ML063560378

Notification of National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Renewal

ML063560378
Person / Time
Site:	Watts Bar
Issue date:	12/19/2006
From:	James Smith Tennessee Valley Authority
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML063560378 (129)

Text

Tennessee Valley Authority, Post Office Box 2000, Spring City, Tennessee 37381-2000 DEC 1 9 ?000 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Gentlemen:

In the Matter of the ) Docket No. 50-390 Tennessee Valley Authority )

WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT (WBN) UNIT 1 - NOTIFICATION OF NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT RENEWAL The purpose of this letter is to notify NRC that an application for renewal of NPDES Permit Number TN0020168 was released to the State of Tennessee on May 3, 2006. Section 3.2, "Reporting Requirements for Changes to, and Renewal of, the NPDES Permit or State Certification," of Appendix B, "Environmental Protection Plan," to facility operating license NPF-90, requires that NRC be notified at the time the renewal application is made.

TVA acknowledges the delay in this notification and is addressing this issue in WBN's Corrective Action Program.

There are no regulatory commitments associated with this submittal. If there are any questions about this letter, please contact me at (423) 365-1824.

Sincerely, J. D. Smith Manager, Site Licensing and Industry Affairs (Acting)

Enclosure cc: See Page 2 '17 "

Prnoted on recycled paper

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 DEC 1 9 2006 Enclosure cc (w/o Enclosure):

NRC Resident Inspector Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 1260 Nuclear Plant Road Spring City, Tennessee 37381 Mr. D. V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MS O8G9a One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth St., SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Enclosure NPDES Permit Number TN0020168 Renewal Application Dated May 3, 2006

Tennessee Valley Authority, Post Office 2000, Spring City, Tennessee 37381-2000 Mike Skaggs Site Vice President, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant May 3, 2006 Dr. Richard Urban, PhD Division of Water Pollution Control Chattanooga Field Office Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation State Office Building, Suite 550 540 McCallie Avenue Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402

Dear Dr. Urban:

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (TVA) - WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT (WBN) -

NPDES PERMIT NO. TN0020168 - RENEWAL APPLICATION Enclosed are a signed original and a copy of the NPDES permit renewal application packet consisting of EPA Form 1, site map, Form 2C, Form 2C addendum, flow schematic, Form 2E, and a permit address form. Sampling for permit renewal occurred in December 2005 and historical data were compiled from the period of October 1, 2004, through September 30, 2005.

TVA requests consideration of the following in the renewed permit application:

Outfall 101 Enclosed is a reasonable potential determination on the need for whole effluent toxicity (WET) testing for outfall serial numbers (OSNs) 101,102, 112, and 113 at WBN. WBN is currently required by the biocide corrosion treatment plan (BCTP) approved in July 2004 in conjunction with Part IV.B of the NPDES permit to monitor once per year during oxidizing biocide use and once per year during non-oxidizing biocide use. TVA requests that the NPDES permit be made consistent with that frequency by modifying the permit limits table to 2/year or to refer to a footnote indicating that WET testing would be required once per year for oxidizing biocides and once per year for non-oxidizing biocides.

Outfall 102 Footnotes 4 and 6 appear to be incomplete sentences and should be corrected.

Printed on reycled paw

Dr. Richard Urban Page 2 May 3, 2006 Internal Monitoring Point (IMP) 103

1. TVA requests that oil and grease (O&G) monitoring at IMP 103 be reduced to once per month. There have been no detectable values for more than five years. With zero variability and values that are well below the permit limit, this discharge represents a very low risk. In addition, this is an internal monitoring point that is routed to OSN 101, where O&G is monitored again and compared to a permit limit.

2. TVA asks that the monitoring frequency for total suspended solids (TSS) be reduced to once per month. The maximum monthly average for the period from April 2001 to April 2006 was 23.6, below the permit limitation. Since the Division's policy is to require compliance with the monthly average even when only one measurement is made per month, WBN should have no difficulties complying with the monthly average. In addition, this discharge is routed to OSN 101 where further TSS limits are applied.

3. TVA requests that pH monitoring at this internal monitoring point be reduced to once per month since the pH is also monitored at OSN 101, the point at which the discharge reaches the receiving stream.

Internal Monitoring Point (IMP) 107

1. TVA believes that the current monitoring frequency for pH on the metal cleaning waste pond should be changed to 1/batch, consistent with the monitoring frequency for TSS, O&G, etc. It is currently described as 1/week which is not appropriate since the discharge typically does not occur at that frequency.

2. TVA recently notified the Chattanooga Field Office requesting authorization for a discharge of waste water from condenser tube cleaning that had been filtered to 5 microns to address asbestos that may have been present. This discharge was authorized by email dated March 14, 2006. TVA requests that this intermittent wastewater be authorized in the renewed permit.

Outfall 113 TVA requests that the requirement to monitor bottom temperatures at Outfall 113 be removed from the reissued permit. Reviewing data from April 2000 through April 2006 reveals that the maximum temperature recorded has been 29.3 degrees C while the permit limit is 33.5 degrees C. Removing this monitoring requirement appears to be very low risk as the data indicate no excursions and a reasonable margin of safety for protecting bottom temperatures.

Dr. Richard Urban Page 3 May 3, 2006 Part I1.C.3 TVA believes that the definition of overflow should be modified. It is currently defined by this section of the permit as "Overflow means the discharge to land or water of wastes from any portion of the collection, transmission, or treatment system other than permitted outfalls." TVA believes the wording should be consistent with the wording of TCA 69-3-108(b)(5) which prohibits discharges of such wastes into waters or from "a location from which it is likely that the discharged substance will move into waters."

Part Ill. E

1. TVA recently received written authorization to treat Pimephalespromelas toxicity samples (both effluent and intake samples) with UV to address problems with pathogenic interference in WET testing. A copy of this authorization is enclosed for your convenience. TVA requests that language be added to address this in the renewed permit. Suggested wording is; "The permittee is authorized to treat Pimephalespromelas samples collected for toxicity testing at Outfall 112 with UV radiation for up to five minutes."

2. TVA believes the language regarding whole effluent toxicity being required during the first treatment after the effective date of the permit should be removed since the effective date is an unknown future date and the facility may already be in a treatment when the permit becomes effective. TVA suggests that language requiring tests to be conducted within 180 days of the effective date of the permit if oxidizing or nonoxidizing treatments have been utilized should be sufficient.

Part Ill. I TVA requests inclusion of new language for the WBN permit, consistent with language found in Part Ill in all TVA fossil power permits in Tennessee which minimizes administrative burdens. The language is:

The permittee shall be allowed to re-route flows past normal monitoring points as a temporary measure for maintenance purposes. However, such re-routing must be done in such a way that permit limitations are still being met in the receiving waters and compliance with permit limitations is monitored and reported on the DMRs for the rerouted flows. The receiving waters must be the same for the rerouted flows as for the normal discharges.

TVA offers the following general information in support of the NPDES renewal application.

1. Outfall 102 was not discharging at the time of renewal sample collection; therefore, the data presented on the pages for Outfall 102 are only historical data

Dr. Richard Urban Page 4 May 3, 2006 from the few times flow has emanated from there. OSN 102 is an alternate discharge to OSN 101 so the renewal data for 101 are representative of 102.

2. Sampling for IMP 103 consisted of sampling Part II.A.-I.C. parameters only.

IMP 103 is internal to OSN 101 where all required categories of pollutants were evaluated and sampled per EPA Form 2C instructions.

3. IMP 107 was not discharging during permit renewal sampling. This IMP is also internal to 101 where all required categories of pollutants were evaluated and sampled per Form 2C instructions; only historical data from IMP 107 are presented on the forms.

4. Outfall 112 consists of sanitary wastewater, potential cooling tower blowdown and fire protection flushes and storm water runoff.

5. Outfall 114 which consists of traveling screen backwash only from the supplemental condenser cooling water intake has been added to the permit application. This outfall consists of screen reject and raw water only. TVA requests no monitoring requirements, consistent with other screen backwash discharges at TVA facilities.

6. TVA is providing a copy of the report "Biological Monitoring of the Tennessee River near Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Discharge 2004 (June 2005 Final)" for your use.

TVA appreciates your consideration of the information provided herein in the development of the reissued permit. If you have any questions about this NPDES permit renewal application, please contact Lindy Johnson at (423) 751-3361 in Chattanooga, or you may contact her by email at Ipjohnson@tva.gov. TVA requests an expeditious determination of completeness of the application.

Sincerely, Mike Skaggs Enclosures

H*lJ-tn *r*s *t* -*L*U*U JUt 'ISJUlVlJ*. I.e.. "IZ cI)aracters/incn J. Pi-rTm An.o1roven. UMiM NO viiaii-iiuitw .korot alS exnires n.K-ii-Y2.

FORM U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY I. EPA I.D. NUMBER GENERAL EPA GENERAL INFORMATION ConsolidatedPermits Program T 6'4 003 Q 5T/A C r D*

(Headthe "beneral tnstructions before stang.) 2 141 1 LABEL ITEMS " ,,, \ If a preprinted GUNSlabel has been provided. I affix in the

ý., N \,.L -- designated space. Review the information care-fully if a yo f it is in co rre ct, c r0 :*s t r u h it a n d

\*\ \ enter the correct data in the appropriate fill-in area A below. Also, if any of the preprinted data is absent L S E T S (the areato the left of the label space lists the

• A*E* *"* \\ nto rmation that should appear), please provilde it F 11\ in the proper till-in area(s) below. It the lapel is 11 G complete and correct, you need not complete

,,. \ Items 1, 1/l,V, and V1(except VI-B which must be

• • • • -- *.* ' o mpleted regardless). C.omplete all items it no I* * \ \ label has been provided. Refer to the instructions

,. * \ for detailed item descriptions and for the legal authorizations under which this data is collected.

1I. POLLUTANT CHARACTERISTICS ---. ,-*'" =- --.. .--.- * ...-- . . . .... . . .. .. . .. ]

INSTRUCTIONS: Cormplete A through J to determine whether you need to submit any permit application forms to the EPA. if you answer 'yes" to any questions, you must submit this form and the supplemental form listed in the parenthesis following the question. Mark "X" in the box in the third column if the supplemental form is attached. If you answer "no" to each question, you need not submit any of these forms. You may answer "no" if your activity is excluded from permit requirements: see Section G. of the instructions. *See also, :Section D of the instructions tor cdehtin0ins ot bold-faced terms.

MARK *X' MARKX'*

SPECIFIC QUESTIONS YES INO FORM SPECIFIC QUESTIONS YES No FORM ATTACHED ATTACHED AIs this tacility, a publicly owned treatment works b. oes or will this facility (eitherexisting or pro-posedt) which results in a discharge to waters of the U.S.? inc;ude a concentrated animal feeding operation or X (FORM 2A) aquatic animal production facility which results in 16 17 18 a discharge to waters of the U.S 7, (FURM 28) 19 20J 21 Cis thsl a facility which currently results in discharges D. Is this a proposed tacility (other than those aescntved, to waters of the U.S. other than those described in X X in A or 8 above) which will result in a discharge to X AorB above? (FORM 2C) F22 23 24 waters of the U.S.'? (FORM 2D) 25 26 1 27

r. D5oes or will this facility treat,'store, or dispose of 'F. Do0 you or will you injec:t at this facility industrial or hazardous wastes'? (FORM [-*.. 3) l..I I_(the Ileft municipal effluent below the lowermost area to1 the stratum ofIthe label space1lists the con-A raining, within one quarter mile of the well bore, X 28 29 30 1 underground sources of drinking water? (FORM 4) 31 32 33 G. Do you or will you inject at this facility any produced H. Do you or will you inject at this facility fluids for special water or other fluids which are brought to the sur- processes such as mining of sulfur by the Frasch face in connection with conventional oil or natural process. solution mining of minerals, in situ combus-gas production, inject fluids used for enhanced tion of fossil fuel, or recovery of geothermal energy?

-,VFCLIT

-very of oil or natursl gas, or inject fluids for X_ (FORM 4) labeIO hasI" benpoidd ee t h nsrcin l.e of liquid hydroCarbons`ý (FORM 4) 34 13,5 36 37 3:8 39

, tacility a proposed -statronary source which is J. is this fac~ility aroposed stationary source which Is

_. of the 28 industrial categories listed in the in- NOT one of the 28 industrial categories listed in the structions and which will potentially emit 100 tons instructions and which will potentially emit 250 tons per year of any air pollutant regulated under the per year of any air pollutant regulated under the Clean Clean Air Act and may affect or be located in an X Air Act and may attect or be located in an attainment X attainment area',`(FORM 5) 40 41 42 area'? (FURM 5) 43 44 45 FNAME Il11 ýOF FACILITY 1Q-29 130CONTACT 15ý1FACILITY 69 IV.

rw cotr rsi a da. n*tHearea flno- .are AEiII 'E E, Ae I Nnte1E TtheEI Y ,: Iofthe bBlEo pr intcaoredt is a

"-"--' "*L 4614 - 4* 4-, 13 13 16 5 151 16

.V. FACIL'ITIY'MAI'LING ADDRESS  ;**- --10-- '- -- ;

11---- L *-. . . .. . . ".... 11111111.

_I__TA. STý,EEf Cy E.?. BOX

.15116 ... .5.

No 1compleP IL ! 1 Cee FR Tand I cml ZIP CODE deI y.

r crtSTATE al ie i n 1511!6 -R NG CI/i , 140 41 421 '47 51 0R O[HER SPECqfFIq IDENTIFIER Ip 6-*H.I 1 A. LTREET. ROUTr yyL NQ.

I I-SIPLAN  : [ 1I I I ;A RH Y EAW BA COUNTY NAME 46 70; C. CITY OR TOWN D. STATE E. ZIP CODE F. COUNTY CODE firKnOWn)

_ 'II p m iIT

,40!

I N 41 421 13 ! 7!3 !8 1ONINUO52 AG541

.n351 0-1(8-90) CONTINUE ON PAGE 2

I. SIC CODES (4-diit in order ofp riority)

A. FIRST B. SECOND

- , (specify) C 4 9 1 1 ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION 7I I 16 - 19 __ 16 19 C~ THIRD D. FOURTH C THIRD

. , i 1_ (specify) c (specify) 7 16 16 -191

'II. .ATOR INFORMATION .---.

A. NAME lB. Is the name listed as II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Item VIII-A also the T E NN E S SE E VAL LEY AUTHOR I T Y owner?

11111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111[E5YES - NO 316 55 66 C. STATUS OF OPERATOR (Enterthe appropriateletter into the answer box. if 'Other", specify.) D. PHONE (areacode & no.)

F = FEDERAL M = PUBLIC (other than federal or state)-I (specify) L1 1l i IITII I216 S = STATE 0 = OTHER (specify) LF N V :13 1 81 61 F = PRIVATE P56 Is 1 -1__2 2 - 25 E. STREET OR P.O. BOX S I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6 55 _______

F. CITY OR TOWN G. STATE H. ZIP CODE IX. INDIAN LAND 11II' I 1 I Is the facility located on Indian lands?

S,P,R ,N ,G Q I, T, Y, , ..... .. I.. . T, N 3,7,3,,8 1 IIOYES E' NO 5 16 40 41 42 47 - 51 52 EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS

" _ D. PSD (Air Emissions from Proposed Sources)

T _ . _ P_ ischare

__'1_ to Surf~ace_ _I' _Waer I _ I _ _I II I I I

), TN,0,0 ,2 ,0J,1,6, 8, , , , =9I 1I II I 50115,716 1 11881 '_____'___'__'30t_" 30 B. uIC (Underground Injection of Fluids) 1 1 I 7 1 I I 1I I 1 ,T (specify)

)Ju1 9 T IN, R, 0,51,3143,3111 TMSP (STORM WATER) 6 5116117118 30151 1t17 1 C. RCRA (Hzarous Wastes) E. OTrHER (seify) _______________________

I11 II _11CT X I I I I I I I(specify)

SI, 1 1- 44 85,2,91 1 1j TITLE VAIR PERMIT 18 30 1611718 30

.ttach to this application a topographic map of the area extending to at least one mile beyond property boundaries. The map must show the outline of the icility, the location of each of its existing and proposed intake and discharge structures, each of its hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal icilities, and each well where it injects fluids underground. Inc X

)rprecise requirements.

1. NATURE OF BUSINESS 62rovide a brief descrtion

)roduction of electrical power via thermonuclear fission and associated operations.

Vatts Bar Nuclear is located at approximate Tennessee River Mile 528. Unit 1 is rated to produce 1,270 MWe of electricity at full load.

'111.CERTIFICATION (see instructio'ns.

I certify underpenalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this applicationand all attachments and that, based on my inquiry of those persons immediately responsible for obtaining the information containedin the application, I believe that the fine and imprisonment.

• .NAME'&O-[FFICIAL TITLE (type orprint) B. SIGNATURE C. DATE SIGNED Michael D. Skaggs Site Vice President Watts Bar Nuclear Plant IS FOR OFFICIAL USE'ONLY In E IcI 1 '"' II I I I I I I I I I 1I I I I I I I I I I I I I CI - iI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I- I I I i i 1 1 1i1 1 1 1 -1i1 1 155

-PA Form 3510-1 (8-90)

4-.7 . .4 -' .

SCOW intake r/

N ,k '/ r 112 Cn - -

=n &#

'!107.

if' U'.

..,. ,., -._,.i, ,. . ..: . .,; :z:*.,

- . ,._. .S. rP...r* * -a4L L 4 . - IAI t

" ~ ' I

. * .;.* . . -., x .,,- .....* _, . ..  ; f:.

r~i>

411 -i

. ._  ;--"* -, .. .. 'r.. .-. . ... .-

,C . * ,,"  :*' -,: ., *  : '

J _" ,"* .* " Watt Bar2* ,

/ .;] .,::  ! - Nuclear Plan t4 .ŽA

.if, ._. '-t - . " " "

112,..& 1

.- . . .i . . ':*. ' f . ";: . :. 1 0 '

-35O36rýOCF

• ,4 ,: . ,;"

a,*-N' * /.' ' * *,,,* "*w ,. : *. 4-* .,;.' .: ,, '", .* .,

i, 103

• jl-.'..*.*

% --t,**"*,. , *-. *-':"-* " ."

ri"g, Z :.

7, 4 I.

. 4 _- .. ,, _1/4-::*- . o.*...i * * *c

• . : .. ,-:.. ...,*.. 4;

.. . . ,. - . .-. ,_ .. .1 .. : / -

-~~ 4 02 - .,., . . , * . . , " . '- . ,".4 . * " - . , *-. _*

°" " - *' \jUc.

44>

• p. '

-. 4. 4.4 -N" W' N

... . I N TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Plant NPDES permit TNO020168 0/

April 2006 Decatur Quadrangle o Internal Monitoring Point ar, Outfall 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 ni 0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 3 km M=-4. 171 G:1.289

EPA I.D.. NUMBER EAI (copy from Item 1 of Form 1)

TN2640030035 Form Approved OMB No- 2040-0086 AnnrnvI *_xnirr.* 51119,2 U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY FORM APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER

-EPA EXISTING MANUFACTURING, COMMERCIAL, MINING AND SILVICULTURAL OPERATIONS ConsolidatedPermits Progam FALL LOCATION For each outfall, list the latitude and longitude of its location to the nearest 15 seconds and the name of the receiving water.

A. OUTFALL B. LATITUDE C. LONGITUDE D. RECEIVING WATER (name)

NUMBER (list) 1. DEG. 2. MIN 3. SEC. 1. DEG. 2. MIN. 3. SEC. 101 35 35 30 84 47 15 TENNESSEE RIVER @-TRM 527.9 102 35 35 45 84 47 30 UNNAMED TRIBUTARY OF TENNESSEE RIVER @~-TRM 527.2 IMP 103 35 36 0 84 47 30 TENNESSEE RIVER @-TRM 527.9 via OSN 101 IMP 107 35 36 0 84 47 30 TENNESSEE RIVER @-TRM 527.9 via OSN 101 112 35 36 0 84 48 0 UNNAMED TRIBUTARY OF YELLOW CREEK @-TRM 526.9 113 35 35 45 . 84 46 45 TENNESSEE RIVER @ -TRM 529.2 114 35 37 15 84 47 0 TENNESSEE RIVER @-TRM 529.8 I1. FLOWS, SOURCES, OF POLLUTION, AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES A. Attach a line drawing showing the water flow through the facility. Indicate sources of intake water, operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, and treatment units labeled to correspond to the more detailed descriptions in Item B. Construct a water balance on the line drawing by showing average flows between intakes, operations, treatment units, and outfalls. If a water balance cannot be determined (e.g., for certain mining activities), provide a pictorial description of the nature and amount of any sources of water and any collection or treatment measures.

B. For each outfall, provide a description of: (1) All operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, including process wastewater, sanitary wastewater, cooling water, and storm water runoff; (2) The average flow contributed by each operation; and (3) The treatment received by the wastewater. Continue on additional sheets if necessary. _

1. OUT- 2. OPERATION(S) CONTRIBUTING FLOW 3.&TREATMENT'_l FALL NO a. OPERATION (list) b. AVERAGE FLOW a. DESCRIPTION b. LIST CODES FROM (list) (include units) TABLE 2C-1 OSN 101 Diffuser Discharge (receives the following) 33.8217 MGD Discharge through multiport diffuser 4 A See Biocide/Corrosion Treatment Plan

1) Yard Holding Pond 1.1437 MGD ..

a) Turbine Building Station Sump (TBSS) *A" 0 MGD b) Cooling Tower Blowdown (CTBD) "A"' 0 MGD _

c) Emerg. Raw Cooling Water (ERCW) "A" 0 MGD d) Raw Cooling Water (RCW) "A" 0 MGD e) Ice condenser chiller/air coolers "A" 0 MGD f) Low Volume Waste Treatment Pond (IMP 103) 0.2192 MGD Unlined pond with sedimentation and 1 U Precipitation [0.010 MGD. neutralization 2 K Alum sludge supernate [0.025 MGD] ,,,

Vendor water treatment RO reject [0.05 MGD]

Turbine bldg station sump, receives: [0.1342 MGD] Floor drain collection w/oil skimming X X Laboratory waste (0.0001 MGD} ...... _ /

Neutral Waste Tank (0 MGD _

Potable Water Line Leaks (0.0001 MGD}

System Leakage & Maintenance (0.133 MGD)

High Pressure Fire Protection discharges (0.001 MGD) g) ERCW Header flushes 0 MGD h) Precipitation 0.105 MGD i) Less precipitation ý0057 MGD j) Cooling Tower Desilting Basin 0.002 MGD Sedimentation 1 U k) Non-rad Demin Water discharges to Yard Drains 0.011 MGD I) Service Building Sump 0.020 MGO r"=ICIAL USE ONLY (effluent guidelines sub-categories)

-notes an alternate flow path EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) Page I a of 4 Continue on Page 2

PA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item 1 of Form I) Form Approved OMB No. 2040-0086 Please prin* or type in Ihe unshaded areas only E TN2640030035 I Approval expires 5/31/92 U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY FORM APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER EPA EXISTING MANUFACTURING, COMMERCIAL, MINING AND SILVICULTURAL OPERATIONS F-ALL LOCATIONIII sConsolidated IIII Permits Program I

"To,..- chAoutfallt list the latitude and longitude of its location othe--ne-arest 15 seconds and the name of the receiving water.

A. OUTFALL B. LATITUDE C. LONGITUDE D. RECEIVING WATER (name)

NUMBER (list) 1. DEG. 2. MIN 3. SEC. 1. DEG. 2. MIN. 3. SEC.

II. FLOWS, SOURCES, OF POLLUTION, AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES A. Attach a line drawing showing the water flow through the facility. Indicate sources of intake water, operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, and treatment units labeled to correspond to the more detailed descriptions in Item B. Construct a water balance on the line drawing by showing average flows between intakes, operations, treatment units, and outfalls. If a water balance cannot be determined (e.g., for certain mipnno activities), provide a pictorial description of the nature and amount of any sources of water and any collection or treatment measures.

B. For each outfall, provide a description of: (1) All operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, including process wastewater, sanitary wastewater, cooling water, and storm water runoff; (2) The average flow contributed by each operation; and (3) The treatment received by the wastewater. Continue on additional sheets if necessary.

1. OUT- 2. OPERATION(S) CONTRIBUTING FLOW 3. TREAT_,M,,ENT FALL NO a. OPERATION (list) b. AVERAGE FLOW a. DESCRIPTION b. LIST CODES FROM (list) (include units) TABLE 2C-1 OSN 101 m) Diesel Generator (D/G) Building Sump 0.0001 MGD Leak collection w/ oil skimming X X (continued) n) Emergency D/G Building Sump 0.0001 MGD

..... o) CCW Pump Station Sump 0.0001 MGD p) NaOCL Building Sump and Dike 0.001 MGD Sedimentation 1 U q) High Pressure Fire Protection (HPFP) Flushes 0.003 MGD r) Potable water line leaks 0.001 MGD s) Storm Water Runoff 0.699 MGD t) Rainwater releases from secondary 0-001 MGD confinement for bulk chemical storage u) Groundwater sump 0.001 MGD v) Discharge from Lined/Unlined Metal Cleaning 0.031 MGOD 1 MG Lined Pond, 5 MG Unlined Pond 1 U waste ponds (IMP 107) Sedimentation, precip.. neutralization 2 C, K Turbine bldg station sump w/metal cleaning waste (0.0303 MGD] Floor drain collection w/oil skimming X X Metal Cleaning wastes [0.0003 MGD]

Storm water runoff [0.0001 MGD)

Drum rinsing [0.0001 MGD]

Drum dewatering [0.0001 MGD]

Diesel cleaning coolant (0.0001 MGD]

Condenser tube cleaning [0 MGD] Filtration to 5 microns for asbestos X X w) Trash sluice water, receives: 0.1062 MGD Station drainage sumps [0.072 MGD Emergency raw cooling water strainer leakage [0 MGD]

ERCW Strainer backwash (0.027 MGD]

ERCW Traveling Screen backwash (0.0072 MGD _

OFFICIAL USE ONLY (effluent guidelines sub-categories) notes an alternate flow path EPA FOrm 3510.-2C (8-90) Page io of 4 Continue on Page 2

EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item I of Form 1) Form Approved ITN2640030035 OMB No. 2040-0086 Please print or tvye in the unshaded areas only I Acoroval exoires 5/31/92 U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY FORM APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER

-2c EPA EXISTING MANUFACTURING, COMMERCIAL, MINING AND SILVICULTURAL OPERATIONS 3 ConsolidatedPermits Program FALL LOCATION I For each outfall, list the latitude and longitude of its location to the nearest 15 seconds and the name of the receiving water.

A. OUTFALL B. LATITUDE C. LONGITUDE 0. RECEIVING WATER (name)

D NUMBER (list) 1. DEG. 2. MIN 3. SEC. 1. DEG. 2. MIN. 3. SEC.

II. FLOWS, SOURCES, OF POLLUTION, AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES A. Attach a line drawing showing the water flow through the facility- Indicate sources of intake water, operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, and treatment units labeled to correspond to the more detailed descriptions in Item B. Construct a water balance on the line drawing by showing average flows between intakes, operations, treatment units, and outfalls. If a water balance cannot be determined (e.g., for certain mining activities), provide a pictorial description of the nature and amount of any sources of water and any collection or treatment measures.

B. For each outfall, provide a description of: (1) All operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, including process wastewater, sanitary wastewater, cooling water, and storm water runoff; (2) The average flow contributed by each operation; and (3) The treatment received by the wastewater. Continue on additional sheets if necessary. ,

1. OUT- 2. OPERATION(S) CONTRIBUTING FLOW 3. TREATMENT FALL NO a. OPERATION (list) b. AVERAGE FLOW a. DESCRIPTION b. LIST CODES FROM (list) _, ,include units) TABLE 2C-1 OSN 101 2 Cooling Tower Blowdown (CTS6), receives: 24,048 MGD (continued) a) Liquid Radwaste system 0.004 MGD Ion Exchange and Filtration System 2 J which receives flow from the following:

1) Radioactive Floor and Equipment Drains, (0.0039 MGDj

,Tanks, and Sumps ...

2) Laboratory Wastes [0.0001 MGD] _ _._ _

b) Steam Generator Blowdown 0.144 MGD c) Condensate Denim Cleanup 0.0010 MGD Neutralization 2 K d) Cooling Tower Blowdown Weir 23.899 MGD 3 Emergency Raw Cooling Water 4.38 MGD 4 Raw Cooling Water 4.05 MGD 5 Ice Condenser ChillerNarious Air coolers 0.200 MGD OSN 102 Yard holding Pond Overflow Weir (Emergency 0.000 MGD See Outfall 001 1 U Outfall) - provides an alternate discharge path for the diffuser descharge point (OSN 101)

IMP 103 See description above in OSN 10 1 OFFICIAL USE ONLY (effluent guidelines sub-categories) enotes an alternate flow path EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) Page I.c of 4 Continue on Page 2.

EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from item I of Form 1)

I Form Approved ITN2640030035 OMB No. 2040-0086 Please print or type in the unshaded areas only Aooroval exoires 5/31/92 U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY FORM APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER

.,2C

."S EPA EXISTING MANUFACTURING, COMMERCIAL, MINING AND SILVICULTURAL OPERATIONS ConsolidatedPermits Program

ýF-ALL LOCATION I IIII II Fo, ýach outfall list the latitude and Iongitude of its location to the nearest 15 seconds and the name of the receiving water.

A. OUTFALL B. LATITUDE C. LONGITUDE 0. RECEIVING WATER (name)

NUMBER (list) 1. DEG. 2. MIN 3. SEC. 1. DEG. 2. MIN. 3. SEC.

1I. FLOWS, SOURCES, OF POLLUTION, AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES A. Attach a line drawing showing the water H1ow through the facility. Indicate sources of intake water, operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, and treatment units labeled to correspond to the more detailed descriptions in Item B. Construct a water balance on the line drawing by showing average flows between intakes, operations, treatment units, and outfalls. If a water balance cannot be determined (e.g., for certain mining activities), provide a pictorial description of the nature and amount of any sources of water and any collection or treatment measures.

B3. For each outfall, provide a description of: (1) All operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, including process wastewater, sanitary wastewater, cooling water, and storm water runoff; (2) The average flow contributed by each operation; and (3) The treatment received by the wastewater. Continue on additional sheets if necessary-

1. OUT- 2. OPERATION(S) CONTRIBUTING FLOW 3. TREATMENT FALL NO a. OPERATION (list) b. AVERAGE FLOW a. DESCRIPTION b. LIST CODES FROM (list) (include units) TABLE 2C-1 IMP 107 Metal Cleaning Waste Ponds (LP and ULP) 0.031 MGD See description above in OSN 101 IMP 111 Sewage Treatment Plant 0.017 MGD Secondary Treatment = Extended 1 U aeration modification of activated 2 H sludge 3 A Ozone disinfection 2 G Chlorine treatment (backup only) 2 F OSN 112 Construction Run Off Holding Pond which receives 0.247 MGD Sedimentation 1 0 flow from the following: Oil skimming X X

1) Sewage Treatment Plant (IMP 111) 0.017 MGD Discharge to surface water 4 A

2) Training Center HVAC cooling water 0.0"010 MDGD

3) High pressure fire protection system flushing 0. I CO MGD_

4) Potable water leaks 0.00.0 MGOD

5) Storm water runnoff 0,2180 MG D OSN 113 Supplemental Condenser Cooling Water 129.0 MGD Discharge to surface water 4 A System (Noncontact Cooling Water)

OSN 114 SCCW Intake screen backwash 0.019 MGD Discharge to surface water 4 A CIAL USE ONLY (effluent guidelines sub-categories)

"A"denotes an alternate flow path EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) Page I l of 4 Continue on Page 2

CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 C. Except for storm runoff, leaks, or spills, are any of the discharges described in Items II-A or B intermittent or seasonal?

- [-* YES.(complete the followinq table) T1 NO (do to Section M11)

3. FHEQUUNCY 4. FLOW 3.ROEC 4 FLO

8. DAYS b. MONTHS a. FLOW RATE b. TOTAL VOLUME c. DURATION

1. OUTFALL 2- OPERATION(s) PER WEEK PER YEAR fln rwd) - (specify -th units) (in days)

• B ER CONTR:IBUTING FLOW (specify (specify 1. LONG TERM 2. MAXIMUM 1. LONG TERM 2. MAXIMUM (list) averae) averace) AVERAGE DAILY IAVERAGE DAILY

-t j. t--'-$.--.--.'-'--. + -AVER-AGE 1071 Lined Pond (0.91 MG) 4/year Unlined Pond (8.5 MG) 3 MGD 3MG 141SCCW Intake screen backwash 7 12 1.04 1.04 0,01ý 1.04 Ill. PRODUCTION A. Does an effluent guidline limitation promulgated by EPA under Section 304 of the Clean Water Act apply to your faijjy?

IX I YES (complete Item Itl-.) F NO (go to Section IV)

B. Are the limitations in the applicable effluent guideline expressed in terms of production (or othermeasure of operation)?

E7 YES (complete Item I)-C) NO (go to Section IV)

C, Ifyou answered 'yes" to Item Ill-B, list the quantity which represents an actual measurement of your level of production, expressed in the terms and units used in the applicable effluent guideline, and indicate the affected outfalls.

1. AVERAGE DAILY PRODUCTION 2. AFFECTED

a. QUANTITY PER DAY b. UNITS OF MEASURE c. OPERATION, PRODUCT, MATERIAL, ETC. OUTFALLS

__(sectfyi (list outfall numbers)

IV. IMPROVEMENTS A. Are you now required by any Federal, State or local authority to meet any implementation schedule for the construction, upgrading or operation of wastewater treatment equipment or practices or any other environmental programs which may affect the discharges described in this application? This includes, but is not limited to, permit conditions, administrative or enforcement orders, enforcement compliance schedule letters, stipulations, court orders, and grant or loan conditions.

YES (complete the following table) [ NO (go to Itemrn-6)

4. FINAL COM-

1. IDENTIFICATION OF CONDITION, 2. AFFECTED OUTFALLS 3. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLIANCE DATE AGREEMENT, ETC. a. NO. b, SOURCE OF DISCHARGE a. RE- b. PAO-QUIRED JECTED B. OPTIONAL: You may attach additional sheets describing any additional water pollution control programs (or other environmentalprojects which may affect your discharges) you now have underway or which you plan. Indicate whether each program is now underway or planned, and indicate your actual or planned schedules for construction.

W MARK X"IF DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL PROGRAMS IS ATTACHED EPA Form 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85) Page 2 of 4 Continue on Page 3

,ONTINUED FROM PAGE 2 TN2640030035 V. INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS A, B, & C: .. See Instructions before'proceeding -.Complete one set of tables foi eich,'.utfall -'Ahnotathe* ouzfWall number In tlhe space provided.'

--NOTE: Tables V-A, V-8, and V-C are Included on separate sheets numbered V-1 through V-. .- _; - . " .. *.

I :he space below to list any of the pollutants listed in Table 2C-3 of the instructions, which you know or have reason to believe is

... narged or may be discharged from any outfall. For every pollutant you list, briefly describe the reasons you believe it to be present and report any analytical data in your possession.

1. POLLUTANT 2. SOURCE 1. POLLUTANT 2. SOURCE Asbestos cooling tower propylene oxide (as ethlyene-oxide - Prc Nalco biodetergent 73551 as cooling Propylene oxide copolymer) water additive JVI. POTENTIAL DISCHARGES NOT COVERED BY ANALYSIS Is any pollutant listed in Item V-C a substance or a component of a substance which you currently use or manufacture as an intermediate or final product or byproduct?

D YES (list all such pollutants below) I NO (go to Item VI-B)

EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) Page 3 of 4 Continue on Page 4

'ON'lNUED FROM PAGE 3 VII. BIOLOGICAL TOXICITY TESTING DATA Do you have any knowledge or reason to believe that any biological test for acute or chronic toxicity has'been made on any of your discharges or on a receiving water In relation to your discharge within the last 3 years? - -:

YES (identify the test(s) and describe theirpurposes below)t NO (go Section VIII) 3 ual biotoxicity tests (3-Brood Ceriodaphniadubia Survival and Reproduction Tests and 7-Day Fathead Minnow (Pimephales xron,,.as) Larval Survival and Growth Tests are conducted on samples of final effluent from Outfall 101, 102, 112 and 113 as required by the 14PDES permit.

VIIl. CONTRACT ANALYSIS INFORMATION Were any of the analyses reported in Item V performed by a contract laboratory or consulting firm?

YES (list the name, address,and telephone number of, and pollutants i NO (go to Section IX) analyzed by, each such laboratory or firm below)

A. NAME B. ADDRESS C. TELEPHONE D. POLLUTANTS ANALYZED (areacode & no.) (list)

Er-* -mental Science Corp (ESC) 12065 Lebanon Rd (615) 767-5859 Total Cyanide Mt Juliet, Tn 37122 (880)767-5859 Total Phenols X. CERTIFICATION I certify underpenalty of law that this document and all attachments were preparedunder my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualifiedpersonnel properlygatherand evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submittedis, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,and complete. I am aware that there are significantpenalties for submitting false information,including the possibilityof fine and imprisonmentfor knowing violations.

A. NAME & OFFICIAL TITLE (type orprint) B. PHONE NO. (areacode & no.)

vAichael D. Skaggs, Site Vice President, WBN (423) 365-8767 D.DATEISIGN!,D C. SIGNATURE

'-'I EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) Page 4 of 4

TNO020168 WBN PROCESSES 2C Addendum Chemicals Used~in Plant Processes Chemical additives are used in plant processes and may be found in trace quantities in the various NPDES discharge points due toblowdown, leakage, and system maintenance activities. The following paragraph describes the most commonly used system additives. A table on the next page summarizes all chemical additives including the raw water additives that may be found in each outfall as well. The raw water additives are biocides and corrosion treatment chemicals and are discussed in more detail in the Biocide Corrosion Treatment Plan (BCTP) approved in July 2004 by the Division of Water Pollution Control.

Hydrazine, ammonia, boric acid, sodium tetraborate, monoethanolamine, sodium molybdate, sodium tolyltriazole, potassium hydroxide, and lithium hydroxide are routinely added to the Primary and Secondary Systems to control pH and corrosion. Up to 300 pounds of modified alpha cellulose could be added to the condenser intake channel to temporarily plug pinhole tube leaks in the condenser. Hydrogen peroxide may be added during refueling for Primary System cleanup to reduce radiation exposure to maintenance personnel.

Similarly, small quantities of ethylene glycol, a heat transfer medium used in building chiller packages, the ice condenser chiller packages, and diesel generators, could end up via leakage or maintenance activities in OSNs 101, 102, internal monitoring point (IMP) 103, and IMP 107.

4/26/06

TNO020168 WBN PROCESSES 2C Addendum

SUMMARY

OF CHEMICALS ADDED BY DISCHARGE DESCHARGE DESCRIPTION CHEMICAL ADDED OSN 101 Diffuser Discharge Ammonium Hydroxide, Ammonium Chloride, Alpha Cellulose, Boric Acid, Sodium Tetraborate, Bromine, Chlorine, Copolymer Dispersant, Ethylene Glycol, Hydrazine, Laboratory Chemical Wastes, Lithium, Molybdate, Monoethanolamine, Molluscicide, Oil and Grease, Phosphates, Phosphate Cleaning Agents, Paint Compounds, Sodium Hydroxide, Surfactant, Tolyltriazole, Zinc Sulfate, (also see BCTP)

OSN 102 Yard Holding Pond Alternate discharge path for OSN 101 Overflow Weir (See OSN 101)

IMP 103 Low Volume Waste Ammonium Hydroxide, Ammonium Chloride, Treatment Pond Boric Acid, Sodium Tetraborate, Bromine, Chlorine Copolymer Dispersant, Ethylene Glycol, Hydrazine, Laboratory Chemical Wastes, Lithium, Molybdate, Monoethanolamine, Molluscicide, Oil and Grease, Phosphates, Phosphate Cleaning Agents, Paint Compounds, Sodium Hydroxide, Surfactant, Tolyltriazole, Zinc Sulfate, (also see BCTP)

IMP 107 Lined Pond & Metals - mainly Iron and Copper, Acids Unlined Pond and Caustics, Ammonium Hydroxide, Ammonium Chloride, Boric Acid, Sodium Tetraborate, Bromine, Chlorine, Copolymer Dispersant, Hydrazine, Laboratory Chemical Wastes, Lithium, Monoethanolamine, Molybdate, Molluscicide, Oil and Grease, Phosphates, Phosphate Cleaning Agents, Sodium, Sodium Hydroxide, Surfactant, Tolyltriazole, Zinc Sulfate, (also see BCTP)

IMP 111 Sewage Treatment Chlorine, Organic Matter, Laboratory Chemical Plant Wastes, Paint Compounds, Asbestos from Insulators taking showers, X-ray Film Processing Rinse Water OSN 112 Runoff Holding Pond Chlorine, Organic Matter, Paint Compounds, Asbestos from insulators taking showers, X-ray Film Processing Rinse Water, Potable Water (Cooling Tower at Training Center) and High Pressure Fire Protection flushes, (also see BCTP) 4/26/06

Abbreviallons

'A' - Alternate Flow Path CCW - Condenser Cooling Water CRHP - Construction Runoff HoldIn g Pond CT - Cooling Tower 23899 ERCW - Emergency Raw CoolingV aler HPFP - High Pressure Fire Proteali on System RCW - Raw Cooling Water RSW - Raw Service Water SCCW - Supplemental CCW Watts Bar Reservoir Cross Tie Control U-i Main Conde sei U-1 CT Basin 4 SGBD - Steam Generator Blow Dowin o..,.T00, Dlsohor DIsca a 1,,2 OS

,9.000113 TC - Training Cenler VWTP - Vendor Waler Treatment OSN 114 0.019 Plant j -R.,,Wte r WTP -Water Treatment Plant FSCCW Screen BackWash l Recirculating Chemical Additi.e

• I I ., ,.-U-1 CT Spray r WatefuserOrSN-101 KEY

"* Intermittent Flow Evaporation... CT24 i ",. .. ... .".......... 048

-> Chemical Additive

/ ....

3 8...... A*,

o Watt Rseed Barri I

• DisctrargeI __

"

• S~ * -L._._ __ i ^, ifue /OSN101 Watts0 Ba Resevoi D1AluhSlude ChemicalAdditives PUitTn g n r Tennessee River WervaPS

• ,j Ver ..... - .c iooW -7 U-hLow* Coo0075 OnProce (4o05)me '

I I O elrs 1wTPSum I 3 S 0 Tenine~ltssetie tto ERCWHeaderFlh I. ... . .33J Trash Sluice Walervia IPS .e 103 ERCW Traveln Screen Back Wash 0 0072 Holding Pond Sewage ERCW Srarnern Bk Wash 002 0 2t92 Y Treatment ERCWSVatrrs LeLaPaae0 Slt*aon Drainage Suips 0.072 r 010.2 . , 0 .1062 s2 H

Blow Down CoLhIng Tower MetalCleevirr Wasties (0.01003)

SW Rsrorr(0 cas1 )

DrumRInsing (0.D0001 d Drum oiewailng (0.0031) Asbestos Micro I Sstem LLekLad Radwasl S sal0m Diesel Clearing Coolant(0oO Fitra Unnamed 0.05 g Tributary 0,004 P mary LabootoryWase (0.0001 Riadiccicve Floor&Equipment Dmins, Tanks. to Yellow

&4 0.E14 eSs(0.0039Rs and SRW P Creek ci

• 0.057 0

,I Lined Pond/

0- on IMP 107 .......... d TBSS w/Melal CleanirrgWastes I. . .

CiCondensabteerainoCleanup ................................. ..............................

nI ............... h ed Pond 3..1..we 0.031 0.0303 I

WMetalCleanlngWWý[es "°N* ......

t S............ ....

S. Non-Rod Demln Water (0.01 I)

SG BD Service Building Sump (0.020) k M.Jke-Upa~r VWTP I Laboratory Waste Iooo Turbine Diesel Gen (DIG) Building Sump (0.0001)

Emergency D/G Building Sump (0.0001)

Neutral Waste Tank Io Building Station CCW Pump Station Sump (0.0001)

NaOCI Building Sump & Dike (0.001)

Potable Water Line Leaks 0.0001 Sump 0.7373 HPFP System Flushes (0.003) TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Plant System Leakage &,Maintenance 0 133 Potable Water Line Leaks (0.001) once ThroughCooling Wre Stnor Water Runofl (0.599) NPDES Permit No:TNO020168 (ERCW &RCW Sý.Ia*) Main I HPFPSytm I'° 000 Chemical Storage Rainwater Release (0.001) April 2006 Groundwater Sump (0.001)

F-clwater &Condermate sy-tema All Flows in MGD RSW System K

EPA ID Number (copy from Item I of Form 1) Form Approved TN2640030035 OMB No. 2040-0086 Please type or print in the unshaded areas only. Approval expires 7-31-88 Form EPA Facilities Which Do Not Discharge Process Wastewater

.jES

1. Receiving W aters 'I f . .. . . .. . .

For this outfall list the latitude and longitude, and name of the receiving water(s).

Outfall Latitude Longitude Receiving Water (name)

Number (list) Deg I Min I Sec De Min Sec IMP 111 1351 36 155 84 48I 15 UNNAMED TRIBUTARY OF YELLOW CREEK VIA DSN 112 II. Discharge Date (If a new discharger, the date you expect to begin discharging)

NA Ill. Type of Waste--, - -.

A. Check the box(es) indicating the general type of wastes discharged. Other Nonprocess

[X-- Sanitary Wastes I (Restaurant or Cafeteria Wastes -F-"Noncontact Cooling Water F, Wastewater (identify)

B. Ifany cooling water additives are used, list them here. Briefly describe their composition if this information is available.

n/a IV. Effluent Characteristics A. Existing Sources - Provide measurements for the parameters listed in the left-hand column below, unless waived by the permitting authority (see instructions).

B. New Discharges - Provide estimates for the parameters listed in the left-hand column below, unless waived by the permitting authority. Instead of the number of measurements taken, provide the source of estimated vah'es (see instructions).

(1) (2) (3 or) (4)

Pollutant or Maximum Average Daily Number of Source of Parameter Daily Value Value (last year) Measurements Estimate (inclu units) (include units) Taken (ifnew Mass Concentration Mass Concentration (last year) discharger)

Biochemical Oxygen ind (BOD) 15 mg/L <3.3 mg/L 54

.o., Suspended Solids (TSS) 7.4 mg/L <3 mg/L 54 Fecal Coliform (if believed present or if sanitary waste is <19 #/100ml <9 #/100mI 6 discha*ged)

Total Residual Chlorine (if <0.05 mcl/L NA chlorine is used) (Not chlorinating) 1 Oil and Grease < 5 mg/L NA 1

• Chemical oxygen demand (COD) 14 mg/L NA 1

• Total organic carbon (TOC) 4.2 rg/L NA 1 Ammonia (as N) 0.03 mg/L NA 1 Value Discharge Flow 0.119 MGD 0.03 MGD 366 Value pH (.give range) 6.24 - 6.82 S.U. NA 4 Temperature (Winter) 10.4 .C NA 1

°C Temperature (Summer) NA NA

• contact cooling water is discharged EPA Form 3510-2E (9-86) Page I of 2

V. Except for leaks or spills, will the discharge described in this form be intermittent or seasonal?

if yes, briefly describe the frequency of flow and duration. FllYes FW1No VI. Treatment System (Describe briefly any treatment system(s) used or to be used)

Four (4) Extended Aeration Plants with UV Treatment for disinfection.

her Information (0ptional)

Jse the space below to expand upon any of the above questions or to bnng to the attention of the reviewer any other information you feel should be considered in establishinq permit limitation. Attach additional sheets, if necessary.

Presently the discharge is being monitored weekly for E. Coli.

VIII. CertificationIIII I certify underpenalty of law that this document and all attachments were preparedunder my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properlygather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gatheringthe information, the information submitted is to the best of my knowledqe and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are siqnificant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.

A. Name & Official Title B. Phone No. (areacode & no.)

Michael D. Skaggs, Site Vice President 423-365-8767 C S.ignature D. Date Signed

__ _ _ _ _ / __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ '4?ý I

, S EPA Form 35io-2F- ("6) 'I) Page 2 of :2

• ,,,, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION ADDRESSES All addresses must be completed even if the same address is used:

NPDES PERMIT NUMBER: TN0020168 CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS (where permit should be sent):

CONTACT PERSON: Betsy Eiford-Lee, Mgr Chemical & Environmental TELEPHONE: (423) 365-3364 Name Title COMPANY NAME: Tennessee Valley Authority - Watts Bar Nuclear Plant STREET AND/OR P.O. BOX: P.O. Box 2000 CITY: Spring City STATE TN ZIP CODE: 37381 PERMIT BILLING ADDRESS (where invoices should be sent):

CONTACT PERSON: Jerri L. Phillips Environmental Scientist TELEPHONE: (423) 365-3576 Name Title FACILITY NAME: Tennessee Valley Authority - Watts Bar Nuclear PL1 nj.

STREET AND/OR P.O. BOX: P.O. Box 2000 CITY: Spring City STATE: TN ZIP CODE: 37381 FACILITY LOCATION (actual location of permit site):

CONTACT PERSON: Jerri L. Phillips Environmental Scientist TELEPHONE: (423) 365-3576 Name Title FACILITY NAME: Tennessee Valley Authority - Watts Bar Nuclear Plant STREET AND/OR P.O. BOX: HWY 68 Nuclear Plant Road CITY: Spring City STATE: TN ZIP CODE: 37381 COUNTY; Rhea TELEPHONE: (423) 365-3576 DMR MAILING ADDRESS (where preprinted Discharge Monitoring Reports should be sent):

CONTACT PERSON: Lindy Johnson Sr. Water Reg. Spec TELEPHONE: (423) 751-3361 Name Title FACILITY NAME: Tennessee Valley Authority - Watts Bar Nuclear Plant STREET AND/OR P.O. BOX: 101 Market Street, LP .D CITY: Chattanooga STATE: TN ZIP CODE: 37402 CN-1090 RDAs 2352 AND 2366 S \n-dia files\watcr npdeskw.bnN\WN p*t'nut addrcs rorm 4-06 lpj doc

)

PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE IN THE UNSHADED AREAS ONLY. You may report some or all oft.U. NumorM Icopy from nein I of tonn 11 this information on separate sheets (use the same format) Instead of completing Ihese pages. TN264UU30UU35 SEE INSTRUCTIONS O NO.

10 *OUTFALL 101 V. INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS (continued from page 3 of Form 2-C)

PART A - You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table, Complete one table for each outfall. See Instructions for additional details.

2. EFFLUENT 3. UNITS 4. INTAKE (optional)

1. POLLUTANT a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAYVALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE (specify if blank) a. LONG TERM (ffavallable) (Wfavailable) d. NO. OF AVERAGE VALUE b NO OF (2)MASS 12) MASS (11 ANALYSES a. CONCEN- b.MASS I (2) MASS ANALYSES t) {2) MASS (1)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION TRATION CONCENTRATION

a. Biochemical

a. Biochemical Oxygen Demand 3 1 mgIL <2 1 (Ls ) 1

b. Chemical Oxygen Demand <5 1 mg/L 6 1 (COD)

c. Total Organic Carbon (TOC) 2.0 1 mg/L 1.7 1

d. Total Suspended 10.3 5.8 17 mg/L 6 1 Solids (TSS) 1 mg/L 0.02 1

e. Ammonia (as N) 0.10 VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE 1.Flow 71.6 36 366 MGD 46.70 1

g. Temperature VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE 27.7 19.2 178 'C 5.8 1 (winter)

h. Temperature VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE (summer) 32.3 27.2 183 "C NA NA MINIMUM MAXIMUM MINIMUM MAXIMUM Z

1. pH 7.11 8.56 31 STANDARD UNITS PART B - Mark 7X"in column 2-a Ior each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is preaet. ark" in coiumn elieve to be absent. Ityou mark column 2a 3r any pulltant which is limited either directly, or indirectly but expressly, Inan effluent limitations guideline, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutanL. For other pollutants for which you mark column 2a. you must provide quanlilative dala or an explanation of their presence in your discharge. Complete one table for each outfall. See the Instructions for additional details and requirements.

2. MARK'X 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional)

b. BE- a. MAXIMUMDAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG, VALUE a LONG TERM

1. POLLUT- a. BE-ANT AND LIEVED LIEVED (ifavanlable) (ifavaflaba) a,NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE b NO OF (2) MASS (1) (2)MASS (I) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (4) (2) MASS ANAL.

CAS NO. PRE- AB- (1)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES CONCENTRATION YSES (f available) SENT SENT CONCENTRATION

a. Bromide (24959-67-9) x <2 1 mgIL <2

b. Chlorine, Total Residual x <0.05 <0.03 259 mg/L <0.05

c. Color x 10 1 PCU 5

d. Fecal Coliform X NA

e. Fluoride (1698448-8) X 0.1 1 mglL <0.1 1

f. Nitrate-NItrite (as i) X 0.32 1 mgIL 0.22 1 Page V-11 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-2 EPA Form 3510-2C (--90)

)

ITEM V-B3CONTINU~2ED R AGE V-1 ________ __________________

2. MARKW X' 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional)

1. POLLUT- a. BE- b. BE- VALUE

a. MAXIMUM DAILY b. MAXIMUM30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO OF ANT AND LEVED LIEVED _ffava*blel (f avagable) d NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-CAS NO. PRE- AB- (1) (2)MASS (1) (2)MASS (1) (2)MASS ANAL- TRATION (1) (2)MASS YSES (ifavailabfe) SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES CONCENTRATION

q. Nitrogen, Total Organic X 0.22 1 mg/L 0.19 1 (as NJ

h. Oil and Grease X <5.0 -<5.0 17 mg/L <5.0 1 I. Phosphorus (as P), Total X 0.09 1 mg/L 0.04 1 (7723-14--0)

i. Radloactlvity (1) A]lpha, Total X <7.0 (1) 1 pCi/L <7.0 1 (2) Beta.

Total X <3.4 (1) 1 pCi/L <3.4 1 (3) Radiumn, Total x (4) Radium 226, Total X

k. Sulfate (as SO,) X 14 1 mgtL 13 1 (14808-79-8)

I. Sulfide (as S) X <0.02 1 mg/L <0.02 1 m Sul ite (as SO3 ) x <0.5 1 mg/L <0.5 1 (14265-45-3)

n. Surfactants X <0.1 1 mg/L <0.1 1

o. Aluminum, Total X 0.21 1 mg/L 0.20 1 (7429-90-5)

p. Barium, Total X 0.02 1 mg/L 0.02 1 (7440-39-3)

q. Boron, Total X <0.2 1 mgtL <0.2 1 (7440-42-6)

r. Cobalt.

Total X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 17440-48-4)

s. IronTotal (7439-89"6) X 0.21 1 mg/L 0.23 1 L.Magnesium, Total X 5.5 1 mg/L 4.9 1 (7439-95-4)

u. Molybdenum, Total X <0.02 1 mg/L <0.02 1 (7439-98-7) vt.Manganese, Total x 0.032 1 mgIL 0.051 1 7439-96-5)

w. Tin, Total (7440-31-5) X <0.05 1 mg/L <0.05 1

x. Titanium.

Total X <0.005 1 mgfL <0.005 1 (74 Wf.* rm.',3510-2C (8-6)) Page V-2 _ ONTINUE PAGE V.3

____ 3 EPA 1.0. NUMBER (copy from Item 1 of Form 1) OUTFALL NUMBER TN2640030035 101 COMVTINtII*f FRO)M PACFI= OF FORM 2-C PART C - Ifyou are a primary Industry and this outfall contains process wastewater, refer to Table 2c-2 in the Instructions to determine which of the GCIMS fractions you must test for. Mark WX" in column 2-a for all such GC/MS fractions that apply to your Industry and for ALL toxic metals, cyanides. and total phenols. If you are not required to mark column 2-a (secondary induslries, nonprocess wastewater outfalls, and nonrequired GCMS fractions), mark "X"in column 2-b for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present. Mark "X"in column 2-c for each pollutant you believe is absent. Ifyou mark column 2a for any pollutant, you must provide the results of at Jeast one analysis for that pollutant, If you mark column 2b for any pollutant, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant if you know or have reason to believe Itwill be discharged in concentrations of 10 ppb or greater. If you mark column 2b for acrolein, acrylonlitrile, 2.4 dinitrophenol, or 2-methyl-4. 6 dinitrophenol. you must provide the results of at least one analysis for each of these pollutants which you know or have reason to believe that you discharge in concentrations of 100 ppb or greater. Otherwise for pollutants for which you mark column 2b, you must either submit at least one analysis or briefly describe the reasons the pollutant is expected to be discharged. Note that there are 7 pages to this part; please review each carefully.

Complete one table (adl 7 pages) for each outfall. See instructions for additional details and requirements.

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK 'X' 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional)

AND CAS a. TEST- b. BE- c, BE- a. MAXIMUMDAILYVALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAYVALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED (ifava/able) (1favallable) d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(if available) RE- PRE- AB- (1) (2) MASS (0) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (t)CONCEN- 12)MASS YSES OUIRED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION METALS, CYANIDE, AND TOTAL PHENOLS IM. Antimony, Total (7440-36-0) X <0.003 1 mg/L <0.003 2M. Arsenic, Total (7440-38-2) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 3M. Beryllium, Total, (7440-41-7) X <0.001 1 mglL <0.001 4M. Cadmium, Total (7440.43-9) X <0.0001 1 mg/L <0.0001 1 5M. Chromium, Total (744047-3) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 6M. Copper. Total (7440-5-a) X 0.003 1 rng/L <0.001 1 7M. Lead, Total (7439-92-1) X <0.001 1 mglL <0.001 1 BM. Mercury, Total (7439-97-6) X <0.0001 1 rng/L <0.0001 1 9M. Nickel, Total (7440-02-0) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 10M. Selenium, Total (7782-49-2) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 11M. Silver, Total (7440-22-4) X <0.0001 1 mg/L <0.0001 1 12M. Thallium, Total (7440-28-0) X <0.002 1 mg/L <0.002 1 13M. Zinc, Total (7440-66-6) X 0.94 <0.08 25 mg/L <0.01 14M. Cyanide, Total (57-12-5) X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 15M. Phenols, Total X <0.04 1 mg/L <0.04 DIOXIN

,3,r,o-TJ era-chtorodibenzo-P XIMLOUNIBE RESDULTS EP.IS" I .--- - I I V-4

1. POLLVJ 5. INTA' '"notional)

I I 2. MARKX I 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS Ic. BE-AND ( I1a. TEST- b.BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY' C. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG T ERAGE' b. NO. OF NUMB ING LIEVED LIEVED fif available) (ifavaidable _ d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AV) ANAL-(ffavafiabit; I * ). (1) CON CEN- 1,2 IRE- PIIE- AB- (1) (2) MASS (1) (2 (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION YSES

-l: -, IT ID ,-, h*

GC/MS FRACTION -VOLATILE COMPOUNDS IV. Acrolein (107-02-8) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 2V. Acrylonitrile (107-13-1) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 3V. Benzene (71-43-2) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0,001 4V. Bis (Chforo-melhyt) Ether X <0.1 1 mg/L <0.1 1 (542-88-11 5V. Bomoform (75-25-2) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 WV.Carbon Tetrachforide x <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 (56-23-5) 7V. Chlorobenzene (108-90-7) X <0.01 1 mgJL <0.01 1 8V. Chlorodi-bromomethane X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 (124-48-1) 9V. Chloroethane (75-00-3) X <0.01 1 mg/L <0.01 1 1OV. 2-Chlc ro-ethylvinyl Ether X <0.01 1 mg/L <0.01 1 (110-75-8) 11V. Chlorofonn (67-66-3) X <0.0005 1 mg/L <0.0005 1 12V. Dichloro-bromomethane X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 (75-27-4) 13V. Dichloro-difluoromethane x <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 (75-71-8) f 14V. 1,1-Dichloro-ethane (75-34-3) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 15V. 1.2-Dichloro-ethane (107-06-2) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 16V. 1,1-Dichloro-ethylene (75-35-4) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 17V. 1,2-Dichloro-propane (78-87-5) X <0.01 1 mg/L <0.01 1 18V. 1,3-Dichforo-propylene (542-75-6) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 19V. Elhvtbenzene (100414) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 20V. MethAt 3romide (74-83-9) X <0.01 1 mgfL <0.01 1 21V. Methyl Chloride (74-87-3) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) Page V-4 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-5

Item I of Form EPA ID. NUMBER (c 1) OUTFAL L NUMBER

1. -.46030035 101 r'*r1MTIMJlI~n OI~pU I:A*$:IA

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK 'X' 3. EFFLUENT .*4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optiona) 1 AND CAS a.TEST-lb.

IE- c. BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM30 DAYVALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF NUMBER ING .LIEVED LIEVED ___a___a_ (Oale (ifaae _ _ d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(ifavailable) RE- PRE- AB. (1) (2)MASS (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1)CONCEN- (2) MASS YSES QUIRED JSENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATJON GCIMS FRACTION - VOLATILE COMPOUNDS_(contued_

22V. Methylene Chloride (75-09-2) X 0,001 1 mglL 0.002 1 23V. 1,1,2,2-Tetra-chloroethane X <0.0005 1 mg/L <0.0005 1 (79-34-51 24V. Tetrachloro-ethylene (127-18-4) X <0.0005 1 mg/L <0.0005 1 25V. Toluene (108-88-3) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 26V. 1,2-Trans-DIchloroethylene X <0.01 1 mg/L <0.01 1 (156-60-51 27V. 1.1,1-Ti-chloroethane X <0.001 1 mgIL <0.001 1 (71-55-SI_________ __________

28V. 1.,l,-TrI-chloroethane X <0.0002 1 mgtL <0.0002 1 (79-00-51 ____________

29V. Trichloto-ethylene (79-01-6) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 30V. TrichIoro-fluoromethane x <0.01 1 mgtL <0.01 1 (71-69-4) __ ___________________

31V. Viny)

Chloride (75"014) X <0,002 1 mg/L <0.002 1 GCfMS FRACTION - ACID COMPOUNDS IA. 2-Chlorophenol (95-57-8) X <0.005 1 mq/L <0.005 1 2A. 2,4-Dlchloro-phenol (120-83-2) X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 3A. 2,4-Dimethyl-phenol (105-67-D) X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 4A. 4.6-Dlnitro Cresol (534-52-1) X <0.024 1 mg/L <0.024 1 5A. 2,4-Dinltro-phenol (51-28-5) X <0.02 1 mg/L <0.02 1 3A. 2-Nitrophenol (88-75-5) x <0.005 I mg/L <0.005 1 7A. 4-Nitrophenol (100-02-7) X <0.03 1 mg/L <0.03 1 SA. P-Chloro-M Cresol (59-50-7) x <0.024 1 mg/L <0.024 1 9A. Pentachioro-phenol (87-86-5) X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 10A. Phenol (108-95-2) X <0.005 1 mgiL <0.005 1 11 A. 2.4,6-T40chloro-phenol (88-06-2) X <.0.0027 1 mg/L <.0.0027 1 E ýA Form 3510-2C (8:L0) -- Page V-5, _ONTINUE C N PAGE -4

CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-5 1 POLLUTANT 2, MARKWX' 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNLTS 5, tNTA.KE ýocrti '

AND CAS a. TEST- b. BE- c. BE- a. MAXIMUM VALUE DAILY b, MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF NUMBER ING LIEVED jLIEVED (ifavafabe (iffavaJiable) d NO.OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(ifavaidable) RE- PRE- AB- (1) (2}MASS (1) (2)MASS (1) {2) MASS ANAL- TRATiON (1) CONCEN- (2) MASS YSES QUIRED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES _ TRATION GCIMS FRACTION -BASEINEUTRAL COMPOUNDS lB. Acenaphthene (83-32-9) X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 2B. AcenaphtVlene (208-96-8) X <0.0023 1 mgIL <0.0023 1 3B. Anthracene (120-12-7) X <0.0007 1 mglL <0.0007 1 4 B. Benzldine (92-87-5) X <0,05 1 mg/L <0.05 1 5B. Benzo (a)

Anrthracene X <0.0003 1 mg/L <0.0003 1 (56-55-3) 6B. Benzo (a)

Pyrene (50-32-8) X <0.0003 1 mg/L <0.0003 1

78. 3,4-Benzo-fluoranthene X <0.0003 1 mg/L <0.0003 1 (205-99-2) 8B. Benzo (oahiJ Perylene X <0.01 1 mg/L <0.01 1 (191-24-2) 9B. Benzo (.k)

Fluoranthene X <0.0003 1 mg/L <0.0003 1 (207-08-9) I 5'B.Bls (2-Chloro-ethoxy) Methane X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 (111-91-1) _______________ _____

11I. gis (2-Chloro-ethyl) Ether x <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 (11144-4) 126. Bis (2-Chloro-isopropyl) Ethor x <0.005 1 mq/L <0.005 1 (102-60-1) 13B. Bls (2-E00V1-hexyl) Phthalate x <0.0025 1 mgIL <0.0025 1 1117-81-7) 149. 4-Bromo-phenyl Phenyl X <0.005 1 mgtL <0.005 1 Ether (101-55-3) 15B. Butyl Benzvy Phthalate (85-68-7) X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 16B. 2-Chloro-naphthalene X <0.005 1 mgIL <0.005 1 (91-58-7) 17B. 4-Chloro-phenyl Phenyl X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 Ether (7005-72-3) 18B. Chrvsene (218-01-9) x <0.0025 1 mg/L <0.0025 1 19B. Djbenzo (a.h)

Anlthracene X <0.01 1 mg/L <0.01 1 (53-70-3) 208. 1.2-Dlchloro-benzene (95-50-1) X <0.002 1 mg/L <0.002 1 21B. 1,3-Olchloro-benzene (541-73-1) X <0.002 1 mg/L <0.002 1 E PA Form 3510.2C (8 x I 1--0Page CONTINUE )N PAGE V

I

'~1 EPA I.D. NUMBER (coDvfrtnm Item 1 of Forn 1) OUTFAL L NUMBLE TN2640030035 101 CONTIINUED. F"UROM* PfAGEt:V-6

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK X 3. EFFLUENT 4. U__ITS 5. INTAKE (ootional AND CAS a. TEST- b. BE- c BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILYVALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF NUMBER ING L EVED LIEVEC (ifavailable_ (ifavailabje d. NO. OF a CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(ifavailable) RE. PRE- AB- (1) (2tMASS (1) (2)MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1)CONCEN- [2)MASS YSES IUERED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION GCIMS FRACTION - BASEiNEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (conlinued_

22B. 1.4-Oichloro-benzene (106-46-7) X <0.0044 I mrqnL <0.0044 1 23B. 3.3'-Oichloro-benzidine X <0.025 1 rnglL <0.025 1 191-94-1)________

24B. Dlethvl Phthalate X <0.0019 1 mg/L <0.0019 1 (84-66-2_

25B. Dimethyl Phthalate X <0.0016 1 mg/L <0.0016 1 (131-11-3) 26B. DJ-N-Butyl Phthalate X <0.0025 1 mqlL <0.0025 1 (84-74-2) 27B. 2,4-Olnitro-toluene (121-14-2) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 28B. 2,6-0inifto- I toluene (606-20-2) X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 29B. Di-N-Octyl Phlhalate X <0.01 1 mg/L <0.01 1 (117-84-O) 30B. 1.2-0lphonyl.

hydrazIne (as Azo- X <0.1 1 mg/L <0.1 1 benzene) (1.22-66-7) 318. Fruoranthene (206-44-0) X <0.0022 1 mg/L <0.0022 1 32B. Fluorene (86-73-7) X <0.0003 1 mg(L <0.0003 1 338. Hexachrorobanzeno (118-74-1) X <0.001 9 1 mg/L <0.0019 1 34B. Hexa-chlorobutadlene x <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 358. Hexachloro-cyclopentadlene x <0.03 1 mg/L <0.03 1 (77-47-4)_.

36B. Hexachloro-ethane (67-72-1) X <0.0005 1 mg/L <0.0005 1 37B. Indeno (1.2,3-cd) Pyrene x <0.01 1 mg/L <0.01 1 (193-39-5) 388. Isophorone (78-59-1) X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 39B. Naohthalena (91-20-3) x <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 40B. Nitrobenzene (98-95-3) X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 41B. N-Nilro-sodimethylamine X <0.001 1 mq/L <0.001 1 (62-75-9) 420. N-Nitrosodi-N-Propytamfne X <0.005 1 mgtL <0.005 1 EPQ'2;Ift4~n_,cin _ _7__________F~n _______ .aar - -- V-8

CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-7

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK 'X' 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (ootionaf)

AND CAS a. TEST- b.BE- c. BE- a. MAXIMUMDAILYVALUE b, MAXIMUM30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO.OF NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED (ifava)lable (if ava#abe d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(ifavailable) RE- PRE- AB- (2) MASS (1) (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1) CONCEN (2) MASS YSES jSENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION

_QUIRED SENT CONCENTRATION GCIMS FRACTION - BASEINEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (continued) 43B. N-Nitro-sodipheny*am[ne X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 (86-30-6) 44B. Phenanhrnerte (85-01-8) x <0.0007 1 mgiL <0.0007 45B. Pvrene (129-00-0) X <0.0003 1 mg/L <0.0003 46B. 1,2,4 -Tri-chiorobenzone x <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 (120-82-1) 1 1 1 _ _

GCIMS FRACTION - PESTICIDES iP. Aldrin (309-00-2) X 2P. ri-BHC (319-84-6) X 3P. 0 -8HC (319-85-7) X 4P. Y- BHC (58-89-9) X 5P. 5- BHC (319-86-8) X 5P. Chlordane (57-74-9) X 7P. 4,4'-ODT (50-29-3) X BP. 4,4'-DDE (72-55-9) X 913.4.4'-DDD (72-54-8) X 10P. Dielddn (60-57-1). x 11P. a-Endosulfan (115-29-7) X 12P. B-Endosulfan (115-29-7) X 13P. Endosulfan Sulfate X (1031-07-8) 14P. Endrin (72-20-8) X 15P. Endrin Aldehyde X (7421-93-4) 16P. Heptachlor (76-44-8) X A Fnr'-.lflfR.qf I -LTIKIIF Panp J nw P/r.F

2 EPA i.D. NUMBER (copvfroIem I of Form 1; OUTFAL L NUMBER TN2640030035: 101 CONTINUDF:) FROM PArF V-8 I

3. EFFLUENT _ _-_4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (o tiona1)

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK'

a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF

b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM AND CAS Ia.TEST- lb.BE- Jc.E- a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-

,_(ifai dabfe) (dfavaflable) d. NO. OF AVERAGE VALUE NUMBER ING LrEVED LIEVED (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- a.CONCEN- b.MASS (l)CONCEN-1 (2) MASS YSES (if avallable) IRE- JPRE- JA8- (1) (2) MASS CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION TRATION IQUIRED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION GCIMS FRACTION - PESTICIDES (contlnuedj 17B. Heptachlor Epoxide X (1024-57-3) 18P, PCB-1 242 (53469-21-9) X 19P. PCB-1254 (11097-69-1) X 20P. PCB-1221 (11104-28-2) x 21P. PCB-1232 (11141-16-5) X 22P. PCB-1248 (12672-29-6) X 23P. PCB-1260 (11096-82-5) X 24P. PCB-1016 (12674-11-2) X 25P. Toxavhene (8001-35-2) X NOTES:

(1) Natual baclground adliatlon levels.

Note: Long term average values from October1, 2004 through September 30, 2005.

EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) Page V-9

,1' Iern7orFrm 7 PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE IN THE UNSHADED AREAS ONLY. You may report some or JIla'NutvtzN(copyfrom of -u this information on separate sheets (use the same format) instead of completing these pages. TN26400313035

, i N MI , O, SEE INSTRUCTIONS Outtall 102 V. INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS (continued from page 3 of Form 2-C) o -= al, to1 101)

PART A - You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table. Complete one table for each outfall. See instructions for additional details.

2. EFFLUENT 3. UNITS 4. INTAKE (olional)

1. POLLUTANT a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE (specify if blank) a, LONGTERM

.(iavatlabr) (ffavaiable) d NO. OF AVERAGE VALUE b NO OF

((I (2)MASS (1) (2) MASS () (2) MASS ANALYSES a. CONCEN- b. MASS (1) (2) MASS ANALYSES CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION __CONCENTRATION TRATION CONCENTRATION

a. Biochemical Oxygen Demand FBoo

b. Chemical Oxygen Demand NO DISCHARGE FROM 102 DURING RENEWAL SAMPLING.

M.Total Oranic Carbon (TOC)

-- I SEE DISCHARGE OF 101 FOR REP. DATA. HISTORICAL DATA FROM 102.

II d, Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 5.5 5.2 2 mgIL a, Ammonia (as N)

VALUE VALUE f.Flow 29.3 17.41 7 MGD VALUE q, Temperature VALUE (winter) 12.1 11.2 7 C VALUE

h. Temperature VALUE (summer) NA NA c MINIMUM I. pH 7.46 8,06 3 STANDARD UNITS PART B - Mark "X"n column 2-a 0oreach pol llant you know or have reason to believe is present. r X"in column 9-h for each po ulant you -elieve to be absent. Ifyou mark column 2a tor any pollutan whicr is limited either directly, or indirectly but expressly, In an effluent limitations guideline, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollulant. For othel pollutants for which you mark column 2a, you must provide ,uanlilative data or an explanation of their presence In your discharge. Complete one table for each outfall. See the instructions for additional details and requirements.

2. MARKW 3. EFFLUENT - 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional)

1. POLLUT- a. BE- b. BE. a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM sva~sbts) (iffavaeabte) d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE b NO OF ANT AND LIEVED LIEVED __ _

PRE- AB- (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS (1) (2)MASS ANAL- "RATION (1) (2)MASS ANAL-CAS NO.

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES CONCENTRATION YSES (if available) SENT SENT

a. Bromide (24959-67-9)

b. Chlorine, Total Residual 0.06 0.026 7 mgIL

c. Color

d. Fecal Coliform

e. Fluoride (16984-48-8)

f. Nitrate- _ _ _

Nitrite (as N)

EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) Page V-1 CONTINUE ON ptr.F~ V-9

ITEM V-B ' 2. MAK'X_W V-1 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional)

1. POLLUT- a. BE- b. BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAYVALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF ANT AND LIEVED LIEVED (ifavaila (ifvavefaba d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-CAS NO. PRE- AB- (1) (2) MASS I2IMASS (1) (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1) (2) MASS YSES (ifavailable) SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES CONCENTRATION

q. Nitrogen.

Total Organic (as NJ

h. OIl and Grease <5 <5. 2 mglL I. Phosphorus (as P), Total (7723-14-0)

f. Radio aclviy (1) AJpha, Total (2) Beta.

Total (3) Radium, Total (4) Radium 226, Total k, Sulfate (as SO4 )

(14808-7M-8) 1.Sulfide (as S) mnSulfte (as SO 3)

(14265-45-3)

n. Surfactants

o. Aluminum.

Total (7429-90-5)

O. Barium, Total (7440-39-3)

Q.Boron, Total (7440-42-8)

r. Cobalt, Total L7440-48-4)

s. lronTotal (7439-89-6)

t. Magnesium, Tota; (7439-95-41

u. Molybdenum, Total L7439-98-7)

v. Manganese, Total

'7439-gs-5)

w. Tin, Total (7440-31-5)

x. Titanium, Total

,f74,;f_. Tm 35 0,2C (8-- ) Page V-2 ( ONTINUE ON PAGE V-3

EPA 1.D.NUMBER (copy from Item I of Form 1) OUTFALL NUMBER TN2640030035 102 CONTINUED FROM PAGE 3 OF FORM 2-C falt to 101i PART C - Jfyou are a primary industry and this outfall contains process wastewater, refer to Table 2c-2 In the instructions to determine which of the GC/MS fractions you must test for. Mark "X" In column 2-a for all such GCIMS fractions that apply to your industry and for ALL Ioxic metals, cyanides, and total phenols. If you are not required to mark column 2-a (secondary industries,nonprocess wastawater outfails, and nonrequired GC/MS fractions), mark WXin column 2-b for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe Is present. Mark X in column 2-c for each pollutant you believe is absent. Ifyou mark column 2a for any pollutant, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. If you mark column 2b for any pollutant, you must provide Ihe results of al least one analysis for that pollutant if you know or have reason to believe Itwill ba discharged in concentrations of 10 ppb or greater. If you mark column 2b for acrolein, acrylonitdle, 2,4 dlnitrophenol. or 2-methyl-4, 8 dinitrophenol. you must provide the results of at least one analysis for each of these pollutants which you know or have reason to believe that you discharge in concentrations of 100 ppb or greater. Otherwise for pollutants for which you mark column 2b, you must elithar submit at least one analysis or briefly describe the reasons the pollutant is expected to be discharged. Note that there are 7 pages to this part; please review each carefully.

Complete one table (all 7pages) for each outfall. See instructions for additional details and requirements.

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK 'X 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. iNTAKE (optiornaf)

AND CAS a. TEST- b. BE- c. BE- a. NAXIMUM DAILYVALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAYVALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b NO. OF NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED (ifav'Jlable) (ifavatlable) d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(ifavailable) RE. PRE- AB- 1) 121MASS (1) (2) MASS 01) (21MASS ANAL- TRATION I)tCONCEN- (21MASS YSES QUIRED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION METALS, CYANIDE, AND TOTAL PHENOLS I M. Antimony.

Total (7440-36-0) 2M. Arsenic, Total (7440-38-2) 3M. Beryllium.

Total, (7440-41-7) 4M. Cadmium, Total (7440-43-9) 5M. ChromIum, Total (7440-47-3) 6M. Copper, Total (7440-50-8) 7M. Lead, Total (743_-92-1_)

8M. Mercury. Total (7439-97-6) 9M. Nickel, Total (7440-02-0) 1OM. Selenium.

Total (7782-49-2)

S1I M. Silver, Total (7440-22-4) 12M. Thallium, Total (7440-28-0) 13M. Zinc, Total (7440-66-6) 0.01 <0.01 3 mgtL 14M. Cyanide, Total (57-12-5) 15M. Phenols, Total DIOXIN "Qawý chlorodlbenzo-P EP "==~

4 U" y 1-0 13 1 %II r~s ~ -4

4. UNITS I. rV.LLU I Z. MAXKKW I 3. EFFLUENT

3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (1 tiona)

AND C a. TEST- b. BE- c. BE- b. MAX]MUM 30 DAYV c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TF " b. NO. OF DAILY VALUE NUMB ING LIEVED LIEVED a. MAXIMUM I (if ava MSabSe d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVEERAGE \% ANAL-fif avaffabý,, II)

RE- PRE- (*1) t2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1) CONC EN. I--.I (2 - YSES

• lri~ ýn.IP*T AI.^. "I - .A~ttk GC/MS FRACTION -VOLATILE COMPOUNDS 1V. Acrolein (107-02-8) 2V. Acrvlonitrile (107-13-1) 3V. Benzene (71-43-2) 4V, Bis (Chloro-methyl) Ether (542-88-1) f 5V. Bromolorm (75-25-2) 6V. Carbon Tetrachloride f56-23-5) 7V. Chlorobenzene (108-90-7) 8V. Chlorodl-bromomethane 9V. Chloroethane (75-00-3) 1OV. 2-ChIoro-ethylvlnyl Ether (110-75-8) 11V. Chloroform (67-66-3) 12V. Dichloro-bromomethane (75-27-4) 13V. Dichloro-difluoromethane (75-71-8) 14V. 1,1-Dichloro-ethane (75-34-3) 16V. 1,2-Dichloro-ethane (107-06-2) 16V. 1,1-Dichloro-ethylene (75-35-4) 1 TV. 1,2-DJchloro-propane (78-87-5) 18V. 1,3-Dichloro-propylene (542-75-6) 19V. Ethvibenzene (10O-41-4) 20V, Methyl Bromide (74-83-9) 21V. Methyl Chloride (74-87-3)

EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) Page V.-4 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-5

CONTINUED FROM PACE V.4 I. AND CAS T P a. TEsT-2. b.

POLLUTAE X' B-I BE- f.

MARK VALUE DAILY

a. MAXIMUM EPA ID. NUMBER (.

3. EFFLUENT

b. MAXIMUM30 DAYVALUE i Item I of Form 1)

"1t,.40030035 OUTFAL L NUMBER

c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE 102 fIflt t. 1ni -I 4.. UNITS a. LONG TERM(optionFRO

5. INTAKE b NO. OF lfavaeavallabtal

______ d. NO. OF a.CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED (2) MASS YSES A3- (1) (2) MASS (1) (2)MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1)CONCEN-(If available) RE- PRE-QUIRED SENT SENTI CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES _TRATION GCIMS FRACTION -VOLATILE COMPOUNDS (confinued_

22V. Methylene Chloride (75-09-2) 23V. 1,1,2,2-Tetra-chloroethane _________________

(79-34-5) 24V, Telrachloro-elhyle m (127-18-4) 25V. Toluene (108-88-3) 26V. 1,2-Trans-Dichloroethylene (t56-60-51 27V. 1,1,1-Trl-chloroethane ____

(71-55-6) _________

28V. 1,1 2-Tn-chloroethane 29V. Tnchloro-ethylene (79-01-6) 30V. Trlchloro-nluoromethane (75-69-4) 3W. VInyl Chloride (15-014)

GCIMS FRACTION - ACID COMPO-UNDS IA. 2-Chiorophenol (95-57-8) 2A. 2,4-Dichloro-phenol (120-83-2) 3A. 2,4-Olmethyl-phenol (105-67-9) 4A. 4,6-Dinitro-O-Cresol (534-52-1) 5A. 2,4-Dinltro-phenol (51-2B-5)

BA, 2-Nitrophenol (88-75-5) 7A. 4-Nitrophenor (100-02-7) 8A. P-Chloro-M Cresol (59-50-7) 9A. Pentachioro-phenol (87-86-5) 10A. Phenol (108-95-2)

11. A,2,4-I nncrloro-phenol (65-06-2) P*n* V.=;,

F *A Form 35t0-20 (a-e0m ____ _ CI PAGE -6

-N I V___5_

Pa__ e___

For -

E~ A______ 35_04_ - 1890

• N CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-5 S. INTAKE (optionac

3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK 'X' NO. OF b.ANAL-

c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG ThRM AND CAS a.TEST- 1b.BE-ING c BE-LIEVEO LEED I

a. MAXIMUM VALUE DAILY b. MAXIMUM 30 DAYVALUE

{if avrabahO ffavawahfe d. NO. OF a, CCONCEN- b. MPSS TRATION

-AVERAGE (1) CONCEN-VALUE (2 MASS YSES NUMBER (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL-(ifavailable) RE- PRE- _(I JAB-CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION OUIRED SENT SENT I CONCENTRATION GCIMS FRACTION.- BASEINEUTRAL COMPOUNDS

11. Acenaphthene (83-32-9) 2B. AcenaPhtvlene (208-96-8) 3B. Anthracene (120-I2-7) 4B. Benzldine (92-87-5)

58. Benzo (a)

Anthracene (56.55-3) .. ,___

6B. Benz (a)

Pyrene (50-32-8) 7B. 3.4-Benzo-fluoranthene (20g-99-2_,,

88. Benzo (p/hi)

Perylene (191k24-24-2}

9, Benzo (k)

Fluoranthene (207-08-9) 1OB. Bis (2-Chloro-elhoxy) Methane

'111-91-'t_________

11B. B1s (2.Chioro.

ethyl) Ether _______

1(111-44-41 _______

12B. Bls (2-Oh) oto-Isopropyl) Ether 102-60-1) 13B. BIs (2-ElhW.-

hexyi) Phthalate (117-81-71 148. 4-Bromo-phenyl Phenyl Elther (101,-55-3) 155. Butyl Benzvl Phlhalate (85-68-7) 168. 2-Chloro-naphthalene (91-58-71 178. 4-ChJoro-phenyl Phenyt EVher (7005-72-3) 188. ChrVsene (218-01-9) 19B. Dlbenzo (a,h)

Anthracene (53-70-31) 208. 1.2-Dichloro-benzene (95-50-1(

218. 1,3-Dichloro-benzene (541-73-1) _CONTINUE N PAGE V7

.... Page V6 E ýA Form 3510-2C (8

.\ \

EPA I.D. NUMBER (cojov fromIfern 1 of Form 1) 1OUTFA LLNUMBER-I 102 r__*J1IM*I ln Il:I*M PA*I=, X. I TN2640030035

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK 'X' 3. IgFFLUENT ___U 5. INTAKE (optional I BE- c. BE- OAILY

a. MAXIMUM VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONGTERM AVRG VALUE a LONGTERM b. NO.OF ANDCAS a. EST- Lb. ANAL-rifeailable) ifiavalabvaI d. NO OF a.CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE NUMBER ING UEVED ILIEVED (2)MASS (1) (2)MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- 'IRATION (1) CONCE4- )2) MASS YSES (ifavailable) RE- PRE. JAB- [1)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATrON QUIREO ISENT SENT GCIMS FRACTION . BASEfNEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (continuedl -,

228..1.4-Dichloto-benzene (106-46-1) 23B. 3.3'-CIchloro-benzidine 24B. Diehyli Phthalate (84-66-2)-

25B. DImethyl Phthalate

[131-1 1-3) __ _______

268. Di-N-ButVJ Phthalate r84 2) ____________ ____ ____________________

278. 2,4-Dinitro-toluene (121-14-2) 268B.2.6-Dinitro-toluene (606-20-2) 29B. Di-N-Octyl PhthaJate (117-84-0) 308. 1.2-Othenyl-hydrazine (as Azo-benzene) 0122-66-71 318, Fluoranthene (20644-0) 322. Fluorene (86-73-7) 33B. Hexachlowbenzoae (118-74-1) 346. Hexa-chlorobutadlene (87-68-3) 35B. Hexachloro-cyclopentadiene

&77-47--4) 36B. Hexachloro-ethane (67-72-1) 378. Indeno (12,3-cd) Pywene ________ ________

1i93-39-5) 36B. Isophorone (78-59-1) 39B. Nanpthalene (91-20-3) 40B. Nitrobenzene 98-95-3) 41B. N-NItro-2,odime-thyiamine

'62-75-9) . ....

429. N--NarrosoI-IN-Pfopytaminq Ifl-cim I I I I I I I D-. %I-'A f I I 1 11 V-8

CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-7 1, POLLUTANT 2. MARK X ""_3. EFFLUENT _ 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional AND CAS a. TEST. b. BE- c.BE- a. MAXIMUM VALUE DAILY b. MAXJMUM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONGTERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF NUMBER ING LIEVEoILIEVED (davaiabte ,_(ltavaiabfe( d, NO, OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(it available) RE- PRE- AB- (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1) CONCEN- (2) MASS YSES QUIREO JSENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION GCIMS FRACTVON - BASEINEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (conlfnued) 43B. N-Nitro-sodiphenylamine (86-30-6) 44B. Phenanthrene (85-01-8) 45B. Pyrene (129-00-0) 468. 1,2,4 - TH-chlorobenzene (120-82-1)

GCIMS FRACTION - PESTICIDES IP, Aldrin (309-00-2) 2P. a-BHC (319-84-6) 31P.D -BHC (319-85-7) 4*P. y- BHC (58-89-9)

SP. 8- BHC (319-86-8) 6P. Chlordane (57-74-9) 71P.4,4ý-DDT (50-29-3) 8P. 4,4'-ODE (72-55-9) 9P. 4,4'-ODD (72-54-8) 10P. Dieldnin (60-57-1) 11P. Q-Endosulfan (115-29-7) 12P. I-Endosulfan (115-29-7) 13P. Endosulfan Sulfate (1031-07-8) 14P, Endfin (72-20-8)

-5P. Enddin Afdehyde (7421-93-4) 16P. Heptachlor (76-44-8)

EA Fnrm n-'.K1flR.1,) I P__rtp V-_r -- TWINF ' -9

CONTINUED FROM

1. POLLUTANT PAGE V-8 2, MARK' EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item i of Form 1)

I TN2640030035

3. EFFLUENT OUTFAL L NUMBER 102 IIIt In 101O I

4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (ootiona/)

b. NO. OF AND CAS a. TEST- b. BE- c. BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM a. LONG TERM NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED Lif,,availabte) (if avaiabte) d. NO.OF AVERAGE VALUE AVERAGE VALUE (2) MASS ANAL-YSES (if available) RE- PRE- AB- (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- a. CONCEN- b. MASS (I)CONCEN-QUIRED ISENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION TRATION GCIMS FRACTION - PESTICIDES (continued) 17B. Heplachlor Epoxide (1024-57-3) 18P. PCB-1 242 (53469-21-9) 19P. PCB-1254 (11097-69-1) 20P. PCB-1221 (1"1104-28-2) 21P. PCB-1232 (11141-16-5) 22P. PCB-1248 (12672-29-6) 23P. PCB-1260 (1109M-82-5) 24P, PCB-1016 (12674-11-2) 25P. Toxaphene (8001-35-2)

NOTES~

(1) Natual background radialion levels.

Note: Long term average values from October 1,2004 through September 30, 2005.

EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) Page V-9

i!

J PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE IN THE UNSHADED AREAS ONLY. You may report some or all of . I, (copyfrom iem I of .o-m1) this information on separate sheets (use the same formal) Instead of completing these pages. TN2640030035 SEE INSTRUCTIONS. N V. INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS (continued from page 3 of Fornt 2-C) IMP

• ,-'klJ*-*

-" *(Int. to103 101)

PART A - You must proeide the results of at leasl one analysis for every pollutant in Ihis table. Complete one table for each outfall. See Instructions for additional details.

2. EFFLUENT 3. UNITS 4. INTAKE (optionat)

1. POLLUTANT a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE (specify if blank) a. LONG TERM (dfavaifable) (ifavailabbe) d. NO. OF AVERAGE VALUE b NO OF (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANALYSES a. CONCEN- b. MASS (1) (2) MASS ANALYSES

_ _CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION TRATION CONCENTRATION

a. Biochemical OxygenOemand 19 INTERNAL DISCHARGE TO OUTFALL 101 1 mg/L (Boo) 1

b. Chemical Oxygen Demand 15 1 mg/L (COD)

c. Total Organic Carbon (TOC) 3.4 1 mg/L

d. Total Suspended SolIds (TSS) 19 7.21 26 mg/L

e. Ammonia (as N) 6.2 1 mgIL VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE

f. FJow 1.5 0.23 289 MGD

q. Temperature VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE (winter) 10.2 NA 1 C

h. Temperature VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE (summer) NA NA NA NA c MINIMUM IMAXIMUM MINIMUM IMAXIMUM 1.pH 7.00 8.89 49 STANDARD UNITS PART B - Mar "X" Incolumn 2-a for each pollulant you know or have reason to believe is present. Mar" In column 2-b each pollutant you elieve tor to be absent. If you mark column 2a [or any pollutant which Is limited either direclly, or Indirectly but expressly, In an effluent Ulmitations guidellne, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutanL For other pollulants for which you mark column 2a. you must provide quantitative data or an explanation of their presence In your discharge. Complete one table for each outfall. See the inslructions for additional details and requirements.

2. MARK'X' 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional)

1. POLLUT- a. eE- b. BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAYVALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM ANT AND IEVEG LIEVED _(favaiable) ((I avadable) d.NO. OF a CONCEN- b MASS AVERAGE VALUE NO OF CAS NO. PRE- AB- (1) (21MASS (I) (2) MASS (1) (2)MASS ANAL- TRATION (1) (2) MASS ANAL-(ifavailabfe) SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES CONCENTRATION _ YSES

a. Bromide (24959-67-9) X <2 1 mg/L

b. Chlorine, Total Residual X <0.05 1 mg/L C.rotor 10 1 PCU

d. Fecal Coalform X NA

e. Fluoride (16984-48-) X 0.12 1 mg/L r Nitrate-Nitrite (as N) x 3.3 1 mgtL EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) Page V-1 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-2

\!

