ML15124A845: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 5 | | page count = 5 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of ) ) ENTERGY NUCLEAR VERMONT ) Docket No. 50-271-LA-2 YANKEE, LLC AND ENTERGY ) NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. ) May 4, 2015 ) (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station) ) NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY NOW COMES Public Service, with the following supplement to its supporting evidence in the above-captioned proceeding currently before the Atomic Safe ). On April 30published a notice of issuance of No Significant 1 in the Federal Register2 The Draft EA and FONSI provide additional supporting evidence for Contentions One and Two of the States Petition for Leave to Intervene and Hearing Request submitted and currently under review in this proceeding, and are attached as Attachment 1. exemptions from portions of 10 CFR §§ 50.47(b), 50.47(c)(2) and Part 50, Appendix E, and filed a directly- 1 See Letter from James Kim, NRC Project Manager, to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Site Vice President (Apr. 24, 2015)( NRC Agencywide Document Access Management System [ADAMS] Accession No. ML15103A419) (attached as Attachment 1). 2 See 80 FR 24291. | |||
2 Level scheme.3 On November 14, 2014, the NRC Staff recommended that the Commission s request.4 The State filed a Petition for Leave to response to the LAR on February 9, 2015.5 tition contains two contentions: One, the LAR is not ready for review because the directly related exemption request has not been approved by the NRC; and Two, the LAR increases the risk to public health and safety in the event that the directly related exemption request is approved. On March 2, 2015, the NRC s recommendation to grant the exemptions request.6 Entergy and NRC Staff each filed 7 The State then filed a xemptions request at the Commission Board on March 17, 2015.8 Both Entergy and NRC Staff argue in their answers that Contention One Petition is recommendation that 3 See Letter from Christopher Wamser, Entergy Site Vice President, to NRC Document Control Desk (Mar. 14, 2014)(BVY 14-009)(ML14080A141); Letter from Christopher Wamser, Entergy Site Vice President, to NRC Document Control Desk (June 12, 2014)(BVY 14-033)(ML14168A302). 4 See Policy Issue (Notation Vote) from Mark A. Satorius, Executive Director for Operations to the Commissioners (Nov. 14, 2014)(SECY-14-0125)(ML14227A711). 5 See State of . 9, 2015)(ML15040A723). 6 See Commission Voting Record re Request by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., for Exemptions From Certain Emergency Planning Requirements (March 2, 2015)(ML15062A135); Memorandum from Annette L. Vietti-Cook to Mark A. Satorius re Staff Requirements SECY 14-0125 (March 2, 2015)(ML15061A516). 7 Mar. 6, 2015) (ML15065A364); 2015)(ML15065A300). 8 See Requests (Mar. 12, 2015)(attachEntergy Answers to Petition to Leave to Intervene and Hearing Request (Mar. 17, 2015)(ML15076A546). | |||
3 the exemptions request directly related to the LAR be granted.9 More specifically, the NRC Staff states at 10 e information. Entergy concedes in its answer that an EA and/or a FONSI were not available when the NRC approved the Staff recommendation to grant the exemptions request.11 proceeding in two ways. First, the Draft EA and FONSI make clear that Contention One of the FONSI shows that the approval is not binding because it preceded any review under the National . Under NEPA, the Commission must consider the EA and FONSI after public comments have been received pursuant to the Federal Register notice and reviewed prior to approval of the exemptions request. NRC approval of the exemptions request on March 2 without consideration of its environmental impacts violated NEPA, as the State argued at length in its Petition for Reconsideration of Commission Decision Approving 12 Contention One therefore continues to be valid in this proceeding. Second, the Draft EA and FONSI . Both Entergy requested exemptions as a 9 Entergy Answer at 16-17; NRC Staff Answer at 21-22. 10 NRC Staff Answer at 21-22. 11 Entergy Answer at 12-13, 17, FN 77. 12 See State Petition for Reconsideration at 6-9. | |||
4 prerequisite for this LAR,13 and the Draft EA and FONSI recognize as they must that environmental review and public comment are required in analyzing the exemptions. CONCLUSION As Entergy has made clear there is no question that the NRC will have to exempt Vermont Yankee from certain requirements of Appendix E before the LAR is granted14 Entergy and NRC Staff claimed in their answers that the NRC had already granted those exemptions in its March 2 decision. The Draft EA and FONSI make clear that further environmental review including public comment is needed before those exemptions can be granted. cannot be issued at this time, and the Board should grant the State a hearing on both of its Contentions. Dated at Montpelier, Vermont this 4th of May, 2015 Respectfully submitted, /Signed (electronically) by/ Aaron Kisicki Counsel for the State of Vermont Vermont Department of Public Service 112 State Street Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620 (802) 828-3785 aaron.kisicki@state.vt.us 13 See, e.g., NRC Staff Answer at 29-31, 36-42; Entergy Answer at 19-25. 14 Entergy Answer at 25 (citing Defueled EAL scheme are predicated on )). | |||
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of ) ) ENTERGY NUCLEAR VERMONT ) Docket 50-271-LA-2 YANKEE, LLC AND ENTERGY ) NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. ) May 4, 2015 ) (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station) ) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.305, I hereby certify that copies of the forgoing State of , 2015, have been served upon the -filing System, in the above-captioned proceeding, this 4th day of May, 2015. /Signed (electronically) by/ Aaron Kisicki Counsel for the State of Vermont Vermont Department of Public Service 112 State Street Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620 (802) 828-3785 aaron.kisicki@state.vt.us Dated at Montpelier, Vermont this 4th day of May, 2015}} | |||
Revision as of 22:51, 11 June 2018
| ML15124A845 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png |
| Issue date: | 05/04/2015 |
| From: | Kisicki A State of VT, Dept of Public Service |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 50-271-LA-2, ASLBP 15-937-02-LA-BD01, RAS 27673 | |
| Download: ML15124A845 (5) | |
Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of ) ) ENTERGY NUCLEAR VERMONT ) Docket No. 50-271-LA-2 YANKEE, LLC AND ENTERGY ) NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. ) May 4, 2015 ) (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station) ) NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY NOW COMES Public Service, with the following supplement to its supporting evidence in the above-captioned proceeding currently before the Atomic Safe ). On April 30published a notice of issuance of No Significant 1 in the Federal Register2 The Draft EA and FONSI provide additional supporting evidence for Contentions One and Two of the States Petition for Leave to Intervene and Hearing Request submitted and currently under review in this proceeding, and are attached as Attachment 1. exemptions from portions of 10 CFR §§ 50.47(b), 50.47(c)(2) and Part 50, Appendix E, and filed a directly- 1 See Letter from James Kim, NRC Project Manager, to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Site Vice President (Apr. 24, 2015)( NRC Agencywide Document Access Management System [ADAMS] Accession No. ML15103A419) (attached as Attachment 1). 2 See 80 FR 24291.
