ML17112A047: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| document type = E-Mail | | document type = E-Mail | ||
| page count = 3 | | page count = 3 | ||
| project = | |||
| stage = Acceptance Review | |||
}} | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Chawla, MaheshSent:Friday, April 21, 2017 3:59 PMTo:Davis, J.Michael (J.Michael.Davis@nexteraenergy.com)Cc:Catron, Steve (Steve.Catron@fpl.com); laura.swenzinski@nexteraenergy.com | |||
==Subject:== | |||
LIC-109 Acceptance of Duane Arnold Energy Center - Relief Request No. 4 - Alternative for Seal Weld Procedure Qualification - MF9373 | |||
==Dear Mr. Davis:== | |||
By letter dated March 7, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17069A172), NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC (the licensee) submitted a relief request, as part of the Fifth Inservice Inspection Interval Program Plan for Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC). The proposed relief request would provide alternative for Seal Weld Procedure Qualification. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(z)(1) and 50.55a(z)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety. | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 110 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 10 months, which is January 31, 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | |||
These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | |||
If you have any questions, please contact me. Thanks Mahesh Chawla Project Manager Phone: 301-415-8371 2Fax: 301-415-1222 mahesh.chawla@nrc.gov | |||
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3459 Mail Envelope Properties (Mahesh.Chawla@nrc.gov20170421155800) | |||
==Subject:== | |||
LIC-109 Acceptance of Duane Arnold Energy Center - Relief Request No. 4 - Alternative for Seal Weld Procedure Qualification - MF9373 Sent Date: 4/21/2017 3:58:52 PM Received Date: 4/21/2017 3:58:00 PM From: Chawla, Mahesh Created By: Mahesh.Chawla@nrc.gov Recipients: "Catron, Steve (Steve.Catron@fpl.com)" <Steve.Catron@fpl.com> Tracking Status: None "laura.swenzinski@nexteraenergy.com" <laura.swenzinski@nexteraenergy.com> Tracking Status: None "Davis, J.Michael (J.Michael.Davis@nexteraenergy.com)" <J.Michael.Davis@nexteraenergy.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3201 4/21/2017 3:58:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 12:03, 28 April 2018
| ML17112A047 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Duane Arnold  |
| Issue date: | 04/21/2017 |
| From: | Chawla M L Plant Licensing Branch III |
| To: | Davis J M Nextera Energy |
| References | |
| MF9373 | |
| Download: ML17112A047 (3) | |
Text
1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Chawla, MaheshSent:Friday, April 21, 2017 3:59 PMTo:Davis, J.Michael (J.Michael.Davis@nexteraenergy.com)Cc:Catron, Steve (Steve.Catron@fpl.com); laura.swenzinski@nexteraenergy.com
Subject:
LIC-109 Acceptance of Duane Arnold Energy Center - Relief Request No. 4 - Alternative for Seal Weld Procedure Qualification - MF9373
Dear Mr. Davis:
By letter dated March 7, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17069A172), NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC (the licensee) submitted a relief request, as part of the Fifth Inservice Inspection Interval Program Plan for Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC). The proposed relief request would provide alternative for Seal Weld Procedure Qualification. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(z)(1) and 50.55a(z)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 110 hours0.00127 days <br />0.0306 hours <br />1.818783e-4 weeks <br />4.1855e-5 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 10 months, which is January 31, 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
If you have any questions, please contact me. Thanks Mahesh Chawla Project Manager Phone: 301-415-8371 2Fax: 301-415-1222 mahesh.chawla@nrc.gov
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3459 Mail Envelope Properties (Mahesh.Chawla@nrc.gov20170421155800)
Subject:
LIC-109 Acceptance of Duane Arnold Energy Center - Relief Request No. 4 - Alternative for Seal Weld Procedure Qualification - MF9373 Sent Date: 4/21/2017 3:58:52 PM Received Date: 4/21/2017 3:58:00 PM From: Chawla, Mahesh Created By: Mahesh.Chawla@nrc.gov Recipients: "Catron, Steve (Steve.Catron@fpl.com)" <Steve.Catron@fpl.com> Tracking Status: None "laura.swenzinski@nexteraenergy.com" <laura.swenzinski@nexteraenergy.com> Tracking Status: None "Davis, J.Michael (J.Michael.Davis@nexteraenergy.com)" <J.Michael.Davis@nexteraenergy.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3201 4/21/2017 3:58:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: