ML060740241: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML060740241 | | number = ML060740241 | ||
| issue date = 03/14/2006 | | issue date = 03/14/2006 | ||
| title = | | title = D.C. Cook, Units 1 and 2 Information Request for NRC Biennial Permanent Modifications and 10 CFR 50.59 (MOD/50.59) Baseline Inspection | ||
| author name = Hills D | | author name = Hills D | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB1 | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB1 | ||
| addressee name = Nazar M | | addressee name = Nazar M | ||
| addressee affiliation = Indiana Michigan Power Co | | addressee affiliation = Indiana Michigan Power Co | ||
| docket = 05000315, 05000316 | | docket = 05000315, 05000316 | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:March 14, | {{#Wiki_filter:March 14, 2006 Mr. M. Nazar Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group One Cook Place Bridgman, MI 49106 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
D.C. COOK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND | D.C. COOK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 INFORMATION REQUEST FOR AN NRC BIENNIAL PERMANENT MODIFICATIONS AND 10 CFR 50.59 (MOD/50.59) BASELINE INSPECTION | ||
==Dear Mr. Nazar:== | ==Dear Mr. Nazar:== | ||
On May 8, 2006, the NRC will begin a Modifications and 10 CFR 50.59 (MOD/50.59) | On May 8, 2006, the NRC will begin a Modifications and 10 CFR 50.59 (MOD/50.59) baseline inspection at the D.C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant. This inspection will be performed in accordance with the NRC baseline Inspection Procedures IP 71111.02 and IP 71111.17. The on-site portion of the inspection will take place on May 8 through May 12, 2006 and May 22 through May 26, 2006. | ||
The first group is necessary to ensure that the inspection team is adequately prepared for the inspection. This information should be available to the Regional Office no later than April 3, 2006. The inspection team will review this information and, by April 11, 2006, | Experience has shown that these baseline inspections are extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site, and to ensure a productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for the inspection. These documents have been divided into three groups. | ||
It is requested that this information be provided to the lead inspector as the information is generated during the inspection. It is important that all of these documents are up to date | The first group is necessary to ensure that the inspection team is adequately prepared for the inspection. This information should be available to the Regional Office no later than April 3, 2006. The inspection team will review this information and, by April 11, 2006, will request specific items that should be available for review by April 28, 2006. The second group of requested documents contain additional items that the team will review, or need access to, during the inspection. Certain documents in Group II.(1) will be requested for review in the Regional Office the week prior to the inspection. The remaining documents should be available by the first day of the on-site inspection, May 8, 2006. The third group lists information necessary to aid the inspection team in tracking issues identified as a result of the inspection. | ||
M. Nazar | It is requested that this information be provided to the lead inspector as the information is generated during the inspection. It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of the inspection. | ||
The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Robert Daley. We understand that our regulatory contact for this inspection is of your organization. If there are any questions about the inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector at (630) 829-9749 or via e-mail at RCD@nrc.gov. | |||
M. Nazar In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
David E. Hills, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-315; 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58; DPR-74 | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
Modification and 50.59 Inspection Document Request | Modification and 50.59 Inspection Document Request (Information for Preparation Week and Information Available On-site During Inspection) cc w/encl: J. Jensen, Site Vice President L. Weber, Plant Manager G. White, Michigan Public Service Commission L. Brandon, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality - | ||
Waste and Hazardous Materials Division Emergency Management Division MI Department of State Police D. Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientists C. Crane | Waste and Hazardous Materials Division Emergency Management Division MI Department of State Police D. Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientists | ||
C. Crane Docket Nos. 50-315; 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58; DPR-74 | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
Modification and 50.59 Inspection Document Request | Modification and 50.59 Inspection Document Request (Information for Preparation Week and Information Available On-site During Inspection) cc w/encl: J. Jensen, Site Vice President L. Weber, Plant Manager G. White, Michigan Public Service Commission L. Brandon, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality - | ||
Waste and Hazardous Materials Division Emergency Management Division MI Department of State Police D. Lochbaum, Union of Concerned | Waste and Hazardous Materials Division Emergency Management Division MI Department of State Police D. Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientists ADAMS Distribution: | ||
JLD PST RidsNrrDirsIrib GEG KGO BJK1 CAA1 DRPIII DRSIII PLB1 JRK1 ROPreports@nrc.gov DOCUMENT NAME:E:\Filenet\ML060740241.wpd G Publicly Available G Non-Publicly Available G Sensitive G Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII NAME RDaley: ls CLipa DHills DATE 03/14/06 03/14/06 03/14/06 | |||
