ML19350A006: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
By letter dated October 30, 2019 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) | By letter dated October 30, 2019 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) | ||
Package Accession No. ML19308A761), as supplemented on November 25, 2019 (ADAMS Accession No. | Package Accession No. ML19308A761), as supplemented on November 25, 2019 (ADAMS Accession No. ML19331A099), the Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant (FNP), Units 1 and 2. The proposed amendment would revise the Renewed Operating Licenses and Technical Specifications to allow for a measurement uncertainty recovery power uprate (MUR-PU) from 2775 megawatts thermal (MWt) to 2821 MWt. | ||
ML19331A099), the Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant (FNP), Units 1 and 2. The proposed amendment would revise the Renewed Operating Licenses and Technical Specifications to allow for a measurement uncertainty recovery power uprate (MUR-PU) from 2775 megawatts thermal (MWt) to 2821 MWt. | |||
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of NRC staffs acceptance review. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of NRC staffs acceptance review. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the licensing request will take approximately 1,300 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by October 1, 2020, as requested in your application. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the licensing request will take approximately 1,[[estimated NRC review hours::300 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by October 1, 2020, as requested in your application. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | ||
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may | These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may | ||
Latest revision as of 09:46, 2 March 2020
ML19350A006 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Farley ![]() |
Issue date: | 12/16/2019 |
From: | Shawn Williams NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL2-1 |
To: | Coleman J Southern Nuclear Operating Co |
References | |
L-2019-LLS-0002 | |
Download: ML19350A006 (3) | |
Text
From: Williams, Shawn Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 6:15 AM To: Coleman, Jamie Marquess Cc: Sparkman, Wesley A.
Subject:
Joseph M. Farley, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of License Amendment Request for a Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate (EPID No. L-2019-LLS-0002)
Dear Ms. Coleman,
By letter dated October 30, 2019 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Package Accession No. ML19308A761), as supplemented on November 25, 2019 (ADAMS Accession No. ML19331A099), the Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant (FNP), Units 1 and 2. The proposed amendment would revise the Renewed Operating Licenses and Technical Specifications to allow for a measurement uncertainty recovery power uprate (MUR-PU) from 2775 megawatts thermal (MWt) to 2821 MWt.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of NRC staffs acceptance review. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the licensing request will take approximately 1,300 hours12.5 days <br />1.786 weeks <br />0.411 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by October 1, 2020, as requested in your application. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may
occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1009.
Shawn Williams, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DRMA Email Number: 349 Mail Envelope Properties (BL0PR0901MB45005117DE02814FF6C083A190510)
Subject:
Joseph M. Farley, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of License Amendment Request for a Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate (EPID No. L-2019-LLS-0002)
Sent Date: 12/16/2019 6:14:53 AM Received Date: 12/16/2019 6:14:54 AM From: Williams, Shawn Created By: Shawn.Williams@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Sparkman, Wesley A." <WASPARKM@southernco.com>
Tracking Status: None "Coleman, Jamie Marquess" <JAMIEMCO@SOUTHERNCO.COM>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: BL0PR0901MB4500.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3712 12/16/2019 6:14:54 AM Options Priority: Normal Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: