questioning  
attitude by all members of the operating  
shift. These actions have raised the sensitivity  
of the operating  
staff to the need for conservative  
decisions  
and questioning  
of apparent procedure  
inconsistencies.  
In addition:  
4. Strategies  
for primary coolant pump starting have been reviewed to identify necessary  
procedure  
clarifications.  
Corrective  
Actions Remaining  
to Avoid Further Violations  
System Operating  
Procedure  
SOP-1 will be revised to clarify requirements  
for starting primary coolant pumps when the PCS is solid. This revision will be made prior to the next use of the procedure  
for this purpose. Date Full Compliance  
Will Be Achieved Full compliance  
will be achieved when System Operating  
Procedure  
SOP-1 is revised to provide better guidance for starting primary coolant pumps, 4
}}

Latest revision as of 11:00, 3 February 2020

Responds to NRC 980121 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-255/97-13.Corrective Actions:Training on Effects of Stratification in SG on Pcs Temperature Was Provided to Licensed Operators
ML18068A300
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/27/1998
From: Rogers D
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
50-255-97-13, NUDOCS 9803060419
Download: ML18068A300 (7)


Text

.. !'

Consumers Energy>

  • A CMS Energy Company Palisades Nuclear Plant 27780 Blue Star Memorial Highway Covert, Ml 49043 Da11/d llt Rogers General Manager - Plant Operations February 27, 1998 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATIN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 - LICENSE DPR PALISADES PLANT REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION DESCRIBED IN INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-255/97013 NRC Inspection Report No. 50-255/97013 dated January 21, 1998, contains a Notice of Violation (NOV) concerning an inadequate procedure which allowed operators to start a primary coolant pump without meeting Technical Specification requirements. The Consumers Energy Company reply to the violation is included in the Attachment to this letter.

The reply to the violation was requested to be submitted within 30 days from the date of the letter transmitting the violation. Discussion with Bruce Burgess (NRC Region Ill) on l' l

. II ,

January 28, 1998, confirmed that the 30-day requested response could be provided * .!

f within 30 days of receipt of the letter, which was January 28, 1998.

Consumers Energy Company agrees with the violation as written.

An additional concern regarding the Technical Specification aspects of the event and the lack of a questioning attitude by the operators was expressed in the cover letter for the insp~911Q!1 repor:t. Jha_t concern will be addressed in more detail in a separate submittal.

9803060419 980227 PDR ADOCK 05000255 G PDR 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111

  • &&8E37*

2

SUMMARY

OF COMMITMENTS This letter contains one commitment. This commitment is a restatement of the

. commitment made previously in Licensee Event Report 97-011, submitted on November 11 , 1997. That commitment is:

  • System Operating Procedure SOP-1 will be revised to clarify requirements for starting primary coolant pumps when the PCS is solid. This revision will be made prior to the next use of the procedure for this purpose.

David W. Rogers Plant General Manager CC Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, NRR, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector - Palisades Attachment

. - ATTACHMENT CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY PALISADES PLANT DOCKET 50-255 REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION NO. 50-255/97013-01 (DRP) 4 Pages

ATTACHMENT

  • REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION NO. 50-255/97013-01 (DRP)

NRC NOTICE OF VIOLATION During an NRG inspection from October 18 through December 5, 1997, one violation of NRG requirements was identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRG Enforcement Actions", NUREG 1600, the violation is listed below:

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix 8, Criterion V, "Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings," requires, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.

Contrary to the above, on October 12, 1997, the operations shift started the first primary coolant pump, using System Operating Procedure (SOP)-1, Revision 38, Step 4.3.1.(c)2, a procedure inappropriate to the circumstances in that it allowed using shutdown cooling return temperature (when shutdown cooling is operating), instead of Tccld* which resulted in the operators exceeding the Technical Specifications Tcold primary coolant pump start temperature limits.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement/).

CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY RESPONSE Consumers Energy agrees with this violation as 'written.

Background

On October 12 1997, plant heatup from a short maintenance outage was in progress.