INITIAL DOCUMENT REQUEST OFFICIAL RECORD COPY MODIFICATIONS AND 50.59 INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Inspection Report: 05000315/2006009; 05000316/2006009 (DRS) | |||
Inspection Dates: May 8 through May 26, 2006 Inspection Procedures: IP 71111- 02, Evaluation of Changes, Tests, or Experiments IP 71111- 17, Permanent Plant Modifications Lead Inspector: R. Daley (630) 829-9749 I. Information Requested for In-Office Preparation Week The following information is requested by April 3, 2006, or sooner, to facilitate the selection of specific items that will be reviewed during the on-site inspection week. The team will select specific items from the information requested below and submit a list to your staff by April 11, 2006. We will request that certain items be made available to the Regional Office during the week prior to the inspection, no later than April 28, 2006. We request that the remaining items selected from the lists be available and ready for review on the first day of inspection. All requested information should cover the time frame from the last Permanent Modification inspection exit (September 17, 2004) to the present. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call the team leader as soon as possible. | |||
(1) List of permanent plant modifications to risk significant systems, structures or components. (For the purpose of this inspection, permanent plant modifications include permanent: plant changes; design changes; set point changes; equivalency evaluations; suitability analyses; and commercial grade dedications.) | |||
The list should contain the number of each document, the title, the revision (or date), and the affected system. In addition to the list, please provide a description of each modification, and a list of associated calculations, and affected procedures. | |||
(2) List of all 10 CFR 50.59 completed evaluations involving: | |||
(a) calculations; (b) procedure revisions; (c) changes to the facility (modifications); | |||
(b) non-routine operating configurations; and (c) departures in methods of analyses. | |||
1 Enclosure | |||
INITIAL DOCUMENT REQUEST The list should contain the number and title of each document, a brief description of the change, and the corresponding number and type of the affected document (i.e., the modification or procedure to which the evaluation applies). The list should NOT include any evaluations in which prior NRC approval was sought and obtained. | |||
(3) List of all 10 CFR 50.59 changes that have been screened out as not requiring a full evaluation involving: | |||
(a) calculations; (b) procedure revisions; (c) changes to the facility (modifications); | |||
(d) non-routine operating configurations; and (e) departures in methods of analyses. | |||
The list should contain the number and title of each document, a brief description of the change, and the corresponding number and type of the affected document (i.e., the modification or procedure to which the evaluation applies). | |||
(4) List of any modifications, procedure revisions, or UFSAR changes where it was determined that 10 CFR 50.59 did not apply. | |||
(5) List of corrective action documents (open and closed) that address plant permanent modification or 10 CFR 50.59 issues, concerns, or processes. These documents should also include corrective action documents associated with modification, and 10 CFR 50.59 change implementation. | |||
The list should contain the number, title and revision (or date) of each document, the affected system and corresponding documentation (if applicable), and should be sorted in order of significance. | |||
(6) Copies of procedures addressing the following: modifications, design changes, set point changes, equivalency evaluations or suitability analyses, commercial grade dedications, post-modification testing, 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation and screenings, and UFSAR updates. | |||
(7) UFSAR updates submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e)(4). Provide copies of the complete submittal. | |||
(8) Name(s) and phone numbers for the regulatory and technical contacts. | |||
(9) Current management and engineering organizational chart. | |||
2 Enclosure | |||
INITIAL DOCUMENT REQUEST II. Information Requested to be Available the Week Prior to Inspection (Request will be made by April 11, 2006) or on First Day of Inspection (May 8, 2006) | |||
(1) Copies of all selected items from Section I. This includes copies of associated documents such as calculations, post-modification test packages, 10 CFR 50.59 evaluations or screenings, and any corrective action documents. | |||
(2) Copies of these documents do not need to be solely available to the team as long as the inspectors have easy and unrestrained access to them. | |||
(f)Updated Final Safety Analysis Report; (g) Original FSAR Volumes; (h) Original SER and Supplements (for Original FSAR); | |||
(i) FSAR Question and Answers; (j) Quality Assurance Plan; (k) Technical Specifications; (l) Latest IPE/PRA Report; (m) Vendor Manuals; and (n) The Latest 10 CFR 50.59 FSAR Update Submittal. | |||
(3) Please ensure that other supporting documents for the selected items have been located and are readily retrievable as the team will likely be requesting these documents during the inspections. Examples of supporting documents are: | |||
(a) Drawings supporting the modifications; (b) Procedures affected by the modifications; and (c) UFSAR change papers generated due to a 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation. | |||
(i)FSAR Question and Answers; (j)Quality Assurance Plan; (k)Technical Specifications; (l)Latest IPE/PRA Report; (m)Vendor Manuals; and (n)The Latest 10 CFR 50.59 FSAR Update Submittal.(3)Please ensure that other supporting documents for the selected items have | (4) Current management and engineering organizational chart. | ||
III. Information Requested to be provided throughout the inspection (1) Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams questions or queries during this inspection. | |||