,/ ( /t ITEM V-B, CONTINUEDFRM AG V-1 ________

1 2. MAK 'X' I 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (ootional_

1. POLLUT. a. BE- b. BE- a. MAXIMUMDAILYVALUE b. MAXIMUM30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF ANT AND LIEVED LIEVED (ilavaljalet (ifavaabi d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-CAS NO. PRE- AB- (1) (2) MASS (1)

2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1) (2) MASS YSES (Wfavailable) SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES CONCENTRATION q~.Nitrog en.

Total Organic X <0.01 I mgIL (as N)

h. Oil and Grease X <5.0 <5.0 26 mgIL I. Phosohorus (asP). Total X 0.12 1 mg/L (7723-14-01 I.Radioactivity (11 Alpha.

Total X <7.0 (1) 1 pCi/L (2) Beta.

Total X <3.4 (1) 1 pCi/L (3) Radium, Total X (4) Radlium 226, Total " X

k. Sullale (as SO 4

) X 29 1 mg/L (14808-79-8)

I. Sulfide (as S) x <0.02 1 mg/L rn Sullite (as SO3 ) X <0.5 1 mg/L (14265-45-3)

n. Surfaclants X <0.1 1 mglL

o. Aluminum, Total x 0.08 1 mg/L (742g-9-go5) ____________________

. Barium.

Total x 0.03 1 mgIL (7440-39-3) ___ ________

q. Boron, Total x <0.2 1 mg/L (7440-42-8) ___ ________ _____ ____________________________

r. Cobalt, Total x <0.001 1 mg/L (144o-48-41 ___ ________ _____ ________ _____ __________ ______________

s. Iron,Total (7439-9-6) X 0.08 1 mg/L I. Magnesium, Total X 8.4 1 mg/L (74.3.9-95-4) ___ ________ ____ _____

u. Molybdenum, Total X <0.02 1 mgtL (74 39-98-7) .....

v. Manganese, Total X 0.020 1 mgIL (7439-96-5) ___ _____ ________ _____ _________

w.Tin. Total (7440-31-5) X <0.05 1 mg/L

x. Titanium, Total X <0.005 1 mg/L (74W-*@Tm 3510-2C0 8-+ ( Page V-2 I ONTINUE 0NPAGE V-3

f EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy fromfIem I of Form 1) OUTFALL NUMBER 2

I TN2640030035 IMP 103 CONTINUED FROM PAGE 3 OF FORM 2-C PART C - If you are a primary Industry and this outfall contains process wastewater, refer to Table 2c-2 in the instructions to determine which of the GC/MS fractions you must test for. Mark X In column 2-a for all such GC/MS fractions that apply to your industry and for ALL toxic metals, cyanides, and total phenotsý. If you are not required to mark column 2-a (secondaryindustries, nonprocess wastewater outfafes, and nonrequiredGC/MS fractions), mark 'X7in column 2-b for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe Is present. Mark "X" in column 2-c for each pollutant you believe is absent. If you mark column 2a for any pollutant, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. If you mark column 2b for any pollutant, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant if you know or have reason to believe it will be discharged In concentrations of 10 ppb or greater. If you mark column 2b for acroleln, acrylonitrile, 2,4 dinitrophenol, or 2-methyl-4, 6 dinitrophenol, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for each of these pollutants which you know or have reason to believe that you discharge In concentrations of 100 ppb or greater. Otherwise for pollutants for which you mark column 2b, you must either submit at least one analysis or briefly describe the reasons the pollutant is expected to be discharged. Note that there are 7 pages to this part; please review each carefully.

Complete one table (all 7 pages) for each outfall. See instructions for additional details and requirements.

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK 'X 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional)

AND CAS a. TEST- b.BE. c. BE. a,MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAYVALUE c.LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO OF NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED ffavailable) (oravallable) d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(Ifavailable) RE- PRE- AB. (1) 12)MASS (1) 12)MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION ()ICONCEN- (2) MASS YSES QUIRED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION METALS. CYANIDE, AND TOTAL PHENOLS 1M. Antimony, Total (7440-36-3) X <0.003 1 rnctL 2M. Arsenic, Total (7440-38-2) X <0.001 1 mgIL 3M. Beryllium, Total, (7440-41-7) X <0.001 1 mg/L 4M. Cadmium, Total (744043-9) X <0.0001 1 mg/L 5M. Chromium, Total (744047-3) X <0.001 1 mq/L SM. Copper, Total (7440-50-8) X 0.004 1 mglL 7M. Lead, Total (7439-92-1) X <0.001 1 mg/L 8M. Mercury, Total (7439-97-6) X <0.0001 1 rng/L 9M. Nickel, Total (7440-02-0) X <0.001 1 mgtL lOM. Selenium,

'Total (778249-2) X <0.001 1 mg/L i1 M.Silver, Total (7440-22-4) X <0.0001 1 mg/L 12M. Thallium, Total (7440-28-0) X <0.002 1 mg/L 13M. Zinc, Total (7440-66-6) X <0.01 1 mg/L 14M. Cyanide, Total (57-12-5) X <0.005 1 mg/L 15M. Phenols, Total X <0.04 1 mg/L DIOXIN

,$,3,7-ITetra-chlorodibernzo-P XIIUOOKb rIoUL NOIIO FPMW&" 3"iINW 4WGQý.ý I -_ 11 1 - I - 11 V4

% Sonal

1. POLU 3. EF-FLUEN " 4. UNITS 5. INTP" 2, MARK IX" b. NO. OF c, LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a, LONG AND a. TEST- b. BE- c. BE- a, MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY !I ANAL-ING LIEVED pLIEVED- (ifavailable) (if avadiable) d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE%.

NUMB, ,")m,. YSES (1) j(2)MASS (1) (2)MASS ) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1)ACONCEN-(if available) RE- PRE- JAB- (C1C CONCEFNTRA'fKONI TRATION I OUIRED SENT [SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES GCIMS FRACTION - VOLATILE COMPOUNDS J_ I 1V. Acrolefn (ID 7.-O2-8 )

2V, Ac~lenitrile (107-13-1) Volatile, Acid, and Base/Neutral Compounds Sampled at DSN 101.

3V. Benzene (71-43-2) 4V. Bis (Chloro-methyl) Ether (542-88-1 )

5V. Bromoform (75-25-2)

GV. Carbon Tetrachloride (56-23-5) 7V. Chlorobenzene (108-90-7) 8V. Chlorodi-bromemethane (124-48-11 9V. Chioroethane (75-00-3) 10V. 2-Chioro-elhylvinyl Ether f1l10-75-8) 1IV. Chloroform (67-66-3) 12V. Dichioro-bromomelhane l75.27-4_

13V, Cichloro-difluoromethane (75-71-8W i

14V. 1,-Dichloro-ethane (75-34-3) 15V. 1,2-Dichloro-ethane (107-06-2) 16V. l,.1-Dichloro-ethylene (75-35-4) 17V. 1,2-Dichloro-propane (78-87-5) 11V. 1,3-Dichloro-propylene (542-75.6) 19V. Ethvlbenzene (100-414) 2(V, Methyl Bromide (74-83-9) 21V. Methyt Chloride (74-87-3)

Pag V. COTIU ON EP For 30IC I890 LAE CONTINUE ON PAGE V-5 EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) Page V-4

EPA ID. NUMBER (cop, 'orn. Item I of Form 1) OUTFAL L NUMBER

\ '9030035 IMP 103 M PA GE V-4 I 5. INTA, CONTINL

3. EFFLUE. 4. UNITS

1. PO. IT 2. MARK'X*

b. NO OF

b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALJE c LONGTERM AVRG. VALUE a, LONG TEr, AND LAS a. TEST- b. BE- c. BE- a, MAXIMUMDAILYVALUE NS ULIEVE0 LIEVED (ifavailablea d. NO. OF a. CON CEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL.

NUMBER available. I f (2) MASS YSES AB- (1) (2) MASS (1) MASS (2) ANAL- TRATION (I)CONCEN-(if available) RE- PRE- (2) MASS fli iiorn OFRMT I1 IaNT flnJ-MrokTATIflKJ (1)~oT~R GCIMS FRACTION -VOLATILE COMPOUNDS (contlnued) 22V. Methylene Chloride (75-09-2) 23V. 1,1,2,2-Tetra-chioroethane Volatile, Acid, and Base/Neutral Compounds Sampled at DSN 101.

(79-34-51 24V. Tetrachloro-ethylene (127-18-4) 25V. Toluene (108.88-3) 26V. 1,2-Trans-Dichloroethylene (156-60-51 27V, 1.1.1-Tri-chliroethane (71-55-6) 28V. 1,1,2-TrI-chloroethane (79-00-5) 29V, Trichloro-ethylene (79-01-6) 30V, Trichloro-ituoromethane (75-69-41 31 V. Vinyl Chlodde (75-01-4)

GCIM S FRACTION- ACID COMiPOUNDS lA. 2-Chlorophenol (95-57-8) 2A. 2,4-Dichloro-phenol (120-83-2) 3A. 2.4-Dimethy[-

phenol (105-67-9) 4A.4,6-Dinitro-O-Cresol (534-52-1) 5A. 2.4-Dinitro-phenol (51-28-5) 6A, 2-Ntrophenol (88-75-5) 7A. 4-Nitrophenol (100-02-7)

BA. P-Chloro-M Cresol (59-50-7) 9A. Pentachloro-phenol (87-86-5)

W0A. Phenol (108-95-2) 1 IA. 2,4,6-Trichloro-phenol (88-06-2)

EPA Form 3510-2C (1-90) 1 Page V-5 CON INUE ON P, GE V-6

CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-S

2. MARK X' 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (ootiona)

1. POLLUTANT

a. TEST- b. BE- c, BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAYVALUE c.LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF AND GAS (ifavatabLe) _favarable d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-NUMBER ING LIEVEO LIEVED RE- PRE- AB- (1) (2) MASS (1) {2) MASS (1) (2)MASS ANAL- TRATION (1)CONCEN- (2)MASS YSES (if available)

QUIRED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION GCIMS FRACTION - BASEINEUTRAL COMPOUNDS lB. AcenaDhthene (83-32-9) 2B. AcenaDhtyvene (208-96-8) Volatile, Acid, and Base/Neutral Compounds Sampled at DSN 101.

3B. Anthracene (120-12-7)

49. Benzldine (92-87-5) 5B. Benzo (a)

Anthracene (56-55-3) 6B. Benzo (a)

Pyrene (50-32-8) 7B. 3.4-Benzo-fluoranthene (205-99 8B. Benzo (0hi0 Perylene (1.91-24-21

98. Benzo (k)

Fluoranthene f207-08-9) 108. Bis (2-Chloro-ethoxy) Methane 11 B. Bis (2-Chloro-ethyl) Ether ________________

(111-44-4) _______ _______

126. Bis (2-Chloro-lsopropyo)Ether (102-60-1) 13B. Bis (2-Ethvi-hexyl) Phthalate (117-81-71 14 B. 4-8mrmo-phenyl Phenyl Ether (101-55-3) 15B. Butv[ Benzvl Phthalale (85-68-7) 16B. 2-Chloro-naphthalene _______

{91-58-7 _______

17B. 4-,Chloro-phenyl Phenyl Eth r 7005-72-3) 18B. Chrvsene (218-01-9) 19B. Oibenzo (a.h)

Anthracene ____________ ____ _________

(53-70-3) ____

206. 1 ,2-Dichloro-benzene (95-50-1) 21B. 1.3-Dichloro-benzene (541-73-1)

Paaeg_ 6 CONTINUE N PAGE V7 EA Form 3510-2C (8- 01

EPA I.D. NUMBER (coy v(rom Item I of Form 1) OUTFAL L NUMBER TN2640030035 IMP 103 CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-6

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK "X' 1 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional)

AND CAS a. TEST- Lb.BE- jc BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILYVALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAYVALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF NUMBER ING LIEVEDLEVED (iravailable)_i(avaifable d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(if available) RE- PRE- AB- (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (I}CONCEN- (2) MASS YSES QUIRED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION GCIMS FRACTION - BASEINEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (continued) 22B. 14-Dichloro--

benzene (106-46-7) 23B. 3,3-Dichloro-benzldine

'(91-94 -1 )

Volatile, Acid, and Base/Neutral

________ Compounds Sampled at DSN 101.

24B, Diethvl Phthalate (84-66-2) 25B. Dlmethvl PhIlhalate (131-I 1-3 ___ _______ ________________

268. D-N-BuIyI Phthalate (84-74-2) 27B. 2.4-Dlnitro-toluene (121-14-2) 28B. 2,6-DiNltro-toluerne (606-20-2) 298. 01-N-Octyl Phthalate 308. 1,2-Diphenvl-hydrazine (asAzo-benzene) (122-66-7L_ _

310. Fluoranthene (206-44-0)

M2B.Fluorene (86-73-7) 33B. Hexa chlorobenzene (118-74-1) 348. Hexa-chlorobutadlene 35B. Hexachloro-cyclopentadlene 36B. Hexachloro-ethane (67-72-1) 37B. Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene (193-39-5) 388. Isophorone (78-59-1) 398. Naphthalene (91-20-3) 40B. Nitrobenzene (96-95-3) 41B. N-Nir-o- -

sodimelhylamine (62-75-9)

Propylamlne Q-LWwdL I I. .-.. -1 1 1 1 1 _I................L...........L.....1

CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-7

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK' 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 65.INTAKE (optonafl AND CAS a, TEST- 1b.BE- c. BE. a. MAXIMUMDAILYVALUE b. MAXIMUM30 DAY VALUE c. LONGTERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED _ifavaelable) (ifaalabbte) d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGEVALUE ANAL-(if available) RE- PRE- AB. (1) (2) MASS (1) ({2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1) CONCEN- (2) MASS YSES UIRED I SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION GCtMS FRACTION - BASEINEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (continued) 438. N-NItro-sodiphenylamineI (86-30-6) 44B. Phenanthrene (B5-01-8) Volatile, Acid, and Base/Neutral Compounds Sampled at DSN 101.

458, Pyrene (129-00-0) 46B, 1,2,4 - Tn-chlorobenzene 120-82-1 )

GCIMS FRACTION - PESTICIDES IP. Aid rn (309-00-2) x 2P. a-BHC (319-84-6) x 3P. D -BHC (319-85-7) X 4P. y" BHC (58-89-9) X 5P. 8- BHC (319-8"8) X 6P. Chlordane (57-74-9) X 7P. 4.4'-DDT (50-29-3) X 8P. 4,4'-DDE (72-55-9) X 9P. 4,4'-ODD (72-54-8) X lOP. Dieldnn (60-57-1) X 11P. a-Endosulfan (115-29-7) X 12P. 5-Endosulfan (115-29-7) X 13P. Endosulfan Sulfate X (1031-07-8) 14P. Endrin (72-20-8) x 15P. Endiin Aldehyde X 7421-93-4)5 16P. Heptachlor (76-44-8) X A F",, ?r.J-' IIfll I, Pgn j NTI-I 1P

'I (OUTFAL L NUMBER

(~flMT~NI i~r~ SDnM OArF XLa

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARKX' EPA 1.0. NUMBER (copy from Item I of Form 1)

3. EFFLUENT TN2640030035 IMP 103 1

4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (oplionajj AND CAS a. TEST- b. BE- c. BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED _f avai/able_ (ffavailable d. NO. OF AVERAGE VALUE AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(if available) RE- PRE- AB- (1) (2) MASS (0) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- a. CONCEN- b. MASS (1) CONCEN- (2) MASS YSES QUIRED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRA, ION YSES TRATION TRATION GCJMS FRACTION - PESTICIDES (continued) 17B. Heolachlor Epoxide X (1024-57-3) 18P, PCB-1242 (53469-21-9) X 19P. PCB-1254 (11097-69-1) X 20P. PCB-1221 (11104-28-2) X 21P. PCE-1 232 (11141-16-5) X 22P. PCB-1248 (12672-2M-6) X 23P. PCB-1260 (11096-82-5) x 24P. PCB-1016 (12674-11-2) X 25P. Toxaphene (8001-35-2)

NOTES' (i) Natual background radiation levels.

NoteWLong term average values from October 1,2004 through Septemnbet 30. 2005.

~IN A e.. ~C4flflf' fa~Ofl% Page V-9

,/

PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE INTHE UNSHADED AREAS ONLY. You may report some or all atA of w. NVM]IOM icopy Irom Ilein I e77em U this Information on separate sheets (use the same format) Instead of completing these pages. TN2640030035 SEE INSTRUCTIONS

... OUTFALL NO V.INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS (continued from page 3 of Form 2-C) IMP 107 (mntto 1111)

PART A - You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table. Complete one table for each outfall. See instructions for additional details.

2. EFFLUENT 3. UNITS 4. INTAKE (optional)

1. POLLUTANT a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAX]MUM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE (specify if blank) a. LONG TERM (dfavailable) (Pfavaiable) d. NO. OF AVERAGE VALUE b NO OF l 1(2)MASS 1(2) MASS (1) f2) MASS ANALYSES a. CONCEN. b. MASS (1) (2)MASS ANALYSES CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION TRATION CONCENTRATION

a. Biochemical I Oxygen Demand NO DISCHARGE FROM 107 DURING RENEWAL SAMPLING.

(BOO)

b. Chemical Oxygen Demand INTERNAL DISCHARGE TO 101 - HISTORICAL DATA FROM 107.

(COt))

c.Total Organic Carbon (TOC) d, Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 7.0 4.5 4 mg/L

e. Ammonia (as N)

VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE

.Flow 2.6 1.9 4 MGD

g. Temperature VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE (winter) NA NA C

h. Temperature VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE (summer) NA NA c MINIMUM MAXIMUM MINIMUM MAXIMUM 4 1.pH 8.35 8.52 STANDARD UNITS PART E- Marl "i" n column 2-a for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present. Mark um tnaca be you mark column 2a for any pollutant which is limited either directly, or Indirectly but expressly, In an effluent limitations guideline, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. For other pollutants for which you mark column 2a, you must provide quantitative data or an explanation of their presence in your discharge. Comptele one table for each outfall. See the instructions for additional details and requiremenls.

2. MARK'X' 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional)

1. POLLUT- a. BE- b BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c.LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM ANT AND LIEVED LIEVED (if available) (ifavalabsle) d. NO OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE b. NO OF CAS NO. PRE- AB- (1) (2)MASS 11 (2) MASS (1) (2)MASS ANAL- TRATION (1) (2) MASS ANAL-(if available) SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES CONCENTRATION _YSES

a. Bromide (24959-67-91

b. Ch.orine.

Total Residual

c. Color

d. Fecal Coliform

e. Fluoride (16984-48-8)

f. Nitrate-Nitrite (as N)

EPA Form 3510-2C J8-90) Page V-1f CONTINUE ON PAGE V-2

/

ITEM V-B CONTINUED FROM PAGE S'2. MARK W' 3.EFUNV.-1ITK

3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS ofonl S. INTAKE (orptibnaf) ____

1. POLLUT- a. BE- b. BE- a. MAXIMUMDAILYVALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF ANT AND LIEVED LIEVED (ifavaiiabe * (itaabte d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-CAS NO. PRE- AB- (Ii (2IMASS (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1) (2)MASS YSES (ifavailable) SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES CONCENTRATION

q. Nitrogen, Total Organic as NJ I h, Oil and Grease <5 <5 4 mg/L I. Phoshorus (asP), Total 0.16 0.09 4 mgtL (7723-14-0)

i. Radioactivity (1) Alpha.

Total T2)Beta.

Total (3) Radium, Total (4) Radium 226, Total k.Sulfate (as SO,)

(14808-79-8)

I. Sulfide (as S) m Suffite (as SO)

(14265-45-3)

n. Surfactants

o. Aluminum.

Total (7429-90-5) 1, Barium, Total (7440-39-3)

q. Boron, Total (7440-42-8)

r. Cobalt, Total (7440-48-4)

s. IronTotal (7439-89-6) 0.37 0.20 4 mgIL

t. Magnesium.

Total (7439-95-4)

u. Molybdenum, Total (7439-98-7)

v. Manganese, Total (7439-96-51

w. Tin, Total (7440-31-5)

a. Titanium, Total

'74 .*inm 35 0-2C (8- _)_Page V-2 ONTINUE ON PAGE V-3

,1 EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item I of Form 1) OUTFALL NUMBER TN2640030035 IMP 107 CONTINUED FROM PAGE 3 OF FORM 2-C I PART C - If you are a primary Industry and this outfall contains process wastewater, refer to Table 2c-2 In the instructions to determine which of the GCIMS fractions you must test tor. Mark "X"in column 2-a for all such GCIMS fractions that apply to your Industry and for ALL toxic metals, cyanides, and total phenols. If you are not required to mark column 2-a (secondary industries, nonprocess wastewater ouffalls, and nonrequired GC/MS fractions), mark X in column 2-b for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe Is present. Mark "X" Incolumn 2-c for each pollutant you believe is absent. If you mark column 2a for any pollutant, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. Ifyou mark column 2b for any pollutant, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant if you know or have reason to believe itwill be discharged in concentrations of 10 ppb or greater. If you mark column 2b for acrolein, acrylonitrile, 2,4 dinltrophenol, or 2-methyl-4, 6 dinitrophenol, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for each of these pollutants which you know or have reason to believe that you discharge in concentrations of 100 ppb or greater. Otherwise for pollutants for which you mark column 2b, you must either submit at least one analysis or briefly describe the reasons the pollutant is expected to be discharged. Note that there are 7 pages to this part; please review each carefully.

Complete one table (all 7 pages) for each outfall. See Instructions for additional details and requirements.

1. POLLUTANT 2. VIARK'X' 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional)

AND GAS a.TEST- b. BE- e.BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILYVALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAYVALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED (ifavailable) (favailablae) d. NO. OF a. CONCEN. b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(ifavailabie) RE- PRE- AB- 1 (2) MASS (I) (2) MASS (I) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (I)CONCEN- (2) MASS YSES IUIRED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION METALS, CYANIDE, AND TOTAL PHENOLS 1M. Antimony, Total (7440-35-0) 2M. Arsenic, Total (7440-38-2) 3M. Beryllium, Total, (7440-41-7) 4M. Cadmium, Total (7440-43-9)

SM. Chromium, Total (7440-47-3)

SM. Copper, Total (7440-50-8) 0.006 0.0048 4 mg/L 7M. Lead, Total (7439-92-1) 8M. Mercury, Total (7439-97-6) 9M. Nickel, Total (7440-02-0) 10M. Selenium, Total (7782-49-2) 11 M. Silver, Total (7440-22-4) 12M. Thallium, Total (7440-28-0) 13M. Zinc, Total (7440-66-6) 14M. Cyanide, Total (57-12-5) 15M. Phenols, Total DIOXIN 2,3,7,8-Tet ra-chlorodibenzo-P IDESCRBtEKULýW EP4= I .--- . I 1Q'1'lWLL6.Q&&.;'A1G9V4

CONTINUED r- 4 PAGE V3 MARKX I 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAK 0ona "G

AND C la. TEST- BE- C, BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONGTF 1-bNO. OF NUMBED. ING IEVED ULEVED ravaQf I

(Wf avagablel d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVEERAGE V ' ANAL-RE- I PRE- AB- (2) MASS (2) MASS (1) 1 (2)MASS ANAL- TRATION (1) GONCEEN- (2 . YSES

((if availablej (1) -- I -

S I OUIRED isSENT SENT I CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATIONI YSES TRATION GCIMS FRACTION -VOLATILE COMPOUNDS 1V. Acrolein (107-02-8) 2V. Acrý,onitriie (107-13-1) 3V. Benzene (71-43-2) 4V. Bis (Chlora-methyl) Ether (542-88-1) 5V. Bromoformn (75-25-2)

OV. Carbon Tetrachloride 7V. Chlorobenzene (108-90-7)

BV. Chlorodi-bromomethane (124-48-1) 9V. Chloroethane (75-00-3) 1OV. 2-Chicro-aihylvinyl Ether (110-75-8) 11V, Chloroform (67-66-3) 12V, Dichloro-bromomethane (75-27-4) 13V. Dichloro-dilluoromethane (75-71-8) 14V. 1,1-Dichloro-ethane (75-34-3) 15V. 1,2-Dichloro-ethane (107-06-2) 16V. 1,1-Dichloro-ethylene (75-35-4) 17V. 1,2-Dfchloro-propane (78-87-5) 18V. 1,3-D[chloro-propylene (542-75-")

19V. Ethylbenzene (100-41-4) 20V. Methyl Bromide (74-83-9) 21V. Methyl Chloride (74-87-3)

EPA Form 35110-2C (8-90) Page V-4 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-S

="--A IU. NUMUth (copv irom Rem 1 oti-orm n) UU IrAL L NUMLN

'0030035 CONTINI M PAGE V-A 1 IMP 107 I

1. PO, II 2. MARK ýX I 3. E-FFLUE 4. UNITS 5. INTAi a/

"X" * ~

AND t-AS a. TEST-2. bMARK BE- c. BE- a. MAXIMUMDAILY VALUE b. MAIMUM 30DAY,-. C. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TE, b. NO. OF NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED I fifavailableJ fifaviaho d. NO. OF a, CONCEN- b MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(if available) RE- PRE- AB. - 1T (2) MASS

-t --

(1) (2) MASS

+

(1)

(2) MASS ANAL-YSER TRATION (1)CONCEN- [2) MASS YSES QUIRED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION TRATION GCIMS FRACTION -VOLATILE COMPOUNDS (con'inued) ..... ..............

22V. Methylene Chloride (75-09-2) 23V. 1,1,2,2-Tetra-chioroethane (79-34-5),

24V. Tetrachloro-ethylene (127-18-4) 25V. Toluene (108-88-3) 26V, 1,2-Trans-DIchloroethylene (156-60-5) 27V. 11,1,li-T chloroethane (71-55-6) 28V. 1.1,2-Tn-chlomethane (79-00-5) 29V. Trichioro.

ethylene (79-01-6) 3OV. Trichloro-fluoromelhane f75-69-4) 31V. Vinyl Chloride (75-01-4)

GC(MS FRACTION - ACID COMPOUNDS 1A. 2-Chlorophenol (95-57-8) 2A. 2.4-Dichloro-phenol (120-83-2) -

3A. 2.4-Dimelhyl-phenol (105-67-9) 4A, 4.6-Dinitro-O-Cresol (534-52-1) 5A. 2.4-Oinitro-phenol (51-28-5) 6A. 2-Nllrophenol (88-75-5) 7A. 4-Nitrophenol (100-02-7)

BA, P-Chloro-M Cresol (59-50-7) 9A Pentachloro-phenol (87-86-5) 10A. Phenol (108-95-2) 11 A. 2,4,6-Trlchloro-phenol (88-06-2)

EPA Form 3510-2C, (1i_-90) I __ Page V-51 CON INUE ON P GE V-S

)

CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-S

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK X 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optiona/

AND CAS a. TEST- b. BE- Ic. BE- a. MAXIMUMOA1LY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAYVALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED (ifavailabte (if avalablel d. NO.OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(ifavailable) RE- PRE- AB- (1) (2) MASS (1) (2)MASS (1) (2)MASS ANAL- TRATION (1 ) CONCEN- (2)MASS YSES QUIRED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION GCIMS FRACTION - BASEtNEUTRAL COMPOUNDS 1B. Acenaphthene (83-32-9) 2B. Acenahlfvlene (208-95-8) 3B. Anthracene (120-12-7) 4B. Benzidine (92-87-5) 5B. Benzo (a)

Anthracene (56-55-3*.

6B, Benzo (a)

Pyrene (50-32-8) 7B. 3.4-Benzo-fluoranthene

[205-99-2)

81. Benzo (chi)

Perylene (191-24-2)

98. Benzo (k)

Fluoranthene (207-08-91 IOB. Bis (2-Chloro-ethoxy) Methane I11-91-1) 1 B. Bis (2-Chloro-ethyl) Ether 12B. Bis (2-Chloro-isopropyl) Ether

[102-60-1) 138. Bis (2-Elhvl-hexyl) Phthalate (117-81-7) 14B. 4-BromD-phenyl Phenyl Ether (101-55-3) 15B. Bury Benzv)

Phthalate (85-68-7) 16B. 2-Chloro-naphtha]ene (91-58-7) 17B. 4-Chloro-phenyl Phenyl Ether f7005-72-3) 188. Chrysene (218.-01.-9) 19B. Dibenzo (a~h)

Anthracene (53-70-3) 20B. 1,2-Olctoro-benzene (95-50-1) 21S. 1.3-Dichloro-benzene (541-73-1)

E DA Form 3510-2C (8. _0) Page I, 6 CONTINUE NPAGEV7

EPA J.0. NUMBER (coov from Item f of Form 1) OUTFAL L NUMBER TN2640030035 IMP 107 CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-6

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK X 3. EFFLUENT 4, Ulrs_ S5.INTAKE (optional)

AND CAS a. TEST- b. BE- c. BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILYVALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAYVALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF NUMBER ING LIEVEO LIEVED (if avaCable (if available d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-fifavailabte) RE- PRE- AB- (I) (2)MASS (1) (2) MASS (I) (2)MASS ANAL- TRATION (I)CONCEN- (2) MASS YSES OUIRED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION GCIMS FR-.CTOtN - BA.SE*(N-II*AL C *POUNGS (contviued_ _

228. 1,4-Dichloro-benzene (10S-46-7) 23B. 3,3-Dichloro-benzidine 24B. Oielhyl Phthalate (84-66-2) 25B. Dimethvl Phthalate (131-11-3) _________ ______________________

26B. Di-N-Butyl Phthalate (84-74-2) 27B. 2.4-Dinitro-toluene (121-14-2) 28B. 2,6-Dinitro-toluene (606-20-2) 29B. Di-N-Octvl Phthalate (117-84-0) 30B. 1.2-Diphenyl-hydrazine (asAzo-benzene) (122-66-7) 31 B. Fluoranthene (206-44-0) 328, Fluorene (86-73-7) 33B. Hexachlorobenrzene (118-74-1) 34B. Hexa-chlorobutadiene 356. Hexachloro-cyclopentadiene 1(77-47-4) 38B, Hexachloro-ethane (67-72-1) 37B. Indeno (12,3-cd) Pyiene (1 93-39-51 368B. Isophorone (78-59-1) 39B. Naphthalene (91-20-3) 40B. Nitrobenzene (98-95-3) 41B. N-Nitro-sodimethylamine 162-75-9),

_Inj Propylamine

-r~~~~~~Pg IK. V.

'-8L..... I I________.....

1-.t (..-. V'r

CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-7

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK 'X 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optiona/)

AND CAS a. TEST- b. BE- c. BE- a, MAXIMUMDAILYVALUE b. MAXIMUM30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF NUMBER ING UEVED LLEVED __ (ifava able (ffavaitabbej d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(Wfavailable) RE- PRE- AN- (1) (2) MASS (I) (2) MASS (1) (2)MASS ANAL- TRATION (1) CONCEN. (2) MASS YSES QUIRED jSENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES rTRATION GCIMS FRACTION -BASEINEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (confinued) 43B. N-N-ao-sodrphenylamine (86-30-6) 44B. Phenanthrene (85-01-8) 45B. Pyrene (129-00-0) 46B. 1.2.4 - Tri-chlorobenzene (120-82-11 GCIMS FRACTION -PESTICIDES iP. Aldrdn (309-00-2) 2P. a-BHC (319-84-6) 3P. I0 -BHC (319-85-7) 4P. y- BHC (58-89-9) 5P. 8- BHC (319-86-8) 6P. Chlordane (57-74-9) 7P. 4,4'-DDT (50-29-3)

OP. 4,4'-DOE (72-55-9) 9P. 4.4'-DDD (72-54-8) 1OP. Dielduin (60-57-1) 11P. a-Endosultan (115-29-7) 12P. I3-Endosulfan (115-29-7) 13P. Endosulfan Sulfate (1031-07-8) 14P. Endrin (72-20-8) 15P. Endrin Aldehyde (7421-93-4) 16P. Heptachlor (76-44-8)

A n 7r_151_

_I. IR.On _NTr'I IF n j PP.-FV 9

EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item I of Form 1) OUTFAL L NUMBER CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-8

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK 'X' I

3. EFFLUENT TN26400300: I IMP 107 I

4. UNITS A.NTAKE (optionaI AND CAS a. TEST- b. BE- c. BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM a.LONG TERM b. NO. OF NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED (if available (if avai7able_ d, NO. OF AVERAGE VALUE AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(ifavaidable) RE- PRE- JAB- (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- a. CONCEN- b. MASS (I)CONCEN- (2) MASS YSES QUIRED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRPT!ON YSES TRATION TRATION GCfMS FRACTION - PES*iC,; >'ES(confinued) 17B. Heptachlor Epoxide (1024-57-3) 18P. PCB-1 242 (53469-21-9) 19P. PCB-1254 (11097-69-1) 20P. PCB-1221 (11104-28-2) 21P. PCB-1232 (1114 1-16-5) 22P. PCB-1248 (12672-29-8) 23P. PCB-1260 (11096-82-5) 24P. PCB-1016 (12674-11-2) 25P. Toxaphene (8001-35-2)

Note: Long term average values from October 1, 2004 through September 30, 2005.

EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) Page V-9

) /

t-, 11. JUM tK (Copy erem I of Form 3)

PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE IN THE UNSHADED AREAS ONLY. You may report some or all of this information on separate sheets (use the same format) instead of completing these pages. TN2640030035 SEE INSTRUCTIONS.

112 V.INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS (continued from page 3 of Form 2-C)

PART A - You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollulant in this lable. Complete one table for each outfall See Instruclions for additional details,

2. EFFLUENT ,. 3. UNITS 4. INTAKE (optional) b.MAXIMUM 30DAY VALUE c.LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE (specify if blank) a. LONG TERM

1. POLLUTANT a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b NO OF (ifavailable) ifavaflahle) d. NO. OF AVERAGE VALUE (1) (2) MASS ANALYSES a. CONCEN- b. MASS (1) (2) MASS ANALYSES (1) (2)MASS (1) (2)MASS CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION TRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

a. Biochemical Oxygen Demand 4 1 mgIL (BOD) b.Chemical 13 1 mg/L Oxygen Demand I

(COD)

c. Total Orpanlc mg(L 5.0 1 Carbon (TOC)

d. Total Suspended 33.0 11.5 53 mg/L SolIds (TSS) 0.58 0.11 54 mg/L

e. Ammonia (as N)

VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE F.Flow 0.65 0.27 54 MGD VALUE VALUE VALUE P. Temperature VALUE 5.3 NA NA 1 C (winler)

VALUE VALUE VALUE

h. Temperature VALUE NA NA C (summer) NA MINIMUM MAXIMUM MINIMUM oMAXIMUMU STANDARD UNITS I. PH 6.6 9.0 157 is limited PART B - Mark W in column 2-a for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe s present. Mark "X"in column 2-b [or each pollutant you believe to be absent. If you mark column 2a for any pollutant which tor which you mark column 2a, you must eilher directly, or Indirectly but expressly, In an effluent limitations guideline, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. For other pollutants requirements.

provide quantitative dala or an explanation of their presence In your discharge. Complete one table for each outfall. See Ihe instructions for additional details and 5. INTAKE (optional) 2.MARK'X' 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM

1. POLLUT- a BE- b. BE- a. MAXIMUM rifavailabie) (ffavalable) d. NO. OF a CONCEN- b.MASS AVERAGE VALUE b NO OF ANT AND LIEVED LIEVED (2) MASS ANAL-(1) (2)MASS ((I (2)MASS (t) (2t)MASS ANAL- TRATION (1)

CAS NO. PRE- AB- YSES

! CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES CONCENTRATION (ifavablabe SENT SENT CONCENTRATION

a. Bromide (24959-67-9) x <2 1 mg/L

b. Chlorine, X <0.05 <0.02 9 mg/L Total Residual

c. Color X 35 1 PC Units d.Fecal X 27 1 No,/100ml Coliform

e. Fluoride X 0.11 1 mg/L (16984-48-8) f.Nitrate-Nitrite (as N) X 1.7 1 mg/L Page V-1 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-2 EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90)

ITEM V-B CONTINUED FR M PAGE V-1 5. INTAKE Ctionait__

3.EFFLUENT 4. UNITS

2. MARK IX'. a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF

1. POLLUT- a. BE- b. BE- a. MAXIMUMDAILYVALUE b. MAXLMUM 30 DAYVALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG, VALUE ffavauabke d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-ANT AND LIEVED LIEVED iffavadabo (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (t) (2) MASS YSES CAS NO. PRE- AB- (1) (2)MASS (1)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES CONCENTRATION (if available) SENT SENT CONCENTRATION

.. Nitrooen, X 0.54 1 mg/L Toal Organic

ýas N)

h. Oil and 1 mg/L Grease X <5 I. Phosphorus X 0.26 1 mg/L (as P), Total (7723-14-0) 1.Radioactivity (111Alpha.

<7.0 (1) 1 pCiL Total X (2) Beta.

Total x 6.6 +1- 1.4 1 pCitL (3) Radium, Total X (4) Radium 226. Total X

k. Sulfate x 42 1 mg/L (as so)

(14808-79-8)

. Sulfide 1 mg/L (asS) X 0.02 ra ullite (as SO 3) X <0.5 1 mg/L 1 1 1 (14265-45-3) 1 1

n. Surfactants x <0.1 1 mg/L

o. Aluminum, x 0.43 1 mg/L "rota 7429-90-5)

D. BarIum, X 0.05 1 mg/L Total (7440-39-3)

q. Boron,

<0.2 1 mg/L Total X ________ _____ _____ _____

17440-42-81 ___ ___ ________ _____

r, Cobalt.

X <0.001 1 mg1L Total (7440-48-4)}

s. IronTotal (7439-89-6) X 0.48 1 mg1L I. Magnesium, Total X 8.0 1 mgIL

• 7439-95-4)

u. Molybdenum.

Total x <0.02 1 mg/L (7439-98-7)

v. Manganese, Total x 0.065 1 mg/L (7439-96-5)

w. Tin. Total x <0.05 1 mg/L (7440-31-5) xTitanium, Total X <0.005 1 mg/L PageV-2 :ONT1NUE ON PAGE V-3 (iT4f"*p rM 35 0-2C (8- __

/

EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item I ofForm 1) OUTFALL NUMBER I TN2640030035 CONTINUED FROM PAGE 3 OF FORM 2-C 112 PART C - If you are a primary Industry and thts outfall contains process wastewater, refer to Table 2c-2 In the instructions to determine which of the GC/MS fraclions you must test for. Mark "X7 in column 2-a for all such GC/MS fractions that apply to your industry and for ALL toxic metals. cyanides, and total phenols. If you are not required to mark column 2-a (secondaryindustries, nonprocess waslewater ouffalls, and nonrequired GCIMS fractions), mark "X" in column 2-b for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe Is present. Mark "X"in column 2-c for each pollutant you believe is absent. If you mark column 2a for any pollutant, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. If you mark column 2b for any pollutant, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant if you know or have reason to believe it will be discharged in concentrations of 10 ppb or greater. If you mark column 2b for acrolein. acrylonitrile. 2,4 dinitrophenol, or 2-methyl-4, 6 dinitrophenol, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for each of these pollutants which you know or have reason to believe that you discharge in concentrations of 100 ppb or greater. Otherwise for pollutants for which you mark column 2b, you must either submit at least one analysis or brielly describe the reasons the pollutant is expected to be discharged, Note that there are 7 pages to this part; please review each carefully, Complete one table (all 7pages) for each outfall. See instructions for additional details and requirements.

I. POLLUTANT 2. MARK'X' 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional)

AND CAS a. TEST- b. BEE tc.BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b, MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF NUMBER ING LIEVEOLIEVED _ff available) (ffavailablo) d. NO OF a CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL.

(ifavailable) RE- PRE- Ae1. (I) I2)MASS (1) (2)MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (t) CONCEN. (2)MASS YSES QUIRED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION METALS, CYANIDE, AND TOTAL PHENOLS IM. Antimony.

Total (7440-36-0) X <0.003 1 mg/L 2M. Arsenic, Total (7440-38-2) X <0.001 1 mg/L 3M. Beryllium, Total, (7440-41-7) X <0.001 1 mglL 4M. Cadmium, Total (7440-43-9) X <0.0001 1 mg/L 5M. Chromium, Total (7440-47-3) X <0.001 1 mg/L BM. Copper. Total (7440-50-8) X <0.001 1 m.q/L 7M. Lead, Total (7439-92-1) X <0.001 1 mg/L 8M. Mercury, Total (7439-97-6) X <0.0001 1 mg/L 9M. Nickel, Total (7440-02.0) X <0.001 1 mg/L 10M. Selenium, Total (7782-49-2) X <0.001 1 mg/L IIM. Silver, Total (7440-22-4) X <0.0001 1 mqtL 12M. Thallium, Total (7440-28-0) X <0.002 1 mgtL 13M, Zinc. Total

(7440.66-6) X <0.01 1 mg/L 14M. Cyanide, Total (57-12-5) X <0.005 1 mg/L 15M. Phenols, Total X <0.04 1 mg/L DIOXIN chlorodibenzo-P X -I 1bE H 1 ..ULT S E 01 XmM U11 It I -lC .I

4. UNITS

1. POLLUT . . 2. MARKX I EFFLUENT

3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE f(0ronaVO ANDC" a. TEST- . BE- Ic. BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILYVALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY V c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TF b. NO. OF NUME ING LIEVED LIEVED C(aONaffatIeL d. NO. OF1 a, CONCEN- b.MASS AVERAGE\ ANAL-(if avallaL. RE- PRE- AB- (1) (2) MASS (1) . (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1) CON GEN- 1[2 YSES J (,)

0UIRED ISENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATIONI CONCENTRATION YSES TRATIO )Nd GCIMS FRACTION -VOLATILE COMPOUNDS 1V. Acrolein (107-02-8) X <0.001 1 mgtL 2V. Acrylonitrile (107-13-1) x <0.001 1 mg/L 3V, Benzene (71-43-2) X <0.001 1 mg/L 4V. Bis (Chloro-methyO) Ether x <0.1 1 mg/L

[542-88-1) 5V. Bromolorm (75-25-2) x <0.001 I mgIL GV. Carbon Tetrachloride x <0.001 1 mg/L (56-23-5) 7V. Chlorobenzene (108-90-7) X <0.01 1 mgIL SV. Chlorodi-bromomethane X <0.001 1 mg/L (124-48-1) 9V. Chloroethane (75-00-3) X <0.01 1 mg/L 10 /. 2-Chloro--

ethylvinyl Elher X <0.01 1 mg/L 11MV. Chloroform (67-66-3) X <0.0005 1 mg/L 12V, Dichloro-bromomethane X <0.001 1 mgIL r75.27-4) ________ ________ _____________ ____

13v. Dichtoro-difluoromelhane x <0.001 1 mIq/L (75-71-8) 1 14V. 1,1-DJchloro-ethane (75-34-3) X <0.001 1 mglL 15V. 1,2-Dichloro-ethane (107-06-2) X <0.001 1 mg/L 16V. 1.,-Dichloro-elhylene (75-35-4) X <0.001 1 mg/L 17V. 1.2-Dichloro-propane (78-87-5) X <0.01 1 mg/L 18V. 1,3-Dichloro-propylene (542-75-6) X <0.001 1 mg/L 19V. Ethylbenzene (100-41-4) X <0.001 1 mg/L 20V. Methyl Bromide (74-83-9) X <0.01 1 mg/L 21 V. Methyl Chloride (74-87-3) X <0.001 1 mg/L EPA Form 3510-20 (8-90) Page V-4 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-5

112 CONTINI M PAGE V-4 3. EFFLUE ____.... _

I 4C UNITS 5, INTA' a)

1. PC, iT 2. MARKW ANI _.. a. TEST- b. BE- a. MAXIMUMDAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DA - C,LONG TER M AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TIL / b. NO. OF

c. BE-(1available) (itaivaffable) d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALI.u ANAL.

NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED (1) (2) MASS (1) (2)MASS 0)r-xIcrn (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1)CONCEN- I (2)MASS YSES (if available) RE- PRE- A*- TaATIA, I COI*NI'Fi:JT *A TIflN GCIMS FRACTION -VOLATILE COMPOUNDS_(confinued) .....

22V, Methylene Chloride (75-09-2) X <0.001 mq/L 23V. 1,1,2.2-Tet-a-chloroethane X <0.0005 1 mg/L (79-34-51 24V. Teirachlero-ethylene (127-18-4) X <0.0005 1 mg/L 25V. Toluene (108-88-3) X <0.001 1 mg/L 26V, 1,2-Trans-Dlchloroethylene X <0.01 1 mgoL (156-60-51 27V, 1,1,1-Tn-chioroethane X <0.001 1 mo/L (71-55-6) 28V, 1,1,2-Tri-chloroethane X <0.0002 1 molL (79-00-5) 29V, Trichloro-ethylene (79-01-6) X <0.001 1 mq/L 30V, Trichloro-fluoromethane x <0.01 1 mg/L M75-69-4) 31V, Vinyl Chloride (75-01-4) X <0.002 1 mgfL GCIMS FRACTION - ACID COMPOUNDS 1A. 2-Chtorophenol (95-57-8) X <0.005 1 mg/L 2A. 2,4-Dichloro-phenol (120-83-2) X <0.005 I mgtL 3A. 2,4-DJmethyl-phenol (105-67-9) X <0.005 1 mg/L 4A. 4,6-DinLtro-O-Cresol (534-52-1) X <0.024 1 mg/L 5A. 2.4-Oinitro-phenol (51-28-5) X <0.02 1 mgfL 6A. 2-Nitrophenol (88-75-5) X <0.005 1 mg/L 7A. 4-Nitrophenol (100-02-7) X <0.03 1 mg/L 8A. P-Chloro-M Cresol (59-50-7) X <0.024 1 mg/L SA. Pentachloro-phenol (87-86-5) X <0.005 1 mg/L 10A. Phenol (108-95-2) X <0.005 1 mg/L 1 iA. 2,4,6-Trichloro-phenol (88-06-2) X <.0.0027 1 mq/L EPA Form 3510-2C (1-90) PageV-5 I I CON 'INUEON P GE V-6

CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-5

2. MARK ' 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optionl)

1. POLLUTANT b. NO. OF

a. MAXIMUMDAILYVALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAYVALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG, VALUE a. LONG TERM AND CAS a. TEST. B.11E- c. BE-(ifavagabfe_ (ofavafabe) d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-NUMBER ING LLEVED LIEVED ....

(,2)VASS (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATLON (1) CONCEN- (2) MASS YSES (ifardab/le RE- PRE- AS- (,

SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATLON CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION QUIRED GC/MS FRACTION - BASEINEUTRAL COMPOUNDS lB. AcenaDhthene (83-32-9) x <0.005 1 mg/L 2B, Acenaphtvlene (208-96-8) x <0.0023 1 mg/L 3B. Anthracene (120-12-7) X <0.0007 1 mg/L 4B. Benzidine (92-87-5) X <0,05 1 mglL 5B, Benzo (a)

Anthracene X <0.0003 1 mg/L (56-55-3) 6B. Benzo (a)

Pyrene (50-32-8) X <0.0003 1 mg/L 7B. 3,4-Benzo-fluoranthene X <0.0003 1 mq/L (205-99-21

88. Benzo (ohi)

Perylene X <0.01 1 mg/L f191-24-21 9B. Beanzo (1)

Fluoranthene X <0.0003 1 mg/L (207-08-9) 1081. Bis (2-Chloro-ethoxy) Methane x <0.005 1 mg/L (1 11-91-1) ___________ ___________ ____________

11B. BIs (2-Chioro-ethyl) Ether X <0.001 1 mgtL (111-44-4) 12B. Bis (2-Chloro-Isopropyl) Ether X <0.005 1 mg/L

('102-60-1) ______________________

13B. Bis 12-EthyVl-hexyl) Phthalate x <0.0025 1 mg/L (117-81-7) 14B. 4-Bromo-phenyl Phenyl x <0.005 1 mg/L Ether (101-55-3) 15B. Butvl Benzvl Phthalate (85-68-7) X <0.005 1 mglL 168. 2-Chroro-naphthalene x <0.005 1 mgIL (91-58-7) _________________ ______________

178. 4-Chloro-phenyl Phenyl X <0.005 1 mg/L Ether (7005-72-3) 18B. Chrysene (218-01-9) X <0.0025 1 mg/L 19B. Dlbenzo (a.h)

Anthracene X <0.01 1 mgtL (53-70-3)"

20B. 1,2-Dichloro-benzene (95-50-1) X <0.002 1 mgJL 218, 1.3-Dlchtoro-benzene (541-73-1) X <0.002 1 mgIL 0 Page V__ CONTINUE N PAGE V7 IA Form 3510-2C (8-

I 11). NUMbtlK rcoPv UOm Ifle 7 Of f-OIfl 71 CONTINUJFr FROM PAGE V-9 I TN2640030035 Ou IVL L NUMIJt7%

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK'X 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNlTS 5. INTAKE (oilional)

AND CAS a. TEST- b. BE- Ic. BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b, MAXIMUM 30 DAYVALUE C.LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b NO. OF NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED _ifavarlable) .iravalfabie d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGEVALUE ANAL-(ifavailable) RE- PRE- jAB- (I) (2) MASS (2))2.MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1)CONCEN- (2) MASS YSES QUIRED ISENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION GCIMS FRACTION -BASEINEUrRAL COMPOUNDS (confinued(

228. 1.4-Ohchloro-benzene (106-46-7) X <0.0044 1 mg1L 23B. 3,3-Dichloro-benzJdine X <0.025 1 mg/L 91-94-1 248. Oiethv'l _

Phthalale X <0.0019 1 mgtL (84-66-2) 256. Dimethvi Phthalate x <0.0016 1 mgIL (131-11-3) ___ ____

2W8. Oi-N-Butv)

Phihalate X <0.0025 1 mgqL f84-74-2) 278. 2.4-Dinit,ro-toluene (121-14-2) X <0,001 1 mg/L 28B. 2,6-Dinitro-tolue ne (606-20-2) X <0.005 1 mg/L 298. DJ-N-Ocyv Phthalate X <0.01 1 mg/L (117-84-0) 308.1.2-Diphenyl-hydrazine (asAzo. x <0.1 1 m~qL bzene) (122-66-7) 31B. Fluoranthene (206-44-0) X <0.0022 1 mg/L 32B. Fluorene (86-73-7) X <0.0003 1 mg/L 33B. Hexachlotobentene (118-74-1) X <0.0019 I mq/L 348. Hexa-chlorobutadiene X <0.005 1 mg/L W3B.e eachloro-cyclopentadiene x <0.03 1 mg/L (77-47-4) _______ ____________ ___ ____

36B. Hexachloro-ethane (67-72-1) X <0.0005 1 mg/L 378. Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene x <0.01 ,rIq1/L (193-39-5) 38B. Isophorone (786-59-1) X <0.005 1 mg/L 39B. Naphthalene (91-20-3) X <0.005 1 mg/L 40B. Nltrobenzene (98-95-3) X <0.005 1 m1/L 41B. N-Nitro-sodimethylam[ne <0.001 1 mg/L 428. N-Nitrosodi-N-Propylamine X <0.005 1 mg/L EP __________ ___n I I V,8

CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-7

3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (otlionial

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK 'X' Ic,BE- a./AXIMUM DAJLY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAYVALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF AND GAS a. TEST- b. SE-(f avafable _ifavabable_ rd. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGEVALUE AN,(.-

NUMBER ENG L1EVEDLIEVEO NAB- (1) (2) MASS (1) (2)MASS (1) J2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1)CONCEN. (2) MASS YSES (ifavaftabie) RE- PRE-CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION OUIREO SENT ISENT CONCENTRATION GCIMS FRACTION - BASEINEEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (continued) 43B. N-Nitro-sodiphenylamlne X <0.005 1 mg/L 86-30-61 44B, Phenanthrone (85-01-8) x <0.0007 1 mg/L 45B. Pyrene (129-00-0) X <0.0003 1 mg/L 46B. 1,2.4 - Tri-chlorobenzene X <0.005 1 mg/L 1 1 (120-82-11 GCIMS FRACTION - PESTICIDES IP. Aidrin (309-00-2) X 2P. a-BHC (319-84-6) x 3P. 3 -BHC (319-85-7) X 4P. y- BHC (58-89-9) X 5P. 5- BHC (319-86-8) X 6P. Chlordane (57-74-9) x 7P. 4,4'-DDT (50-29-3) x 8P. 4.4'-DDE (72-55-9) x 9P, 4.4'-DD (72-54-8) x lOP. Dieldrin (50-57-1) x 11P. a-Endosulfan (115-29-7) x 12P. B-Endosullan (115-29-7) x 13P. Endosulran Sulfate x

'1031-07-8) 14P. Endrin (72-20-8) X 15P. Endrin Aldehyde x L7421-93-4 16P. Heptachlor (76-44-8) x 11 _-_*_ _ f -T _

m _r I IN rF n_ j_ Ia FV 9

I EPA ID. NUMBER (copy from ilem I of Form 1) OUTFAL L NUMBER CONTINUIJE FROM PAGF V-8

1. POLLUTANT 2 MARK X' 1 I

3. EFFLUENT TN2640030035 112 I

4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optiona)

b. MAXIMUMM30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERMAVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF AND CAS a. TEST- i. BE- c. BE- a. MAXIMUM OAILY VALUE

([available_ (ifavailable) d. NO, OF AVERAGE VALUE AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED (2)MASS (1) (2)MASS (1) (2)MASS ANAL- a.CONCEN- b. MASS (i)CONCEN- (2) MASS YSES (if available) RE- PRE- AB- (I)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION TRATION

[UIRED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION GCiMS FRACTION - PESTICIDES (continued) 17B. Heptachlor Epoxide X (1024-57-3) 18P. PCB-1242 (53469-21-9) X 19P. PCB-1254 (11097-69-1) X 20P, PCB-1221 (11104-28-2) x 21P. PCB-1232 (11141-16-5) X 22P. PCB-1248 (12672-29-6) X 23P. PCB-1260 (11096-82-5) X 24P. PCB-1016 (12674-11-2) X 25P. Toxaphene (8001-35-2) X NOTES:

(1) Nalual background radiation levels.

Note: Long term average values from October 1, 2004 through September30, 2005.

EPA Form 3510.2C (8-90) Page V-9

(

/

PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE IN THE UNSHADED AREAS ONLY. You may report some or all o0 I this information on separate sheets (use the same format) Instead of completing these pages. I IN2640030035 SFF rNSTRIJC:TIrlMR SEE INSTRUCTIONS

)UTFALL NO V. INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS (conhinued from page 3 of Form 2-C) 113 PART A - You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table. Complete one table for each

2. EFFLUENT 3. UNITS

1. POLLUTANT a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE (specify If blank) a. LONG TERM (it available) (if avallable) d. NO. OF AVERAGE VALUE b NO OF

<5.0 (1) (2) MASS (1) -50 (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANALYSES a. CONCEN- b. MASS (1) (2) MASS ANALYSES CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION TRATION CONCENTRATION

a. Biochemical Oxygen DemE <2 1 mgIL <2 1 (BOO)

b. Chemical Oxygen Demand 6 1 rng/L 6 1 (roo_

0

c. Total Organic Carbon (TOC) 1.8 1 mglL 1.7 1

d. Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 5.3 3.6 12 mgtL 6 1

e. Ammonia (as N) <0.01 1 mg/L 0.02 1 VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE f, Flow 208 135 367 MGD 46.7 1

u. Temperature VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE rwlnter) 30.1 21.3 170 c 9.8 1

h. Temperature VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE (summer) 34.2 29.5 184 "C NA NA MINIMUM MAXIMUM MINIMUM MAXIMUM

.pH 6.53 8.36 15 STANDARD UNITS PART B - Mae X in column 2-a for each polutani you know or have reason to believe-is present. Mark for eec polutn you Cieve to be absen. Ifyou mark column 2a for any p'oiu nt which is limited 2in either directly, or indirecty but expressly. Inan effluent limitations guideline, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. For other pollutants for which you mark column 2a, you must provide quanlitative data oran explanation of their presence in yourdlscharge. Complete one table for each outfall. See the instruclions for additional de i~s and requirements.

2. MARKW'X 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optbonal)

1. POLLUT- a. tIE- b. BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILYVALUE b. MAXIMUM30 DAYVALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE .LON TERM ANT AND LIEVED LIEVED (i7avatable) (ffavaWiab.re) d.NO. 0 a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE b NO. OF CAS NO. PRE- AB- (1) (2)MASS (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1) (2) MASS ANAL-(f available) SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES CONCENTRATION YSES

a. Bromide (24959"67-9) X <2 1 mq/L <2

b. Chlorine.

Total Residual X <0.05 <0.03 215 mWq/L <0.05

c. Color X 5 1 PCU 5

d. Fecal Coliform X NA

a. Fluoride (1698448.8) X 0.11 1 mqtL <0.1

f. Nitrate.

Nitrite (as N) X 0.28 1 m~q/L 0.22 EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) Page V-1 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-2

ITEM V-9 CCO1TUEDFIRM2AGE V-1 2..MARK 'X' "_3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optionat a.BE- b. BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF

1. POLLUT- ANAL-ANT AND LIEVED LIEVED (ifavailable} (.ffavailabae d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE PRE- AB- (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS (1) (2)MASS ANAL- TRATION (1) (2) MASS YSES CAS NO.

(ifavailablel SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES CONCENTRATION

., Nitrogen, Total Organic X <0.01 1 mg/L 0.19 (as N) h, Oil and <5.0 1 Grease X <5.0 1 mgtL I. Phosphorus X <0.01 1 mg/L 0.04 1 (as P), Total (7723-14-0) ..

i. Radioactivity (1) Alpha. 1 Total X <7.0 (1) 1 pCi/L <7.0 (2) Beta, Total X <3.4 (I) I pCi/L <3.4 (3) Radium, Total X W4)Radium 226. Total X

k. Sulfate X 13 1 mg/L 13 1 (asSO4 )

(14808-79-8)

I. Sulfide (ass) X <0.02 1 mg/L <0.02 1 Sullhie - _____'

(asSO 3 ) X <0.5 1 mg/L <0.5 1 (14265-45-3)

n. Surfactants x <0.1 1 mg/L <0.1 1

o. Aluminum, Total X 0,06 1 mgIL 0.20 1 (7429-90-5)

P. Barium, Total X 0.02 1 mgIL 0.02 1 (74 40-39-3) ___ ________ _____ ________ _____ ___________________

q. Boron, Total X <0.2 1 mg/L <0.2 1 (7440-42-8)

r. Cobalt.

Total x <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 (7440-48-4)

s. Iron*Total X 0.09 1 mg/L 0.23 1 (7439-89-6) t Magnesium, Total x 5.1 1 mg/L 4.9 1 (7439-95-4)

u. Molybdenum, Total X <0.02 1 mg/L <0.02 1 (7439-98-7)

v. Manpanese, Total X 0,032 1 mg/L 0.051 1 (7439-96-5)

w. Tin, Total (7440-31-5) X <0.05 1 mg/L <0.05 1

a. Titanium,.

Total X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 Page V-2 ONTINUE ON PAGE V-3 I 35 0-2C (8-9 0)

J4'AIOff1m

/

EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item l o Form 1)

)

OUTFALL NUMBER I TN2640030035 113 CONTINUED FROM PAGE 3 OF FORM 2-C PART C - If you are a primary Industry and this outfall contains process wastewater, refer to Table 2c-2 In the Instructions to determine which of the GCJMS fractions you must test for. Mark 'X7 Incolumn 2-a for all such GC/MS fractions that apply to your industry and for ALL toxic metals, cyanides, and total phenols. If you are not required to mark column 2-a (secondaryindustries,nonprocess wastewater outfalls, and nonrequired GC/MS fractions), mark "IC in column 2-b for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present, Mark "r in column 2-c for each pollutant you believe is absent. Ifyou mark column 2a for any pollutant, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. Ifyou mark column 2b for any polutant. you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant if you know or have reason to believe it will be discharged in concentrations of 10 ppb or greater. If you mark column 2b for acrolain. acrylonitrile, 2,4 dinitrophenol, or 2-mothyt-4, 6 dinitrophenol. you must provide the results of at least one analysis for each of these pollutants which you know or have reason to believe that you discharge in concentrations ol 100 ppb or greater. Otherwise for pollutants for which you mark column 2b, you must either submit at least one analysis or briefly describe the reasons the pollutant Is expected to be discharged. Note that there are 7 pages to this part; please review each carefully.

Complete one table (all 7 pages) for each outfall. See Instructions for additional details and requirements.

