ML20236B357: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO VENDOR/MANUFACTURER, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO VENDOR/MANUFACTURER, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
| project =
| stage = Draft Approval
}}
}}


Line 184: Line 186:
propose meetings be set up between the NRC and your staff, where appropriate,                l to discuss these issues in order to resolve them. Expeditious resolution ~ of              1 the issues designated to be resolved.before the PDA is-issued.is critical _to i
propose meetings be set up between the NRC and your staff, where appropriate,                l to discuss these issues in order to resolve them. Expeditious resolution ~ of              1 the issues designated to be resolved.before the PDA is-issued.is critical _to i
the review schedule of the PDA application.
the review schedule of the PDA application.
Some issues have been designated as issues to be resolved on a plant-specific basis. In your ap)lication, Westinghouse defined the scope of the RESAR SP/90                i to be limited to tiose buildings, structures, systems, and components that are essential to the safe operation of the plant. E>y letter dated November 22, 1988,            ;
Some issues have been designated as issues to be resolved on a plant-specific basis. In your ap)lication, Westinghouse defined the scope of the RESAR SP/90                i to be limited to tiose buildings, structures, systems, and components that are essential to the safe operation of the plant. E>y {{letter dated|date=November 22, 1988|text=letter dated November 22, 1988}},            ;
we indicated that, should Westinghouse decide to pursue design certification    '
we indicated that, should Westinghouse decide to pursue design certification    '
of the RESAR SP/90 design, the application should be.for a design whose' scope              ;
of the RESAR SP/90 design, the application should be.for a design whose' scope              ;

Latest revision as of 10:26, 6 October 2021

Forwards Proprietary Draft SER Re Status of Review of Pda Application for RESAR SP/90.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
ML20236B357
Person / Time
Site: 05000601
Issue date: 03/09/1989
From: Chris Miller
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Johnson W
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP.
Shared Package
ML19302D714 List:
References
NUDOCS 8903210050
Download: ML20236B357 (4)


Text

-

1 ,

g ,

_!. u <

Q, g#p# REo .

g f'o, UNITED STATES

. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

$ $ WASHINGTON, D. C. 20655

(*****,[ March 9, 1989 i

Docket No. 50-601 .

.1 l

Mr.-W. E ' Johnson Nuclear Safety Department

. Westinghouse Electric Corporation ,

Water Reactor Division
.

Box 355 . ,

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania' 15230 0

>j

Dear Mr. Johnson:

I

SUBJECT:

DRAFT SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT REGARDING RESAR SP/90 As part of;our review of the PDAfapp11 cation for.RESAR SP/90,.the' staff is .

writing a Draft Safety Evaluation Report-(DSER)idiscussing the current status -  !

of the: review. Enclosedsis a copy of completed sections of this DSER,Lincluding: ,

the following subjectfareas:< f . J

-mechadi2al'eng[neering; i

- structural engineering' 4

- reactor systems

- plant systems +

c.

- fire' protection

~

- radiation protection A "f, p 1

- accident _ analysis b ? - . 't '

e ,

- human factors engineering) t

, e Basedon'thispreliminarkreview,,the'st'ffconcludis'thatthere'are.open a

issues that, because of. the stage of-the design,?may or may no_t be resolvable. l during the PDA stage of review. These issues are discussed:in detail throughout' the draft SER (see section 1.6 'of> the. report for a summary of issues). --We r*opose meetings be set ;up between' the NRC and your. staff, where, appropriate,-

i to-discuss these. issues:in order to resolve them. Expeditious resolution of~ ,

the issues designated to be resolved before the PDA is issued is critica11to the review schedule of the PDA application.

Some issues-have been designated as issues to be resolved'on a plant-specific-basis. .In your application, Westinghouse defined the ' scope ofJthe_ RESAR SP/90 to be limited to those_ buildings, structures, systems', and components:that are .y essential to the safe' operation of the plant. By, letter dated November- 22,:-1988,

.we indicated that, should Westinghouse decide,to pursue design certification:

-ofJthe RESAR SP/90 design, the application should be.for a" design whose" scope

.is~ essentially: complete and consistent with the proposed 10 CFR Part 52. .

.A Therefore, all issues.; designated throughout this DSER asl items'to be resolved on 'a plant-specific basis may be required to be addressed.at the FDA stage,; on. g a plent-specific basis,'or both. Certain' items may be~ required to be addressed..

using-enveloping parameters for-the site,:and then be addressed on a plant .-

-specific basis to show.how the actual site complies with the site envelope of the FDA. To. expedite issuance of this draft SER,_the technical ^ discussions  !

throughout'this documentf(except in. Chapter 1)-have;not been modified to k-sreflect-this position.

8903210050 890309  ;

L PDR ADOCK 05000601 ,

g4 A PNV y

.k(J

-v

. h Mr. W. J. Johnson '

March 9, 1989 This DSER represents the results of the staff's review of the-compliance of RESAR SP/90 with the Commission's current regulations. -Compliance with the-requirements resulting from the staff's review of severe accidents as promulgated in the proposed 10 CFR Part 52 will be discussed in future DSERs and in the final SER, and may result in^ modifications to the conclusions discussed in this draft document.. ,

Staff review of. the unresolved safety ' issues and generic safety issues .as they  :

apply to the RESAR SP/90 design will be completed upon receipt.of your update l to Module 2 of the RESAR SP/90 application. The DSER regarding the back-end portion of the PRA is under development and is expected to be issued shortly.

The.DSER has been written utilizing information that has been determined to be'  :

proprietary, and, therefore, .has'been withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790. We request you review the enclosure for information' that might be considered proprietary by your corporation, and notify 'the staff'of.

the results of your review within ten working days from the date of issuance i of this letter. The staff will withhold'this enclosure from public disclosure.

until this review period has expired at which time the staff will release the DSER to the NRC Public Document Room (PDR). If you have any questions f regardin I at (301)g492-1120.

this matter, please contact the Project Manager, Thomas J. Kenyon, i

Sincerely, -+

ch d nh m l l Charles L. Miller, Director : 4

! Standardization and Non-Power l Reactor Project Directorate l

Division of4 Reactor Projects III,-IV, l

V and Special Projects l Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. 1

Enclosure:

l As stated v cc: See next page l

l u_ _ b

v: , ,

Mr.,W.- J. Johnson March 9, 1989 This.DSER represents the results of the staff i s review of.the-compliance of RESAR SP/90 with the Commission's current regulations. ~ Compliance with the requirements resulting from the staff's review of severe accidents as promulgated ,

in the proposed 10 CFR Part 52 will be discussed in future DSERs and in the. '

final SER, and may result in modifications to the conclusions. discussed in this l . draft document.

Staff review of the-unresolved safety' issues and generic safety-issues as they apply to the RESAR SP/90 design will be completed upon receipt of your update to Module 2 of the RESAR SP/90 application. . The DSER regarding--the back-end .

portion of the PRA is under development and is expected to be issued shortly.- g l

The DSER has been written utilizing information that has been determined to be proprietary, and, therefore, has'.been withheld'from public disclosure pursuant

~

to 10 CFR 2.790. 'We' request you review the enclosure for. information that might be considered proprietary by your corporation, and ~ notify the, staff of the.results of your review within ten working days from the-date.of issuance of this letter.. The staff will withhold.this enclosure from public disclosure until.this review period has expired at which time.the staff will release the DSER to the HRC Public Document Room (PDR). .'If you have any questions -

regardin at (301)g492-1120.

this matter, please contact the Project Manager, Thomas J. Kenyon, Sincerely,  ;

/s/

Charles L. Miller, Director Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects'- III, IV, V and Special' Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

4 As stated

?

cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION:  ;

bigocket2F11et/, 'EJordan  ;

>%RC PDRs w/o enclosure "BGrimes . l PDSNP Reading

'GHola han..

ACRS(10)

"AThadani  %.V f. ,

EHy1 ton "JRichardson

. TKenyon . ?LShao

- "LRubenstein PHembree, OGC- ,

'SVarga lI l

  • See Previous Concurrerice I PDSNP* PDSNP* OGC* PDSNPCk, l EHylton . TKenyon:cw MHembree CMiller 01/11/89 01/10/89 01/17/89 03/C//89 ,

l j t

)

s,

., y a l

.- .l

. , , , . ..c. l

, +

.h

-Docket No. 50-601 , -1 ,

q RESAR-SP/90 - i q

cc: 3-l Trevor'Pratt " <

l- .Brookhaven'NationaliLaboratory' ,

.d' Building:1301 a .; .., ,

l. Upton, New York.111973 .'

q., s.

L Mr.-William Schivley . , ,

4 "$ '

Westinghouse' Electric Corporation,

~

~

]

'ECE-410.

Mail Stop 4 * '

L . Box 355- -' E'-

q Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania -15230 J .. c s . ,

1;j y

, A

'l  :

l

  • q l

l l

a -

iD-l

.i t J . -

nt I i.

