ML20137U130: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:. _ . . . .
{{#Wiki_filter:._
LOUISI ANA P O W E R & LI G H T/ INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
LOUISI ANA P O W E R & LI G H T/ INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
          "$S:N$rsE u
"$S:N$rsE u
August 1, 1984 W3K84- 1755 Q-3-A35.02.01 TO: DISTRIB ?'IJ0 '
August 1, 1984 W3K84-1755 Q-3-A35.02.01 TO: DISTRIB ?'IJ0 '
t (
t (
FROM: W. M. Morgan Nuclear Operations Quality Assurance Manager
FROM:
W. M. Morgan Nuclear Operations Quality Assurance Manager


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Waterford SES Unit No. 3 Exit Interview Notes NRC Inspection Report 84-34 July 20, 1984 NRC                             Ebasco               LP&L J. T. Collins                   M. K. Yates         R. S. Leddick W. A. Crossman                 A. M. Cutrona       D. E. Dobson M. Peranich                     H. J. Kunis, Jr. N. S. Carns G. L. Constable                 P. L. Pittman       T. F. Gerrets T. A. Flippo                                         L. L. Bass K. A. Whittlesey                                     K. W. Cook R. P. Mullikin                                       R. G. Bennett R. G. Pittman J. Sleger, Jr.
Waterford SES Unit No. 3 Exit Interview Notes NRC Inspection Report 84-34 July 20, 1984 NRC Ebasco LP&L J. T. Collins M. K. Yates R. S. Leddick W. A. Crossman A. M. Cutrona D. E. Dobson M. Peranich H. J. Kunis, Jr.
P. V. Judd (NUS) l 8510020487 840801 PDR   ADOCK 05000382 E                 PDR
N. S. Carns G. L. Constable P. L. Pittman T. F. Gerrets T. A. Flippo L. L. Bass K. A. Whittlesey K. W. Cook R. P. Mullikin R. G. Bennett R. G. Pittman J. Sleger, Jr.
P. V. Judd (NUS) 8510020487 840801 PDR ADOCK 05000382 E
PDR


4 .
4.
1 i
1 i
'                                                                                            NRC EXIT INSPECTION NOTES
NRC EXIT INSPECTION NOTES Inspection 84-34 i
'                                                                                                  Inspection 84-34 i
l Mr. Collins, Regional Administrator, USNRC, opened the meeting and had all j
l Mr. Collins, Regional Administrator, USNRC, opened the meeting and had all j                                   participants identify themselves as to name, position and company. Following j                                     some brief discussion on agenda of the meeting, the meeting was turned over to j                                   Mr. Peranich, I&E, Bethesda.                                 Mr. Peranich gave a brief history of the Inquiry i                                   Team which was initiated to investigate the allegations brought forward in a
participants identify themselves as to name, position and company.
;                                    series of Gambit articles. The investigation centered around Quality Assurance activities during the construction of Waterford 3. The basis of the i                                   inspection was the information contained in LP&L letters of September 29, 1983
Following j
;                                    and February 20, 1984, to the Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement
some brief discussion on agenda of the meeting, the meeting was turned over to j
!                                    in response to I&E letter dated August 4, 1983.
Mr. Peranich, I&E, Bethesda.
l                                     Areas inspected included:
Mr. Peranich gave a brief history of the Inquiry i
t j                                                        o        Task Force Review performed by LP&L in response to NRC EA 82-109
Team which was initiated to investigate the allegations brought forward in a series of Gambit articles.
)                                                       o          Adequacy of LP&L QA program; LP&L didn't know whether its QA program i                                                                 was being implemented 1
The investigation centered around Quality Assurance activities during the construction of Waterford 3.
1
The basis of the i
!                                                      o          Adequacy of LP&L QA program; LP&L action on MAC recommendations o Common Basemat Leakage f
inspection was the information contained in LP&L letters of September 29, 1983 and February 20, 1984, to the Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement in response to I&E {{letter dated|date=August 4, 1983|text=letter dated August 4, 1983}}.
j                                                       o CE/LP&L Dispute on QA program i
l Areas inspected included:
t Task Force Review performed by LP&L in response to NRC EA 82-109 j
o
)
Adequacy of LP&L QA program; LP&L didn't know whether its QA program o
i was being implemented 1
1 Adequacy of LP&L QA program; LP&L action on MAC recommendations o
o Common Basemat Leakage f
j o CE/LP&L Dispute on QA program i
Mr. Peranich stated that this is Inspection Report 50-382/84-34 and contains eight (8) unresolved items, contained in Appendix C of the inspection report.
Mr. Peranich stated that this is Inspection Report 50-382/84-34 and contains eight (8) unresolved items, contained in Appendix C of the inspection report.
Discussion, for clarification, on the eight unresolved items followed. LP&L felt, in some instances, a clear understanding of the LP&L programs was j                                     lacking on the part of the inspectors.                                 It was decided that a followup
Discussion, for clarification, on the eight unresolved items followed.
LP&L felt, in some instances, a clear understanding of the LP&L programs was j
lacking on the part of the inspectors.
It was decided that a followup meeting, with fewer participants, would be held to clarify the specifies
^
^
meeting, with fewer participants, would be held to clarify the specifies within the inspection report.                                                                                             ;
within the inspection report.
1 1
1 1
f                                     Mr. Collins spoke on " Philosophy" changes that should be instituted by the i                                     industry.                             This discussion was primarily on the resolution of " root-cause" and
f Mr. Collins spoke on " Philosophy" changes that should be instituted by the i
.                                      how the utilities should pay particular attention to this issue as he is
industry.
)                                     instructing the Regional inspectors to evaluate issues closely for root cause.
This discussion was primarily on the resolution of " root-cause" and how the utilities should pay particular attention to this issue as he is
)
instructing the Regional inspectors to evaluate issues closely for root cause.
i i
i i
Mr. Collins stated that the proposed enforcement actions outlined in Appendix i                                     B of Inspection Report 84-34, will be considered jointly with the proposed                                               '
Mr. Collins stated that the proposed enforcement actions outlined in Appendix i
j                                      enforcement actions of other reports presently being evaluated by Region IV.
B of Inspection Report 84-34, will be considered jointly with the proposed j
enforcement actions of other reports presently being evaluated by Region IV.
i I
i I
l
l f
!                                                                                                                                                                l f


