IA-87-759, Annotated Slides of NRC 870909 Briefing on Pipe Replacement Project

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Annotated Slides of NRC 870909 Briefing on Pipe Replacement Project
ML20236X006
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/09/1987
From:
NRC
To:
Shared Package
ML20236X002 List:
References
FOIA-87-759 NUDOCS 8712080365
Download: ML20236X006 (37)


Text

, .. , - . e. y. - mawwarauw

'; 0 N-.. ..

?3AC' 30":'0Y f.?0Y C ?0ERi S'.'A'.'10K X '.' 3

??3 33?.'AC3Y3N'.' ?30;3C'.'

m, hfc q 3::s

/  %

C 0 g

m 4t- . _

y

= gr , 4#b ...:..._ -

m m

. e P i  :

b/

e I

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF BRIEFING g, g. fy. 7f7

@"@$$'[$a'. SEPTEMBER 9,1987

-. s----__.---a-_w.----. . _ _ - - -._-__..--A.__---_---_a__ ._-----_-__---a---- - - _ - - - _ . - _ _ . _ - - ---________.__--_-_--.a__---------_--_.----__------____--___-______..__-------__--.-.n_ _--.__

n.

?3A?S Uf' 3 ?:?3 E3: ACE: M ' ?30J3CT TODAY'S MEETING PURPOSB TO PROVIDE INFORMATION TO THE NRC STAFF CONCERNING TECHNICAL ISSUES ADDRESSED DURING THE PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECT AT PEACH BOTTOM- ATOMIC POWER STATION UNIT 3 s

~ ,

m. .-

1 s

e

.y .

'BA?S UNL" 3 ?IPE REPUCPMEN" PRO." CT .

PlFOSE TO REPLACE-OR CLAD EX!SW.: lGSCC. SUSCEP~. :' E.

MATER'ALS (304SSL 2flD ALLO':' ' 82) m.t '

6 L s ( ; ks .?>[ .h k Ln>

k A

,w . , p .

,s,c.-

gy., . - . . .

RE4SO/h

40 0F 132-WELDS "lERE CRA.CKED-

  • Li.. FED SAFE T.] L!FE -

e ' . 0 t ed

  • . . - A.CT OF CC '~~:FJED F' .;_ EMS UNAC:T F .. _1

' ~

.st a- C :* * % ).s ' ("s V s c a/- Aln/1/w .

c e.g_., r.. , . 6 e #

  • 1 .

l r .-

l__1____._.___ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ , _

g PBAPS UNIT 3 PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECT S

AGEhTA TOP!C PRESENT0R PROJECT 0'ERVEN TONY BAZZAN!

DECONTAMINATION.

MARK MILLER ENGINEERING FRAT!K COOK L

i___-_________. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

k 4

?3A?S "10' 3 ?Zs E3MC3k3r ?30;3C" A33 ROAC ~~0 3ROJ EC- l UTILIZE AVAILABLE TIME TO MAXIMlZE ADVANCE PLANNING

-* MINIMlZE FUTURE RISK 1

  • INCORPORATE LATEST TECHNOLOGY UTILIZE LESSONS LEARNED FROM UNIT 2 AND OTHER
  • CONTINGENCY PLANNING i

ADDRESS EVOLVING REGULATORY POSITIONS

{

wse- amm

___-____m___.._ -. _---_..-__ ____m_ __-.___ _____mu

7 3 .

.)

L .

P3APS UNIT 3 ?IPE 33:3:AC3M3N" :330J3C" J; i

JECOUTAM'NK~l0X i

-*- DECONTA!.!!NAT!0N REAGENT QUALIFICATION

e. DECOMTAM: NATION REAGENT SELECTION
  • liATER!ALS REV.EW
  • DECONTAM! NATION FLOW PATH SELECTION

,2 _.

- . )

S .T P R N O GAL

.N CEP /

U W NN0 .

_ S5D PAR

_ A BtOl. O T _

P C

(

C E _

J _

O _ V R _ I DR P _

_ RN

.G GE N

T N _ EJ

.O N O _

CR EP E I _

L E

M T _

E A _

C Z T N _

A I E S R

R L N D E T R E

T G

N

~ A E

P A I S -R C E _

N E A )

S E C L

E G E L PJO

.N N U J N E 8 O N R R R I O G RROCI E J .

P . R N _ EPD A C O - G _

W . (

OV A

. E --

E N CE P E _ PR E

J P

  • a x P T I S

I C V _

P E _

- 3 J _

R)S O _

GL T N A R

_ NEI .

T P _

A LJE

.R S T S E

I POT N N L R A A O TE N RPW E

I T

L J H A U _

WN8 OG .

U S

A C E

I PIS N JBS

_ SE O , * *

  • S _ - D(ED C P _

A _

B _

P _

_ N O R R

_ IN TO G EI

. _ CIN L USE L8 RI I A I VJ 1 B SIO 5 NDR N C O P I C

'[ i. ji

! .t ! .

~

k u J

s 4

, l L

PBAPS UNITL3 PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECT-- ) ,

I

)

DECONTAMINATION .0 ORGANIZATION c:

I I

l PECO MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DMSION: i POWER PLANT SERVICES SECTION - LEAD RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER - MARK MILLER PROJECT ADVISORS:

J. A. J0NES APPLIED RESEARCH COMPANY DECONTAMINATION VENDOR:

PACIFIC NUCLEAR SERVICES, INC.

CONSULTANT:

i UNITED KINGDOM CENTRAL ELECTRICITY GENERATING BOARD

__.u__________. _ _ - . _ , _m _ ._ _ -

N T m J

- - C E

J O ' "s R "

r P o o

- " \ t X

x_

- k E

E 5 )

L L

E W

Y C R D

A y N E R D L U RT S I

P [ i E NI t

mR E  ;

(

R 3 [ .g .

P I

P [

m 3

T [ "A I "

X S r

o n

U R E

S I

[ L I

R S  :- $

3 t k M

3

~

U C

W R

m w) L T L c E u W s ;Y R

D Y E L D r I S

R, ru H

, s (t 1 .: i

I A Tt AQ

" RK EE

, j C M ET CA

,lJ E EE RH J -

0 M M ,

O .

^

3 -

P P -

3 C

S E

E j N O

C .'

d I T

A 3 , j ,\J

  • A

_ N 3: r,

-(

I M

A E

T

_ N

- - = .

O E

L C 3 3 4 4 E

_ D I '

3 . \

U R .

3 ^

E C E G v N W T

1 T

A t R I

  • Ad RX N

EE N

U .

ET CA EE RM S

  • s P *p A w B

3 i . i

k

. . 4

~ ~

.PBAPS URT 3 ?IPE 3EPLACEMENT PROJECT DECONTAM;NATiOM REAGE;E QU.E'J CATION PEACH BOTTOM UN!i 3 P!PE SA!,iPLES, 304SS

  • "A" LOOP SUCT!0M 4" BL!!!D FLA':GE
  • 1" PLUG-SAMPLE FRO:.! REC:RCUI'!O': P:P!NG e- REAGENTS ,
  • - LOMI-NP-LO!f! @ 90*C
  • LOMI-AP-LO!A @ 90*C
  • CANDECON-AP-CANDECON @ 90*C
  • CANDEC0!! @ 120*C
  • PNS C!TROX-AP-CITROX @ 90*C 1

= . . __

PBAPS U' NIT 3 PIPE . REPLACEMENT PROJECT-DECONTAMINATION REAGENT QUAUFICATION t

  • RESULTS '

HIGH CHROMlUM/ ZINC 0XIDE INDICATED THE NEED FOR

~

PRE-0XIDATION STEP

-i ALL REAGENTS REMOVED AT LEAST 75% OF ACTMTY ON SAMPLES EXTREMELY LOW AND ACCEPTABLE CORROSION ON ALL OF; -

i THE SAMPLES

___-m.m- . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ . _ _ . -

yq4 l

.N.; c1.

?3PS UN"'? :3L :31PE'RIPIAC: BIEN'.' :330JEC'? t

{

f DECONTAM!NAT!0N1 REAGENT SEl.ECT!01 lu

,i 1

q e

  • l010- .AP-La%' SELECTEn d 7 3
  • COMPAT!BLE WTH0!/EUED MATER:ALS; (PER GE/EPR:: TEST PROGRAM)

H'GH ACTMlY RE!.'0\'AL (80 - 90.".)

l SHORTEST APPL! CATION TIME-(ABOUT HALF THAT 07 OTHER COMMERClA!.LY AVAILAB.'.E SOLVE!C

  • EXTENS!VE SUCCESSFUL PLANT EXPERENCE-

. 4 3

(MONT! CELLO, DRESDEN 2 & 3,-QUAD CIT!ES 1 & 2, OYSTER CREEK) l l

_-___m_m._ __________...m__.

_ _ _ ___._.______.m.

_ __ _a

F ; -__ :.' (!_t _ .Q'

') :

+ :,, . ,

,,i, L j',y L '., '

bt

j} ,
4 t ..; t.*

' f :P3A?S4UN:" 3 ?IPEEPIAC3 MEN'l PROJECT

+ .

.. I' ,

- Kb '.-g.c i

.n

(..

^i(

',n *

). ! . Q T*' A /"\- f"i 6i!l' - - -- . '!

t.'T 7 L.i.,.1, i . '.

1 l..6

  • wA T' .4.

.\..

s i '.' 'm.I' I .. -i s l

i

.. .. .. ..:e s .. o

..i:.- .

.N*[,.,p,.,.w%il'*T^

,m, '

'?

p Ae. . y .

  • . CO U.. . .D.A.~...". "".T. a".

.. ..' r'. .", c'r D U,1.1.A.

. , . . , m , .'..'.'mS -

r

  • LR. .Gr '"f DR'i e 6S7 PR. .OGP4. ....) .

.(o. .. j 1. t i a

.- ;j

  • - H GH ACP.17Y RU.'.0i'.u. -(80' - 905) J x a h

... q

  • S.r.,0R, _S.!.  ;. PPL,.C.m. .,.!0n .s u.t.k. (.,30.vi.- . .- u., y o~ o,

- v

0. ~n:U n i , s.u. VUr!.u,cpV,r.

.. e

.l . .

p:t..m.ncc

... D..._ ._ ..

,.0 c) 1

  • EXTE!,'S!',1~ SUCCESSFU!. PL4!T EXP..R.. ..I
  • .(L'.0NT!C..'.LO, r DRESDEN 2 '& 3, QUAD . ~ .

s 1 & .', '

OYSTER CREEK)

. .- 6 o -

. , a

1 w '

PBAPS; UNIT 3 PIPE' REPLACEMENT PROJECT GE COMPONENT MATER!AL REVIEW 0F LOMI-NP-LOMI

  • Ai1 WETTED SURFACES REV!EWED:'
  • PUMPS- 4

.i VALVES'

  • RWCU HEAT EXCHANGERS l

CONCLUS!0N:

i l

  • NO DELETERIOUS EFFECTS RESULTING FROM L

EXPOSURE TO LOMi-MP-LOMI ARE EXPECTED j l

1 l

_ _ l

e- .

g.

y w.< yo

+ +

.~ 4. PBAPS UNIT!3 PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECT

)

m u

(, VESSELiiNTERNAL MATERIAL REVIEW-g -

IEFFECTSf 0F LOMI-NP-LOMI LONl VESSEL INTE

'* LOMI, EVEN WITHOUT. DILUTION, DEMONSTRATED NOT-TO HAVE DELETERIOUS EFFECTS ON- ANY. VESSEL-INTERNAL l MATERIAL-

  • NP, EVEN WITHOUT DILUTION, DEMONSTRATED NOT 1T0;HAVE DELETERIOUS EFFECTS-ON ANY VESSEL INTERNAL MATERIAL EXCEPT SA-508 LOW ALLOY STEEL (VESSEL N0ZZLES)

INSUFFICIENT TEST DATA'TO CONCLUDE EFFECTS - ON . SA-508 e

.NP NOT TO BE PERFORMED ON 28" RECIRC n- -

SUCTION PlPING WHERE CONTACT WlTH l SA-508 POSSIBLE 1

1

.l l

+ c

. l l ,

    • I , , , 1 1

,'l!i1 I l ' ,

' '  ; ' 1 t

'l

-, E M -

, A E _

0 R 5

c .

, 8 1

1 s

1 1 M

~ _

1 8 V _

_ T 1

m 1

Tf R a

_ 2

, , ( M R

4 m, ,.

~

._ Tt 2

o r

, i g >f

.(y/7/[

j

, ' - /

/- - - - - y' i n

i N

>dI OA

~

T 1

' l , N e ' . I r

,Y M

\

4 R

I T5 "A C

' a g .

A T

_, i

$ T, e N .

', } $ V oL

  • O My, p A
  • _ CV
  • r C .

E riI fr,

//, / // J X // ,hyh/ ' /y _

D M

Y E

- p , M R

L rU rC UW T

S

, i 1

] -

U T

f.