(2) Copies of any corrective action documents generated that are related to documents from the list that we give you on April 11, 2006. For the purposes of this request, only provide corrective action documents generated from April 11, 2006 until the first day of the inspection, May 8, 2006. | |||
(2) Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the status/resolution of the information requested, (provide daily during the inspection to each team member). | |||
If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the team leader. | |||
3 Enclosure}} |
Latest revision as of 21:06, 23 November 2019
ML060740241 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Cook |
Issue date: | 03/14/2006 |
From: | Dave Hills NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB1 |
To: | Nazar M Indiana Michigan Power Co |
References | |
Download: ML060740241 (8) | |
Text
March 14, 2006 Mr. M. Nazar Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group One Cook Place Bridgman, MI 49106
SUBJECT:
D.C. COOK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 INFORMATION REQUEST FOR AN NRC BIENNIAL PERMANENT MODIFICATIONS AND 10 CFR 50.59 (MOD/50.59) BASELINE INSPECTION
Dear Mr. Nazar:
On May 8, 2006, the NRC will begin a Modifications and 10 CFR 50.59 (MOD/50.59) baseline inspection at the D.C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant. This inspection will be performed in accordance with the NRC baseline Inspection Procedures IP 71111.02 and IP 71111.17. The on-site portion of the inspection will take place on May 8 through May 12, 2006 and May 22 through May 26, 2006.
Experience has shown that these baseline inspections are extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site, and to ensure a productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for the inspection. These documents have been divided into three groups.
The first group is necessary to ensure that the inspection team is adequately prepared for the inspection. This information should be available to the Regional Office no later than April 3, 2006. The inspection team will review this information and, by April 11, 2006, will request specific items that should be available for review by April 28, 2006. The second group of requested documents contain additional items that the team will review, or need access to, during the inspection. Certain documents in Group II.(1) will be requested for review in the Regional Office the week prior to the inspection. The remaining documents should be available by the first day of the on-site inspection, May 8, 2006. The third group lists information necessary to aid the inspection team in tracking issues identified as a result of the inspection.
It is requested that this information be provided to the lead inspector as the information is generated during the inspection. It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of the inspection.
The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Robert Daley. We understand that our regulatory contact for this inspection is of your organization. If there are any questions about the inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector at (630) 829-9749 or via e-mail at RCD@nrc.gov.
M. Nazar In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
David E. Hills, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-315; 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58; DPR-74
Enclosure:
Modification and 50.59 Inspection Document Request (Information for Preparation Week and Information Available On-site During Inspection) cc w/encl: J. Jensen, Site Vice President L. Weber, Plant Manager G. White, Michigan Public Service Commission L. Brandon, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality -
Waste and Hazardous Materials Division Emergency Management Division MI Department of State Police D. Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientists
C. Crane Docket Nos. 50-315; 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58; DPR-74
Enclosure:
Modification and 50.59 Inspection Document Request (Information for Preparation Week and Information Available On-site During Inspection) cc w/encl: J. Jensen, Site Vice President L. Weber, Plant Manager G. White, Michigan Public Service Commission L. Brandon, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality -
Waste and Hazardous Materials Division Emergency Management Division MI Department of State Police D. Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientists ADAMS Distribution:
JLD PST RidsNrrDirsIrib GEG KGO BJK1 CAA1 DRPIII DRSIII PLB1 JRK1 ROPreports@nrc.gov DOCUMENT NAME:E:\Filenet\ML060740241.wpd G Publicly Available G Non-Publicly Available G Sensitive G Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII NAME RDaley: ls CLipa DHills DATE 03/14/06 03/14/06 03/14/06
INITIAL DOCUMENT REQUEST OFFICIAL RECORD COPY MODIFICATIONS AND 50.59 INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Inspection Report: 05000315/2006009; 05000316/2006009 (DRS)
Inspection Dates: May 8 through May 26, 2006 Inspection Procedures: IP 71111- 02, Evaluation of Changes, Tests, or Experiments IP 71111- 17, Permanent Plant Modifications Lead Inspector: R. Daley (630) 829-9749 I. Information Requested for In-Office Preparation Week The following information is requested by April 3, 2006, or sooner, to facilitate the selection of specific items that will be reviewed during the on-site inspection week. The team will select specific items from the information requested below and submit a list to your staff by April 11, 2006. We will request that certain items be made available to the Regional Office during the week prior to the inspection, no later than April 28, 2006. We request that the remaining items selected from the lists be available and ready for review on the first day of inspection. All requested information should cover the time frame from the last Permanent Modification inspection exit (September 17, 2004) to the present. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call the team leader as soon as possible.
