ML20235J814: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adams | |||
| number = ML20235J814 | |||
| issue date = 03/25/1986 | |||
| title = NRC Briefing Entitled, Nuclear Employee Data Sys (Neds) | |||
| author name = | |||
| author affiliation = NRC | |||
| addressee name = | |||
| addressee affiliation = | |||
| docket = | |||
| license number = | |||
| contact person = | |||
| case reference number = FOIA-87-249 | |||
| document report number = NUDOCS 8707160009 | |||
| package number = ML20235J809 | |||
| document type = ARCHIVE RECORDS, PHOTOGRAPHS & SLIDES | |||
| page count = 11 | |||
}} | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:M E | |||
T S | |||
Y S | |||
A T g 6 A - | |||
n 8 | |||
D i f 9 1 | |||
E S) e , | |||
E D i | |||
r 5 Y E B 2 O N h L ( C c P R r | |||
a M N M | |||
.E - | |||
R A | |||
E . | |||
L C | |||
U N | |||
andse! | |||
m* | |||
mt !es ? | |||
Dy % y9 5 | |||
t II i .' | |||
d NEDS EMPLOYEE SYSTEM PRESENTATION i | |||
: 1. HISTORY TASK FORCE PILOT UTILITY GROUP SUBCOMMITTEES | |||
) | |||
l | |||
: 2. OBJECTIVES CONCEPT OF OPERAT10N INFORMATION | |||
: 3. SECURITY ) | |||
ADVANTAGES ELEENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA | |||
: 4. QUALITY ASSURANCE / AUDITS l PARTICIPANT INTER-UTIL ITY NON-EDS PARTICIPANT | |||
: 5. IMPLEMENTATION | |||
: 6. QUEST 10N AND ANSWER I | |||
I | |||
. ~ | |||
S E | |||
Y V | |||
'l I h I T E O L A Y C h | |||
I P | |||
I L T l h I | |||
* 1 | |||
" A A 1' A G A U b G E L R - | |||
I h G E S A U S I R l L E E D G O k U S D k L P O S O I E A | |||
O P R C | |||
i E E A h I'I I T k L 'I' T O - | |||
I l T R h O A I E D T 1 | |||
' h C E M C'I A L h E G L S P A L R O J A A D O l 0 O | |||
. T C II O N E E L l k P O R A 1 h E h I | |||
* R L G P h V O h O I h E C O C N P l D | |||
O k C I S E T D E A | |||
E I G | |||
Y 2 h S' L S h T I | |||
h A h C l I A A C T I h R T G I L S l U | |||
- D A Y A C A H - E E H R E - | |||
D G - N h P | |||
'I S E T - | |||
E h - - - . | |||
Y E - - | |||
O M - | |||
L P - | |||
P O - S M L L E E E A V V h I k E h O 'I A D O I A E I | |||
'l I L ) l A 'h C S A E Z E U D l | |||
' C I S A E h H h E A E 0 A H | |||
( F | |||
: d. G P - | |||
M t | |||
L K k E E O h l' S | |||
*1 h A _ | |||
S I I Y _ | |||
S S S D E E V - | |||
h I - | |||
L T - | |||
Y A A I | |||
* h " l _ | |||
I O h - | |||
L I E 1 G S 1 E E U h k P | |||
E k | |||
NEDS OBJECTIVES 0 TO ESTABLISH A COMPUTER BASED INFORMT10N SYSTEM THAT WILL PROVIDE TRANSIENT WORKER IN-PROCESSING INFORmTION FOR UNESCORTED ACCESS TO NUCLEAR POWER FACILITIES BY: EXPEDITING INPROCESSING OF TRANSlENT WORKERS MINIMlZING IMPACT OF CHANGE AND CURRENT l OPERATIONS EFFECTING SIGNIFICANT COST SAVINGS ., | |||
\ | |||
9 i | |||
I l | |||
i | |||
a E | |||
C N | |||
A R | |||
A E G L N C I N | |||
D I N Y A, A R R G O T N N Y T I O R S N N I O I O I D | |||
T T I I S I A _ | |||
E A S N T R _ | |||
R C I I | |||
E O C T I I I R I E U F U T T E . | |||
Q I S S A O E E T S O N R Y _ | |||
S R N E P I P O _ | |||
D E C X M L _ | |||
A E D C E A Y P _ | |||
N T I A X R N _ | |||
A N E O E _ | |||
D L Y O T _ | |||
A T I L A L _ | |||
S N I T A R A _ | |||
O O R A C I R _ | |||
E S U I I P E _ | |||
N R C D D S N - | |||
E E A E E E _ | |||
P S R M R G | |||
ii> | |||
e e S | |||
E T | |||
N E | |||
M R E I Y C U T R O I O E L F R I B K . | |||
Y F A R T O E O T I C W N R N A E U O R F M C I T O E E T G S A N Y A Z O T N I I I A D T L M R A I A M B D D R A R N O I O A F L C T N E E S I R R | |||