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARKX 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional)

AND CAS a. TEST- b. BE- c. BE- a, MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 CAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b NO. OF NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED (ifavalable) (Ifavailabie) d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(ifavailable) RE- PRE- AB- (i) (2)MASS (1) (2)!MASS (l) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1)CONCEN- (2) MASS YSES QUIRED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION METALS, CYANIDE, AND TOTAL PHENOLS IM. Antimony, Total (7440-36-0) X <0.003 1 mg/L <0.003 2M. Arsenic, Total (7440-38-2) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 3M. Beryllium, Total, (7440-41-7) X <0,001 1 mg/L <0,001 1 4M. Cadmium, Total (7440-43-9) X <0.0001 1 mgfL <0.0001 1 5M. Chromium, Total (7440-47-3) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 6M. Copper, Total (7440-50-8) X 0.001 1 m1QL <0.001 1 7M. Lead, Total (7439-92-1) X <0.001 1 mglL <0.001 I 8M. Mercury, Total (7439-97-6) X <0.0001 I mgJL <0.0001 1 9M. Nickel, Total (7440-02-0) X <0.001 1 mg(L <0.001 IOM. Seienium, Total (7782-49-2) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 1 tIM.Silver, Total (7440-22-4) X <0.0001 1 mgIL <0.0001 1 12M. Thallium, Total (7440-28-0) X <0.002 1 mg/L <0.002 1 13M. Zinc, Total (7440-66-6) X <0.01 1 mgfL <0,01 1 14M. Cyanide, Total (57-12-5) X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 15M. Phenols, Total X <0.04 1 mglL <0.04 DIOXIN 2.3,.7,8-Tera-rhlorodibenzo-P E P =UaAW b&10.2-1,-GJJ"I.1tn~ttr~tn I I I X jUEt CR UE ,EtiUL t TS n-

I

_________________________________________________________ -~

I1.NTIN PL AT AGE V-3 2. MARK' X. 1 3. EFFLUENFK  ! 4 UNITS 5. INTAK, l AND CAS a.TEST.-. BE- c. BE- a. MAXIMUMOAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUJn C. LONG TERM'AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM 1b NO- OF NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED hf avaiiaMP~) (if avwM ha] d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-

+ 4.

i1)CONCEN- 1(2)MASS

- -~ -- -

(if available) RE- PRE- AB- (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION YSES GCMS FRACTION - VOLATILE COMPOUNDS IV. Acrolein (107-02-8) X <0.001 2V. Acjylonltrire (107-13-1) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 3V. Benzene (71-43-2) X <0.001 1 mq/L <0.001 1 4V. Bis (Chioro-methyl) Ether x <0.1 1 mg/L <0.1 1 5V, Bfomo arm (75-25-2) X <0.001 1 rmg/L <0.001 1 6V. Carbon Tetrachloride X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1

,VChlorbenzene (108-90-7) X <0.01 1 m.q/L <0.01 1 8V. Chlorodl-bromomethane X <0,001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 (124-48-1 _____ _________

V, Chloroethane (75-00-3) X <0.01 1 mq/L <0.01 1 1OV. 2-Chloro-ethylvinyl Ether X <0.01 1 mgtL <0.01 1 11V. Chloroform -

(67-66-3) X <0.0005 1 m.flL <0.0005 1 12V. Dichloro-bromomethane X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 (75-27-4"_

13V. Dlchloro-difluoromethane x <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 (75.71 -8) ________

14v. 1.l-Dlchloro-ethane (75-34-3) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 15V. 1,2-Dichloro-ethane (107-06-2) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 16V. 1,1-Dichloro-ethylene (75-354) X <0.001 1 mgJL <0.001 1 17V. 1.2-Dichloro-propane (78-87-5) X <0.01 1 mg/L <0.01 1 18V. 1,3-Dichloro-propylene (542-75-6) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 19V. Ethylbenzene (100-41-4) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 20V. Methyl Bromide (74-83-9) X <0.01 I rng/L <0.01 1 21V. Methyl Chloride (74-87-3) X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) ___Pag __4 _TINUE Pa1e V 4 ______ { CO CC TINUEON ON PAGE PAGEV-5V-5

EPAI.0. NUMBER I I Item I ofForm 1) OUTFAL L NUMBER 40030035 113 C"ONTIMlIJFD FROIM PAOF: V.4

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK 'X' 3. EFFLUENT 1 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional AND CAS a. TEST- o. BE- c. BE- a. MAXrMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE (jfavaffable

c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE NO OF ddifalablo a. CONCEN- b. MASS

a. LONG TERM AVERAGEVALUE

b. NO. OF ANAL-NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED (ifavaefable) RE- IPRE- AB. (1 (2)MASS (1 (2)MASS (1t (2)MASS ANAL. TRATION (11CONCEN- (21MASS YSES QUIRED JSENT SENT I CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION GC/MS FRACTION - VOLATILE COMPOU DS (continued_

22V. Methylene Chloride (75-09-2) X <0.001 1 mg(L 0.002 1 23V. 1,1,2,2-Tetra-choroeihane X <0.0005 1 mg/L <0.0005 1 (79-34-5) 24V. Tetrachioro-ethylene (127-18-4) X <0.0005 1 mgoL <0.0005 1 25V. Toluene (108-88-3) X <0.001 I mg/L <0.001 26V, 1,2-Tians-Dichloroethylene x <0.01 1 mo/L <0.01 1 (156-60-5) 27V. 1.1,1-Tri-chloroothane x <0.001 . mg/L <0.001 1 (71-5S-6) 28V. 1,1,2-Tri-chloroelhane X <0.0002 1 mglL <0.0002 1 (79-00-5) 29V, Tichforo-ethylene (79-016) X <0.001 1 mglL <0.001 1 30V. Tdchlioro-fluoromethane x <0.01 1 mg/L <0.01 1 (75-694) 3WV. Vlnyl Chloride (75-01-4) x <0.002 1 mg/L <0.002 1 GCIMS FRACTION - ACID COMPOUNDS I.

IA. 2-Chlorophenol (95-57-8) X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 2A. 2,4-Dichloro-phenol (120-83-2) X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 3A. 2,4-Dimethyl-phenol (105-67-9) X <0.005 1 mgIL <0.005 1 4A. 4.6-Dinitro-O-Cresol (534-52-1) x <0.024 1 mg/L <0.024 1 6A, 2.4-Dinltro-phenol (51-28-5) X <0.02 1 mgoL <0.02 6A. 2-Nirophenol (88-75-5) x <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 7A. 4-Nitrophenol (100-"2-7) X <0.03 1 mg/L <0.03 1 BA. P-Chloro-M Cresol (59-50-7) x <0.024 1 mg/L <0.024 1 9A. Pentachloro-phenol (87-86-5) X <0.005 1 mg/L <0,005 1 10A. Phenol (108-95-2) X <0.005 1 mg/L <0,005 1 IA. 2,4,6-Tfichloro-phenol (8.806-2) X <0.0027 1 mgiL <.0.0027 1 El 'A Form 3510-2C (8-90) Page V-5 _ONTINUE I CN PAGE -C

CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-5

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK X 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optionat)

AND CAS a. TEST- b. BE- ic. BE- a. MAXIMUMDAILYVALUE b. MAXIMUM30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED I _(fifaavavaa' ifavaab~e d NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(ifavailable) IRE- PRE- AB- (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1) CONCEN- (2) MASS YSES

'QUIRED SENT SENT C ONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION GCIMS FRACTION - BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS 1B. AcenaohUiene (83-32-9) X <0.005 I mg/L <0.005 1 2B. Acenaehtyrene (208-96-8) X <0.0023 1 mg/L <0.0023 1 3B. Anthracene (120-12-7) X <0.0007 1 mg/L <0.0007 1 48, Benzidine (92-87-5) x <0.05 1 mg/L <0.05 1 5B. Benzo (a)

Anthracene X <0.0003 1 mg/L <0.0003 1 (56-55-3) 6B. Benzo (a)

Pyrene (50-32-8) X <0.0003 1 mg/L <0.0003 1

78. 3,4-Benzo-fluoranihene X <0.0003 1 mg/L <0.0003 1 (205-99-21 8B. Benzo (ghl)

Peryiene X <0.01 1 mg/L <0.01 1 (191-24-2)

98. Benzo (k)

Fluoranthene x <0.0003 1 m/gL <0.0003 1 (207-08-9")

1OB. Bis (2-Chioro-ethoxy) Methane X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 (111-91-11) 118. BIs (2-Chloro-ethyl) Ether x <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 (111-44-4) 12B, Bis (2-Chloro-IsOpropyl) Ether X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 (102-60-11 13B, BIs (2-Ethyl-hexy/) Phihalate X <0.0025 1 mg/L <0.0025 1 (117-81-7) 1413. 4-Bromo-phenyl Phenyl x <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 Ether 0101 3) 158. Butyl Benzvl Phthalate (85-68-7) x <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 16B. 2-Chloro-naphth alene x <0.005 1 mgtL <0.005 1

.(91 7) ____

17B. 4-Chloro--

phenyl Phenyl x <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 Ether (7005-72-3) 18B. Chrvsene (218-01-9) X <0.0025 1 mg/L <0.0025 1 198. Dibenzo (a,h)

Anthracene x <0.01 1 mgIL <0.01 1 70-3) 208. 1,2-Dichlorm-benzene (95-50-1) X <0.002 1 mgIL <0.002 1 21B. 1.3-Dichloro-benzene (541-73-1) X <0.002 1 mg/L <0.002 1 A Form 3510-2C (8- 0. I - I I Page V 6 _ _CONTINUE IN PAGE V7

NUMBER (coov from UIem I oI Form 1) 1.D.EPA OUTFAL L NUMBER TN2640030035 113

(*flMTIM(II=Il G:ISAM PA(r.F V.A

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK X' 1 3. EFFLU T 4. UTS 5. INTAKE (ootional)

a. TEST. b. BE- ic. BE- DAILYVALUE

a. MAXIMUM b. MAXIMUM30 DAY VALUE C.LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF AND CAS (if avatIbe, (ifava~iab*,) d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED (A( (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL. TRATION (1)CONCEN- (2) MASS YSES

((favailable) RE- PRE- AB-7 UIRED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION

.GCMS FRACTION - BASENEUITRAL COMPOUNDS (continued) I 22B. t .4-Dichloro-benzene (106-46.7) X <0.0044 1 mgIL <0.0044 1 23B. 3.3'-Dlchloro-benzidlne X <0.025 1 mglL <0,025 1 (9t-94-1) __________,______

248. Diethyl Phthalate X <0.0019 1 mgtL <0.0019 1 f8,4-66-21 25B. Dimethvl Phihalale X <0.0016 1 mgiL <0.0016 1

ý131-1 1-3) 26B. QJ.N-Butyl Phthalate X <0.0025 1 mgIL <0.0025 1 (84-74-2) 27B. 2,4-Dinitro- 1 toluene (121-14-2) x <0.001 1 mglL <0.001 28B. 2,6-Dlnitro-Ioluene (606-20-2) X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 29B. D1-N-OclvI Phthalate X <0.01 1 mglL <0.01 1 1I17-84-0) 30B, 1,2-DlvhenvJ-hydrazlne (asAzo- X <0,1 1 mgtL <0.1 1

'renzeneI (122-66-7) 31B. Fluoranthene 1 (206-44-0) X <0.0022 1 mg/L <0.0022 32B. Fluorene (86-73-7) X <0.0003 m.q/L <0.0003 1 331, Hexachlorobenzeno (118-74-1) X <0.0019 1 mg/L <0.0019 1 34B. Hexa-chlorobutadiene X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 (87-68-3) 358. Hexachloro-cyclopenladiene X <0.03 1 mg/L <0.03 1

%*7-47-,

36B. exachltoro-ethane (67-72-1) X <0.0005 1 mg/L <0.0005 1 378. Indeno (lZ3-cd) Pywene x <0.01 1 mg/L <0.01 1 f193-39-5) - . I 38B. isophorone 1 (78-59-1) X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 398. Naphthalene (91-20-3) X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 40B. Nitrobenzene (98-95-3) X <0,005 1 mg/L <0.005 1 41B. N-Nltro-sodlmethylamine X <0.001 1 mg/L <0.001 1 A~.IN-Nrosodi-N- 1 mgq/L <0.005 Propylamina X <0.005 1i P<,000 71.'jI '<0.005TFMI I* M g)&¢'*

i u--r (}

[ - QQ) 1- xv*Q

CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-7

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK 1'3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. KE tiona AN'D CAS a. TEST- bn.BE- c.BE- a. MAXIMUJDAIL.Y VALUE b. MAZXMUM 30 DAYVALU)E c LONG IERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM b. NO. Of NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED (dfava __ifavayable rlaaJ d. NO. OF a. CONCEN- b. MASS AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(ifavai/able) RE- PRE- AS- (1) (2) MASS (1) (2)MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- TRATION (1) CONCEN- (2) MASS YSES QUIRED SENT SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION GC/MS FRACTION - BASEINEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (continued) 438. N-Niro-sodiphenylamine X <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 (86-30-6) 44B. Phenanihrene (85-01-8) X <0.0007 1 mg/L <0.0007 458 Pvfene (129-00.0) X <0.0003 1 mglL <0.0003 1 46B. 1.2,4 -Td-chlorobenzene x <0.005 1 mg/L <0.005 (120-82-1)

GG/MS FRACTION - PESTICIDES iP. Aid rin (309-00-2) X 2P, a-BHC (319-84-6) X.

3P. 3-BHC (319-85-7) X 4P. y- BHC (58-89-9) X 5P, 6- BHC (319-86-8) X 6P, Chlordane (57-74-9) X 7P. 4,4'-DDT (50-29-3) X 6P. 4,4'-ODE (72-55-9) X 9P. 4.4'-DD0 (72-54-8) X 10P. Dleldrin (60-57-1) X 11P, a-Endosullan (115-29-7) X 12P. 13-Endosulfan (115-29-7) X 13P. Endosullan Sulfate X (1031-07-8) 14P. Endrin (72-20-8) X 15P. Endrin Aldehyde X (7421-934) 16P. Heptachlor (76-44-8) X w-A-In _ _ _ _ ACQ~lwajPr_nl

• 1 )

EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item 1 of Form 1) OUTFALL NUMBER TN2640030035 i13 CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-8 I

1. POLLUTANT 2. MARK X' 3. EFFLUENT 4. UI__IT _ 5. INTAKE (optionafa AND CAS a. TEST, b. BE- c. BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE a. LONG TERM a. LONG TERM b. NO. OF NUMBER ING LIEVED LIEVED _ifavaolable (if avadable) d. NO. OF AVERAGE VALUE AVERAGE VALUE ANAL-(if available) RE- PRE- AB- (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS (1) (2) MASS ANAL- a.CONCEN- b.MASS (1)CONCEN- (2)MASS YSES QUIREO ISENT j SENT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION - -CONCENTRATION YSES TRATION TRATION GCIMS FRACTION - PESTICIDES (continued) 17B. Heptachlor Epoxide X (1024-57-3) 1 18P. PCB-1242 (53469-21-9) X 19P. PCB-1254 111097-69-1) X 20P. PCB-1221 (11104-28-2) X 21P. PCD -1232 (11141-16-5) X 22P. PCB-1248 (12672-29-6) X 23P. PCB-1260 (11096-82-5) X 24P. PCB-1016 (12674-11-2) X 25P. Toxaphene (8001-35-2) X NOTES:

(1) Natual background radiation levels.

Note: Long term average values from October 1,2004 through September 30, 2005.

EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) Page V-9

STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 401 CHURCH STREET L&C ANNEX 6th FLOOR NASHVILLE, TN 37243-1534 April 7, 2006 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED RECEIPT # 7004 2510 0002 4678 0347 Gordon Park Manager of Environmental Affairs Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, LP-5D Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402 RE: TVA-Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Cumberland Fossil, and Kingston Fossil Plants NPDES Permit # TNO020168, TN0005789, and TN0005452 Rhea, Stewart, and Roane Counties, Tennessee

Dear Mr. Park:

This responds to the request made on behalf of TVA, dated February 7, 2006, for written division approval to allow effluent samples from outfall 112 at Watts Bar, outfall 002 at Cumberland, and outfall 002 at Kingston to be treated, for toxicity testing on Pimephalespromelas,with UV radiation.

The division has reviewed the request and hereby approves the use of UV radiation at the above referenced facilities as proposed in your letter.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence please feel free to contact me at 615-532-0672.

Sincerely, Christopher S. Moran Manager, Enforcement and Compliance Section _

APR *20(

cc: OGC WPC-Permits-PRIM ENVIROUrMjIT WPC-EFO-CH-RDU, WVIK AFARS WPC-EFO-N-Joey Holland, DJE WPC-EFO-K-Jeff Horton Lindy Johnson-TVA

A 45 1 UJ1IL Johnson, Lindy P.

From: Chris Moran [Chris.Moran@state.tn.us]

Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 2:25 PM To: Johnson, Lindy P.

Subject:

Re: question about UV letter Lindy - I agree that it is appropriate to treat both the effluent and intake samples. I think in drafting the letter responding to your request, we did not take into account that the permits allow testing of intake water. Please let me know if you need anything more formal than this email.

Chris Moran, Manager Enforcement & Compliance Division of Water Pollution Control

>>> "Johnson, Lindy P." <lpjohnson@tva.gov> 04/14/06 8:43 AM >>>

Hi Chris, We were getting together our next toxicity test for Watts Bar Nuclear Outfall 112 (happily with the ability to treat samples with UV). In the letter, you state that we are authorized to treat effluent samples with UV. My question is (after talking with our toxicologist), shouldn't we also be authorized to treat our intake samples so we are appropriately comparing intake to effluent? (I think our earlier request just requested authorization to treat samples.)

Treating intake samples could also prevent us from having to invalidate tests due to intake toxicity due to pathogenic interference.

Would you be agreeable to treating intake samples as well under the same conditions authorized in your letter for effluent samples? Please advise.

Thanks.

Lindy Printz Johnson Tennessee Valley Authority Environmental Affairs, LP SD-C.

phone: 423 751 3361 fax: 423 751 7011 email: /piohnsonctva.,gov 04/21/2006

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (TVA) - WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT (WBN) -

NPDES PERMIT NO. TN0020168 - APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL Current Whole Effluent (WET) Toxicity Limits:

Outfall 101 - 7-day or 3-brood IC25 >2.4%

effluent (42.3 TUc)

Monitoring Frequency = 2/year Outfall 102 - 7-day or 3-brood IC25 >_2.4%

effluent (42.3 TUc)

Monitoring Frequency = 2/year (only if discharge operated Z_30 days from Jan. - Jun., or Jul. -

Dec. if all toxicity testing has not been completed for Outfall 101)

Outfall 112 - 7-day or 3-brood IC25 L-100%

effluent (1 TUc)

Monitoring Frequency = 2/year Outfall 113- 7-day or 3-brood IC25 >7.6%

effluent (13.2 TUc)

Monitoring Frequency = 2/year Proposed Whole Effluent (WET) Toxicity Requirements:

Outfall 101 - 7-day or 3-brood IC25 >2.4%

effluent (42.3 TUc)

Monitoring Frequency = 2/year, one during oxidizing biocide treatment and one during non-oxidizing biocide treatment Outfall 102 - Same as currently required Outfall 112- 7-day or 3-brood IC25 Ž_100.0%

effluent. Same frequency as current. Requesting inclusion of

authorization to use UV treatment on Pimephalespromelas in permit.

Outfall 113 - 7-day or 3-brood IC25 -_7.6%

effluent (13.2 TUc)

Monitoring Frequency = 2/year, one during oxidizing biocide treatment and one during non-oxidizing biocide treatment Outfalls 101 and 113:

In accordance with EPA's recommendation (Technical Support Document for Water Quality-based Toxics Control, EPA/505/2-90-001), WBN Outfall OSN101 and Outfall OSN113 would not be required to have chronic WET limits based on a demonstration of no Reasonable Potential (RP) for excursions above the ambient water quality chronic (CCC) criterion using effluent data for current operating conditions. Following guidance in the Technical Support Document (TSD), when no RP exists, biomonitoring would be conducted at a frequency of only once every 5 years as part of the permit renewal process to document acceptable effluent toxicity and toxicity at the instream wastewater concentration (IWC) would serve only as a hard trigger for accelerated toxicity biomonitoring.

However, raw water used at the facility is treated with corrosion inhibitors and biocide products. These products, which can become concentrated in the cooling tower system, are discharged through Outfalls 101 and 113. The chemical makeup of the products used can change during the permit period and the combined toxicity effect of the chemicals is not known. Thus it is not feasible to control toxicity only by the application of chemical specific effluent limits to the discharge. Toxicity testing is a reasonable method to evaluate the toxicity impacts of the products in the effluent. Therefore, TVA believes it is appropriate to maintain the current WET requirements for WBN Outfalls OSN101 and OSNI 13 that are specified in the Biocide Corrosion Treatment Plan (BCTP),

approved by letter on dated July 30, 2004, with one test per outfall during oxidizing biocide treatment and one test per outfall during non-oxidizing biocide treatment. TVA is requesting permit language consistent with the BCTP.

The following RP determination utilizes nine years (19 studies) and six years (13 studies) of WET biomonitoring data collected for Outfalls 101 and 113, respectively. Only I025 based studies were used in this determination. Table 1 summarizes Outfall 101 biomonitoring results while Table 3 summarizes Outfall 113 biomonitoring results.

Outfall 102:

Sampling and analysis of Outfall OSN 102 has not been required under the current permit since the conditions for biomonitoring were not met. No RP determination was made for this Outfall.

Outfall 112:

In accordance with EPA's recommendation (Technical Support Document for Water Quality-based Toxics Control, EPA/505/2-90-001), WBN Outfall OSN112 should retain its WET chronic limit based on a demonstration of Reasonable Potential (RP) for excursions above the ambient water quality chronic (CCC) criteria usinq effluent data. The following RP determination utilizes nine years (28 studies) of WET biomonitoring data collected for Outfall 112. Only IC25 based studies were used in this determination. Table 2 summarizes Outfall 112 biomonitoring results obtained during the last twelve years.

Table 1. Summary of WBN Outfall OSN101 WET Biomonitoring Results:

Acute Results (96-h Survival) Chronic Results Test Date Test Species  % Survival in Study Study Highest Toxicity IC25 Toxicity Concentration Units (TUa) Units (TUc)

Tested tChis Based NOEC:*

1e -1ypo ^ -

1.Feb. 2-96,1994 Ceriodaphnia dub/a 100% -

"1 0 10.2 Pimephales promelas 100% (0C25:<1.0)

2. Aug, 26 - Sept. 22,1994 Ceriodaphniadubia 100%

<1.0 <1.0 Pimephales promelas 100%

3. Feb. 1-8, 1995 Ceriodaphniadub/a 100% >100%

Pimephalespromelas 98% <1.0 <1.0

>100%

4. Aug. 9-16, 1995 Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >100%

Pimephales promelas 100% <1.0 <1.0

>100%

5. Feb. 23 - Mar. 1, 1996 Ceriodaphniadubia 100%

Pimephalespromelas 98% <1.0

,. --IC2r.Based ..-

6. Aug. 22-29, 1996* Ceriodaphniadubia 89% >100%

Pimephalespromelas 100% <1.0 <1.0

>100%

7. Feb. 19-26, 1997* Ceriodaphniadubia 80% 58.0%

<1.0 >100% 1.7 Pimephalespromelas 100%

8. Aug. 12-20, 1997* Ceriodaphniadubia 0% 30.9%

Pimephalespromelas 3.1 >100% 3,2 100%

9. Feb. 24 - Mar. 3, 1998* Ceriodaphnia dubia 100% >100%

Pimephalespromelas 100% <1.0 >100% <1.0

10. Sept. 16, 1998* Ceriodaphniadubia 0% 32.4%

Pimephalespromelas 3.2 >100% 3.1 98%

11. Mar. 2-9, 1999" Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >100%

Pimephalespromelas 90% <1.0 2.5 40%

12. Sept. 9 - Oct. 6, 1999* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >13.2%

Pimephalespromelas 100% <7.58 <7.58

>13.2%

13. Apr. 4-11, 2000* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >13.2%

Mar. 22-29, 2000* Pimephales promelas 98% <7.58 <7.58

>13.2%

14. Oct. 25 - Nov. 1, 2000* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >13.2%

<7.58 <7.58 Pimephates promelas 100% >13.2%

- I

Summary of WBN Outfall OSN101 WET Biomonitoring Results (continued):

Acute Results (96-h Survival) Chronic Results Test Date Test Species Sivasin Study Study ConcHighest Toxicity IC25 Toxicity Concentration Units (TUa) Units (TUc)

Tested

15. Apr. 18-25, 2001* Cenodaphniadubia 89% <7.58 >13.2% <7.58 Aor. 17-24. 2001* Pimephales promelas 95% >13.2%

16. Oct. 15-22, 2001* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% <7.58 >13.2% <7.58 Pimephales promelas 100% >13.2%

17. Apr. 14-19, 2002* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% <7.58 >13.2% <7.58 Apr. 28 - May 3, 2002* Pimephalespromelas 100% >13.2%

18 Oct. 22-29, 2002* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >13.2%

<7.58 <7.58 Oct. 21-28, 2002* Pirmephalespromelas 100% >13.2%

19. Apr. 14-21, 2003* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >13.2%

<7.58 <7.58 Pimephalespromelas 100% >13.2%

20. Nov. 3-10, 2003* Ceriodaphniadubia 90% 12.1%

<7.58 8.3 Pimephales promelas 100% >13.2%

21. Apr. 20-27, 2004* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >13.2%

<7.58 <7.58 Pimephalespromelas 98% >13.2%

22 Nov 8-1"3,2004 Cefi~daphnia dubia- 100% . 2, . >19.2%

.'. >12

>19.20 5.20 "100%.. "" " - " " - '*..,'* .. ,>19.2% . ... :-  : " -" i

,23-Apr 12-19,2005.,, Cerodaphniadubia. 10 %'"'?-'":'

5'0"".:*.' "" ' ;'""' ,<5 20 ",

,Pimephalespromelas 100% >19.2 ".'.

24. Nov., 2-9-2005" Cerdod~phnia dubia 100% >192 %-

Pimephales promelas 98% <5.20 >19.2% <5.20, n 38 19 19 Maximum 100% 7.58 8.30 Minimum 0% 1.00 1.00 Mean 92.8% 5.35 5.51 CV 0.24 0.51 0.47 tStatistical endpoint biased by selection of the dilution series. IC2 5 derived from original data.

• Used in RP determination.

Shaded area designates data collected during current permit (Effective Date: November 5, 2004).

Current permit limit: IC25 _2.4%, 42.3 TUc.

Current permit dilution series: Control, 1.2%, 2.4%, 4.8%, 9.6%, 19.2%.

Table 2. Summary of WBN Outfall OSNI12 WET Biomonitoring Results:

Acute Results (96-h Survival) Chronic Results

% Survival in Study Study Test Date Test Species Highest Toxicity IC25 Toxicity Concentration Units (TUa) Units (TUc)

Tested

. . ypothesis Based NOEC:.....

1. February 2-9, 1994 Ceriodaphniadubia 100%

<1.0 4.0 Pimephalespromelas 90%

2. Feb. 18-25, 1994 Ceriodaphniadubia 100%

<1.0 4.0 Pimephalespromelas 95%

3. Mar. 23-30, 1994 Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >100%

<1.0 <1.0 Pimephales promelas 98% >100%

4. Aug. 26 - Sept. 2, 1994 Ceriodaphniadubia 90%

<1.0 <1.0 Pimephalespromelas 100%

5. Feb. 1-8, 1995 Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >100%

<1.0 <1.0 Pimephalespromelas 100% >100%

6. Aug. 9-16, 1995 Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >100%

<1.0 <1.0 Pimephalespromelas 100% >100%

7. Feb. 23 - Mar. 1, 1996 Ceriodaphniadubia 100%

<1.0 <1.0 Pimephalespromelas 88%

Ceriodaphniadubia Based '. <-1,,0,,-

8. Aug. 22-29, 1996* 89% 67.5%

100% <1.0 >100% 1.5 Pimephalespromelas

9. Sept. 6-12, 1996*t Ceriodaphniadubia 90% 10.0%

<1.0 10.0 Pimephales promelas

10. Feb. 19-26, 1997" Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >100%

Pimephalespromelas 65% <1.0 59.1% 1.7

11. Mar. 14-21, 1997" Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >100%

<1.0 1.1 Pimephales promelas 90% 94.3%

12. Jul. 2-9, 1997*" Ceriodaphnia dubia

<1.0 <1.0 Pimephalespromelas 100% >100%

13. Aug. 12-20, 1997* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >100%

<1.0 <1.0 Pimephalespromelas 100% >100%

14. Feb. 24 - Mar. 3, 1998* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >100%

<1.0 2.0 Pimephales promelas 70% 49.0%

15. Mar. 24-31, 1998*: Ceriodaphniadubia

<1.0 2.7 Pimephalespromelas 75% 37.3%

Summary of WBN Outfall OSN112 WET Biomonitoring Results (continued):

Acute Results (96-h Survival) Chronic Results

% Survival in Study Study Test Date Test Species Highest Toxicity IC25 Toxicity Concentration Units (TUa) Units (TUc)

Tested

16. Apr. 26 - May 6, 1998*": Ceriodaphniadubia

<1.0 <1.0 (w/UV & AB tests) Pimephalespromelas 100% >100%

17. Nov. 17-24, 1998* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >100%

<1.0 <1.0 (w/AB test) Pimephales promelas 100% >100%

18. Mar. 2-9, 1999* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >100%

<1.0 <1.0 (w/AB test) Pimephalespromelas 95% >100%

19. Oct. 19-26, 1999* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% 99.4%

<1.0 1.0 (w/AB test) Pimephalespromelas 100% >100%

20. Dec. 7-13, 1999*: Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >100%

<1.0 <1.0 Pimephalespromelas

21. Apr. 4-11, 2000* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >100%

<1.0 <1.0 Mar. 22-29, 2000* Pimephalespromelas 93% >100%

22. Nov. 28 - Dec. 6, 2000* Ceriodaphniadubia 90% >100%

<1.0 <1.0 Pimephafes promelas 98% >100%

23. Apr. 18-25, 2001* Ceriodaphniadubia 90% >100%

<1.0 4.2 Pimephalespromelas 78% 23.8%

24. May 7-14, 2001 *: Ceriodaphniadubia

<1.0 <1.0 Pimephalespromelas 100% >100%

25. Oct. 16-23, 2001* Cer/odaphniadubia 100% >100%

<1.0 <1.0 Pimephalespromelas 98% >100%

26. Apr. 23-30, 2002* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >100%

<1.0 <1.0 (w/UV test) Pimephalespromelas 100% >100%

27.Oct. 22-29, 2002* Ceriodaphniadub/a 100% >100%

<1.0 <1.0 (w/UV test) Pimephalespromelas 98% >100%

28. Apr. 15-22, 2002* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >100%

<1.0 1.2 (w/UV test) Pimephalespromelas 65% 82.5%

29. Apr. 29 - May 6, 2003*ý Ceriodaphniadubia

<1.0 <1.0 (w/UV test) Pimephalespromelas 88% >100%

30. Nov. 3-11, 2003* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >100%

<1.0 <1.0 (w/UV test) Pimephalespromelas 100% >100%

31. Apr. 20-27, 2004* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >100%

<1.0 <1.0 (w/UV test) Pimephalespromelas 100% >100%

Summary of WBN Outfall OSNl12 WET Biomonitoring Results (continued):

Acute Results (96-h Survival) Chronic Results Test Date Test Species  % Survival in Study Study Highest Toxicity IC25 Toxicity Concentration Units (TUa) Units (TUc)

Tested

32. Nov. 8-13, 2004,,,, CQeriodaphniadubia 100% " >100%

<1.0 <1.0 (w/UV test) Imel hales promelas 95%

• ,33.Apr.1219,2005 Cedodaphnia dubia

• ,:es (Iu

) . ..100%'. <11.0 .i e VtPimephales promelas 80% " 80.2% 1.2 34ý May 3 10 2005*" Cediodaohniadubia .. - . .

,I/UV test ), Pmephalespromelas..

Pupstr 100% >1.00%

34 Nov. 29- Dec. 6, 2005*., Ceriodaphniadubia 100. >100%

"" . , : " " ,' <'1.0 <1.0

.,w/UV test) Pimephalespromelas, 100% ,>100% .O n 48 28 28 Maximum 100% 1 10 Minimum 65% 1 1 Mean 95% 1 1.59 CV 0.10 0 1.12

'Single species test.

• Used in RP determination.

Shaded area designates data collected during current permit (Effective Date: November 5, 2004).

Current permit limit: IC25 _Ž100%, 1.0 TUc Current permit dilution series: Control, 6.25%, 12.5%, 25.0%, 50.0%, 100.0%

Table 3. Summary of WBN Outfall OSNl13 WET Biomonitoring Results:

Acute Results (96-h Survival) Chronic Results Test Date Test Species  % Survival in Study Study Highest Toxicity IC25 Toxicity Concentration Units (TUa) Units (TUc)

Tested Cedodaphnia dubia 100% >41.2%

1. October 19-26, 1999" Pimephalespromelas 98% <2.43 >41.2% <2.43

2. Apr. 4-11, 2000* Ceriodaphniadubia 90% 19.5%

Pimephalespromelas 100% <2.43 >41.2% 5.0

3. Oct. 25 - Nov. 1, 2000* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >41.2%

Pimephalespromelas 98% <2.43 <2.43

>41.2%

4. Apr. 18-25, 2001* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >41.2%

Pimephalespromelas 100% <2.43 25.1%

4.0

5. Oct. 15-23, 2001* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >41.2%

Pimephales promelas 100% <2.43 >41.2% <2.43

6. Apr. 14-19, 2002* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >41.2%

Apr. 28 - May 3, 2002* Pimephalespromelas 93% <2.43 5.0 20.0%

7. Oct. 21-28, 2002' Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >41.2%

Pimephalespromelas 98% <2.43 <2.43

>41.2%

8. Apr. 15-22, 2003* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >41.2%

Pimephalespromelas 93% <2.43 >41.2% <2.43

9. Nov. 3-10, 2003* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >41.2%

Pimephalespromelas 100% <2.43 >41.2% <2.43

10. Apr. 20-27, 2004* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% >41.2%

Pimephalespromelas 100% <2.43 >41.2% <2.43

>41.2%9

>30.4%...;....... ;.....-;

.11-Nov. 9-16, 2.004 ' Ceriodaphniadubia '. l0.-- .

Pimephaiespromelas 100% - . <3.29 >30.4/ <3.29

12. Apr. 12-19, 2005* Ceriodaphniadubia 100% -. >30.4%.

<3.29 <3.29 Pimephales promelas 98% >30.40/6

Summary of WBN Outfall OSN113 WET Biomonitoring Results (continued):

Acute Results (96-h Survival) Chronic Results

% Survival in Study Study Test Date Test Species Highest Toxicity IC 25 Toxicity Concentration Units (TUa) Units (TUc)

Tested 13., Nov.2-9, 2005* - . Ceriodaphniadubia 100% - >30.4% -.

Pimephalesromelas :98% -. ".:>30.4% - - ,

n 26 13 13 Maximum 100% 3.29 5 Minimum 90% 2.43 2.43 Mean 99% 2.63 3.14 Cv 0.03 0.14 0.31

• Used in RP determination.

Shaded area designates data collected during current permit (Effective Date: November 5, 2004).

Current permit limit: IC25 >7.6%, 13.2 TUc.

Current permit dilution series: Control, 1.9%. 3.8%, 7.6%, 15.2%, 30.4%.

OSN 101 Reasonable Potential (RP) Determination Based on OSN101 Effluent Data Only Technical Support Document, Text Box 3-2 and Section 3.3 (EPA/505/2-90-001)

DILUTION OSN101 Discharge Flow = 34.04 MGD (calculated as mean flow, Nov. 5, 2004 - Mar. 31 2006, per Technical Support Document)

Stream 1Q10 = 2062 MGD Dilution Factor (DF): DF= Q0s = 2062 = 60.6 Qw 34,04 Instream Wastewater Concentration (IWC): IWC =DF-' xOO = 1.65%

Chronic TOXICITY Step 1 Nineteen WET Biomonitoring Studies, Maximum Observed Toxicity is 8.3 TUc.

[Average toxicity = 5.51 TUc; compliance limit = 42.3 TUc (IC25 Ž>2.37%

effluent).]

Step 2-3 Coefficient of variation (CV) = 0.47. For 19 samples and a CV of 0.5, the multiplying factor (99% confidence level and 99% probability) is 2.1.

Step 4 Low river flow = 2062 MGD and WBN Outfall OSN101 discharge = 34.04 MGD = 1.65% Instream Waste Concentration (IWC) after mixing.

At a 0.0165 IWC: 8.3 TUc x 2.1 x 0.0165 = 0.29 TUc Step 5 0.41 TUc is less than the ambient CCC criterion of 1.0 TUc. This outcome demonstrates that no Reasonable Potential for excursions above the CCC exists, based on effluent data obtained from testing conducted under current operating conditions.

OSN 112 Reasonable Potential (RP) Determination Based on OSN112 Effluent Data Only Technical Support Document, Text Box 3-2 and Section 3.3 (EPA/505/2-90-001)

DILUTION OSN112 Discharge Flow = 0.279 MGD (calculated as mean flow, Nov. 5 2004 - Mar. 31 2006, per Technical Support Document)

Stream 7Q10 = 0.000 MGD

Dilution Factor (DF): DF= Qs Qw+ Qw - 0.279 = 1.0 Instream Wastewater Concentration (IWC): IWC- Qw x100=100%

Qs + Qw Chronic TOXICITY Step 1 Twenty-eight WET Biomonitoring Studies, Maximum Observed Toxicity is 10.0 TUc.

[Average toxicity = 1.59 TUc; compliance limit = 1.0 TUc (IC25 -> 100%

effluent).]

Step 2-3 Coefficient of variation (CV) = 1.12. For 28 samples and a CV of 1.1, the multiplying factor (99% confidence level and 99% probability) is 3.8.

Step 4 Low stream flow = 0.000 MGD and WBN Outfall OSN112 discharge =

0.279 MGD = 100% Instream Waste Concentration (IWC) after mixing.

At a 1.0 IWC: 10.0 TUc x 3.8 x 1.0 = 38 TUc Step 5 38 TUc is greater than the ambient CCC criterion of 1.0 TUc.

Reasonable potential, therefore, exists for excursions above the CCC, based on effluent data. This requires a permit limit.

OSN 113 Reasonable Potential (RP) Determination Based on OSN113 Effluent Data Only Technical Support Document, Text Box 3-2 and Section 3.3 (EPA/505/2-90-001)

DILUTION OSN113 Discharge Flow = 131.35 MGD (calculated as mean flow, Nov. 5, 2004 - Mar.

31 2006, per Technical Support Document)

Stream 1Q10 = 2062 MGD Dilution Factor (DF): DF= QsQw +Qw Qw

-2062+131.35 131.35 131.35 =16.7 Instream Wastewater Concentration (IWC): IWC = DF-'x100 = 5.99%

Chronic TOXICITY Step I Thirteen WET Biomonitoring Studies, Maximum Observed Toxicity is 5.0 TUc.

[Average toxicity = 3.14 TUc; compliance limit = 13.2 TUc (1025 _>7.58%

effluent).]

Step 2-3 Coefficient of variation (CV) = 0.31. For 13 samples and a CV of 0.3, the multiplying factor (99% confidence level and 99% probability) is 1.7.

Step 4 Low stream flow plus WBN Outfall OSNl13 discharge = 2193.35 MGD and WBN Outfall OSN113 discharge = 131.35 MGD = 5.99% Instream Waste Concentration (IWC) after mixing.

At a 5.99 IWC: 5.0 TUc x 1.7 x 0.0599 = 0.51 TUc Step 5 0.51 TUc is less than the ambient CCC criterion of 1.0 TUc. This outcome demonstrates that no Reasonable Potential for excursions above the CCC exists, based on effluent data obtained from testing conducted under current operating conditions.

Biological Monitoring of the Tennessee River Near Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Discharge 2004 by Dennis S. Baxter Donny Lowery June 2005 Final Aquatic Monitoring and Management Knoxville, Tennessee

Table of Contents Page-Introduction 1 Methods 2 Fish Community 2 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community 3 Sport Fishing Index 4 Spring Sport Fish Survey 5 Results and Discussion 5 Fish Community 5 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community 6 Sport Fishing Index 6 Spring Sport Fish Survey 7 Literature Cited 9 List of Tables Table 1. Scoring Results for the Twelve Metrics and Overall Reservoir Fish Assemblage Index for Chickamauga Reservoir, 2004. 10 Table 2. Recent (1993-2004) RFAI Scores Developed Using the RFAI Metrics Upstream and Downstream of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 11 Table 3. Scoring Results for the Twelve Metrics and Overall RFAI for Watts Bar Reservoir, 2004. 12 Table 4. Species Listing and Catch Per Unit Effort for Chickamauga Reservoir Forebay and Sequoyah Transition Transects During the Fall Electrofishing and Gill Netting on Chickamauga Reservoir, 2004 (Electrofishing Effort =

300 Meters of Shoreline and Gill Netting Effort = 10 Net-Nights). 13 Table 5. Species Listing and Catch Per Unit Effort for the Transition, and Inflow Transects During the Fall Electrofishing and Gill Netting on Chickamauga Reservoir, 2004 (Electrofishing Effort = 300 Meters of Shoreline and Gill Netting Effort = 10 Net-Nights). 14 Table 6. Individual Metric Ratings and the Overall Benthic Community Index Scores for Watts Bar Forebay and Sites Downstream of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Watts Bar and Chickamauga Reservoirs, November 2004. 16 i

List of Tables (continued)

Page Table 7. Average Mean Density Per Square Meter of Benthic Taxa Collected at the Downstream Site Near Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Chickamauga Reservoir, November 2004. 17 Table 8. Recent (1994-2004) Benthic Index Scores Collected as Part of the Vital Signs Monitoring Program at Watts BartReservoir Transition and Forebay Zone Sites (Upstream), and Chickamauga Reservoir Inflow (Upstream) and Transition (Downstream) Sites. 19 Table 9. Sport Fishing Index Results for Chickamauga Reservoir, 2003. 19 Table 10. Sport Fishing Index Results for Watts Bar Reservoir, 2003. 20 Table 11. Sport Fishing Index Population Quantity and Creel Quantity and Quality Metrics and Scoring Criteria. 21 Table 12. Sport Fishing Index Population Quality Metrics and Scoring Criteria. 23 Table 13. Electrofishing Catch Rate, Mean Weight, Percent Harvestable, Numbers of Black Bass Greater than Five Pounds, Numbers of Black Bass Greater than Four Pounds and Largest Black Bass Collected, Chickamauga Reservoir Black Bass Surveys, 1995-2004. 23 Table 14. Black Bass Catch Per Hour Compared to Habitat Types by Location. 24 Table 15. Black Bass Catch Per Hour Compared to Habitat Types by Reservoir. 24 Table 16. Electrofishing Catch Rate, Mean Weight, Percent Harvestable, Numbers of Black Bass Greater than Five Pounds, Numbers of Black Bass Greater than Four Pounds and Largest Black Bass Collected, Watts Bar Reservoir Black Bass Surveys, 1995-2004. 25 List of Figures Figure 1. Parameters used to calculate the Sport Fishing Index. 25 Figure 2. Annual Chickamauga Reservoir RFAI scores for sample years between 1993 and 2004. 26 11

List of Figures (continued)

Page Figure 3. Annual Watts Bar Reservoir RFAI scores for sample years between 1993 and 2004. 27 Figure 4. Sport Fishing Index results for Chickamauga R-servoir between 1997 and 2003. 28 Figure 5. Sport Fishing Index results for Watts Bar Reservoir between 1997 and 2003. 29 Figure 6. Chickamauga Reservoir length frequency histogram, (all sites) spring 2004. 30 Figure 7. Relative stock density values for Tennessee River Reservoirs. 30 Figure 8. Proportional stock density values for Tennessee River Reservoirs. 31 Figure 9. Chickamauga Reservoir mean relative weights (Wr) for largemouth bass broken out by RSD category and fish numbers. 31 Figure 10. Watts Bar Reservoir length frequency histogram, (all sites) spring 2004. 32 Figure 11. Watts Bar Reservoir mean relative weights (Wr) for largemouth bass. 32 Acronyms BI Benthic Macroinvertebrate Index BIP Balanced Indigenous Population NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System PSD Proportional Stock Density QA Quality Assurance RFAI Reservoir Fish Assemblage Index RSD Relative Stock Density RSDM Relative Stock Density of Memorable-sized RSDP Relative Stock Density of Preferred-sized RSDT Relative Stock Density of Trophy-sized SAHI Shoreline Assessment Habitat Index ScCW Supplemental Condenser Cooling Water SFI Sport Fishing Index ill

Acronyms (continued)

SSS Spring Sport Fish Survey TRM Tennessee River Mile TVA Tennessee Valley Authority VS Vital Signs WBN Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Wr Relative Weight iv

Introduction Section 316(a) of the Clean Water Act specifies that industrial, municipal, and other facilities must obtain permits if their discharges go directly to surface waters. Industries responsible for point-source discharges of heated water can obtain a variance from state water quality standards if the industry can demonstrate compliance with thermal criteria by documenting the maintenance of Balanced Indigenous Populations (BIP) of aquatic life in the vicinity of its discharge.

Historically, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) used special studies to evaluate affects on aquatic life in the vicinity of its power plant discharges. In July 1999, a Supplemental Condenser Cooling Water (SCCW) system went on line at TVA's Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN). As required by WBN's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit TN0020168,1 impacts to aquatic communities in the vicinity of WBN and Watts Bar Reservoir forebay were evaluated. Baxter et al. (2001) recommended components of TVA's Vital Signs (VS) monitoring program (Dycus and Meinert 1993), the Reservoir Fish Assemblage Index (RFAI) and Benthic Macroinvertebrate Index (BI) to WBN management as a means of assessing Chickamauga and Watts Bar Reservoirs' aquatic community integrity while the SCCW is operational. The purpose of this document is to briefly summarize-and prcvide results of the Calendar Year 2004 monitoring and analyses to the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation and compare these results with historical monitoring data.

Prior to 1990, TVA reservoir studies focused on reservoir ecological assessments to meet specific needs as they arose. In 1990, TVA instituted a Valley-wide VS monitoring program which is a broad-based evaluation of the overall ecological conditions in major reservoirs. Data is evaluated with a multi-metric monitoring approach utilizing five environmental indicators:

dissolved oxygen, chlorophyll, sediment quality, benthic macroinvertebrate community, and the fish community. When this program was initiated, specific evaluation techniques were developed for each indicator, and these techniques were fine-tuned to better represent ecological conditions. The outcome of this effort was development of multi-metric evaluation techniques for the fish assemblage (i.e., RFAI) and the benthic community, as described below. These multi-metric evaluation techniques have proven successful in TVA's monitoring efforts as well as other federal and state monitoring programs. For consistency, only RFAI analyses between 1993 and 2004 will be utilized. The BI is used primarily to support the RFAI analysis.

The Sport Fishing Index (SFI) was developed to quantify sport fishing quality for individual sport fish species. The SFI relies on measurements of quantity and quality aspects of angler success and fish population characteristics. This provides biologists with a reference point to measure the quality of a sport fishery. Comparison of the population sampling parameters and creel results for a particular sport fish species with expectations of these parameters from a high quality fishery (reference conditions) allows for the determination of fishing quality. Indices have been developed for black bass (largemouth, smallmouth and spotted bass), sauger, striped bass, bluegill, and channel catfish.

I

In recent years, SFI information has been used to describe the quality of the resident fishery in conjunction with compliance monitoring, thermal variance requests, and other regulatory issues at TVA nuclear plants in Tennessee. Similar NPDES compliance monitoring programs using the methodologies described above are also being performed at Browns Ferry Nuclear, Colbert and Widows Creek Fossil Plants in Alabama.

Based on the RFAI and benthic macroinvertebrate analyses, TVA biologists have concluded that the SCCW and WBN operation had no effect on the fish and benthic macroinvertebrate communities in the vicinity of WBN and Watts Bar Reservoir forebay during Calendar Year 2004.

The TVA Spring Sport Fish Survey (SSS) is conducted to evaluate the sport fish population of TVA Reservoirs. The results of the survey are used by state agencies to protect, improve and assess the quality of sport fisheries. Predominant habitat types in the reservoir are surveyed to determine sport fish abundance. In addition to accommodating TVA and state databases, this surveying method aligns with TVA Watershed Team and TVA's Reservoir Operations Study objectives. Sample sites are selected using the shoreline habitat characteristics employed by the Watershed Teams. The survey predominantly targets three species of black bass (liargemouth, smallmouth, and spotted bass) and black and white crappie. These species are the predominant sport fish sought after by fisherman.

Methods Fish Community Reservoirs are typically divided into three zones for VS monitoring - inflow, transition and forebay. The inflow zone is generally in the upper reaches of the reservoir and is riverine in nature; the transition zone or mid-reservoir is the area where water velocity decreases due to increased cross-sectional area, and the forebay is the lacustrine area near the dam. The Chickamauga Reservoir inflow zone sample site is located at Tennessee River Mile (TRM) 529.0, the transition zone is sampled at TRM 490.5, and the forebay zone sample site is located at TRM 472.3. The VS inflow zone starts below Watts Bar Dam at TRM 529 and extends downstream to TRM 526.3. This station is used to provide downstream data for the 316(a) thermal variance studies performed in 1993 to 1995, 1997, and 1999 to 2004. Since the WBN discharge is located within Chickamauga Reservoir inflow zone, no upstream control site data are available for comparison. Watts Bar Reservoir forebay site (TRM 531) will be used to document any notable changes in Tennessee River ecological conditions above the WBN discharge but will not be used for upstream/downstream comparisons of RFAI scores.

Fish samples consisted of fifteen 300-meter electrofishing runs (approximately 10 minutes duration) and ten experimental gill net sets (five 6.1 meter panels with mesh sizes of 2.5, 5.1, 7.6, 10.2, and 12.7 cm) per site. Attained values for each of the 12 metrics were compared to reference conditions for transition zones of lower mainstream Tennessee River reservoirs and assigned scores based upon three categories hypothesized to represent relative degrees of degradation: least degraded -5; intermediate -3; and most degraded -1. These categories are 2

based on "expected" fish community characteristics in the absence of human-induced impacts other than impoundment. Individual metric scores for a site are summed to obtain the RFAI score.

Comparison of the attained RFAI score from the potential impact zone to a predetermined criterion has been suggested as a method useful in identifying the presence of normal community structure and function and hence existence of a BIP. For multi-metric indices, two criteria have been suggested to ensure a conservative screening for a BIP. First, if an RFA score reaches 70 percent of the highest attainable score (adjusted upward to include sample variability), and second, if fewer than half of RFAI metrics potentially influenced by thermal discharge receive a low (1) or moderate (3) score, then normal community structure and function would be present indicating that a BIP existed. Under these conditions the heated discharge would meet screening criteria and no further evaluation would be needed.

The range of RFAI scores possible is from 12 to 60. As discussed in detail below, the average variance for RFAI scores in TVA reservoirs is 6 (+ 3). Therefore, any location that attains an RFAI score of 45 (42 + our sample variance of 3) or higher would be considered to demonstrate a BIP. It must be stressed that scores below this endpoint do not necessarily reflect an adversely imp*,f.ed fish community. The endpoint is used to serve as a conservative screening levei; for example, any fish community that meets these criteria is obviously not adversely impacted.

RFAI scores below this level would require a more in-depth look to determine if a BIP exist. If a score below this criterion is obtained, an inspection of individual RFAI metric results would be an initial step to help identify if WBN operation is a contributing factor. This approach is appropriate if a validated multi-metric index is being used and scoring criteria applicable to the zone of study are available.

The Quality Assurance (QA) component of VS monitoring deals with how well the RFAI scores can be repeated and is accomplished by collecting a second set of samples at 15-20 percent of the sites each year. Previous statistical analyses with the QA component of VS has shown that the comparison of RFAI index scores from 54 paired sample sets collected over a seven year period ranged from 0 to 18 points. Based on these findings, the 7 5th percentile is 6 and the 9 0 "h percentile is 12. The mean difference between these 54 paired scores is 4.6 points with 95 percent confidence limits of 3.4 and 5.8. Therefore, a difference of 6 points or less was the value selected for defining "similar" scores between upstream and downstream fish communities. That is, if the downstream RFAI score is within 6 points of the upstream score, the communities will be considered similar. It is important to bear in mind that differences greater than 6 points can be expected simply due to method variation (25 percent of the QA paired sample sets exceeded that value). When this occurs, a metric-by-metric examination will be conducted to determine what caused the difference in scores and the potential for the difference to be thermally related.

Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communitv Ten benthic grab samples were collected at equally spaced points along the upstream and downstream transects. A Ponar sampler was used for most samples but a Peterson sampler was used when heavier substrate was encountered. Collection and processing techniques followed standard VS procedures. Bottom sediments were washed on a 5 33p. screen; organisms were then 3

picked from the screen and remaining substrate and identified to Order or Family level in the field using no magnification. Benthic community results were evaluated using seven community characteristics or metrics. Results for each metric were assigned a rating of 1, 3, or 5 depending upon how they compared to reference conditions developed for VS sample sites. The ratings for the seven metrics were summed to produce a total benthic score for each sample site. Each reservoir section (inflow, transition, or forebay) differs in their maximum potential for benthic diversity; thus, the criteria for assigning metric ratings were adjusted accordingly such that the total benthic scores from sites on different reservoir sections are comparable. Potential scores ranged from 7 to 35. Ecological health ratings ("Poor," "Fair,", or "Good") are then applied to scores. A similar or higher benthic index score at the downstream site compared to the Watts Bar forebay site is used as basis for determining WBN's absence of impact on the benthic community.

The QA component of VS monitoring shows that the comparison of benthic index scores from 49 paired sample sets collected over a seven year period ranged from 0 to 14 points, the 7 5 th percentile was 4, the 9 0 th percentile was 6. The mean difference between these 49 paired scores was 3.1 points with 95 percent confidence limits of 2.2 and 4.1. Based on these results, a difference of 4 points or less is the value selected for defining "similar" scores between upstream and downstream benthic communities. That is, if the downstream benthic score is within 4 points of the upstream score, the communities will be considered similar. Once again, it is important to bear in mind that differences greater than 4 points can be expected simply due to method variation (25 percent of the QA paired sample sets exceeded that value). When this occurs, a metric-by-metric examination will be conducted to determine what caused the difference in scores and the potential for the difference to be thermally related.

Sport Fishing Index Calculations described by Hickman (2000) were used to compare SFI values for selected quantity and quality parameters from creel and population samples to expected values that would occur in a good or high quality fishery. Quantity parameters include angler success and catch per unit effort from standard population samples (electro fishing, trap and experimental gill netting).

Population quality is based on measurement of five aspects of each resident sport fish community. Four of these aspects address size structure (proportional number of fish in each length group) of the community, Proportional Stock Density (PSD), Relative Stock Density of Preferred-sized fish (RSDP), Relative Stock Density of Memorable-sized fish (RSDM), and Relative Stock Density of Trophy-sized fish (RSDT) (Figure 1). Relative weight (Wr), a measure of the average condition of individual fish makes up the fifth population quality aspect.

As described by Hickman (2000), observed values were compared to reference ranges and assigned a corresponding numerical value. The SFI value is calculated by adding the scores for quantity and quality from existing data and multiplying by two when only creel or population data are available. Species received a low score when insufficient numbers of individuals were captured to reliably determine proportional densities or relative weights for particular parameters.

SFI scores are typically compared to average Tennessee Valley reservoir scores; however, Valley-wide scores are unavailable from natural resource agencies. Therefore, Chickamauga 4

Reservoir fish species scores will be compared to previous years. The 2004 State Fisheries gill

-*- netting and creel data were not available for analysis before this report was published; therefore 2003 SFI data were used for analysis.

Spring Sport Fish Survey A spring sportfish survey was conducted on Watts Bar Reservoir April 2004. Twelve sites at four locations including Watts Bar Dam, Blue Springs, Caney Creek and Center's Ferry were sampled using boat-mounted electrofishers. Each run consisted of thirty minutes of continuous electrofishing in the littoral zones of prominent habitat types represented in the reservoir.

Summer pool lex el for Watts Bar is 741.0 msl and sampling was conducted at 740.5 msl.

TVA Fisheries Biologists use electrofishing equipment to sample fish at selected locations. In that process an electric current is used to temporarily stun the fish so they float to the surface of the water. The fish are collected with nets, counted, weighed, measured, and released unharmed.

Each run consisted of thirty minutes of continuous electrofishing, a total of twenty-four hours, in the littoral zones of prominent habitat types represented in the reservoir.

Results of the SSS monitoring were calculated using Shoreline Assessment Habitat Index (SAHI), Relative Stock Density (RSD), PSD, and Wr.

Habitat type is evaluated using the SAHI metric and is a critical component incorporated into the spring sport fish survey. The resultant habitat designations (good, fair and poor) are correlated to black bass abundance (numbers/hour).

RSD is the number of fish greater than a minimum preferred length in a stock divided by the number of fish greater than or equal to a minimum stock size.

PSD is the number of fish greater than or equal to a minimum quality length in a sample divided by the number of fish greater than or equal to a minimum stock length.

Wr is an index that quantifies fish condition and the preferred range value is 90-105% for moderate density bass populations such as those found in the Tennessee Valley latitudes.

Results and Discussion Fish Community In the autumn of 2004, R.FAI results from the downstream site received the RFAI score of 42 (Good) indicating that resident fish community below the WBN discharge was above the screening level and considered to have BIP (Table 1). In fact, the inflow site averaged an RFAI score of 46 for the last ten sample years (Table 2). The RFAI scores for the inflow site remained in the good to excellent ecological health range for all sampling seasons (Figures 2 and 3). Watts Bar Reservoir RFAI forebay data collected between 1993 and 2004 reflect little change in the overall ecological health of the fish communities at this site (Figure 3). Five of the eight sample seasons scored in the good range; the other three sample seasons were only slightly below the good range illustrating only slight variability in ecological health. Watts Bar Reservoir forebay 5

reached 75 percent of its highest potential RFAI score (Tables 2 and 3) and Chickamauga inflow reached 70 percent of its highest potential score in sample year 2004 (Tables 1 and 2) indicating that a BIP exists downstream of the WBN discharge and that neither the operation of WBN or SCCW are adversely affecting fish communities in the vicinity of the discharge.

Electrofishing and gill netting catch rates for individual species collected in Chickamauga Reservoir downstream of the discharge are listed in Tables 4 and 5. Thirty two species were collected at the inflow site in 2004 (Table 5) compared to 29 species collected in 2003 (Baxter and Gardner 2004).

Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Table 6 provides results and ratings for each metric as well as the overall benthic index score for three monitoring sites: one site upstream and two sites downstream from WBN. Table 7 summarizes density by taxon at the downstream collection site (TRM 527.4). The sample from Watts Bar Reservoir forebay (TRM 532.5) was field processed and no lower level taxonomic identifications were made. In 2004 samples, the Watts Bar forebay station had a benthic index score of 17 ("Poor") while both the Chickamauga Reservoir downstream sites (TRM 527.4 and TRM 518) scored 33 ("Good"). Therefore, WBN has not had an effect on the benthic macroinvertebrate community immediately downstream from the plant.

Table 8 provides benthic index scores from VS monitoring at the forebay, inflow, and transition zone sites on Chickamauga and Watts Bar reservoirs from 1994 through 2004. The Chickamauga transition zone sample site (TRM 490.5) is of sufficient distance downstream (37 miles) such that results would not be expected to reflect plant effects. In 2004, both sites immediately downstream from WBN (TRM 527.4 and TRM 518) produced a score of 33 (excellent). This suggests that WBN has had no effect on the macroinvertebrate community immediately downstream from the plant.

Sport Fishing Index In the autumn of 2003, Chickamauga Reservoir's sport fish population received similar SFI scores compared to the seven year average. Black bass, largemouth bass, smallmouth bass, spotted bass, crappie and white bass received higher scores than their seven year averages (Table 9 and Figure 4). Both sauger and striped bass received lower scores in 2003 compared to scores in 2002. The score for sauger was the lowest it has been since 1997 when this analysis technique was implemented by TVA. This quality assessment is not necessarily indicative of a trend.

Historical data indicate that SFI scores typically vary across years. However if future scores continue to decline, further investigation would be warranted. Channel catfish, crappie and white bass received their highest SFI scores to date. Crappie and white bass scores increased from 38 to 42 and 30 to 40, respectively (Table 9 and Figure 4).

SFI results for Watts Bar Reservoir's black bass species received lower scores in 2003 compared to their seven year averages (Table 10). Bluegill, white and striped bass received higher scores than their seven year averages (Table 10 and Figure 5).

6

Tables 11 and 12 illustrate SFI scoring criteria for population metrics and creel quantity and quality.

Sauger, striped bass, and channel catfish are easily caught during their spring migration to preferred spawning habitats. Fishing creel surveys conducted in the spring would better describe and evaluate these species compared to only using autumn fisheries surveys.

Spring Sport Fish Survey Chickamauga Reservoir A total of 18 hours2.083333e-4 days <br />0.005 hours <br />2.97619e-5 weeks <br />6.849e-6 months <br /> of electrofishing resulted in 736 black bass collected; of these, 60.2% were harvestable size (10" or greater). Of the total black bass collected, 579 were largemouth, 120 were spotted and 37 were smallmouth bass. Overall catch rate (40.9 fish/hr.) was less than the 2003 survey (62.0/hour) (Table 13). The average weight of harvestable sized black bass was 1.3 pounds. The largest black bass collected was s 6.6 pound largemouth bass taken from Skull Island. Numbers of lunker bass were well represented with a total of 21 bass greater than three pounds, 13 greater than four pounds and 6 over five pounds. In 2003, 23 bass over four pounds were collected and eight of them were five pounds plus.

