IR 05000321/2012403: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 28: Line 28:


==Dear Mr. Madison:==
==Dear Mr. Madison:==
On March 29, 2012, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRC's Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed report documents the inspection results which were discussed on March 29, 2012, with you and other members of your staff.
On March 29, 2012, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant , Units 1 and 2. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRC's Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed report documents the inspection results which were discussed on March 29, 2012, with you and other members of your staff.


This inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commission=s rules and regulations, and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
This inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commission
=s rules and regulations, and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.


This report documents one finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process). The deficiency was corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspector left the site. The finding had a crosscutting aspect in the area of Human Performance-Work Practices H.4 (a).
This report documents one finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process). The deficiency was corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspector left the site. The finding had a crosscutting aspect in the area of Human Performance-Work Practices H.4 (a).
Line 36: Line 37:
Because of the very low safety significance and because it is entered into your corrective action program, the NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the NRC Enforcement Policy. If you contest the non-cited violation, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555-
Because of the very low safety significance and because it is entered into your corrective action program, the NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the NRC Enforcement Policy. If you contest the non-cited violation, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555-
0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator Region II; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the E.I Hatch Nuclear Plant. In addition, if you disagree with the cross-
0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator Region II; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the E.I Hatch Nuclear Plant. In addition, if you disagree with the cross-
cutting aspect assigned to the finding in this report, you should provide a response within 30 SNC 2 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, RII, and the NRC Senior Resident Inspector at the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant.
cutting aspect assigned to the finding in this report, you should provide a response within 30 SNC 2 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional  


In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system, ADAMS. ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letter=s enclosure will not be available for public inspection.
Administrator, RII, and the NRC S enior Resident Inspector at the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant.


Sincerely,/RA/ Binoy B. Desai, Chief Plant Support Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-321, 50-366 License Nos. DPR-57, NPF-5
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system, ADAMS. ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letter
=s enclosure will not be available for public inspection.


===Enclosure:===
Sincerely,/RA/ Binoy B. Desai, Chief Plant Support Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety
Inspection Report 05000321/2012403 And 05000366/2012403
 
===w/Attachment:===
Supplemental Information (OUO)
cc w/Encl (See page 3) SNC 2 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, RII, and the NRC Senior Resident Inspector at the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant.
 
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system, ADAMS. ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letter=s enclosure will not be available for public inspection.


Sincerely,/RA/ Binoy B. Desai, Chief Plant Support Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-321, 50-366 License Nos. DPR-57, NPF-5  
Docket Nos. 50-321, 50-366 License Nos. DPR-57, NPF-5  


===Enclosure:===
===Enclosure:===
Line 58: Line 53:
===w/Attachment:===
===w/Attachment:===
Supplemental Information (OUO)
Supplemental Information (OUO)
cc w/Encl: (See page 3)  
cc w/Encl (See page 3)  


Distribution w/encl: RidsNrrPMHatch Resource C. Evans, RII EICS (Part 72 Only)
ML1217A432 X SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE X FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII: DRS/PSB2 RII: DRS/PSB2 RII: DRS/PSB2 RII: DRS/PSB2 RII: DRP/BR2 SIGNATURE RA/JW RA/AR RA/JT RA/BD RA/FSE NAME J. WALLO A. RICHARDSON J. TORNOW B. DESAI F. EHRHARDT DATE 04/25/2012 04/25/2012 04/25/2012 04/25/2012 04/25/2012 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO SNC 3 cc w/Encl:
L. Douglas, RII EICS (Linda Douglas)
B. Westreich, NSIR (hard copy w/ encl)
RIDSNRRDIRS OE Mail (email address if applicable)
PUBLIC - OUO REMOVED X PUBLICLY AVAILABLE -OUO REMOVED X NON-PUBLICLY AVAILABLE X SENSITIVE X NON-SENSITIVE - OUO REMOVED ADAMS: X Yes ACCESSION NUMBER: ML1217A432 X SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE X FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII: DRS/PSB2 RII: DRS/PSB2 RII: DRS/PSB2 RII: DRS/PSB2 RII: DRP/BR2 SIGNATURE RA/JW RA/AR RA/JT RA/BD RA/FSE NAME J. WALLO A. RICHARDSON J. TORNOW B. DESAI F. EHRHARDT DATE 04/25/2012 04/25/2012 04/25/2012 04/25/2012 04/25/2012 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO OFFICIAL RECORD COPY DOCUMENT NAME: G:\DRSII\PSBII\REACTORS\HATCH\REPORTS\2012\HATCH IR 2012403 REV1 OUO REMOVED.DOC SNC 3 cc w/Encl:
Keith Wooten Project Manager Nuclear Fleet Security Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Keith Wooten Project Manager Nuclear Fleet Security Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.


Revision as of 00:02, 29 July 2018

IR 05000321-12-403 & 05000366-12-403, on 03/29/2012, Edwin I. Hatch
ML12117A432
Person / Time
Site: Hatch  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/25/2012
From: Desai B B
NRC/RGN-II/DRS/PSB2
To: Madison D R
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
References
IR-12-403
Download: ML12117A432 (4)
v • d • e


Text

April 25, 2012

Mr. Dennis Vice President Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant 11028 Hatch Parkway North Baxley, GA 31513

SUBJECT: EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT - NRC SECURITY INSPECTION REPORT 05000321/2012403 AND 05000366/2012403

Dear Mr. Madison:

On March 29, 2012, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant , Units 1 and 2. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRC's Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed report documents the inspection results which were discussed on March 29, 2012, with you and other members of your staff.

This inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commission

=s rules and regulations, and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

This report documents one finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process). The deficiency was corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspector left the site. The finding had a crosscutting aspect in the area of Human Performance-Work Practices H.4 (a).

Because of the very low safety significance and because it is entered into your corrective action program, the NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the NRC Enforcement Policy. If you contest the non-cited violation, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555-

0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator Region II; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the E.I Hatch Nuclear Plant. In addition, if you disagree with the cross-

cutting aspect assigned to the finding in this report, you should provide a response within 30 SNC 2 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional

Administrator, RII, and the NRC S enior Resident Inspector at the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system, ADAMS. ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letter

=s enclosure will not be available for public inspection.

Sincerely,/RA/ Binoy B. Desai, Chief Plant Support Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-321, 50-366 License Nos. DPR-57, NPF-5

Enclosure:

Inspection Report 05000321/2012403 And 05000366/2012403

w/Attachment:

Supplemental Information (OUO)

cc w/Encl (See page 3)

ML1217A432 X SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE X FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII: DRS/PSB2 RII: DRS/PSB2 RII: DRS/PSB2 RII: DRS/PSB2 RII: DRP/BR2 SIGNATURE RA/JW RA/AR RA/JT RA/BD RA/FSE NAME J. WALLO A. RICHARDSON J. TORNOW B. DESAI F. EHRHARDT DATE 04/25/2012 04/25/2012 04/25/2012 04/25/2012 04/25/2012 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO SNC 3 cc w/Encl:

Keith Wooten Project Manager Nuclear Fleet Security Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

40 Iverness Center Parkway Birmingham, AL 35242

David Burford Manager Nuclear Fleet Security Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

40 Iverness Center Parkway Birmingham, AL 35242

L. B. Hogg Nuclear Licensing Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

40 Inverness Center Parkway Birmingham, AL 35242

Jonathan M. Merritt Site Security Manager Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant 11028 Hatch Parkway North Baxley, GA 31513

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000321/2012403&oldid=918523"