ML15195A193

2015/07/13 Indian Point Lr Hearing - [External_Sender] FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA

ML15195A193
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	07/13/2015
From:	- No Known Affiliation
To:	Division of License Renewal
References
Download: ML15195A193 (10)

Text

1IPRenewal NPEmailsFrom:Louie, Richard [rlouie@entergy.com]Sent:Monday, July 13, 2015 6:57 AMTo:Wentzel, Michael

Subject:

[External_Sender] FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRAAttachments:070115, Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and Entergy Concerning the RAIs Pertaining to the Indian Point LRA Safety Review.docxImportance:HighFollow Up Flag:Follow upDue By:Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:00 AMFlag Status:FlaggedMike, Please note below, a comment regarding the attached phone call summary.

Rich From: TAYLOR, ANDREW C Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 1:28 AM To: Louie, Richard Cc: Lach, David J

Subject:

FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA Importance: High Rich -

After further review, we have determined that we do have comments on this phone call summary.

We need NRC to specify which statement in LR-ISG-2013-01 indicates that "Environments with high temperatures are not evaluated to be bounding within the assumptions of GALL AMP XI.M42" as claimed in DRAFT- RAI 3.0.3-16

Andy Andrew Taylor, P.E.

Acting Manager Entergy Nuclear License Renewal Services 479-858-3531 From: Louie, Richard Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 7:58 AM To: TAYLOR, ANDREW C

Subject:

FW: Draft Phone Call Summary Andy, 2Let me know if you have any comments.

Rich From: Wentzel, Michael [1] Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 8:42 AM To: Louie, Richard

Subject:

Draft Phone Call Summary Rich, Attached is a draft of the phone call summary from our phone call last week. Please let me know if you have any comments.

Thanks, Mike Michael Wentzel Project Manager NRR/DLR/RPB2 (301) 415-6459 michael.wentzel@nrc.gov Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 5225 Mail Envelope Properties (CB159DC717B797428E92782CE3B5F40B0F16BF9B)

Subject:

[External_Sender] FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA Sent Date: 7/13/2015 6:56:51 AM Received Date: 7/13/2015 6:56:56 AM From: Louie, Richard Created By: rlouie@entergy.com Recipients: "Wentzel, Michael" <Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: JDCXMETSP003.etrsouth.corp.entergy.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1339 7/13/2015 6:56:56 AM 070115, Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and Entergy Concerning the RAIs Pertaining to the Indian Point LRA Safety Review.docx 81821

Options Priority: High Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: Follow up By 7/14/2015 8:00:00 AM

LICENSE FACILITY SUBJEC The U.S.Operatio clarify theNuclear G Enclosurdiscusse Entergy h

Docket N EnclosurAs stated cc w/encEE: EntergY: IndianCT: SUMMBETWENTEREQUINDIARENE. Nuclear Rens, Inc., (Ene NRC staff'Generating Ure 1 providesed with Enterhad an oppoNos. 50-247 re: d cl: Listserv NUCgy Nuclear On Point NucleMARY OF TWEEN THE UERGY NUCLUEST FOR AAN POINT NEWAL APPLegulatory Contergy)held as request foUnit Nos. 2 as a listing of rgy, includingortunity to coand 50-286 UNITCLEARREGUWASHINGTOperations, ear GeneratELEPHONEU.S. NUCLELEAR OPERADDITIONAUCLEAR GLICATION, Sommission (Na telephone or additional and 3 licensthe participag a brief desomment on t TED STATESULATORY COTON, D.C. 20555 Inc. ing Unit NosE CONFEREEAR REGULRATIONS, INAL INFORMAENERATINGSET 2015-02NRC) staff aconference information se renewal aants and Enscription of ththis summaryMichael WeProjects BraDivision of LOffice of Nu S OMMISSION5-0001 s. 2 and 3 ENCE CALL LATORY CONC. CONCERATION FOR G UNIT NOS2 (TAC NOSnd represencall on July (RAI) concepplicationsaclosure 2 cohe status. y. entzel, Projeanch 2 License Renuclear ReactHELD ON JOMMISSION RNING THETHE REVIES. 2 AND 3, S. MD5407 Antatives of En1, 2015,to derning the Inafety review. ontains a listct Manager newal tor RegulatioJULY 1, 201AND E DRAFT EW OF THE LICENSE AND MD540ntergy Nuclediscuss and dian Point ing of the RAon 5, 08) ear AIs

• concurrence via e-mail OFFICE LA:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR BC:RPB1:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR NAME MWentzel YDiaz MWentzel DATE

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 1, 2015, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. CONCERNING THE DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION, SET 2015-02 (TAC NOS. MD5407 AND MD5408)

DISTRIBUTION: HARD COPY: DLR RF E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRsrg Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource ------------- MWentzel JWeil, OCA BFu MGray, RI WHolsten ABurritt, RI YDiaz DonaldJackson, RI DMorey MModes, RI DPickett NSheehan, RI OPA STurk, OGC DScrenci, RI OPA BMizuno, OGC DTifft, RI DRoth, OGC NMcNamara, RI BHarris, OGC GNewman, RI SBurnell, OPA JSStewart, RI DMcIntyre, OPA BPinson, RI

ENCLOSURE 1 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JULY 1, 2015 PARTICIPANTS: AFFILIATIONS:Bart Fu U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)Bill Holsten NRCMichael Wentzel NRC Stephen Eric Clair Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)Dave Lach EntergyRich Louie EntergyAndy Taylor EntergyDave Wootten Entergy ENCLOSURE 2 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL CONCERNING DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (RAI), SET 2015-02 RELATED TO INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 (IP2 and IP3) LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION DOCKET NOS. 50-247 AND 50-286 REGARDING LR-ISG-2013-01 JULY 1, 2015 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy) held a telephone conference call on July 1, 2015, to discuss and clarify the following requests for additional information (RAIs) concerning the license renewal application safety review.

RAI 3.0.3-16 Background As amended by letter dated March 10, 2015, LRA Table 3.3.2-19-43-IP3, "Pressurizer System," states that loss of coating integrity is managed for metal components with internal coating in a "treated borated water > 140°F" environment by the Coating Integrity Program.

Issue Environments with high temperatures are not evaluated to be bounding within the assumptions of GALL AMP XI.M42, "Aging Management of Loss of Coating or Lining Integrity for Internal Coatings/Linings on In-Scope Piping, Piping Components, Heat Exchangers, and Tanks." The changes to the LRA do not state the specific coating material used in systems with temperatures exceeding 140°F. Therefore, the staff lacks sufficient information to conclude that the recommendations in AMP XI.M42 (e.g., inspection intervals, acceptance criteria) are sufficient for the materials exposed to temperatures greater than 140°F.

Request State the coating materials exposed to temperatures greater than 140°F. Provide the basis for concluding that loss of coating integrity is adequately managed in the subject environment. Discussion: Entergy requested clarification as to what information the staff was requesting. The staff stated that AMP XI.M42 does not include any elevated temperature environments. As such, the staff needs to know the coating type to ensure that the condition monitoring recommendations of AMP XI.M42 are appropriate. RAI 3.0.3-17 Background As amended by letter dated March 10, 2015, LRA Sections A.2.1.42, A.3.1.42, and B.1.43, "Coating Integrity," state that the Coating Integrity Program will be implemented by December 31, 2024. In addition, Commitment 8, as revised, states that LRA Sections A.2.1.13, A.3.1.13 and B.1.14, "Fire Water System," will be implemented by December 31, 2019.

Issue The implementation schedule for LRA Section B.1.43 ranges up to nine years, from 2015 to 2024. In addition, implementation of Commitment 8, as revised, ranges from 2015 to 2019.

SRP-LR Table 3.0-1 for AMP XI.M42 states that the first inspections of internal coatings should be completed no later than the last refueling outage prior to the period of extended operation.

The staff recognizes that Indian Point Unit 2 has entered timely renewal and Indian Point Unit 3 may shortly enter timely renewal. As such, it does not appear that the inspection section schedule recommended in Table 3.0-1 will be met. Further, it is not clear to the staff how loss of coating integrity will be managed in the time frame prior to the programs being implemented.

Request State how loss of coating integrity will be managed between now and the proposed implementation dates and the basis for concluding that coating integrity will be adequately managed in this time period.

Discussion: Entergy stated that they understood what information the NRC staff was requesting. RAI 3.0.3-18 Background As amended by letter dated March 10, 2015, LRA Section B.1.14, "Fire Water System," provides an enhancement to the "corrective actions" program element associated with returning degraded coatings (i.e., peeling, delaminated, or blistered) coatings to service without repair, replacement or removal. No exceptions related to conducting adhesion testing are stated in LRA Section B.1.43, "Coating Integrity." Issue GALL Report AMP XI.M42, element 7, "corrective actions," recommends that the coatings/linings for in-scope components that do not meet acceptance criteria are repaired, replaced, or removed. GALL Report AMP XI.M42 allows an alternative, which recommends, among other things, that adhesion testing be performed before returning degraded (i.e., peeling, delaminated, or blistered) coatings to service. For the alternative for returning a coating exhibiting peeling and delamination to service without repair, the Fire Water System program does not include adhesion testing as part of the alternative. In addition, the enhancement states that for coatings exhibiting blistering, "light tapping" of the coating will be performed to determine the extent of blistering. AMP XI.M42 only recommends the use of "light tapping" when it is physically impossible to perform adhesion testing.

LRA Section B.1.14 did not state an exception to adhesion testing even though the proposed changes to the Fire Water System program were not consistent with GALL Report AMP XI.M42.

LRA Section B.1.43 does not state an exception to adhesion testing. It is not clear to the staff whether adhesion testing will be conducted prior to returning degraded coatings/linings within the scope of the Coating Integrity Program to service.

Request

1. State whether the Coating Integrity Program will include adhesion testing prior to returning degraded coatings/linings to service. 2. If the Coating Integrity Program does not include adhesion testing for returning degraded coatings/linings to service, explain why adhesion testing is not needed as part of the alternative for returning degraded coatings to service for in-scope fire water system components. Discussion: Entergy stated that it intends to perform adhesion testing as recommended in AMP XI.M42. As such, no exceptions were stated related to adhesion testing. As such, the staff agreed to delete this RAI and would document the use of adhesion testing, as stated by the applicant, as appropriate.