ML16013A459: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML16013A459
| number = ML16013A459
| issue date = 02/07/2016
| issue date = 02/07/2016
| title = Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1- Response Regarding Phase 2 Staffing Submittals Associated with Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 9.3 Related to Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident
| title = Response Regarding Phase 2 Staffing Submittals Associated with Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 9.3 Related to Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident
| author name = Bowman G T
| author name = Bowman G
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/JLD
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/JLD
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Vice President, Operations Entergy Operations, Inc. Grand Gulf Nuclear Station P.O. Box 756 Port Gibson, MS 39150 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 February 7, 2016
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 February 7, 2016 Vice President, Operations Entergy Operations, Inc.
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station P.O. Box 756 Port Gibson, MS 39150


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 - RESPONSE REGARDING PHASE 2 STAFFING SUBMITTALS ASSOCIATED WITH NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 9.3 RELATED TO THE FUKUSHIMA DAl-ICHI NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ACCIDENT (TAC NO. MF7055)


GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 -RESPONSE REGARDING PHASE 2 STAFFING SUBMITTALS ASSOCIATED WITH NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 9.3 RELATED TO THE FUKUSHIMA DAl-ICHI NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ACCIDENT (TAC NO. MF7055)
==Dear Sir or Madam:==


==Dear Sir or Madam:==
By letter dated March 12, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12053A340), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a request for information pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Section 50.54(f) (hereafter referred to as the 50.54(f) letter), regarding Recommendations 2.1 (seismic and flooding evaluations), 2.3 (seismic and flooding walkdowns), and 9.3 (emergency preparedness communication and staffing) of the Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) review of insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi accident. With respect to Recommendation 9.3, Enclosure 5 to the NRC's letter requested licensees and holders of construction permits to assess their means to power communications equipment onsite and offsite during a prolonged station blackout (SBO) event and to perform a staffing assessment to determine the staff required to fill all necessary positions in response to a multi-unit event.
By letter dated March 12, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 12053A340),
The 50.54(f) letter, in part, requested licensee responses pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(f) pertaining to onsite and augmented staff availability to implement the strategies discussed in the emergency plan and plant operating procedures, including new staff or functions resulting from the assessment, identified collateral duties, an implementation schedule to perform the assessments, identified modifications, and any changes that have been made or will be made to the emergency plan regarding on-shift or augmented staffing.
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a request for information pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Section 50.54(f)  
In addition, NTTF Recommendation 9.3 has a dependency on the implementation of NTTF Recommendation 4.2 (mitigating strategies). As a result of this dependency, licensees responded to the 50.54(f) letter in phases. The Phase 1 staffing assessment requested licensees to evaluate their ability to respond to a multi-unit extended loss of alternating current (ac) power (ELAP) event utilizing existing processes and procedures. Licensees were not requested to submit Phase 1 staffing assessments for single-unit sites.
(hereafter referred to as the 50.54(f) letter),
Licensees were also requested to submit for NRC staff review a Phase 2 staffing assessment, which provides an assessment of the staffing necessary to perform the functions related to the strategies developed in response to NTTF Recommendation 4.2 and the resulting NRC Order EA-12-049, "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events [BDBEE]" (ADAMS Package Accession No. ML12054A736). Licensees were requested to provide their Phase 2 staffing assessments to
regarding Recommendations 2.1 (seismic and flooding evaluations),
 
2.3 (seismic and flooding walkdowns),
the NRC no later than four months prior to the beginning of their second refueling outage (as used in the context of NRC Order EA-12-049). By letter dated October 21, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15294A546), Entergy Operations, Inc. (the licensee) submitted its Phase 2 staffing assessment for Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1 to the NRC in response to the 50.54(f) letter.
and 9.3 (emergency preparedness communication and staffing) of the Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) review of insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi accident.
The NRC staff reviewed your Phase 2 staffing assessment in accordance with the assumptions and guidelines of Sections 2.2, 2.3, and 3 of the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) guidance document NEI 12-01, "Guideline for Assessing Beyond Design Basis Accident Response Staffing and Communications Capabilities" (ADAMS Accession No. ML12125A412), which was endorsed by the NRC staff by letter dated May 15, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12131A043). The NRC staff noted that you assessed your current onsite minimum staffing levels to identify any enhancements needed to respond following a beyond-design-basis large- scale natural event, and to ensure that the strategies contained in the existing emergency plan and plant operating procedures, such as those used in response to a SBO, can be performed by the site staff. Your assessment assumed that a large-scale natural event causes:
With respect to Recommendation 9.3, Enclosure 5 to the NRC's letter requested licensees and holders of construction permits to assess their means to power communications equipment onsite and offsite during a prolonged station blackout (SBO) event and to perform a staffing assessment to determine the staff required to fill all necessary positions in response to a multi-unit event. The 50.54(f) letter, in part, requested licensee responses pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(f) pertaining to onsite and augmented staff availability to implement the strategies discussed in the emergency plan and plant operating procedures, including new staff or functions resulting from the assessment, identified collateral duties, an implementation schedule to perform the assessments, identified modifications, and any changes that have been made or will be made to the emergency plan regarding on-shift or augmented staffing.
(1) an ELAP, (2) all units on the site to be affected, and (3) access to the site to be impeded for a minimum of six hours. You also assessed your capability to perform the site-specific functions related to the strategies developed in response to Order EA-12-049. You conducted independent reviews and concluded, based on your staffing assessment, that the existing on-shift minimum staff is sufficient to implement the loss of all ac power event response strategies, including those strategies developed to support the requirements of Order EA 049, while supporting performance of the required emergency planning duties without unacceptable collateral duties.
In addition, NTTF Recommendation 9.3 has a dependency on the implementation of NTTF Recommendation 4.2 (mitigating strategies).
The NRC staff reviewed your Phase 2 staffing submittal and confirmed that your existing emergency response resources, as described in your emergency plan, are sufficient to perform the required plant actions and emergency plan functions, and implement the event response strategies that were developed in response to NRC Order EA-12-049 without the assignment of collateral duties that would impact the performance of assigned emergency plan functions.
As a result of this dependency, licensees responded to the 50.54(f) letter in phases. The Phase 1 staffing assessment requested licensees to evaluate their ability to respond to a multi-unit extended loss of alternating current (ac) power (ELAP) event utilizing existing processes and procedures.
Licensees were not requested to submit Phase 1 staffing assessments for single-unit sites. Licensees were also requested to submit for NRC staff review a Phase 2 staffing assessment, which provides an assessment of the staffing necessary to perform the functions related to the strategies developed in response to NTTF Recommendation 4.2 and the resulting NRC Order EA-12-049, "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events [BDBEE]"  
(ADAMS Package Accession No. ML 12054A736).
Licensees were requested to provide their Phase 2 staffing assessments to   the NRC no later than four months prior to the beginning of their second refueling outage (as used in the context of NRC Order EA-12-049).
By letter dated October 21, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 15294A546),
Entergy Operations, Inc. (the licensee) submitted its Phase 2 staffing assessment for Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1 to the NRC in response to the 50.54(f) letter. The NRC staff reviewed your Phase 2 staffing assessment in accordance with the assumptions and guidelines of Sections 2.2, 2.3, and 3 of the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) guidance document NEI 12-01, "Guideline for Assessing Beyond Design Basis Accident Response Staffing and Communications Capabilities" (ADAMS Accession No. ML 12125A412),
which was endorsed by the NRC staff by letter dated May 15, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 12131A043).
The NRC staff noted that you assessed your current onsite minimum staffing levels to identify any enhancements needed to respond following a beyond-design-basis large-scale natural event, and to ensure that the strategies contained in the existing emergency plan and plant operating procedures, such as those used in response to a SBO, can be performed by the site staff. Your assessment assumed that a large-scale natural event causes: (1) an ELAP, (2) all units on the site to be affected, and (3) access to the site to be impeded for a minimum of six hours. You also assessed your capability to perform the site-specific functions related to the strategies developed in response to Order EA-12-049.
You conducted independent reviews and concluded, based on your staffing assessment, that the existing on-shift minimum staff is sufficient to implement the loss of all ac power event response strategies, including those strategies developed to support the requirements of Order EA-12-049, while supporting performance of the required emergency planning duties without unacceptable collateral duties. The NRC staff reviewed your Phase 2 staffing submittal and confirmed that your existing emergency response resources, as described in your emergency plan, are sufficient to perform the required plant actions and emergency plan functions, and implement the event response strategies that were developed in response to NRC Order EA-12-049 without the assignment of collateral duties that would impact the performance of assigned emergency plan functions.
As a result, the NRC staff concludes that your Phase 2 staffing submittal adequately addresses the response strategies needed to respond to a BDBEE using your procedures and guidelines.
As a result, the NRC staff concludes that your Phase 2 staffing submittal adequately addresses the response strategies needed to respond to a BDBEE using your procedures and guidelines.
The NRC staff will verify the implementation of your staffing capabilities through the inspection program. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Stephen Philpott at (301) 415-2365 or via email at Stephen.Philpott@nrc.gov.
The NRC staff will verify the implementation of your staffing capabilities through the inspection program.
Docket No. 50-416 cc: Distribution via Listserv Sincerely, Gregory T. Bowman, Branch Chief Orders Management Branch Japan Lessons-Learned Division Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation   If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Stephen Philpott at (301) 415-2365 or via email at Stephen.Philpott@nrc.gov.
 
Docket No. 50-416 cc: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Stephen Philpott at (301) 415- 2365 or via email at Stephen.Philpott@nrc.gov.
PUBLIC JOMB R/F RidsN rrDorl Lpl4-2 JBoska, NRR RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrLASLent VWilliams, NSIR MKhanna, NRR ADAMS Accession No.: ML16013A459 OFFICE NRR/JLD/JOMB NRR/JLD NAME SPhilpott Slent DATE 1/22/2016 1/14/2016 Sincerely, IRA/ Gregory T. Bowman, Branch Chief Orders Management Branch Japan Lessons-Learned Division Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation RidsNrrPMGrandGulf RidsRgn4MailCeriter
Sincerely, Gregory T. Bowman, Branch Chief Orders Management Branch Japan Lessons-Learned Division Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-416 cc: Distribution via Listserv
: GBowman, NRR NSIR/DPR/NRLB*
 
ARivera 1/26/2016  
ML16013A459                                           *via email OFFICE       NRR/JLD/JOMB       NRR/JLD        NSIR/DPR/NRLB*            NRR/JLD/JOMB NAME         SPhilpott           Slent           ARivera                    GBowman DATE         1/22/2016           1/14/2016       1/26/2016                 2/7/2016}}
: CMurray, NSIR ARivera, NSIR SPhilpott, NRR *via email NRR/JLD/JOMB GBowman 2/7/2016 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}

Latest revision as of 06:12, 5 February 2020

Response Regarding Phase 2 Staffing Submittals Associated with Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 9.3 Related to Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident
ML16013A459
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/07/2016
From: Gregory Bowman
Japan Lessons-Learned Division
To:
Entergy Operations
Philpott, Stephen NRR/JLD 415-2365
References
TAC MF7055
Download: ML16013A459 (4)
v • d • e


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 February 7, 2016 Vice President, Operations Entergy Operations, Inc.

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station P.O. Box 756 Port Gibson, MS 39150

SUBJECT:

GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 - RESPONSE REGARDING PHASE 2 STAFFING SUBMITTALS ASSOCIATED WITH NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 9.3 RELATED TO THE FUKUSHIMA DAl-ICHI NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ACCIDENT (TAC NO. MF7055)

Dear Sir or Madam:

By letter dated March 12, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12053A340), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a request for information pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Section 50.54(f) (hereafter referred to as the 50.54(f) letter), regarding Recommendations 2.1 (seismic and flooding evaluations), 2.3 (seismic and flooding walkdowns), and 9.3 (emergency preparedness communication and staffing) of the Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) review of insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi accident. With respect to Recommendation 9.3, Enclosure 5 to the NRC's letter requested licensees and holders of construction permits to assess their means to power communications equipment onsite and offsite during a prolonged station blackout (SBO) event and to perform a staffing assessment to determine the staff required to fill all necessary positions in response to a multi-unit event.

The 50.54(f) letter, in part, requested licensee responses pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(f) pertaining to onsite and augmented staff availability to implement the strategies discussed in the emergency plan and plant operating procedures, including new staff or functions resulting from the assessment, identified collateral duties, an implementation schedule to perform the assessments, identified modifications, and any changes that have been made or will be made to the emergency plan regarding on-shift or augmented staffing.

In addition, NTTF Recommendation 9.3 has a dependency on the implementation of NTTF Recommendation 4.2 (mitigating strategies). As a result of this dependency, licensees responded to the 50.54(f) letter in phases. The Phase 1 staffing assessment requested licensees to evaluate their ability to respond to a multi-unit extended loss of alternating current (ac) power (ELAP) event utilizing existing processes and procedures. Licensees were not requested to submit Phase 1 staffing assessments for single-unit sites.

Licensees were also requested to submit for NRC staff review a Phase 2 staffing assessment, which provides an assessment of the staffing necessary to perform the functions related to the strategies developed in response to NTTF Recommendation 4.2 and the resulting NRC Order EA-12-049, "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events [BDBEE]" (ADAMS Package Accession No. ML12054A736). Licensees were requested to provide their Phase 2 staffing assessments to

the NRC no later than four months prior to the beginning of their second refueling outage (as used in the context of NRC Order EA-12-049). By letter dated October 21, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15294A546), Entergy Operations, Inc. (the licensee) submitted its Phase 2 staffing assessment for Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1 to the NRC in response to the 50.54(f) letter.

The NRC staff reviewed your Phase 2 staffing assessment in accordance with the assumptions and guidelines of Sections 2.2, 2.3, and 3 of the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) guidance document NEI 12-01, "Guideline for Assessing Beyond Design Basis Accident Response Staffing and Communications Capabilities" (ADAMS Accession No. ML12125A412), which was endorsed by the NRC staff by letter dated May 15, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12131A043). The NRC staff noted that you assessed your current onsite minimum staffing levels to identify any enhancements needed to respond following a beyond-design-basis large- scale natural event, and to ensure that the strategies contained in the existing emergency plan and plant operating procedures, such as those used in response to a SBO, can be performed by the site staff. Your assessment assumed that a large-scale natural event causes:

(1) an ELAP, (2) all units on the site to be affected, and (3) access to the site to be impeded for a minimum of six hours. You also assessed your capability to perform the site-specific functions related to the strategies developed in response to Order EA-12-049. You conducted independent reviews and concluded, based on your staffing assessment, that the existing on-shift minimum staff is sufficient to implement the loss of all ac power event response strategies, including those strategies developed to support the requirements of Order EA 049, while supporting performance of the required emergency planning duties without unacceptable collateral duties.

The NRC staff reviewed your Phase 2 staffing submittal and confirmed that your existing emergency response resources, as described in your emergency plan, are sufficient to perform the required plant actions and emergency plan functions, and implement the event response strategies that were developed in response to NRC Order EA-12-049 without the assignment of collateral duties that would impact the performance of assigned emergency plan functions.

As a result, the NRC staff concludes that your Phase 2 staffing submittal adequately addresses the response strategies needed to respond to a BDBEE using your procedures and guidelines.

The NRC staff will verify the implementation of your staffing capabilities through the inspection program.

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Stephen Philpott at (301) 415- 2365 or via email at Stephen.Philpott@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, Gregory T. Bowman, Branch Chief Orders Management Branch Japan Lessons-Learned Division Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-416 cc: Distribution via Listserv

ML16013A459 *via email OFFICE NRR/JLD/JOMB NRR/JLD NSIR/DPR/NRLB* NRR/JLD/JOMB NAME SPhilpott Slent ARivera GBowman DATE 1/22/2016 1/14/2016 1/26/2016 2/7/2016

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16013A459&oldid=2445594"