ML22005A086
| ML22005A086 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Duane Arnold  |
| Issue date: | 01/04/2022 |
| From: | Tilda Liu Storage and Transportation Licensing Branch |
| To: | Marlone Davis, Thomas Weaver Nextera Energy |
| T LIU NRC/NMSS/DFM/STLB 4049974730 | |
| References | |
| Download: ML22005A086 (2) | |
Text
From:
Liu, Tilda To:
Davis, J.Michael Cc:
Weaver, Tracy
Subject:
Supplement info for Duane Arnold Exemption Request Date:
Tuesday, January 04, 2022 1:43:00 PM Hi Mike,
A supplement to correct the information is needed as we will cite this information in the SER.
Tilda
From: Davis, J.Michael <J.Michael.Davis@nexteraenergy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2022 1:05 PM To: Liu, Tilda <Tilda.Liu@nrc.gov>
Cc: Weaver, Tracy <Tracy.Weaver@nexteraenergy.com>
Subject:
[External_Sender] RE: Status and Query - Duane Arnold Exemption Request
- Tilda,
Our vendor has reviewed the question you posed regarding weights on Page 5 and concurs that there was a mathematical error. The sentence should state as follows:
In addition, DAEC commits that at least two other fuel cells within the basket assembly adjacent to the FFC location will remain empty, to increase the available margin. This will further reduce the load on the basket assembly by about 1410 1,352 lb. resulting in a net reduction of about 3,150 3,092 lb. when combined with the lower maximum fuel assembly weight.
Can this be addressed in the SER or should we submit a supplement with the correction?
Mike
From: Liu, Tilda <Tilda.Liu@nrc.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 9:32 AM To: Davis, J.Michael <J.Michael.Davis@nexteraenergy.com>
Subject:
Status and Query - Duane Arnold Exemption Request
Hi Mike,
For the status update, the technical review on this exemption request is in good progress.
The technical staff noted that there appears to be an error on page 5 in the 3rd paragraph
of the request. Would the 1410 lb reduction be a 1352 lb reduction instead? The 1740 lb reduction, which was calculated in the 2nd paragraph, already accounted for all the fuel assemblies being reduced from 705 lb to 676 lb, including the two in paragraph 3. Hence, the 3rd paragraph calculation would be (2 x 676 lb = 1352 lb), not (2 x 705 lb = 1410 lb).
Let us know if a clarification call would be helpful to discuss the above. I can set a time up for this week.
Tilda Tilda Liu, Senior Project Manager Storage and Transportation Licensing Branch (STLB)
Division of Fuel Management (DFM)
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
- R-II l (404-997-4730 l Tilda.Liu@nrc.gov