ML16168A175: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 12: Line 12:
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1IPRenewal NPEmailsFrom:Wentzel, MichaelSent:Thursday, June 16, 2016 10:54 AMTo:Louie, RichardCc:Walpole, Robert W
==Subject:==
RE: RE: Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference CallThanks, Rich. I will have to take a closer look at your proposed edits when I edit the summary, but they seem consistent with what was discussed on the phone call.
Thanks, Mike  From: Louie, Richard [mailto:rlouie@entergy.com]  Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 10:36 AM To: Wentzel, Michael <Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov> Cc: Walpole, Robert W <rwalpol@entergy.com>
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] RE: Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference Call  Mike, Please consider revising the following two sentences in the first paragraph of the draft summary.
Revise:  In response, Entergy stated that they would give broader consideration of the operating experience that could constitute recurring internal corrosion, including enhancing review procedures to ensure that responses to NRC staff requests for additional information have fully considered all potentially applicable operating experience.
To:  We briefly discussed program procedures; however, Entergy stated that they would give broader consideration of the degradation identified in operating experience that could be attributed to the effects of aging.
Revise:
The NRC staff and Entergy agreed to have a follow-up phone call in approximately 3 months to assess the effectiveness of Entergy's changes.
To:
The NRC staff and Entergy agreed to have a follow-up phone call in approximately 3 months to discuss the status of any potential corrective actions.
Thanks, Rich  From: Wentzel, Michael [mailto:Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov]  Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 2:54 PM 2To: Louie, Richard
==Subject:==
Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference Call  Rich, Attached is a draft summary of our May 10 phone call. Please review and let me know if you have any comments. Thanks, Mike Michael Wentzel Project Manager NRR/DLR/RERP (301) 415-6459 michael.wentzel@nrc.gov Hearing Identifier:  IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX  Email Number:  6764  Mail Envelope Properties  (28af6c402b354344a9381ca61780efc9) 
==Subject:==
RE: RE: Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference Call  Sent Date:  6/16/2016 10:54:19 AM  Received Date:  6/16/2016 10:54:19 AM  From:    Wentzel, Michael  Created By:  Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov  Recipients:    "Walpole, Robert W" <rwalpol@entergy.com>
Tracking Status: None  "Louie, Richard" <rlouie@entergy.com>
Tracking Status: None  Post Office:  HQPWMSMRS03.nrc.gov Files    Size      Date & Time  MESSAGE    2022      6/16/2016 10:54:19 AM Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:       
}}
}}

Revision as of 18:04, 14 May 2018

2016/06/16 Indian Point Lr Hearing - Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference Call
ML16168A175
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/16/2016
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
Download: ML16168A175 (3)


Text

1IPRenewal NPEmailsFrom:Wentzel, MichaelSent:Thursday, June 16, 2016 10:54 AMTo:Louie, RichardCc:Walpole, Robert W

Subject:

RE: RE: Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference CallThanks, Rich. I will have to take a closer look at your proposed edits when I edit the summary, but they seem consistent with what was discussed on the phone call.

Thanks, Mike From: Louie, Richard [1] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 10:36 AM To: Wentzel, Michael <Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov> Cc: Walpole, Robert W <rwalpol@entergy.com>

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference Call Mike, Please consider revising the following two sentences in the first paragraph of the draft summary.

Revise: In response, Entergy stated that they would give broader consideration of the operating experience that could constitute recurring internal corrosion, including enhancing review procedures to ensure that responses to NRC staff requests for additional information have fully considered all potentially applicable operating experience.

To: We briefly discussed program procedures; however, Entergy stated that they would give broader consideration of the degradation identified in operating experience that could be attributed to the effects of aging.

Revise:

The NRC staff and Entergy agreed to have a follow-up phone call in approximately 3 months to assess the effectiveness of Entergy's changes.

To:

The NRC staff and Entergy agreed to have a follow-up phone call in approximately 3 months to discuss the status of any potential corrective actions.

Thanks, Rich From: Wentzel, Michael [2] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 2:54 PM 2To: Louie, Richard

Subject:

Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference Call Rich, Attached is a draft summary of our May 10 phone call. Please review and let me know if you have any comments. Thanks, Mike Michael Wentzel Project Manager NRR/DLR/RERP (301) 415-6459 michael.wentzel@nrc.gov Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 6764 Mail Envelope Properties (28af6c402b354344a9381ca61780efc9)

Subject:

RE: RE: Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference Call Sent Date: 6/16/2016 10:54:19 AM Received Date: 6/16/2016 10:54:19 AM From: Wentzel, Michael Created By: Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov Recipients: "Walpole, Robert W" <rwalpol@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None "Louie, Richard" <rlouie@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQPWMSMRS03.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2022 6/16/2016 10:54:19 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: