ML18338A095: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML18338A095 | | number = ML18338A095 | ||
| issue date = 12/04/2018 | | issue date = 12/04/2018 | ||
| title = Acceptance Review for Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 2.109(b) | | title = NRR E-mail Capture - Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 - Acceptance Review for Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 2.109(b) | ||
| author name = Wiebe J | | author name = Wiebe J | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Accession No. ML18312A139), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC) requested an exemption from 10 CFR 2.109(b) for Clinton Power Station, Unit 1. The proposed exemption would permit submittal of the license renewal application for the Clinton Power Station (CPS) no later than three years prior to the expiration of the station's operating license (as potentially extended to April 17, 2027, by the pending EGC recapture license amendment request (ADAMS Accession No. ML18260A307) and still receive timely renewal protection under 10 CFR 2.109(b). The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this request, as supplemented. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | Accession No. ML18312A139), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC) requested an exemption from 10 CFR 2.109(b) for Clinton Power Station, Unit 1. The proposed exemption would permit submittal of the license renewal application for the Clinton Power Station (CPS) no later than three years prior to the expiration of the station's operating license (as potentially extended to April 17, 2027, by the pending EGC recapture license amendment request (ADAMS Accession No. ML18260A307) and still receive timely renewal protection under 10 CFR 2.109(b). The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this request, as supplemented. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 130 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is November 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::130 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is November 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-6606. | If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-6606. | ||
Joel S. Wiebe, Sr. Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1 | Joel S. Wiebe, Sr. Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1 | ||
Latest revision as of 02:44, 6 March 2020
| ML18338A095 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 12/04/2018 |
| From: | Joel Wiebe Plant Licensing Branch III |
| To: | Steinman R Exelon Generation Co |
| References | |
| Download: ML18338A095 (2) | |
Text
NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Wiebe, Joel Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 8:38 AM To: 'Steinman, Rebecca L:(GenCo-Nuc)'
Subject:
Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 - Acceptance Review for Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 2.109(b)
- Rebecca, By letter dated November 8, 2018 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML18312A139), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC) requested an exemption from 10 CFR 2.109(b) for Clinton Power Station, Unit 1. The proposed exemption would permit submittal of the license renewal application for the Clinton Power Station (CPS) no later than three years prior to the expiration of the station's operating license (as potentially extended to April 17, 2027, by the pending EGC recapture license amendment request (ADAMS Accession No. ML18260A307) and still receive timely renewal protection under 10 CFR 2.109(b). The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this request, as supplemented. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 130 hours5.417 days <br />0.774 weeks <br />0.178 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is November 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-6606.
Joel S. Wiebe, Sr. Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 699 Mail Envelope Properties (SN6PR0901MB24479C1C7B21D14CE17550588BAF0)
Subject:
Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 - Acceptance Review for Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 2.109(b)
Sent Date: 12/4/2018 8:37:34 AM Received Date: 12/4/2018 8:37:00 AM From: Wiebe, Joel Created By: Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov Recipients:
"'Steinman, Rebecca L:(GenCo-Nuc)'" <Rebecca.Steinman@exeloncorp.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: SN6PR0901MB2447.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2718 12/4/2018 8:37:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: