ML20217Q612: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 1 | | page count = 1 | ||
}} | }} | ||
See also: [[see also::IR 07100231/1998201]] | |||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
| Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
~ | ~ | ||
.- Mr. Richrrd E. Crmpbell | .- Mr. Richrrd E. Crmpbell | ||
: G:m;r:l Mrnrg:r, Qu lity Assurance April 3, 1998 Chem-Nuclear Systems I 140 Storieridge Drive ) | ' | ||
: G:m;r:l Mrnrg:r, Qu lity Assurance April 3, 1998 | |||
Chem-Nuclear Systems | |||
I 140 Storieridge Drive ) | |||
l Columbia, SC 20210 l | l Columbia, SC 20210 l | ||
! | |||
! | |||
NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 710231/98-201 AND NOTICE OF NONCONFORMANCE | SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 710231/98-201 AND NOTICE OF | ||
NONCONFORMANCE | |||
! Dear Mr. Campbell: | |||
This letter refers to your response, dated March 2,1998, concerning the Notice of | |||
This letter refers to your response, dated March 2,1998, concerning the Notice of Nonconformance issued with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspection Report 1 | Nonconformance issued with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspection Report | ||
No. 71-0231/98-201, dated February 4,1998. | 1 | ||
Conceming Nonconformances A, B, C.1, C.2, D, E, F, G, and H, the corrective actions which l have been, or will be, taken appear acceptable, and no additionalinformation is required at this time. | No. 71-0231/98-201, dated February 4,1998. | ||
, However, the staff requests further clarification of your response to Nonconformance C.3, l regarding Chem-Nuclear Systems' (CNS's) failure to present a nonconformance report (NCR) to the CNS Safety Review Board (SRB). The staff acknowledges that the nonconformance { | Conceming Nonconformances A, B, C.1, C.2, D, E, F, G, and H, the corrective actions which | ||
identified in the NCR did not meet your criteria for "10 CFR 21 applicable," requiring subsequent submittal to the SRB. Nonetheless, the staff remains concemed that an NCR identified (albeit incorrectly) as meeting the criteria for an SRB review did not appear on the agenda for the next SRB meeting. Please clarify the process of how an NCR identified as "10 CFR applicable" is transferred to the SRB from the individual who first completes the NCR form. | l have been, or will be, taken appear acceptable, and no additionalinformation is required at | ||
The information requested should be provided within 30 days from the date of this letter. | ! | ||
Sincerely, Original /s/ by: | this time. | ||
Susan F. Shankman, Acting Deputy Director Transportation Safety and Inspection Branch Spent Fuel Project Office Docket No. 71-0231 cc: R. E. Voit, President Chem-Nuclear Systems l | , However, the staff requests further clarification of your response to Nonconformance C.3, | ||
Distribution: g NRC F/C SFPO r/f NMSS r/f PUBLIC g\ | l regarding Chem-Nuclear Systems' (CNS's) failure to present a nonconformance report (NCR) | ||
CHaughney, SFPO GJackson, OCFO JLieberman, OE WReamer, OGC l | to the CNS Safety Review Board (SRB). The staff acknowledges that the nonconformance { | ||
ELeeds, SFPO FSturz, SFPO RChappell, SFPO FCostel;o, RI ; | ' | ||
JMadera, Rill l | identified in the NCR did not meet your criteria for "10 CFR 21 applicable," requiring | ||
CHosey, Ril TSIS Route Document: g:\710231.ltr BSpitzberg, RIV HStromberg, INEEL 0 | subsequent submittal to the SRB. Nonetheless, the staff remains concemed that an NCR | ||
g ! | identified (albeit incorrectly) as meeting the criteria for an SRB review did not appear on the | ||
OFC SFPO E SFJO E SFPO E SFROa , E NAME SMcDuke N'Connor $hfn~g' S nkman DATE 04k298 04/2/98 04/2/98 04N98 , | agenda for the next SRB meeting. Please clarify the process of how an NCR identified as | ||
C = COVER E = COVER & ENCLOSURE N = NO COPY l 9004130047 900303 CI O O r* n~r ~.,, | "10 CFR applicable" is transferred to the SRB from the individual who first completes the | ||
PR ADOCK 0710 1 I w a L mZ g L , h,JQ}f j}} | NCR form. | ||
The information requested should be provided within 30 days from the date of this letter. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
Original /s/ by: | |||
Susan F. Shankman, Acting Deputy Director | |||
Transportation Safety and Inspection Branch | |||
Spent Fuel Project Office | |||
Docket No. 71-0231 | |||
cc: R. E. Voit, President | |||
Chem-Nuclear Systems | |||
l | |||
, | |||
Distribution: g | |||
NRC F/C SFPO r/f NMSS r/f PUBLIC g\ | |||
CHaughney, SFPO GJackson, OCFO JLieberman, OE WReamer, OGC | |||
l | |||
ELeeds, SFPO FSturz, SFPO RChappell, SFPO FCostel;o, RI ; | |||
JMadera, Rill | |||
l | |||
' | |||
CHosey, Ril | |||
TSIS Route Document: g:\710231.ltr | |||
BSpitzberg, RIV HStromberg, INEEL | |||
0 | |||
g ! | |||
OFC SFPO E SFJO E SFPO E SFROa , E | |||
NAME SMcDuke N'Connor $hfn~g' S nkman | |||
DATE 04k298 04/2/98 04/2/98 04N98 , | |||
C = COVER E = COVER & ENCLOSURE N = NO COPY | |||
l 9004130047 900303 CI O O r* n~r ~.,, | |||
PR ADOCK 0710 1 I w a L mZ g L , h,JQ}f | |||
j | |||
}} | |||
Latest revision as of 01:23, 6 September 2023
| ML20217Q612 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07100231 |
| Issue date: | 04/03/1998 |
| From: | Shankman S NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| To: | Campbell R CHEM-NUCLEAR SYSTEMS, INC. |
| References | |
| 71-0231-98-201, 71-231-98-201, NUDOCS 9804130047 | |
| Download: ML20217Q612 (1) | |
See also: IR 07100231/1998201
Text
i 1
~
.- Mr. Richrrd E. Crmpbell
'
- G:m;r:l Mrnrg:r, Qu lity Assurance April 3, 1998
Chem-Nuclear Systems
I 140 Storieridge Drive )
l Columbia, SC 20210 l
!
!
SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 710231/98-201 AND NOTICE OF
NONCONFORMANCE
! Dear Mr. Campbell:
This letter refers to your response, dated March 2,1998, concerning the Notice of
Nonconformance issued with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspection Report
1
No. 71-0231/98-201, dated February 4,1998.
Conceming Nonconformances A, B, C.1, C.2, D, E, F, G, and H, the corrective actions which
l have been, or will be, taken appear acceptable, and no additionalinformation is required at
!
this time.
, However, the staff requests further clarification of your response to Nonconformance C.3,
l regarding Chem-Nuclear Systems' (CNS's) failure to present a nonconformance report (NCR)
to the CNS Safety Review Board (SRB). The staff acknowledges that the nonconformance {
'
identified in the NCR did not meet your criteria for "10 CFR 21 applicable," requiring
subsequent submittal to the SRB. Nonetheless, the staff remains concemed that an NCR
identified (albeit incorrectly) as meeting the criteria for an SRB review did not appear on the
agenda for the next SRB meeting. Please clarify the process of how an NCR identified as
"10 CFR applicable" is transferred to the SRB from the individual who first completes the
NCR form.
The information requested should be provided within 30 days from the date of this letter.
Sincerely,
Original /s/ by:
Susan F. Shankman, Acting Deputy Director
Transportation Safety and Inspection Branch
Spent Fuel Project Office
Docket No. 71-0231
cc: R. E. Voit, President
Chem-Nuclear Systems
l
,
Distribution: g
NRC F/C SFPO r/f NMSS r/f PUBLIC g\
CHaughney, SFPO GJackson, OCFO JLieberman, OE WReamer, OGC
l
ELeeds, SFPO FSturz, SFPO RChappell, SFPO FCostel;o, RI ;
JMadera, Rill
l
'
CHosey, Ril
TSIS Route Document: g:\710231.ltr
BSpitzberg, RIV HStromberg, INEEL
0
g !
OFC SFPO E SFJO E SFPO E SFROa , E
NAME SMcDuke N'Connor $hfn~g' S nkman
DATE 04k298 04/2/98 04/2/98 04N98 ,
C = COVER E = COVER & ENCLOSURE N = NO COPY
l 9004130047 900303 CI O O r* n~r ~.,,
PR ADOCK 0710 1 I w a L mZ g L , h,JQ}f
j