V TO: Distribution W3K84-Page 2 Mr. Leddick stated LP&L's impression of the " professionalism" exhibited by this inspection team and thanked Mr. Peranich for this attitude shown by his t ea:n.
V TO: Distribution W3K84-Page 2 Mr. Leddick stated LP&L's impression of the " professionalism" exhibited by this inspection team and thanked Mr. Peranich for this attitude shown by his t ea:n.
WMM:CNH:VER cc:       R. S. Leddick, T. F. Gerrets, N. S. Carns , J. Sleger, Jr. ,
WMM:CNH:VER cc:
R. P. Barkhurst, F. J. Drummond, J. Woods , D.. E. Dobson, K. W. Cook, L. L.' Bass, R. G. Pittman, R. G. Bennett, P. V. Judd (NUS), Project Files, Nuclear Records Ebasco - A. M. Cutrona, M. K. Yates, H. J. Kunis, Jr., P. L. Pittman NRC - J. T. Collins , W. A. Crossman, M. Peranich, G. L. Constable, T. A. Flippo, K. A. Whittlesey, R. P. Mullikin i
R. S. Leddick, T. F. Gerrets, N. S. Carns, J. Sleger, Jr.,
R. P. Barkhurst, F. J. Drummond, J. Woods, D.. E. Dobson, K. W. Cook, L. L.' Bass, R. G. Pittman, R. G. Bennett, P. V. Judd (NUS), Project Files, Nuclear Records Ebasco - A. M. Cutrona, M. K. Yates, H. J. Kunis, Jr., P. L. Pittman NRC - J. T. Collins, W. A. Crossman, M. Peranich, G. L. Constable, T. A. Flippo, K. A. Whittlesey, R. P. Mullikin i
i
i
            ,-,      . , . . . , , .    - , - - - , . _ _ , _ _ - _ , _ . , . . - . . . - , _ , _ . - - - _ . , . . . . . . _ . . . , , _ , ~ . , - . - _ , _ - _ . , . . . . _ - _ , , , , , -}}
-, - - -,. _ _, _ _ - _, _.,.. -... -, _, _. - - - _.,...... _...,, _, ~., -. - _, _ - _.,.... _ - _,,,,,
-}}