N T O h I E T M N A S O T S I Y U E T _ | |||
S R Y P S A _ | |||
T O R Y E E S V N T O R C R A R E S T O I E M I S T V D L S . | |||
E l | |||
l I l | |||
S R N A B L l I E A C O E T l l S I N N R G L G E O L Y E O A N N I A R T L U I Y T N A C 0 N N O A I T A l i I E L C M I R C T E P U I L A Y N R M D R I l i S O C E E C M C P C S | |||
9 O | |||
SCREENING EVALUATION CRITERIA OMISSION / FALSIFICATION OF INFORMATION USE OR POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED / | |||
DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES PERTINENT CRIMINAL HISTORY MENTAL ILLNESS / EMOTIONAL INSTABILITY EVIDENCE OF COERCION. ADVERSE INFLUENCEIPRESSURE OTHER DEROGATORY RELIABILITY OR TRUSTWORTHINESS INFORMATION NEGATIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT EACH UTILITY REQUIRED TO MAKE INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION | |||
r l | |||
QUALITY ASSURANCE / AUDITS l | |||
NEDS PARTICIPANTS AUDITS 0 PERFORED ANNUALLY BY EACH NEDS PARTICIPANTS l 0 VERIFY COMPLl ANCE WITH NEDS STANDARDS AND l | |||
PROCEDURES 0 CHECH_lSTS NEDS INTER-UTILITY AUDIT 0 PERFORNED BY AUDIT TEANS CONSISTING OF PROGRAM MANAGER AND UTILITY REPRESENTATIVES 0 ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A PARTICIPANT'S l | |||
NEDS QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM O CHECH_lSTS NON-NEDS AUDITS O VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH NEDS STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES j O PERFORMED BY UTILITY PERSONNEL ! | |||
0 AT LEAST EVERY THREE YEARS O SHARED EFFORTS AND RESULTS , | |||
1 i | |||
R IMPLEMENTATION O AT TIE OF IMPLEMENTATION, NEDS PARTlCIPANTS WILL: | |||
- EXCHANGE ON_Y DATA WHICH WETS OR EXCEEDS NEDS STANDARDS 0 NEDS STANDARDS WET OR EXCEED ANSI 18.17 I | |||
l O EXCHANGE OF INFORMAT10N CURRENTLY ALLOWED IN MDST NEDS UTILITIES BASED ON W ETING ANSI 18.17 THEREFORE: | |||
0 50.54(P) PLAN CHANGES WILL BE MINIWL 0 NEDS CAN BE ABSORBED INTO EXlSTING PROGRAMS GENERALLY O | |||
PREVIOUS 50.54(P) SUBMITTALS WILL BE WITHDRAWN | |||
R 1 | |||
FUTURE REGULATIONS 1 | |||
l l | |||
l 0 NEDS STANDARDS WILL BE CHANGED TO EET FUTURE RULES OR GUIDELINES 1 | |||
j l | |||
l i | |||
h l | |||
) | |||
i}} |
Latest revision as of 09:41, 5 August 2021
ML20235J814 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 03/25/1986 |
From: | NRC |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML20235J809 | List: |
References | |
FOIA-87-249 NUDOCS 8707160009 | |
Download: ML20235J814 (11) | |
Text
M E
T S
Y S
A T g 6 A -
n 8
D i f 9 1
E S) e ,
E D i
r 5 Y E B 2 O N h L ( C c P R r
a M N M
.E -
R A
E .
L C
U N
andse!
m*
mt !es ?
Dy % y9 5
t II i .'
d NEDS EMPLOYEE SYSTEM PRESENTATION i
- 1. HISTORY TASK FORCE PILOT UTILITY GROUP SUBCOMMITTEES
)
l
- 2. OBJECTIVES CONCEPT OF OPERAT10N INFORMATION
- 3. SECURITY )
ADVANTAGES ELEENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA
- 4. QUALITY ASSURANCE / AUDITS l PARTICIPANT INTER-UTIL ITY NON-EDS PARTICIPANT
- 5. IMPLEMENTATION
- 6. QUEST 10N AND ANSWER I
I
. ~
S E
Y V
'l I h I T E O L A Y C h
I P
I L T l h I
- 1
" A A 1' A G A U b G E L R -
I h G E S A U S I R l L E E D G O k U S D k L P O S O I E A
O P R C
i E E A h I'I I T k L 'I' T O -
I l T R h O A I E D T 1
' h C E M C'I A L h E G L S P A L R O J A A D O l 0 O
. T C II O N E E L l k P O R A 1 h E h I
- R L G P h V O h O I h E C O C N P l D
O k C I S E T D E A
E I G
Y 2 h S' L S h T I
h A h C l I A A C T I h R T G I L S l U
- D A Y A C A H - E E H R E -
D G - N h P
'I S E T -
E h - - - .
Y E - -
O M -
L P -
P O - S M L L E E E A V V h I k E h O 'I A D O I A E I
'l I L ) l A 'h C S A E Z E U D l
' C I S A E h H h E A E 0 A H
( F
- d. G P -
M t
L K k E E O h l' S
- 1 h A _
S I I Y _
S S S D E E V -
h I -
L T -
Y A A I
- h " l _
I O h -
L I E 1 G S 1 E E U h k P
E k
NEDS OBJECTIVES 0 TO ESTABLISH A COMPUTER BASED INFORMT10N SYSTEM THAT WILL PROVIDE TRANSIENT WORKER IN-PROCESSING INFORmTION FOR UNESCORTED ACCESS TO NUCLEAR POWER FACILITIES BY: EXPEDITING INPROCESSING OF TRANSlENT WORKERS MINIMlZING IMPACT OF CHANGE AND CURRENT l OPERATIONS EFFECTING SIGNIFICANT COST SAVINGS .,
\
9 i
I l
i
a E
C N
A R
A E G L N C I N
D I N Y A, A R R G O T N N Y T I O R S N N I O I O I D
T T I I S I A _
E A S N T R _
R C I I
E O C T I I I R I E U F U T T E .
Q I S S A O E E T S O N R Y _
S R N E P I P O _
D E C X M L _
A E D C E A Y P _
N T I A X R N _
A N E O E _
D L Y O T _
A T I L A L _
S N I T A R A _
O O R A C I R _
E S U I I P E _
N R C D D S N -
E E A E E E _
P S R M R G
ii>
e e S
E T
N E
M R E I Y C U T R O I O E L F R I B K .
Y F A R T O E O T I C W N R N A E U O R F M C I T O E E T G S A N Y A Z O T N I I I A D T L M R A I A M B D D R A R N O I O A F L C T N E E S I R R
N T O h I E T M N A S O T S I Y U E T _
S R Y P S A _
T O R Y E E S V N T O R C R A R E S T O I E M I S T V D L S .
E l
l I l
S R N A B L l I E A C O E T l l S I N N R G L G E O L Y E O A N N I A R T L U I Y T N A C 0 N N O A I T A l i I E L C M I R C T E P U I L A Y N R M D R I l i S O C E E C M C P C S
9 O
SCREENING EVALUATION CRITERIA OMISSION / FALSIFICATION OF INFORMATION USE OR POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED /
DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES PERTINENT CRIMINAL HISTORY MENTAL ILLNESS / EMOTIONAL INSTABILITY EVIDENCE OF COERCION. ADVERSE INFLUENCEIPRESSURE OTHER DEROGATORY RELIABILITY OR TRUSTWORTHINESS INFORMATION NEGATIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT EACH UTILITY REQUIRED TO MAKE INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION
r l
QUALITY ASSURANCE / AUDITS l
NEDS PARTICIPANTS AUDITS 0 PERFORED ANNUALLY BY EACH NEDS PARTICIPANTS l 0 VERIFY COMPLl ANCE WITH NEDS STANDARDS AND l
PROCEDURES 0 CHECH_lSTS NEDS INTER-UTILITY AUDIT 0 PERFORNED BY AUDIT TEANS CONSISTING OF PROGRAM MANAGER AND UTILITY REPRESENTATIVES 0 ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A PARTICIPANT'S l
NEDS QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM O CHECH_lSTS NON-NEDS AUDITS O VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH NEDS STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES j O PERFORMED BY UTILITY PERSONNEL !
0 AT LEAST EVERY THREE YEARS O SHARED EFFORTS AND RESULTS ,
1 i
R IMPLEMENTATION O AT TIE OF IMPLEMENTATION, NEDS PARTlCIPANTS WILL:
- EXCHANGE ON_Y DATA WHICH WETS OR EXCEEDS NEDS STANDARDS 0 NEDS STANDARDS WET OR EXCEED ANSI 18.17 I
l O EXCHANGE OF INFORMAT10N CURRENTLY ALLOWED IN MDST NEDS UTILITIES BASED ON W ETING ANSI 18.17 THEREFORE:
0 50.54(P) PLAN CHANGES WILL BE MINIWL 0 NEDS CAN BE ABSORBED INTO EXlSTING PROGRAMS GENERALLY O
PREVIOUS 50.54(P) SUBMITTALS WILL BE WITHDRAWN
R 1
FUTURE REGULATIONS 1
l l
l 0 NEDS STANDARDS WILL BE CHANGED TO EET FUTURE RULES OR GUIDELINES 1
j l
l i
h l
)
i