'3-'

)

'.'s..

1

y-3 i Af 4 KE0g Do g UNITED STATES . l 8~' o NUCLEAR REGtRATORY COMMISSION k- (  ;$ WASHINGTON, D. C. 20656 kg...../ March 9, 1989

)

Dbeket No. 50-601- l Mr. W. J. Johnson Nuclear Safety Department Westinghouse Electric Corporation Water Reactor Division Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 "

Dear Mr. Johnson:

SUBJECT:

- DRAFT SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT REGARDING RESAR SP/90 j As part of our review of the PDA application for RESAR SP/90, the staffxis

  • writing a Draft Safety Evaluation Report (DSER) discussing the current status of the review. Enclosed-is a copy of completed sections of this DSER, including the following subject areas:

I

- mechanical engineering

- structural engineering

- reactor systems l

- plant systems ,

- fire protection ,

- radiation protection

- accident analysis

- human factors engineering Based on this preliminary review, the staff. concludes,that there are open ,

issues that, because of the stage of-the design, may or may not be resolvable  ;

during the PDA stage of review. These issues are discussed in detail throughout the draft SER (see section 1.6 of the report for a summary of issues). We -

propose meetings be set up between the NRC and your staff, where appropriate, l to discuss these issues in order to resolve them. Expeditious resolution ~ of 1 the issues designated to be resolved.before the PDA is-issued.is critical _to i

the review schedule of the PDA application.

Some issues have been designated as issues to be resolved on a plant-specific basis. In your ap)lication, Westinghouse defined the scope of the RESAR SP/90 i to be limited to tiose buildings, structures, systems, and components that are essential to the safe operation of the plant. E>y letter dated November 22, 1988,  ;

we indicated that, should Westinghouse decide to pursue design certification '

of the RESAR SP/90 design, the application should be.for a design whose' scope  ;

is essentially complete and consistent with the proposed 10 CFR Part 52. '

. Therefore, all issues' designated-throughout this DSER as items to be resolved on a plant-specific basis may be required to be addressed at the FDA. stage, on a plant-specific basis, or both. Certain items may be required to be~ addressed 1 using enveloping parameters for the site, and then be addressed on a plant- l specific basis to show how the actual site complies with the site envelope of j the FDA. To expedite' issuance of this draft SER, the technical discussions throughout-this document (except in Chapter 1) have not been modified to l reflect this position. i m) ., ,,1 >+ _ ,

O 1

n Q'w Mr. W. J. Johnson March 9, 1989 l

This DSER represents the results of the staff's review of_the compliance of I RESAR SP/90 with the Comission's current regulations. Compliance with the requirements resulting from the staff's review of severe accidents'as promulgated  !

in the proposed 10 CFR Part 52 will be discussed in future DSERs and in the f hal SER, and may result _in modifications to the conclusions discussed in this ,

drift document.

Staff review of the unresolved safety issues and 9jneric safety issues as they.

apply to the RESAR SP/90 design will be completed upon receipt of your update to Module 2 of the RESAR SP/90 application. The DSER regarding the'back-end portion of the PRA is under development and is expected to be issued shortly.

'The DSER has been written utilizing information that has been determined to be ,

proprietary, and, therefore, has been withheld from public disclosure pursuant '

j to 10 CFR 2.790. We request you review the enclosure for information that j might be considered proprietary by your corporation, and notify the staff of I the results of your review within ten working days from the date of issuance of this letter. The staff will withhold.this enclosure from public disclosure ,

until this review seriod has expired at which time the staff will release-the  !

DSER to the NRC Pu)lic Document Room (PDR). If you have any questions ,

regardin at (301)g492-1120.

this matter, please contact the Project Manager, Thomas J. Kenyon,.

]

Sincerely, d a ;[. m E Charles L. Miller, Director  ;

Standardization and Non-Power .i Reactor Project Directorate-  !

Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, i V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulttion

Enclosure:

As stated ,

4 cc: See next page l

l l

. .. s '

\

Docket No. 50-601 's RESAR-SP/90 cc: ,

q-Trevor Pratt -

Brookha"en National Laboratory ,

, s Building 130 Upton, New York 11973 Mr. William Schivley '

Westinghouse'e. Electric Corporation +

ECE-410 Mail Stop 4-08 Box 355 '

li I

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 s i

l t

l D

1

, s I l

I s

)

, ~]

I

\

l l *

, l '

t.

\

t i

s.

k.

5 1

s k

i

.w