ML11306A142: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| document type = E-Mail | | document type = E-Mail | ||
| page count = 2 | | page count = 2 | ||
| project = TAC: | | project = TAC:ME7094, TAC:ME7095 | ||
| stage = | | stage = Request | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Sreenivas, V Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 10:15 AM To: Mark Ajluni (mjajluni@southernco.com) | ||
Cc: McKinney, B. Doug (Southern Co); Kulesa, Glor ia; Gleaves, Bill; NJString@southerco.com; Crumpton, Laura; Thompson, Jon | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
==Dear Mr. Ajluni:== | ==Dear Mr. Ajluni:== | ||
By letter dated September 9, | By letter dated September 9, 201 1, Southern Nuclear submitted a request for an amendment to the Technical Specifications (TS) for Farley Nuclear Plant (FNP) Units 1 and 2. The proposed change, if approved, would add Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.3.1.14 to FNP TS Table 3.3.1-1, "Reactor Trip System Instrumentation," Function 3, "Power Range Neutron Flux High Positive Rate." SR 3.3.1.14 requires verification that the RTS RESPONSE TIME is within limits every 18 months on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS. Function 3 is the Power Range Neutron Flux High Positive Rate Trip (PFRT) function. | ||
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified in "requests for additional information" despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | |||
If you have any questions, please contact the Farley Project Manager, Dr. V. Sreenivas, at (301) 415-2597. | The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified in "requests for additional information" despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | |||
If you have any questions, please contact the Farley Project Manager, Dr. V. Sreenivas, at (301) 415-2597. | |||
V. Sreenivas, PH.D., C.P.M., | V. Sreenivas, PH.D., C.P.M., | ||
Project Manager, Rm.#O8F6, LPL2-1 North Anna Power Reactors, Units 1 and 2 Joseph Farley Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing-NRR (301) 415-2597, v.sreenivas@nrc.gov | Project Manager, Rm.#O8F6, LPL2-1 North Anna Power Reactors, Units 1 and 2 Joseph Farley Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing-NRR (301) 415-2597, v.sreenivas@nrc.gov | ||
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA | ***This email message, and any files transmitted with it, may contain confidential, non-public, sensitive and proprietary data intended solely for the person(s) to whom this email message is directly addressed. Unauthorized use of the data contained in this message is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or email Reply and delete the original message and any attachments without keeping a copy*** | ||
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 190 Mail Envelope Properties (V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov20111102101400) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
ME7094 and ME7095 - Acceptance License Amendement request for Technical Specification Table 3.3.1-1 Sent Date: 11/2/2011 10:14:54 AM Received Date: 11/2/2011 10:14:00 AM | ME7094 and ME7095 - Acceptance License Amendement request for Technical Specification Table 3.3.1-1 Sent Date: 11/2/2011 10:14:54 AM Received Date: 11/2/2011 10:14:00 AM From: Sreenivas, V Created By: V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov Recipients: "McKinney, B. Doug (Southern Co)" <BDMCKINN@southernco.com> Tracking Status: None "Kulesa, Gloria" <Gloria.Kulesa@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Gleaves, Bill" <Bill.Gleaves@nrc.gov> | ||
Tracking Status: None "NJString@southerco.com" <NJString@southerco.com> Tracking Status: None "Crumpton, Laura" <LCRUMPTO@SOUTHERNCO.COM> Tracking Status: None "Thompson, Jon" <Jon.Thompson@nrc.gov> | Tracking Status: None "NJString@southerco.com" <NJString@southerco.com> Tracking Status: None "Crumpton, Laura" <LCRUMPTO@SOUTHERNCO.COM> Tracking Status: None "Thompson, Jon" <Jon.Thompson@nrc.gov> | ||
Tracking Status: None "Mark Ajluni (mjajluni@southernco.com)" <mjajluni@southernco.com> Tracking Status: None | Tracking Status: None "Mark Ajluni (mjajluni@southernco.com)" <mjajluni@southernco.com> Tracking Status: None | ||
Post Office: Files Size Date & Time | Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2944 11/2/2011 10:14:00 AM | ||
}} | |||
Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:}} |
Revision as of 15:46, 2 August 2018
ML11306A142 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Farley |
Issue date: | 11/02/2011 |
From: | V Sreenivas Plant Licensing Branch II |
To: | McKinney B D Southern Nuclear Operating Co |
References | |
TAC ME7094; TAC ME7095 | |
Download: ML11306A142 (2) | |
Text
1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Sreenivas, V Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 10:15 AM To: Mark Ajluni (mjajluni@southernco.com)
Cc: McKinney, B. Doug (Southern Co); Kulesa, Glor ia; Gleaves, Bill; NJString@southerco.com; Crumpton, Laura; Thompson, Jon
Subject:
ME7094 and ME7095 - Acceptance License Amendement request for Technical Specification Table 3.3.1-1
Dear Mr. Ajluni:
By letter dated September 9, 201 1, Southern Nuclear submitted a request for an amendment to the Technical Specifications (TS) for Farley Nuclear Plant (FNP) Units 1 and 2. The proposed change, if approved, would add Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.3.1.14 to FNP TS Table 3.3.1-1, "Reactor Trip System Instrumentation," Function 3, "Power Range Neutron Flux High Positive Rate." SR 3.3.1.14 requires verification that the RTS RESPONSE TIME is within limits every 18 months on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS. Function 3 is the Power Range Neutron Flux High Positive Rate Trip (PFRT) function.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified in "requests for additional information" despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact the Farley Project Manager, Dr. V. Sreenivas, at (301) 415-2597.
V. Sreenivas, PH.D., C.P.M.,
Project Manager, Rm.#O8F6, LPL2-1 North Anna Power Reactors, Units 1 and 2 Joseph Farley Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing-NRR (301) 415-2597, v.sreenivas@nrc.gov
- This email message, and any files transmitted with it, may contain confidential, non-public, sensitive and proprietary data intended solely for the person(s) to whom this email message is directly addressed. Unauthorized use of the data contained in this message is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or email Reply and delete the original message and any attachments without keeping a copy***
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 190 Mail Envelope Properties (V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov20111102101400)
Subject:
ME7094 and ME7095 - Acceptance License Amendement request for Technical Specification Table 3.3.1-1 Sent Date: 11/2/2011 10:14:54 AM Received Date: 11/2/2011 10:14:00 AM From: Sreenivas, V Created By: V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov Recipients: "McKinney, B. Doug (Southern Co)" <BDMCKINN@southernco.com> Tracking Status: None "Kulesa, Gloria" <Gloria.Kulesa@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Gleaves, Bill" <Bill.Gleaves@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "NJString@southerco.com" <NJString@southerco.com> Tracking Status: None "Crumpton, Laura" <LCRUMPTO@SOUTHERNCO.COM> Tracking Status: None "Thompson, Jon" <Jon.Thompson@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Mark Ajluni (mjajluni@southernco.com)" <mjajluni@southernco.com> Tracking Status: None
Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2944 11/2/2011 10:14:00 AM
Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: