ML20247A462: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20247A462
| number = ML20247A462
| issue date = 08/02/1988
| issue date = 08/02/1988
| title = Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 3 Posed in 880614 Ltr
| title = Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 3 Posed in
| author name = Zech L
| author name = Zech L
| author affiliation = NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
| author affiliation = NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = SHARP-880802, NUDOCS 8903290126
| document report number = SHARP-880802, NUDOCS 8903290126
| title reference date = 06-14-1988
| package number = ML20247A310
| package number = ML20247A310
| document type = CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENCE (QUESTIONS & ANSWERS), TEXT-BIBLIOGRAPHIC & CATALOGS & INDEXES
| document type = CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENCE (QUESTIONS & ANSWERS), TEXT-BIBLIOGRAPHIC & CATALOGS & INDEXES

Latest revision as of 19:21, 16 March 2021

Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 3 Posed in
ML20247A462
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 08/02/1988
From: Zech L
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Sharp P
HOUSE OF REP., ENERGY & COMMERCE
Shared Package
ML20247A310 List:
References
SHARP-880802, NUDOCS 8903290126
Download: ML20247A462 (1)


Text

- - - - _ - - - - - _ _ .

','O.. , l I

i CUESTION'(3) Docs the NPC plan any remedial or enforcement action as a. ,

result of your findings on these allegations?

i I

At!SWER j

As identifiea in the enclosures to Question (0)(b), the NRC has cited the litersee for several violations as a result of our findings from review of the 1

allegations. Pany of the concerns are still being inspected by the Regional <

staff or investigated by 01. One issue concerning alleged employment dis-criminaticn resulted in the convening of an Enforcement Peard to consider enforcement action. The Board concluded that additional information was needed and requested that en inspector perform additional inspection. As a result of the additional informatir.n obtained, the case vas referred to 01 for e detailed investigation (see Enclosure (3)-1_through -5).

Other preliminary findings of inspections conducted concerning still-open allegations have indicated that some violations may be issued.as identified in i

the status section of Enclosure (2)(b)-3a, and Documents 34a through 34e).

Review for enforcement actions of ongoing 01 investigations have not been performed. These cases will be reviewed as soon as the investigations are completed and the repcrts are issued.

On July 7, 1988 OI issued a report covering the allegations concerning the  ;

manager alleged to have been unfit for duty. That report is currently being reviewed by cur enforcement staff to determine whether any regulatory action is appropriate based on the report's findings.

e903290126 080802 PDR COMPEL NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR

< _ . - _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ - -__-