Latest revision as of 21:10, 11 December 2024

Forwards Exit Interview Notes from Insp Rept 50-382/84-34 on 840720
ML20137U130
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/01/1984
From: Morgan W
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Jay Collins, Crossman W, Peranich M
NRC
Shared Package
ML17198A272 List:
References
RTR-NUREG-0787, RTR-NUREG-787 W3K84-1755, NUDOCS 8510020487
Download: ML20137U130 (3)


Text

._

LOUISI ANA P O W E R & LI G H T/ INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

"$S:N$rsE u

August 1, 1984 W3K84-1755 Q-3-A35.02.01 TO: DISTRIB ?'IJ0 '

t (

FROM:

W. M. Morgan Nuclear Operations Quality Assurance Manager

SUBJECT:

Waterford SES Unit No. 3 Exit Interview Notes NRC Inspection Report 84-34 July 20, 1984 NRC Ebasco LP&L J. T. Collins M. K. Yates R. S. Leddick W. A. Crossman A. M. Cutrona D. E. Dobson M. Peranich H. J. Kunis, Jr.

N. S. Carns G. L. Constable P. L. Pittman T. F. Gerrets T. A. Flippo L. L. Bass K. A. Whittlesey K. W. Cook R. P. Mullikin R. G. Bennett R. G. Pittman J. Sleger, Jr.

P. V. Judd (NUS) 8510020487 840801 PDR ADOCK 05000382 E

PDR

4.

1 i

NRC EXIT INSPECTION NOTES Inspection 84-34 i

l Mr. Collins, Regional Administrator, USNRC, opened the meeting and had all j

participants identify themselves as to name, position and company.

Following j

some brief discussion on agenda of the meeting, the meeting was turned over to j

Mr. Peranich, I&E, Bethesda.

Mr. Peranich gave a brief history of the Inquiry i

Team which was initiated to investigate the allegations brought forward in a series of Gambit articles.

The investigation centered around Quality Assurance activities during the construction of Waterford 3.

The basis of the i

inspection was the information contained in LP&L letters of September 29, 1983 and February 20, 1984, to the Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement in response to I&E letter dated August 4, 1983.

l Areas inspected included:

t Task Force Review performed by LP&L in response to NRC EA 82-109 j

o

)

Adequacy of LP&L QA program; LP&L didn't know whether its QA program o

i was being implemented 1

1 Adequacy of LP&L QA program; LP&L action on MAC recommendations o

o Common Basemat Leakage f

j o CE/LP&L Dispute on QA program i

Mr. Peranich stated that this is Inspection Report 50-382/84-34 and contains eight (8) unresolved items, contained in Appendix C of the inspection report.

Discussion, for clarification, on the eight unresolved items followed.

LP&L felt, in some instances, a clear understanding of the LP&L programs was j

lacking on the part of the inspectors.

It was decided that a followup meeting, with fewer participants, would be held to clarify the specifies

^

within the inspection report.

1 1

f Mr. Collins spoke on " Philosophy" changes that should be instituted by the i

industry.

This discussion was primarily on the resolution of " root-cause" and how the utilities should pay particular attention to this issue as he is

)

instructing the Regional inspectors to evaluate issues closely for root cause.

i i

Mr. Collins stated that the proposed enforcement actions outlined in Appendix i

B of Inspection Report 84-34, will be considered jointly with the proposed j

enforcement actions of other reports presently being evaluated by Region IV.

i I

l f

V TO: Distribution W3K84-Page 2 Mr. Leddick stated LP&L's impression of the " professionalism" exhibited by this inspection team and thanked Mr. Peranich for this attitude shown by his t ea:n.

WMM:CNH:VER cc:

R. S. Leddick, T. F. Gerrets, N. S. Carns, J. Sleger, Jr.,

R. P. Barkhurst, F. J. Drummond, J. Woods, D.. E. Dobson, K. W. Cook, L. L.' Bass, R. G. Pittman, R. G. Bennett, P. V. Judd (NUS), Project Files, Nuclear Records Ebasco - A. M. Cutrona, M. K. Yates, H. J. Kunis, Jr., P. L. Pittman NRC - J. T. Collins, W. A. Crossman, M. Peranich, G. L. Constable, T. A. Flippo, K. A. Whittlesey, R. P. Mullikin i

i

-, - - -,. _ _, _ _ - _, _.,.. -... -, _, _. - - - _.,...... _...,, _, ~., -. - _, _ - _.,.... _ - _,,,,,

-