Length frequency histograms illustrated a bimodal distribution with the dominant size classes being the 10-11 inch and 13-14 inch groups (Figure 6). Good representation of the memorable category sized fish was also evident.

Habitat type is a critical component that has been incorporated into the spring sportfish survey.

This metric is derived from the SAHI developed by Resource Stewardship. The resultant habitat designations (good, fair and poor) are correlated to black bass abundance (numbers/hour). A positive correlation of habitat type-to-black bass abundance was evident on Chickamauga Reservoir during the 2004 survey. Among the three areas sampled, the correlations at Skull Island were positive but Sale Creek and Harrison Bay showed some variability among habitat types, i.e., the catch rates (abundance) did not align with the habitat designation types (Table 14).

Overall catch rates for the reservoir were 49, 42 and 31 at the good, fair and poor habitats, respectively (Table 15).

RSD is the number of fish greater than a minimum preferred length in a stock divided by the number of fish greater than or equal to a minimum stock size. The RSD value (15) fell within the desirable range (10-25) (Figure 7). The PSD is the number of fish greater than or equal to a minimum quality length in a sample divided by the number of fish greater than or equal to a minimum stock length. The PSD value (53) was also within the preferred range (40-70) (Figure 8). Wr is an index that quantifies fish condition and the preferred range value is 90-105% for moderate density bass populations such as those found in the Tennessee Valley latitudes. The values shown in Figure 9 are designated by inch groups which reflect the classical categories, i.e.,

0-7 = substock, 8-11 = stock, 12-14 = quality, 15-19 = preferred, 20-24 = memorable and 25+ =

trophy. All categories fell within the desired range, which reflects excellent condition of black bass in all size groups of the population. Field observations of large numbers of prey fish indicate an abundance of forage for all size classes of black bass.

7

A total of 106 crappie (88 black and 18 white crappie) were also collected during the survey.

--- The crappies were collected predominantly from tree tops, stumps and other physical structures in shallow water.

Watts Bar Reservoir A total of 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of electrofishing resulted in 1,246 black bass collected; of these, 88.2% were harvestable size (10" or greater). Of the total black bass collected, 1,011 were largemouth, 157 were spotted and 78 were smallmouth bass. Overall catch rate (51.9 fish/hr.) was similar to the last three years surveyed (Table 16). The average weight of harvestable sized black bass was 1.5 pounds. The largest black bass was a 5.9 pound largemouth bass taken from Kingston. Numbers of lunker bass were up from last year's survey. A total of 13 bass over four pounds were collected and 2 of these were over five pounds.

Length frequency histograms illustrated a typical bell-shaped curve with the dominant size class being the 14-15 inch group (Figure 10). All size classes up to 22 inches were represented in the population.

Habitat type is a critical component that has been incorporated into the spring sportfish survey.

This metric is derived from the SAHI dt 'eloped by Resource Stewardship Group. The iesultant habitat designations (good, fair and poor) are correlated to black bass abundance (numbers/hour).

A positive correlation occurred at Blue Springs and Kingston sites. At Watts Bar Dam and Caney Creek the catch rate-to-black bass abundance was more variable (Table 14). The overall reservoir catch rates were 68, 47 and 44 fish/hour at the good, fair and poor habitat types, respectively (Table 15).

RSD is the number of fish greater than a minimum preferred length in a stock divided by the number of fish greater than or equal to a minimum stock size. The RSD value (24) fell within the desirable range (10-25) (Figure 7). The PSD is the number of fish greater than or equal to a minimum quality length in a sample divided by the number of fish greater than or equal to a minimum stock length. The PSD value (84) was outside the preferred range (40-70) (Figure 8).

Wr is an index that quantifies fish condition and the preferred range value is 90-105% for moderate density bass populations such as those found in the Tennessee Valley latitudes.

Relative weight data for Watts Bar fell within the desirable range of 90-105% indicating a balanced population structure of healthy, robust fish (Figure 11).

A total of 237 crappie (136 black and 101 white crappie) were collected during the survey.

8

Literature Cited Baxter, D. S., K. D. Gardner, and G. D. Hickman. 2001. Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Supplemental Condenser Cooling Water System Fish Monitoring Program.

Tennessee Valley Authority, Resource Stewardship, Norris, Tennessee. 33pp.

Baxter, D. S., K. D. Gardner, and D. L. Lowery. 2004. Biological Monitoring of the Tennessee River Near Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Discharge, 2003. Tennessee Valley Authority, Resource Stewardship, Norris, Tennessee. 35pp.

Dycus, D. L. and D. L. Meinert. 1993. Reservoir Monitoring, Monitori.ng and Evaluation of Aquatic Resource Health and Use Suitability in Tennesee Valley Authority Reservoirs.

Tennessee Valley Authority, Water Resources, Chattanooga, Tennessee, TVA/WM-93/15.

Hickman, G. D. 2000. Sport Fish Index (SFI), A Method to Quantifyý Sport Fishing Quality.

Environmental Science & Policy 3 (2000) S117-S 125.

9

Table 1. Scoring Results for the Twelve Metrics and Overall Reservoir Fish Assemblage Index for Chickamauga Reservoir, 2004.

Forebay Transition Inflow Sequoyah TRM 472.3 TRM 490.5 TRM 529.0 TRM 482.0 Metric Obs Score Obs Score Obs Score Obs Score A. Species richness and composition

1. Number of species 25 3 32 5 29 5 27 3

2. Number of centrarchid species 7 5 8 , 5 7 5 6 5

3. Number of benthic invertivores 3 1 4 3 4 3 3 1

4. Number of intolerant species 5 5 5 5 4 3 5 5

5. Percent tolerant individuals electrofishing 37.2 1.5 55.1 1.5 64.8 1.0 58.8 1.5 gill netting 30.6 0.5 22.9 1.5 0 0 45.9 0.5

6. Percent dominance by one species electrofishing 33.8 1.5 29.6 1.5 50.0 1.0 30.4 1.5 gill netting 27.8 1.5 20.7 1.5 0 0 29.6 0.5

7. Number non-native species electrofishing 0.4 2.5 0.8 2.5 0.5 5 0.9 2.5 gill netting 0 2.5 0.5 2.5 0 0 0.6 2.5

8. Number of top carnivore species 8 5 11 5 10 5 9 5 B. Trophic composition

9. Percent top carnivores electrofishing 10.9 2.5 19.9 2.5 16.9 3 9.6 1.5 gill netting 48.9 1.5 50.5 1.5 0 0 39.6 1.5

10. Percent omnivores electrofishing 9.5 2.5 15.0 2.5 51.2 3 19.4 2.5 gill netting 42.8 0.5 33.0 1.5 0 0 48.4 0.5 10

'I Table 1. (continued)

Forebay Transition Inflow Sequoyah TRM 472.3 TRM 490.5 TRM 529.0 TRM 482.0 Metric Obs Score Obs Score Ohs Score Ohs Score C. Fish abundance and health l1. Average number per run electrofishing 51.3 0.5 49.3 0.5 99.9 3.0 60.8 0.5 gill netting 18.0 1.5 18.8 1.5 0 0 15.9 1.5

12. Percent anonmlaies electrofishing 1.0 2.5 1.2 2.5 1.3 5.0 1.5 2.5 gill netting 0 2.5 0.5 2.5 0 0 0 2.5 RFAI 43 49 42 41 Good Good Good Good

• Percent composition of the most abundant species Table 2. Recent (1993-2004) RFAI Scores Developed Using the RFAI Metrics Upstream and Downstream of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant.

• The 2000, and 2002 sample years were not part of the VS monitoring program, however the same methodology was applied.

11

Table 3. Scoring Results for the Twelve Metrics and Overall RFAI for Watts Bar Reservoir, 2004.

Forebay TRM 531.0 Metric Obs Score A. Species richness and composition

1. Number of species 28 5

2. Number of centrarchid species 7 5

3. Number of benthic invertivores 3 1

4. Number of intolerant species 4 3

5. Percent tolerant individuals electrofishing 81.8 0.5 gill netting 26.6 1.5

6. Percent dominance by one species electrofishing 36.8 1.5 gill netting 23.4 1.5

7. Number non-native species electrofishing 1.4 2.5 gill netting 1.3 2.5

8. Number of top carnivore species 11 5 B. Trophic composition

9. Percent top carnivores electrofishing 6.5 1.5 gill netting 57.1 2.5

10. Percent omnivores electrofishing 35.1 1.5 gill netting 31.8 1.5 C. Fish abundance and health

11. Average number per run electrofishing 66.6 0.5 gill netting 15.4 1.5

12. Percent anomalies electrofishing 1.6 2.5 gill netting 0 2.5 RFAI 43 Good 12

Table 4. Species Listing and Catch Per Unit Effort for Chickamauga Reservoir Forebay and Sequoyah Transition Transects During the Fall Electrofishing and Gill Netting on Chickamauga Reservoir, 2004 (Electrofishing Effort = 300 Meters of Shoreline and Gill Netting Effort = 10 Net-Nights).

Forebay TRM 472.3 Transition TRM 482.0 Electrofishing Electrofishing Gill Netting Electrofishing Electrofishing Gill Netting Catch Rate Catch Rate Catch Rate Catch Rate Catch Rate Per Catch Rate Common Name Per Per Per Per Hour Per Run Hour Net Night Run Net Night Spotted gar - -% '1 1) < Z Skipjack herring 3.30 1.50 Gizzard shad 3.13 16.73 5.00 9.80 49.16 4.70 Threadfin shad 3.40 18.15 1.07 5.35 Common carp 0.20 1.07 0.53 2.68 Golden shiner 0.80 4.27 0.10 0.20 1.00 1.50 Emerald shiner 17.33 92.53 12.20 61.20 Spotfin shiner 0.20 1.07 0.07 0.33 Bluntnose minnow 0.20 1.00 Smallmouth buffalo 0.07 0.33 Spotted sucker 0.40 2.14 0.20 0.40 2.01 0.10 Blue catfish 1.40 0.80

- Channel catfish 0.73 3.91 1.20 1.00 5.02 0.70 "lathead catfish 0.40 2.14 0.50 0.20 White bass 0.07 0.36 0.10 Yellow bass 2.80 1.70 Striped bass 0.10 Warmouth 0.33 1.78 Redbreast sunfish 4.53 24.20 3.73 18.73 Green sunfish 0.33 1.78 Bluegill 7.47 39.86 0.20 18.47 92.64 0.50 Longear sunfish 0.27 1.42 0.47 2.34 Redear sunfish 2.13 11.39 0.40 5.07 25.42 0.80 Smallmouth bass 0.33 1.78 0.33 1.67 Spotted bass 2.07 11.03 0.50 1.93 9.70 1.80 Largemouth bass 2.40 12.81 0.20 2.73 13.71 0.40 White crappie 0.20 Black crappie 0.33 1.78 1.40 0.33 1.67 0.40 Logperch 0.40 2.14 0.07 0.33 Sauger 0.20 Freshwater drum 1.27 6.76 0.70 0.87 4.35 0.50 Brook silverside 2.73 14.59 0.67 3.34 Chestnut lamprey 0.07 0.33 Total 51.25 273.69 18.00 60.81 304.99 15.9

---

Number Samples 15 10 15 10 umber Collected 769 180 912 159 Species Collected 26 15 23 16 13

f Table 5. Species Listing and Catch Per Unit Effort for the Transition, and Inflow Transects During the Fall Electrofishing and Gill Netting on Chickamauga Reservoir, 2004 (Electrofishing Effort = 300 Meters of Shoreline and Gill Netting Effort = 10 Net-Nights). I Transition TRM 490.5 Inflow TRM 529.0 Forebay TRM 531.0 Electrofishing Electrofishing Gill Netting ElectrofishingElectrofishingElectrofishing Electrofishing Gill Netting Catch Rate Catch Rate Catch Rate Catch Rate Catch Rate Catch Rate Catch Rate Catch Rate Common Name Per Per Per Per Per Per Per Per Run Hour Net Night Run Hour Run Hour Net Night Longnose gar - - 0.10 1.20 6.21 0.07 0.38 -

Spotted gar 0.53 2.73 - 0.07 0.34 - - -

Skipjack herring - - 2.80 - - - - 3.40 Gizzard shad 5.73 29.35 3.90 50.00 258.62 22.07 126.34 3.60 Threadfin shad 0.33 1.71 - 13.07 67.59 0.07 0.38 -

Largescale stoneroller - - 0.07 0.34 - - -

Common carp 0.27 1.37 - 0.40 2.07 0.47 2.67 0.10 Golden shiner 0.40 2.05 0.10 0.07 0.34 - - -

Emerald shiner 4.13 21.16 - 0.60 3.10 0.73 4.20 Spotfin shiner 0.13 0.68 - 0.73 3.79 1.07 6.11 Bluntnose minnow 0.33 1.71 - 0.07 0.34 - - -

Smallmouth buffalo - - - 0.07 0.34 0.60 3.44 0.10 Black buffalo - - - - - 0.13 0.76 -

Spotted sucker 0.20 1.02 0.20 0.27 1.38 0.93 5.34 1.30 Black redhorse - - - - - - - -

Golden redhorse 0.07 0.34 0.10 0.13 0.69 - 0.10 Blue catfish - - 1.50 - - - - 0.30 Channel catfish 0.67 3.41 0.70 0.60 3.10 0.13 0.76 0.80 Flathead catfish 0.40 2.05 0.40 0.60 3.10 0.33 1.91 0.30 White bass -- - 2.13 11.03 0.07 0.38 1.70 Yellow bass 0.07 0.34 3.10 1.73 8.97 0.07 0.38 0.50 14

Table 5. (continued)

Transition TRM 490.5 Inflow TRM 529.0 Forebay TRM 531.0 Electrofishing Electrofishing Gill Netting Electrofishing Electrofishin g Electrofishing Electrofishing Gill Netting Catch Rate Catch Rate Catch Rate Catch Rate Catch Rate Catch Rate Catch Rate Catch Rate Common Name Per Per Per Per Per Per Per Per Run Hour Net Night Run Hour Run Hour Net Night 0.53 2.73 0.20 0.33 1.91 -

Warmouth Striped bass - - 0.10 - - 0.13 0.76 0.10 2.87 14.68 - 1.27 6.55 3.80 21.76 -

Redbreast sunfish Green sunfish 0.07 0.34 - 0.33 1.72 0.73 4.20 -

Bluegill 14.60 74.74 0.20 5.93 30.69 24.53 140.46 -

0.87 4.44 - 2.13 11.03 - - -

Longear sunfish Redear sunfish 5.07 25.94 1.90 4.27 22.07 2.80 16.03 0.10

- 0.07 0.34 0.47 2.67 -

Hybrid sunfish - -

Smallmouth bass 1.20 6.14 - 1.67 8.62 1.73 9.92 0.10 Spotted bass 3.27 16.72 1.80 3.27 16.90 0.20 1.15 0.90 Largemouth bass 2.67 13.65 - 4.33 22.41 1.73 9.92 0.10 White crappie 0.13 0.68 - 0.40 2.07 - - 0.30 Black crappie 1.53 7.85 1.00 1.53 7.93 - - 1.30 Yellow perch 0.13 0.68 - 0.07 0.34 0.33 1.91 -

- 1.20 6.21 - - -

Logperch 0.20 1.02 Sauger - - 0.20 - - - - 0.10 Freshwater drum 1.27 6.48 0.50 1.13 5.86 0.67 3.82 0.20 Brook silverside 0.87 4.44 - 0.53 2.76 2.40 13.74 -

0.67 3.41 - - - -

Inland silverside 0.68 - - - - - -

ChestnUt lamprey 0.13 Total 49.34 252.54 18.80 99.94 516.85 66.59 381.3 15.4 Number Samples 15 10 15 15 10 Number Collected 740 188 1,499 999 154 Species Collected 30 18 32 26 20 15

)

Table 6. Individual Metric Ratings and the Overall Benthic Community Index Scores for Watts Bar Forebay and Sites Downstream of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Watts Bar and Chickamauga Reservoirs, November 2004.

TRMS32.5 TRM 527.4 TRM 518 Metric Obs Rating Obs Rating Obs Rating

1. Average number of taxa 4 3 13.9 5 10.8 5

2. Proportion of samples with long-lived organisms 20% 1 100% 5 100% 5

3. Average number of EPT taxa 0.2 1 1.9 3 0.9 3

4. Average proportion of oligochaete individuals 19.8% 5 1.1% 5 2.7% 5

5. Average proportion of total abundance comprised by the 90.4% 1 57.6% 5 60.4% 5 two most abundant taxa DOM

6. Average density excluding chironomids and 61.7 1 2028.3 5 1320.5 5 oligochaetes TOTNONCT

7. Zero-samples - proportion of samples containing no 0 5 0 5 0 5 organisms Benthic Index Score 17 33 33 Poor Excellent Excellent TRM 532.5 scored with forebay criteria, TRM 527.4 and 518 scored with inflow criteria.

Benthic Index Scores: Very Poor 7-12, Poor 13-18, Fair 19-23, Good 24-29, Excellent 30-35 16

Table 7. Average Mean Density Per Square Meter of Benthic Taxa Collected at the Downstream Site Near Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Chickamauga Reservoir, November 2004.

Chickamauga Reservoir TRM 527.4 Mean Occurrence Species Density per site Nematoda Turbellaria Tricladida Planariidae Dugesia tigrina 258 9 Annelida Oligocheata Lumbriculidae 2 1 Naididae Nais sp. 3 2 Tubificidae 28 4 Branchiurasowerbyi 2 1 Hirudinea 13 3 Rhynchobdellida Glossiphoniidae 2 1 Helobdella triserialis 2 1 Phamygobdellida Coelenterata Hydra americana 2 1 Crustacea Amphipoda Garnmaridae Gammarus sp. 167 8 Insecta Ephemeroptera Leptohypidae Tricorythodes sp. 3 2 Trichoptera Polycentropodidae Cyrnellusfraternus 417 91 Hydropsychidae Cheumatopsyche sp. 10 3 Leptoceridae Ceracleasp. 18 5 Chironomidae Axarus sp. 2 1 Cricotopussp. 2 1 17

Table 7. (continued)

Chickamauga Reservoir TRM 527.4 Mean Occurrence Species Density per site Dicrotendipessimpsoni 5 3 Dicrotendipessp. 8 4 Glyptotendipessp. 22 4 Parachironomussp. 12 4 Rheotanytarsus sp. 8 1 Mollusca Gastropoda Lymnophila Ancylidae Ferrissiarivularis 23 6 Planorbidae Menetus dilatatus 58 6 Ph-;sdae Physella sp. 2 1 Gastropoda Mesogastropoda Hydrobiidae Amnicola sp. 8 2 Pleuroceridae Pleurocera canaliculata 28 6 Viviparidae Viviparus Georgianus 10 1 Viviparus sp. 123 7 Bivalvia Veneroida Corbiculidae Corbiculaflurninea<10mm 437 9 Corbiculaflurninea>10mm 77 7 Dreissenidae Dreissenapolymorpha 5 2 Sphaeriidae Musculium transversum 232 9 Unionoida Unionidae 15 4 Number of samples 10 Sum 2003 Number of taxa 27 Number of EPT taxa 4 Sum of area sampled 0.60 18

Table 8. Recent (1994-2004) Benthic Index Scores Collected as Part of the Vital Signs Monitoring Program at Watts Bar Reservoir Transition and Forebay Zone Sites (Upstream), and Chickamauga Reservoir Inflow (Upstream) and Transition (Downstream) Sites.

Site l Reservoir I Location 11994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Average Upstream Watts Bar TRM 29 25 23 21 21 24 560.8 Upstream Watts Bar TRM 13 11 13 15 13 9 15 17 13 532.5 Downstream Chickamauga TRM 29 27 33 33 31 527.4 Downstream Chickamauga TRM 19 23 25 21 23 29 25 29 33 25 518.0 Downstream Chickamauga TRM 33 29 31 31 23 25 23 31 29 28 490.5 Scores that are considered very poor range from 7-12, poor range from 13-18, fair range from 19-23, good range from 23-29 and excellent range from 30-35.

Table 9. Sport Fishing Index Results for Chickamauga Reservoir, 2003.

Years Species 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 1997-2004 Average SF1 Score Black bass 35 41 25 35 31 34 34 34 Bluegill 30 32 33 32 32 31 32 Channel catfish 32 32 29 30 25 33 35 Crappie 31 31 32 38 42 35 Largemouth 34 37 34 32 28 36 36 34 bass Spotted bass 20 37 24 40 26 32 32 30 Sauger 27 36 32 39 30 31 27 32 Smallmouth 20 20 24 22 40 32 32 28 bass Striped bass 35 30 30 40 34 31 33 White bass 31 30 30 30 40 32 19

Table 10. Sport Fishing Index Results for Watts Bar Reservoir, 2003.

Years Species 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 1997-2004 Average SFO Score Black bass 42 39 25 41 37 36 31 36 Bluegill 35 30 31 27 36 26 36 32 Channel catfish 30 25 25 22 26 21 30 26 Crappie 20 44 35 37 31 30 31 33 Largemouth bass 44 26 36 43 39 36 34 37 Spotted bass 31 38 30 28 30 31 Sauger 32 30 30 34 29 20 30 29 Smallmouth bass 22 39 32 38 30 38 24 32 Striped bass 25 25 36 39 36 40 43 35 White bass 25 30 25 30 30 30 28 20

Table 11. Sport Fishing Index Population Quantity and Creel Quantity and Quality Metrics and Scoring Criteria.

Metrics Scores 5 10 15 Black bass Population (quantity)

TVA electrofishing catch/hour < 15 15-31 > 31 State electrofishing (catch/hour) < 62 62-124 > 124 Creel (quantity)'

Anglers (catch/hour) < 0.3 0.3-0.6 > 0.6 BAIT and BITE data < 1.1 1.1-2.3 > 2.3 Creel (quality)

Pressure (hours/acre) <8 8-16 > 16 Largemouth bass Population (quantity)

TVA electrofishing catch/hour < 13 13-25 > 25 State electrofishing (catch/hour) < ,*3 53-106 > 106 Creel (quantity)

Anglers (catch/hour) < 0.29 0.29-0.58 > 0.58 Creel (quality)

Pressure (hours/acre) <8 8-16 > 16 Smallmouth bass Population (quantity)

TVA electrofishing catch/hour <4 4-8 >8 State electrofishing (catch/hour) <8 8-15 > 15 Creel (quantity)

Anglers (catch/hour) < 0.1 0.1-0.3 > 0.3 Creel (quality)

Pressure (hours/acre) <8 8-16 > 16 Spotted bass Population (quantity)

TVA electrofishing catch/hour <5 5-11 > 11 State electrofishing (catch/hour) < 14 14-27 > 27 Creel (quantity)

Anglers (catch/hour) < 0.07 0.07-0.13 > 0.13 Creel (quality)

Pressure (hours/acre) <8 8-16 > 16 21

Table 11. (continued)

Metrics Scores 5 10 15 Sauger Population (quantity)

Experimental gill net (catch/net night) <9 9-17 > 17 Creel (quantity)

Anglers (catch/hour) < 0.5 0.5-1 >1 Creel (quality)

Pressure (hours/acre) <5 5-10 > 10 Channel catfish Population (quantity)

Experimental gill net (catch/net night) <2 2-4 >4 Creel (quantity)

Anglers (catch/hour) < 0.3 0.3-0.7 > 0.7 Creel (quality)

Pressure (hours/acre) <9 9-19 > 19 aEach worth 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 points if both data sets are available.

bTVA electrofishing only used when state agency electrofishing data are unavailable.

22

Table 12. Sport Fishing Index Population Quality Metrics and Scoring Criteria.

Scores 5 10 15 Metrics Population (quality) 1 2 3 PSD < 20 or > 80 20-39 or 61-80 40-60 RSDP (preferred) 0 or > 60 1-9 or 41-60 10-40 RSDM (memorable) 0 or > 25 1-4 or 11-25 5-10 RSDT (trophy) 0 <1 > 1 Wr (Stock-preferred size fish) < 90 > 110 90-110 Table 13. Electrofishing Catch Rate, Mean Weight, Percent Harvestable, Numbers of Black Bass Greater than Five Pounds, Numbers of Black Bass Greater than Four Pounds and Largest Black Bass Collected, Chickamauga Reservoir Black Bass Surveys, 1995-2004.

EF Catch Mean Largest Rate Weight Bass >4 -Bass >5 bass Year (n o./h r.'I (Ibs.) Harvestable lbs. lbs. (lbs.)

2004 40.9 1.3 60.2 13 6 6.6 2003 62.0 1.3 65.8 23 8 6.4 2002 57.4 1.1 59.4 9 4 6.6 2001 34.5 0.8 45.2 0 0 2.8 2000 34.4 1 51.2 3 0 4.8 1999 10.6 1.3 60.7 3 1 6.1 1998 37.2 1.1 44.5 9 2 6.6 1997 40.2 1 70.1 8 4 8.7 1996 51 1.2 42.6 13 9 7.9 1995 62 1.2 61.8 28 12 8.3 23

Table 14. Black Bass Catch Per Hour Compared to Habitat Types by Location.

Habitat Designation Reservoir and Site Good Fair Poor Chickamauga Harrison Bay 62(4) 30(4) 47(4)

Sale Creek 35(4) 58(4) 30(4)

Skull Island 50(2) 37(8) 17(2)

Watts Bar Blue Sprngs 57(3) 42(4) 42(5)

Caney Creek 61(4) 56(4) 59(4)

Kingston 70(4) 31(3) 28(5)

Watts Bar Dam 87(3) 51(6) 54(3)

Catch per hour = number of fish collected per hour

( ) = number of transects sampled at each location Table 15. Black Bass Catch Per Hour Compared to Habitat Types by Reservoir.

HABITAT DESIGNATION Reservoir Good Fair Poor Chickamauga 49 41 34 Watts Bar 68 47 44 Wheeler 99 75 43 Catch per hour = number of fish collected per hour 24

Table 16. Electrofishing Catch Rate, Mean Weight, Percent Harvestable, Numbers of Black Bass Greater than Five Pounds, Numbers of Black Bass Greater than Four Pounds and Largest Black Bass Collected, Watts Bar Reservoir Black Bass Surveys, 1995-2004.

EF Catch Mean Largest Rate Weight  % Bass >4 Bass >5. bass Year _ ibs.)

bno./hr.) Harvestable lbs. lbs. (ibs.)

2004 51.9 1.5 88.2 13 2 5.9 2003 56.6 1.1 81.6 2 -2 5.4 2002 57.0 1.2 70.7 28 10 6.4 2001 73.6 1.5 29.3 5 5 6.4 2000 17.0 1.2 56.3 3 1 5.3 1999 19.9 0.9 66.7 11 3 8.1 1998 55.8 1.0 88.6 6 4 7.2 1997 61.8 1.3 47.6 8 8 6.2 1996 34.3 1.6 79.0 9 7 7.7 1995 101.0 1.1 78.6 32 15 6.6 Quantity Parameters Quality Parameters Angler Success Sampling CPUE] Angling Pressure Species Population Figure 1. Parameters used to calculate the Sport Fishing Index.

25

Annual RFAI Scores for Chickamauga 60 Excellent 50 A Good 40 ai 1-12*

Fair

0. RFAI Scores

-s-- Upstream TRM 490.5 30

--- SQN Tran TRM 482.0 Excellent 51-60 U.

Forebay TRM 472.3 Good 41-50

- Inflow TRM 529 Poor Fair 32-40 Poor 22-31 20 10 0

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Year Figure 2. Annual Chickamauga Reservoir RFAI scores for sample years between 1993 and 2004.

26

Annual RFAI Scores for Watts Bar Reservoir 60 50 40 0

U)30 U-20 10 0

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2b03 2004 Year Figure 3. Annual Watts Bar Reservoir RFAI scores for sample years between 1993 and 2004.]

27

Chickamauga SF1 Scores 1997-2003 60 50

• Black bass

• Largemouth bass 40 o1 Smallmouth bass o Spotted bass 0

• Crappie 30 O Sauger U0 I Striped bass o Bluegill 20

• Channel catfish

• White bass 10 0

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Year Figure 4. Sport Fishing Index results for Chickamauga Reservoir between 1997 and 2003.

28

J /

Watts Bar SFI Scores 1997-2003 60 T

50 K

o Black bass m Largemouth bass 40 o Smallmouth bass

• Spotted bass 0

• Crappie C/) 30 1,,

• Sauger C,,

• Striped bass o Bluegill 20 m Channel catfish mWhite bass 10 I

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Year Figure 5. Sport Fishing Index results for Watts Bar Reservoir between 1997 and 2003.

29

LENGTH FREQUENCY ALL SITES CHICKAMAUGA 2004 120 100 80 D 60 M 40 20 0

3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 INCH GROUP Figure 6. Chickamauga Reservoir length frequency histogram, (all sites) spring 2004.

RSD VALUES (Quality)

MAINSTEM RESERVOIRS SPRING 2004 50 45 40 35 0 30

.5 25 20 15 10 5

0

_z C, "O D C, 0 0=

M == 0 Reservoir Figure 7. Relative stock density values for Tennessee River Reservoirs.

30

PSD VALUES MAINSTEM RESERVOIRS SPRING 2004 100 90 84 80 75 70 '67 C

60 C 50 Desirable PSO) Rang~e -4 48 40 30 20 10 0

0 T1 Q X* Z "0 r

C, =o a* w BC C

CD BC Reservoir Figure 8. Proportional stock density values for Tennessee River Reservoirs.

CHICKAMAUGA Wr ALL SITES 2004 r- Percent -- # of Fish 100 250 80 200 i 60 40 20 150ISO 100 so 0 0 0-7 8-11 12-14 15-19 20-24 25+

Relative Stock Size by Inch Group Figure 9. Chickamauga Reservoir mean relative weights (Wr) for largemouth bass broken out by RSD category and fish numbers.

31

LENGTH FREQUENCY ALL SITES WATTS BAR 2004 250 200 uJ 150 100 50 0

3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 INCH GROUP Figure 10. Watts Bar Reservoir length frequency histogram, (all sites) spring 2004.

WATTS BAR Wr ALL SITES 2004 EJPercent -# of Fish 100 600 80 500 -

.L 400 L.

60 "6 300 40

n. 200 20 100 z 0 0 0-7 8-11 12-14 15-19 19-24 25+

Relative Stock Size by Inch Group Figure 11. Watts Bar Reservoir mean relative weights (Wr) for largemouth bass.

32