ML11251A002: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML11251A002 | | number = ML11251A002 | ||
| issue date = 09/26/2011 | | issue date = 09/26/2011 | ||
| title = | | title = Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure by Letters Dated June 30, 2011, and July 11, 2011 | ||
| author name = Thompson J | | author name = Thompson J | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1 | ||
| addressee name = Morris J | | addressee name = Morris J | ||
| addressee affiliation = Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC | | addressee affiliation = Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC | ||
| docket = 05000413, 05000414 | | docket = 05000413, 05000414 | ||
| license number = NPF-035, NPF-052 | | license number = NPF-035, NPF-052 | ||
| contact person = Thompson J | | contact person = Thompson J, NRR/DORL/LPL2-1, 415-1119 | ||
| case reference number = TAC ME6670, TAC ME6671 | | case reference number = TAC ME6670, TAC ME6671 | ||
| document type = Letter | | document type = Letter | ||
| page count = 4 | | page count = 4 | ||
| project = TAC:ME6670, TAC:ME6671 | | project = TAC:ME6670, TAC:ME6671 | ||
| stage = Withholding Request | | stage = Withholding Request Acceptance | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555*0001 September 26, 2011 Mr. J. R. Morris Site Vice President Catawba Nuclear Station Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4800 Concord Road York, SC 29745 CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE BY LETTER DATED JUNE 30, 2011 (TAC NOS. ME6670 AND ME6671) | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555*0001 September 26, 2011 Mr. J. R. Morris Site Vice President Catawba Nuclear Station Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4800 Concord Road York, SC 29745 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE BY LETTER DATED JUNE 30, 2011 (TAC NOS. ME6670 AND ME6671) | |||
==Dear Mr. Morris:== | ==Dear Mr. Morris:== | ||
By letter dated June 30, 2011, you enclosed a letter from Westinghouse Electric Company (Westinghouse) dated June 6, 2011, which enclosed an affidavit dated June 6, 2011, executed by J. A. Gresham, Westinghouse, requesting that the information contained in the following document be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2, Section 2.390: WCAP-17330-P, Revision 1, "H*: Resolution of NRC [Nuclear Regulatory Commission] | |||
Technical Issue Regarding Tubesheet Bore Eccentricity (Model F/Model D5)" (Proprietary) | By letter dated June 30, 2011, you enclosed a letter from Westinghouse Electric Company (Westinghouse) dated June 6, 2011, which enclosed an affidavit dated June 6, 2011, executed by J. A. Gresham, Westinghouse, requesting that the information contained in the following document be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2, Section 2.390: | ||
The affidavit stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons: The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse. The information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public. Westinghouse has a rational basis for determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence. | WCAP-17330-P, Revision 1, "H*: Resolution of NRC [Nuclear Regulatory Commission] | ||
The application of that system and the substance of that system constitutes Westinghouse policy and provides the rational basis required. | Technical Issue Regarding Tubesheet Bore Eccentricity (Model F/Model D5)" | ||
Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or potential competitive advantage, as follows: (a) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies. | (Proprietary) | ||
J. Morris -(b) It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved marketability. (c) Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product. (d) It reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers. (e) It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse. (f) It contains patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable. | The affidavit stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons: | ||
(i) The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse. | |||
(ii) The information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public. Westinghouse has a rational basis for determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence. The application of that system and the substance of that system constitutes Westinghouse policy and provides the rational basis required. | |||
Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or potential competitive advantage, as follows: | |||
(a) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies. | |||
J. Morris - 2 (b) It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved marketability. | |||
(c) Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product. | |||
(d) It reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers. | |||
(e) It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse. | |||
(f) It contains patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable. | |||
We have reviewed your application and the material in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and, on the basis of the statements in the affidavit, have determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains proprietary commercial information and should be withheld from public disclosure. | We have reviewed your application and the material in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and, on the basis of the statements in the affidavit, have determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains proprietary commercial information and should be withheld from public disclosure. | ||
Therefore, the version of the document "WCAP-17330-P, Revision 1, 'H*: Resolution of NRC Technical Issue Regarding Tubesheet Bore Eccentricity (Model F/Model D5), (Proprietary)," marked as proprietary, will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. | Therefore, the version of the document "WCAP-17330-P, Revision 1, 'H*: Resolution of NRC Technical Issue Regarding Tubesheet Bore Eccentricity (Model F/Model D5), (Proprietary)," | ||
If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information. | marked as proprietary, will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. | ||
If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. | Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information. | ||
In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure. | If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure. | ||
J. -3 If you have any questions, please call me at 301-415-1119. | |||
Sincerely, Jon Thompson, Project Plant Licensing | J. Morris -3 If you have any questions, please call me at 301-415-1119. | ||
Sincerely, Jon Thompson, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 cc: Mr. J. A. Gresham, Manager Regulatory Compliance Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, Suite 428 1000 Westinghouse Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 Additional Distribution via Listserv | |||
ML11251A002 OFFICE NRR/LPL2-1/PM NRR/LPL2-1/LA NRR/LPL2-1/BC NRR/LPL2-1/PM NAME JThompson MO'Brien GKulesa JThompson DATE 09/19/11 09/19/11 09/23/11 09/26/11}} |
Latest revision as of 21:27, 20 March 2020
ML11251A002 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Catawba |
Issue date: | 09/26/2011 |
From: | Jacqueline Thompson Plant Licensing Branch II |
To: | Morris J Duke Energy Carolinas |
Thompson J, NRR/DORL/LPL2-1, 415-1119 | |
References | |
TAC ME6670, TAC ME6671 | |
Download: ML11251A002 (4) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555*0001 September 26, 2011 Mr. J. R. Morris Site Vice President Catawba Nuclear Station Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4800 Concord Road York, SC 29745
SUBJECT:
CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE BY LETTER DATED JUNE 30, 2011 (TAC NOS. ME6670 AND ME6671)
Dear Mr. Morris:
By letter dated June 30, 2011, you enclosed a letter from Westinghouse Electric Company (Westinghouse) dated June 6, 2011, which enclosed an affidavit dated June 6, 2011, executed by J. A. Gresham, Westinghouse, requesting that the information contained in the following document be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2, Section 2.390:
WCAP-17330-P, Revision 1, "H*: Resolution of NRC [Nuclear Regulatory Commission]
Technical Issue Regarding Tubesheet Bore Eccentricity (Model F/Model D5)"
(Proprietary)
The affidavit stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons:
(i) The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse.
(ii) The information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public. Westinghouse has a rational basis for determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence. The application of that system and the substance of that system constitutes Westinghouse policy and provides the rational basis required.
Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or potential competitive advantage, as follows:
(a) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies.
J. Morris - 2 (b) It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved marketability.
(c) Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.
(d) It reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers.
(e) It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse.
(f) It contains patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable.
We have reviewed your application and the material in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and, on the basis of the statements in the affidavit, have determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains proprietary commercial information and should be withheld from public disclosure.
Therefore, the version of the document "WCAP-17330-P, Revision 1, 'H*: Resolution of NRC Technical Issue Regarding Tubesheet Bore Eccentricity (Model F/Model D5), (Proprietary),"
marked as proprietary, will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information.
If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.
J. Morris -3 If you have any questions, please call me at 301-415-1119.
Sincerely, Jon Thompson, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 cc: Mr. J. A. Gresham, Manager Regulatory Compliance Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, Suite 428 1000 Westinghouse Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 Additional Distribution via Listserv
ML11251A002 OFFICE NRR/LPL2-1/PM NRR/LPL2-1/LA NRR/LPL2-1/BC NRR/LPL2-1/PM NAME JThompson MO'Brien GKulesa JThompson DATE 09/19/11 09/19/11 09/23/11 09/26/11