ML20151L053: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING, TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
| document type = OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING, TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
| project =  
| project = TAC:59360, TAC:59361, TAC:59362, TAC:59363, TAC:59364, TAC:59365
| stage = Request
| stage = Request
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 02:24, 11 December 2021

Application for Amend to License NPF-29,revising Tech Specs to Reflect Organizational Changes & Addition of Two Primary Containment Penetration Conductor Overcurrent Protection Circuit Breakers
ML20151L053
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/12/1985
From: Kingsley O
MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20129H620 List:
References
TAC-59360, TAC-59361, TAC-59362, TAC-59363, TAC-59364, TAC-59365, NUDOCS 8507190273
Download: ML20151L053 (3)


Text

-

(PrC M N@

  • - -~

59%(

, s'1342-BEFORE THE 573G3 N

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

{

LICENSE NO. NPF-29 w m-03 0WW DOCKET NO. 50-416 IN THE MATTER OF MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY and MIDDLE SOUTH ENERGY, INC.

and SOUTH MISSISSIPPI ELECTRIC POWER ASSOCIATION AFFIRMATION I, O. D. Kingsley, Jr., being duly sworn, stated that I am Vice President Nuclear Operations of Mississippi Power & Light Company; that on behalf of Mississippi Power & Light Company, Middle South Energy, Inc., and South Mississippi Electric Power Association I am authorized by Mississippi Power & Light Company to sign and file with the Nuclear Regv.latory Conunission, this application for amendment of the Operating License of the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station; that I signed this application as Vice President Nuclear' Operations of Mississippi Power & Light Company; and that the statements made and the matters set forth therein are true and correct to t best of my knowledge, information and belief.

g "O.'tK Kin {sl STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COUNTY OF HINDS SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me aF%ryfublic,inandforthe County and State above named, this M ay,of U d 4 1 , 1985.

[

(SEAL) ~

8587L90z75 39 -

"~ Notary d ^~' Public

~ - . _ _ _ _

My commission expires My Ccmmlut:n Dpires Sep. 21, 1987 J13AECM85070301 - 4

  • HEM 11TANCE ADvlCE casex oan 06/19/86~ooa US NUC REG C01E vasooa Nvusta 029958 catc= No. 06-0084

'7a,'!' ofoN'i 'o ['v*f.'C1 i oesca etio=

,v

'v'",'," omoss auouwt oiscouMT NET AMoVNT 06-2822 15 00 Ok1885 10CFR170 APPLICATION FEE l15000 l l

I 1 I I I 1 I l l I I

I i l

i I l l1 f I l I l l l

- I l

l  ! q 1 i I i l i i

, I i I

' 1 l I j

" l lll l

l 9 k l

I l l I

I i

I I 1

I I

l I

I v l I

l I

I I l l i

3 I

I g 8 I I  !

li li l I I i

i i i I I i

I i l i i I i 1

' I l i I I i l1 i l i

i i

i l I

l I

I I

I l

i l

i I

l I i i oEPOSIT GUAR ANTY N ATION AL BANK SaA43 Jenson Mississippi 39205 T g

MIDDLE SOUTH ENERGY, INC.

P.O. BOX 1640

  • J ACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205 cHten No.06-0084 NbE' JOINT CONSTRUCTION ACCOUNT C CK DA ,, g g , ,, ggy,,

06 19 85. $150iOO PAY r q

I U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY

"' COMMISSION e

20555

" * * ' WASHINGTON, DC

/

. i C v '" "'~ ~ ' a ' '

'~ - -

r00 509E 2ii' i:05 5 30 5t.3Ei: =* 2 3 = 5 9 5

  • 2 Gi' ,

4 b

f< .$R k]?iN}-

MM -

606

6. '(PS-85/03)

SUBJECT:

Technical Specification Figure 6.2.2-1, page 6-4 DISCUSSION: It is proposed to revise the subject figure to appoint two supervisors to the Unit Organization's Radiation Control function. The current Radiation Control Supervisor would be replaced by the Radiation Control Supervisor, Opere'. ions, and the Radiation Control Supervisor, Technical Support, and his current responsibilities would be divided between the two new supervisors appropriately. (It should be noted that the affected page 6-4 reflects a previously requested change transmitted on May 14, 1985 as MP&L serial AECH-85/0154.)

JUSTIFICATION: The Radiation Control Supervisor is currently responsible for all radiological activities in both the operational phase and the technical support phase of routine plant activities. The amount of responsibility associated with these activities is so great that a division of these responsibilities to two separate supervisors is justified and appropriate. The proposed Radiation Control Supervisor, Operations, will assume responsibility for the direct radiological support of plant maintenance and operations activities. The proposed Radiation Control Supervisor, Technical Support, vill assume responsibility for health physics technical support activities which include such areas as dosimetry, radwaste ALARA, emergency planning, respiratory protection, instrumentation and effluents.

While the Radiation Control Supervisor is responsible for the activities that monitor effluents, contamination and personnel exposure, he does not have line responsibility for operation of the unit. Therefore, this change is purely administrative in nature. The delineation of the indicated responsibilities to two supervisors instead of one vill allow more effective plant radiological support and increase the management program overview and station efficiency in radiological activities.

Therefore, this change is also conservative in nature.

SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATIONS:

, This change is purely administrative but conservative in nature in that it divides the responsibilities of a supervisory position between two equally qualified supervisors on the Unit Organization Chart. The individuals assigned to these positions will meet the qualification requirements specified in FSAR Section 13. While the lines of communication and responsibility are changed, the position was never one with line responsibility for operation of the plant, and the responsibilities of the position vill be retained by two equally qualified individuals instead of one. This change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated or create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from sny accident previously evaluated, nor does it involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.

Therefore, the proposed change involves no significant hazards considerations.

J13AECM85070301 - 5

- __