|
---|
Category:CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENCE (QUESTIONS & ANSWERS)
MONTHYEARML20247A6321988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 6(c) Posed in ML20247A5961988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 6(b) Posed in ML20247A5781988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 6(a) Posed in ML20247A5631988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 5(d) Posed in ML20247A5431988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Questions 5(a)-(c) Posed in ML20247A5051988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 4 Posed in ML20247A4621988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 3 Posed in ML20247A4521988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 2(b) Posed in ML20247A4341988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 2(a) Posed in ML20247A3601988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 1(e) Posed in ML20247A3521988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 1(d) Posed in ML20247A3471988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 1(c) Posed in ML20247A3261988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 1(b) Posed in ML20247A3131988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 1(a) Posed in ML20246Q3451988-07-0606 July 1988 Zech Response to Gejdenson Subcommittee on General Oversight & Investigation Question 1,per 880613 Request 1988-08-02
[Table view] Category:TEXT-BIBLIOGRAPHIC & CATALOGS & INDEXES
MONTHYEARML20247A3131988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 1(a) Posed in ML20247A3261988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 1(b) Posed in ML20247A6321988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 6(c) Posed in ML20247A5961988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 6(b) Posed in ML20247A5781988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 6(a) Posed in ML20247A5631988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 5(d) Posed in ML20247A5431988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Questions 5(a)-(c) Posed in ML20247A5051988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 4 Posed in ML20247A4621988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 3 Posed in ML20247A4521988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 2(b) Posed in ML20247A4341988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 2(a) Posed in ML20247A3601988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 1(e) Posed in ML20247A3521988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 1(d) Posed in ML20247A3471988-08-0202 August 1988 Zech Response to Sharp Subcommittee on Energy & Commerce Question 1(c) Posed in ML20246Q3451988-07-0606 July 1988 Zech Response to Gejdenson Subcommittee on General Oversight & Investigation Question 1,per 880613 Request ML20129E4131985-07-26026 July 1985 Computer Listing of Data Trend Table ML20129E1011985-06-0909 June 1985 Computer Listing Entitled Subcooling Data ML20129D4171985-05-14014 May 1985 Computer Listing of Test & Procedure Index 1988-08-02
[Table view] |
Text
',
[.
CL'ESTION M if td When and why did the NRC decide to refer the allegation ,
l to the utility for investigation? '
ANSWER As noted ir the answer to Question (1)(a), the NRC received information on January 7,1987, that the plant manager may have been in the control room on l
December 31, 1906, shortly after drinking alcohol and ma.y have been a disrup-tion tc the control room activities. The NRC treated this information as an allegation and referred the matter to the licensee for investigation in a letter # rom the Pegional Administrator, James G. Keppler, to the President of Toledo Edison Company on January 29, 1987 (Document No. 1-6 of Enclosure (1)(d)-2).
This matter was referred to the licensee because it was judged initially not ,
I to involve a regulatory violation, but may have involved actions contrary to the licensee's fitness-for-duty policies, and because, at that time, an 01 l investigation of the matter was not planned. This matter was handled in '
1 accordance with NRC and Region III policies and procedu6s. Furthermore,-NRC Manual Chapter 0517 (Draft - 9/19/84 (Enclosure (1)(b)-1)), Appendix 1, I
Part VI.1.i. and NRC Region III Procedure 0517A, (Enclosure'(1)(b)-4)
Appendix A, Part II, encourage the utilization of licensee resources to address allegations'sub,iect to the review and evaluation of the NRC if certain' conditions are met.
Ii 8903290098 800802 [ I PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR L-_-___-_________-_-
}
CL'EST10h (1 } (td (Cont . ) I Region 1:: Procedure 0518 (Enclosure (1)(b)-2), Part 3.a, indicates that investigation of matters involving the fitness for duty of licensee employees should be tne responsibility of licensee management (Enclosure (1)(b)-2).
Also see Enclosure (1)(b)-3 for additional information ccncerning the policies and proceaures for handlirig allegations and release of information to licer, sees.
.l i
l 1
i l
l
\
l l
E_________________ _ J