At approximately 1926 hours0.0223 days <br />0.535 hours <br />0.00318 weeks <br />7.32843e-4 months <br />, with the plant at 250 psia and 130°F, plant prerequisites and checklists had been completed and Primary Coolant Pump (PCP) P-500 was started. Immediately following the pump start, the Primary Coolant System (PCS) pressure started to rise. Anticipating the PCS pressure rise, operators took manual action and limited the pressure to approximately 280 psia. A Low Temperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP) actuation did not occur since the LTOP setpoint at the prevailing PCS temperature was approximately 31 O psia. Because PCS pressure rose to this extent in a solid PCS, it was apparent that heat had been transferred from the steam generator secondary into the PCS, and that Technical Specification 3.1.1.h(2) 1

ATTACHMENT REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION NO. 50-255/97013-01 (DRP) had been violated. Technical Specification 3.1.1.h(2) requires that forced circulation (starting of the first primary coolant pump) shall not be initiated unless "... the steam generator secondary temperature is less than or equal to T cold, to prevent an overpressurization of the PCS. The magnitude of the PCS pressure rise following start of the pump shows that the steam generator secondary bulk fluid temperature could not have been less than T cold*

The steam generators do not have an installed temperature indicator which can accurately indicate secondary fluid temperature. One method to obtain steam generator secondary side temperature to verify compliance with Technical Specifications is to obtain a contact temperature reading from a secondary handhole cover. While normally adequate, the temperature provided by this method can differ from the bulk average temperature if the secondary side fluid is not adequately mixed.

In this event, the temperature measurement obtained by the operators was not representative of the bulk temperature due to stratification.

  • A similar limitation exists in the measurement of primary coolant temperature when the PCS is on shutdown cooling. Normal T cold indications could be slightly higher than the coldest temperature which may exist in the PCS because shutdown cooling flow does not provide complete mixing in the PCS loops. When primary coolant and shutdown cooling system temperatures are stable, the shutdown cooling return temperature is typically cooler than indicated primary coolant temperatures. Use of this temperature as a lower bound value of T cold is normally viewed as more reliable and conservative than direct Tcold indication. There are times, however, including during this event, when shutdown cooling return temperature is higher than Tcold*
  • Operating Procedure SOP-1 does not adequately account for the temperature measurement limitations inherent in the plant design, ~nd can be construed to permit use of shutdown cooling return temperature instead ofTcold to verify compliance with Technical Specifications. The inadequacy of this procedure was the primary cause for the event.

The situation was aggravated, however, because of inadequate questioning by the operating crew. The crew failed to question the significance of Tcold being lower than the shutdown cooling return temperature, and lower than the steam generator hand hole cover contacttemperature; they failed to question the apparent conflict between the procedure's use of shutdown cooling return temperature and the specific wording of the Technical Specifications restriction on pump starting; and they failed to consider 2

CJ ATTACHMENT

  • REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION NO. 50-255/97013-01 (DRP) uncertainty that may exist in the steam generator secondary fluid temperature as measured at the handhole cover.

This event was reported to the NRC in Licensee Event Report 97-011, dated November 11, 1997.

Reasons for Violation The root causes of this violation are as follows.

1. System Operating Procedure SOP-1 was inadequate. The procedure did not adequately account for the temperature measurement limitations inherent in the plant design, and can be construed to permit use of shutdown cooling return temperature instead of Tcold to verify compliance with Technical Specifications.
2. Inadequate questioning by the operating crew contributed to the event.

The crew failed to challenge the apparent inconsistencies between the procedure and Techni.cal Specifications, and failed to question the accuracy of their temperature indications.

Corrective Action Taken and Results Achieved The following corrective actions have been taken:

1. The Operations Superintendent conducted a critique of this event with licensed operators involved. The emphasis was on compliance with Technical Specifications and making conservative decisions with respect to Technical Specification limits. *
2. Training on the effects of stratification in the steam generators on PCS temperature was provided to licensed operators. This included the effects when the PCPs are started and also the effects when the steam generators are placed on recirculation or bubbled with Nitrogen.
3. The Operations Superintendent discussed this event with the operating crews from the standpoint of making conservative decisions when 3

ATTACHMENT REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION NO. 50-255/97013-01 (DRP) operating the Plant with respect to Technical Specification limits or

  • procedural limits. This included lessons learned and advocacy and questioning attitude by all members of the operating shift.

These actions have raised the sensitivity of the operating staff to the need for conservative decisions and questioning of apparent procedure inconsistencies. In addition:

4. Strategies for primary coolant pump starting have been reviewed to identify necessary procedure clarifications.

Corrective Actions Remaining to Avoid Further Violations System Operating Procedure SOP-1 will be revised to clarify requirements for starting primary coolant pumps when the PCS is solid. This revision will be made prior to the next use of the procedure for this purpose.

Date Full Compliance Will Be Achieved Full compliance will be achieved when System Operating Procedure SOP-1 is revised to provide better guidance for starting primary coolant pumps,

  • 4