R '

SR RD HN Y

S

-

  • pA

% t R

J

_ N D

O

]

- L

- j

/ ' . I T

re1

  • - "4 2

"8 2

A I

{ s U

$ gJ/'s', ,',R / .

u C RI

., Y C r'@

E xg,,MU L

J i R

i*l

~

/ - F hu C

~

T 2

R

~

^ I s

~-

T i L

~

f /N S

E j , ,; , '

~ C Z

Z //// jy/ #' X //

7: 9 N

"3 1 2 M

l

1

?3A?S UX" 3 ?:?3 33?MC3Bf ?30;3C'.'

-)

'N

  1. %\'%

SPRAY' WAND.

- _ ~

n

, q. I ky .

]

=i NO22LE

(

. l 4 .

} \

12" EISER #.

h w -__- - _ _

. , j

, e '= ~

e==== emma.

)

__1 ---- j - - -

, 1

-l l

~'.g.

INLY RISER SPRAY WAND INSTALLATION DETAIL i

w e s -- +,um-w-.6

_____.m.__._ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . - - - - - _ - - - - -

?3X3S X.L3 :3::P3 R3P:ACEMEN'.' :3R0;EC'.'

'mi

.i JEC0bEAMINAT'ON US;hG SPRAY WANJS-i.

  • '/ERY, LOW RISK FOR GETTING REAGENT INT 01 VESSEL e- LEVEL CONTROL LESS CR!Tl CAL THAN FOR

" FILL AND DRA!N" METHOD e APPUCAT!0N T!ME APPROX!MATELY HALFtTHAT OF

" FILL AND DRA!N" METHOD

/?

l

_ _ - _ _ _ - _ = _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _

- - ----- - ---------- - =

2 ...

+

'I

-- i 4

P PBAPS UNIT 13 PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECT i

DECONTAMINATION

SUMMARY

r i

  • - EXPERIENCED ORGANIZATION i
  • PLAN TO USE LOMI-NP-LOMI WITH SPRAY WANDS
*~ CONSERVATIVE APPLICATION METHOD NO DELETERIOUS EFFECTS ON WETTED ' SURFACES / M
o.
  • NP NOT TO BE PERFORMED ON' SUCTION PIPING
  • EXPECT AN AVERAGE OVERALL SYSTEM CONTACT DF 0F 7.0 WHICH WILL SAVE SIGNIFICANT MAN-REM

. q I',

?3A?STUT.' 3 ?:?3 33?MC3NM.' ?30;3C'.' '

i s.

7 .

BG NEalhG SCOPE:0F REPLACEMJT DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS CODES AND STANDARDS NON-DESTRUCTIVE EXAM!NAT!0N

^

PRESERV!CE TESTING 10 CFR 50.59 EVALUATION TECHN! CAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES RESTORATION lij-VESSEL IN-SERVICE INSPECTION

___m_____ _ _ . _ - - _m-__. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = _ _ _ - _ _ _ . - - _ _ _ - _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ __.____._-..__.____________m.m__._____ _ _ - _ _ _ _ __ _ . - _ _ _ _ - __ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___

'4-

i>

33APS .UE' L3 :31P3 3E: 3MCEET PROJECT l c' ll 3 SCOP'E107 E3 AC E E s-~

m,

. r L * . REC!RC PIPING LOOPS A & B

  • RPV DRAIN REROUTE AND SHIELDING

~

'* REPLACE MIRROR WITH FIBERGLASS Bl.ANKET INSULATION l

l 1

i

?3A?S X? 3 ?3 33?MC3Y3N'? ?R0;3CT i

REJSD COV 30VEN~~S I

r P!PE' SUPPORT HARDWARE l

l RECIRCULATION PUMPS AND VALVES 1

  • RHR VALVES RWCU CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVES l

l j,

h

q x

?3A?S UN7.'4 ?:?3 R3?:14CEMEN" :?R0;3C" t DE_ET ONS.

e

  • RHR HEAD.. SPRAY SYSTEM-L.

l REClRCULAT!ON PUMP FLOW SPUTTERS-e '

J CROSS tie VALVES

  • A!B PIPE WHIP RESTRAINTS l.

l u

?3A?S X" 3 ??3 33?AC3NEN" ?30;3C"  ;

J S Gt MROV_g1TS ,

  • SEAMLESS 316 NG PIPING
  • REMOVE / CLAD ALLOY 182 BUTTER ]1
  • USE OF BENT PlPE ELIMINATES 42 WELDS
  • IMPROVED CONTROL OF WELD HEAT INPUT l l

1

'>

  • ELECTROPOLISHING AND PRE 0XlDATION 1

I L

  • REPLACEMENT OF WELDED ATTACHMENTS

. 1

  • RWCU.PlPING REDESIGNED TO REDUCE PUMP LOADS
  • RPV DRAIN REDESIGNED TO REDUCE RADIATION LEVELS I

t ll

L .

. - PBAPS UNIT 3 PIPE RE?lACEMENT PROJECT REDUCED WELDS-

% *O6

) B E -

. ..... 5 ,, Aff

, .h o k, .

m Q e.,- -

.' o .....

.........:: Qe; .......

g g ,

rm

. D M

-t wo L a b i

i l

I

= - __.

l

. PBAPS UNIT 3 PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECT CODES AND STAN)ARDS e RECIRC, RHR, CORE SPRAY AND RWCU INSIDE CONTAINMENT-

. DESIGNED, FABRICATED, AND INSTALLED TO

. ASME SECTION lli SUBSECTION NB RPV DRAIN AND RWCU PlPlNG OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT DESIGNED TO ANSI B31.1

~

FABRICATED AND INSTALLED TO ASME SECTION 111. NB AND ND RESPECTIVELY

  • . PIPE SUPPORTS

. NEW - ASME SECTION lil SUBSECTION NF

. REUSED - ANSI B31.1 e' -CONTAINMENT PENETRATIONS ASME SECTION lll SUBSECTION NB & NE n.-.--n_. _---- .-__ - - - _ . - .

h L

?3A?S UT.' 3 ?I?3 :13?:lC3N3N" ?:10J3C'.'

N0;\-JES RUC VE .EXAMA"ON

  • WELDS PER ASME Ill 80 EDITION W81 ADDENDA
  • ASME XI PSI PER 80 EDITION W81 ADDENDA AS DEFINED BY PBAPS SECOND INTERVAL ISI PROGRAM USING IGSCC ACCEPTED TECHNIQUES AND EPRI QUALIFIED INSPECTORS ALLOY 182/82 BUTTER UT UTILlZING REFRACTED L-WAV I

1

____.c______m-.m- _ - _ - _ - - W

L PBAPS UNIT 3 PIPE-REPLACEMENT PROJECT PRESERV!CE TESTING i

  • RPV DRAIN, RECIRC, RHR AND RWCU INSIDE DRYWELL-OUTLTO THE OUTER C.I. VALVES WILL BE HYDR 0 TESTED WITH THE.

REACTOR VESSEL PER. ASME XI .

o R'NCU OUTSIDE DRYWELL HYDR 0 TESTED SEPARATELY PE CONTA:NMENT ILRT TO TEST NEW PENETRATIONS

~

PBAPS UNIT 3. PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECT l

10 CFR 50.59 O!ALUAT!0N ARBliRARY INTERMEDIATE BREAX (A!B) DELEil0N NRC GENER!C LETTER DAED 6/19/87 ALLOWED EUM!NAT 0F AIB RULES FOR OPERAT!NG PLANTS 1

RHR AND CORE SPRAY STRAlNERS NRC GENER!CALLY APPROVED !"SULA!!0N RG 1.82 TRANSPORT ANALYS:S LARGER STRAINER FLOW AREA FLOW SPLrITERS PURPOSE WAS TO REDUCE PUM? !NLET SWIRL GE AND BYRON JACKSON PERFORMED TESTS A.ND ANALYS!

WH CH VERIF!D ACCEPTABL7Y OF DELET!0N UNTT 2 OPERAT!0N CONFIRMS ANALYSIS

o - .

.' (N j - 2 . .. . .

PBAPS UNIT.3 PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECT 1 4

l-_

10LCFR 50.59 EVALUATION (CONTD.' .

1 BI-STABLE' FLOW - .

-(IEB'86-110) - EXACT CAUSE UNKNOWN BUT SEEMS TO B CAUSED BY HIGH AP IN HEADER TEES COMPARED T0.

TOTAL LOOP AP

.* GE HA3 REVlBED PBAPS AND CONCLUDED PBAPS AP RATIO IS SMALL AND IS ACCEPTABLE-

  • UTTLE DIFFERENCE FROM UN!T 2-FINAL VERIFICATION DURING PRE-0P TESTING y

l

= HYDRAUUC ANALYS!S Ti T l GE ANALYZED AND CONCLUDED THE CHANGES FROM UNIT 2- ARE VERY SMALL AND THERE WILL BE NEGUGIBLE FLOW DISTRIBUTION CHANGES

.x .

PBAPS UNIT.31 PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECT a

v ,  !

J0. CFR 50.59 Ei'Al UATION. (CONTD. . .) 1 i

HEAD SPRAY i

y{

j

  • - NO CREDIT TAKEN IN UFSAR FOR. SAFETY FUNCTION. a

' LORIGlNAL PURPOSE IS ONLY:TO REDUCE HEAD

[ ,

. COOL DOWN TIME.

  • - N0:!MPACT ON HEAD VENT li ,
  • DELEED BY. OTHER PLANTS CROSS TlE
  • NO CREDIT TAKEN FOR ECCS OPERATION
  • EQUAL FLOW DISTR!BUT!0N FROM ONE LOOP UNNECESSARY l

1

  • CURRENTLY LOCKED CLOSED L

l l;

I = = _ _ _ __=__- . - - _ -

w i

r

7. . ... 1 ..

y bh -'- .,

_c ,

PBAPSLUNIT:3 PIPE? REPLACEMENT PRO

(

n . TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGESL

,

  • SEC. 4.6.E.2 - CROSS TIE VALVES
  • ?

TABLEL4.2

-DELETE HEAD! SPRAY LOGIC FUNCTION T 4

  • ' TABLE 3.7.1

- DELETE HEAD. SPRAY ISOLATION VALVES

& 3.7.4

. l 1

1 1

n

-1 L i L

p

_---___zu-___------..1--------__ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----^------------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - -

r; .

I. :; .. .

PBAPS UNIT 3 PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECT-RESTORATION

  • MAIN ATTEMPT IS TO REINSTALL IN ORIGINAL CONFIGURATION
  • CHANGES WILL BE EVALUATED ON CASE BY CASE BASIS
  • ' ALL MODS WILL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME XI 1:

L_ >

m

PBAPSLUNIT:31PIPELREPLACEMENT PROJECT -

J -

ENGINEERING

SUMMARY

~*

1 MATERIAL; UPGRADE FOR RECIRC, RHR, RWCU, & RPV DRAIN!

SAFE END. REPLACEMENT & BUTTER INSPECTION 7

ASME Ill 80 EDITION WINTER 81 ADDENDA

  • ~

. DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS

  • EXPERIENCED PERSONNEL UTILIZATION OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE l>

L

  • - 'l COMPREHENSIVE IN-VESSEL INSPECTION PROGRAM l1 r .

.a

n ,

p ..,

p

+

p n- LPBAPS UNIT 3 PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECT L

IN-VESSEL INSPECTIONS (CONTD. . .)

y INSPECTION. MITIGATION

-COMPONENT PLAN PLAN' JET PUMP SENSING'UNES

. DAMAGE REPAIR N/A- -. REPAIR

. VlBRATION RESONANCE TEST - CLAMPS'AS REQUIRED SHROUD HEAD BOLTS N/A - REPLACE JET PUMP HOLD DOWN N/A - REPLACE-L "Il BEAMS DRY TUBES VISUAL - REPLACE AS REQUIRED STEAM DRYER VISUAL - REPAlR AS REQUIRED CONTROL BLADES VISUAL - BUFFER MAINTENANCE

- MODIFIED BLADES

y, 7 ~, L N i .' % ' .;'

m k l,._

"U' j - ,

l

};;e..

1

. PBAPS UNIT 3 PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECT-1 IN-VESSE!. !NSPECTIONS.

i 1' INSPECTION MmGATION

. COMPONENT PLAN __

PLAN ACCESS HOLE COVER UT- - - 00hTNGENCY CLAM?~

, - HWC.

\;.

TOPLGU!DE - lH -- REPATR AS' REQUIRED

r. ;I.

7 4

' CORE SPRAY SPARGER V!SUAL - CONT!NGENCY CLAMP '

CORE' SPRAY lhT.RNAL MSUAL - C0hTNGENCY MATERIA'.

P!?E

'l -

\ \

w & 4,*.e,*ce.

.e- ,

==.s- 4e, e,in-