2 Level scheme.3 On November 14, 2014, the NRC Staff recommended that the Commission s request.4 The State filed a Petition for Leave to response to the LAR on February 9, 2015.5 tition contains two contentions: One, the LAR is not ready for review because the directly related exemption request has not been approved by the NRC; and Two, the LAR increases the risk to public health and safety in the event that the directly related exemption request is approved. On March 2, 2015, the NRC s recommendation to grant the exemptions request.6 Entergy and NRC Staff each filed 7 The State then filed a xemptions request at the Commission Board on March 17, 2015.8 Both Entergy and NRC Staff argue in their answers that Contention One Petition is recommendation that 3 See Letter from Christopher Wamser, Entergy Site Vice President, to NRC Document Control Desk (Mar. 14, 2014)(BVY 14-009)(ML14080A141); Letter from Christopher Wamser, Entergy Site Vice President, to NRC Document Control Desk (June 12, 2014)(BVY 14-033)(ML14168A302). 4 See Policy Issue (Notation Vote) from Mark A. Satorius, Executive Director for Operations to the Commissioners (Nov. 14, 2014)(SECY-14-0125)(ML14227A711). 5 See State of . 9, 2015)(ML15040A723). 6 See Commission Voting Record re Request by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., for Exemptions From Certain Emergency Planning Requirements (March 2, 2015)(ML15062A135); Memorandum from Annette L. Vietti-Cook to Mark A. Satorius re Staff Requirements SECY 14-0125 (March 2, 2015)(ML15061A516). 7 Mar. 6, 2015) (ML15065A364); 2015)(ML15065A300). 8 See Requests (Mar. 12, 2015)(attachEntergy Answers to Petition to Leave to Intervene and Hearing Request (Mar. 17, 2015)(ML15076A546).
3 the exemptions request directly related to the LAR be granted.9 More specifically, the NRC Staff states at 10 e information. Entergy concedes in its answer that an EA and/or a FONSI were not available when the NRC approved the Staff recommendation to grant the exemptions request.11 proceeding in two ways. First, the Draft EA and FONSI make clear that Contention One of the FONSI shows that the approval is not binding because it preceded any review under the National . Under NEPA, the Commission must consider the EA and FONSI after public comments have been received pursuant to the Federal Register notice and reviewed prior to approval of the exemptions request. NRC approval of the exemptions request on March 2 without consideration of its environmental impacts violated NEPA, as the State argued at length in its Petition for Reconsideration of Commission Decision Approving 12 Contention One therefore continues to be valid in this proceeding. Second, the Draft EA and FONSI . Both Entergy requested exemptions as a 9 Entergy Answer at 16-17; NRC Staff Answer at 21-22. 10 NRC Staff Answer at 21-22. 11 Entergy Answer at 12-13, 17, FN 77. 12 See State Petition for Reconsideration at 6-9.
4 prerequisite for this LAR,13 and the Draft EA and FONSI recognize as they must that environmental review and public comment are required in analyzing the exemptions. CONCLUSION As Entergy has made clear there is no question that the NRC will have to exempt Vermont Yankee from certain requirements of Appendix E before the LAR is granted14 Entergy and NRC Staff claimed in their answers that the NRC had already granted those exemptions in its March 2 decision. The Draft EA and FONSI make clear that further environmental review including public comment is needed before those exemptions can be granted. cannot be issued at this time, and the Board should grant the State a hearing on both of its Contentions. Dated at Montpelier, Vermont this 4th of May, 2015 Respectfully submitted, /Signed (electronically) by/ Aaron Kisicki Counsel for the State of Vermont Vermont Department of Public Service 112 State Street Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620 (802) 828-3785 aaron.kisicki@state.vt.us 13 See, e.g., NRC Staff Answer at 29-31, 36-42; Entergy Answer at 19-25. 14 Entergy Answer at 25 (citing Defueled EAL scheme are predicated on )).
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of ) ) ENTERGY NUCLEAR VERMONT ) Docket 50-271-LA-2 YANKEE, LLC AND ENTERGY ) NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. ) May 4, 2015 ) (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station) ) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.305, I hereby certify that copies of the forgoing State of , 2015, have been served upon the -filing System, in the above-captioned proceeding, this 4th day of May, 2015. /Signed (electronically) by/ Aaron Kisicki Counsel for the State of Vermont Vermont Department of Public Service 112 State Street Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620 (802) 828-3785 aaron.kisicki@state.vt.us Dated at Montpelier, Vermont this 4th day of May, 2015