(1) List of permanent plant modifications to risk significant systems, structures or components. (For the purpose of this inspection, permanent plant modifications include permanent: plant changes; design changes; set point changes; equivalency evaluations; suitability analyses; and commercial grade dedications.)
The list should contain the number of each document, the title, the revision (or date), and the affected system. In addition to the list, please provide a description of each modification, and a list of associated calculations, and affected procedures.
(2) List of all 10 CFR 50.59 completed evaluations involving:
(a) calculations; (b) procedure revisions; (c) changes to the facility (modifications);
(b) non-routine operating configurations; and (c) departures in methods of analyses.
1 Enclosure
INITIAL DOCUMENT REQUEST The list should contain the number and title of each document, a brief description of the change, and the corresponding number and type of the affected document (i.e., the modification or procedure to which the evaluation applies). The list should NOT include any evaluations in which prior NRC approval was sought and obtained.
(3) List of all 10 CFR 50.59 changes that have been screened out as not requiring a full evaluation involving:
(a) calculations; (b) procedure revisions; (c) changes to the facility (modifications);
(d) non-routine operating configurations; and (e) departures in methods of analyses.
The list should contain the number and title of each document, a brief description of the change, and the corresponding number and type of the affected document (i.e., the modification or procedure to which the evaluation applies).
(4) List of any modifications, procedure revisions, or UFSAR changes where it was determined that 10 CFR 50.59 did not apply.
(5) List of corrective action documents (open and closed) that address plant permanent modification or 10 CFR 50.59 issues, concerns, or processes. These documents should also include corrective action documents associated with modification, and 10 CFR 50.59 change implementation.
The list should contain the number, title and revision (or date) of each document, the affected system and corresponding documentation (if applicable), and should be sorted in order of significance.
(6) Copies of procedures addressing the following: modifications, design changes, set point changes, equivalency evaluations or suitability analyses, commercial grade dedications, post-modification testing, 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation and screenings, and UFSAR updates.
(7) UFSAR updates submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e)(4). Provide copies of the complete submittal.
(8) Name(s) and phone numbers for the regulatory and technical contacts.
(9) Current management and engineering organizational chart.
2 Enclosure
INITIAL DOCUMENT REQUEST II. Information Requested to be Available the Week Prior to Inspection (Request will be made by April 11, 2006) or on First Day of Inspection (May 8, 2006)
(1) Copies of all selected items from Section I. This includes copies of associated documents such as calculations, post-modification test packages, 10 CFR 50.59 evaluations or screenings, and any corrective action documents.
(2) Copies of these documents do not need to be solely available to the team as long as the inspectors have easy and unrestrained access to them.
(f)Updated Final Safety Analysis Report; (g) Original FSAR Volumes; (h) Original SER and Supplements (for Original FSAR);
(i) FSAR Question and Answers; (j) Quality Assurance Plan; (k) Technical Specifications; (l) Latest IPE/PRA Report; (m) Vendor Manuals; and (n) The Latest 10 CFR 50.59 FSAR Update Submittal.
(3) Please ensure that other supporting documents for the selected items have been located and are readily retrievable as the team will likely be requesting these documents during the inspections. Examples of supporting documents are:
(a) Drawings supporting the modifications; (b) Procedures affected by the modifications; and (c) UFSAR change papers generated due to a 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation.
(4) Current management and engineering organizational chart.
III. Information Requested to be provided throughout the inspection (1) Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams questions or queries during this inspection.
(2) Copies of any corrective action documents generated that are related to documents from the list that we give you on April 11, 2006. For the purposes of this request, only provide corrective action documents generated from April 11, 2006 until the first day of the inspection, May 8, 2006.
(2) Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the status/resolution of the information requested, (provide daily during the inspection to each team member).
If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the team leader.
3 Enclosure