ML17181A219

302 Exam Administrative Items for ADAMS 2D

ML17181A219
Person / Time
Site:	Oconee
Issue date:	06/30/2017
From:	Division of Reactor Safety II
To:
References
Download: ML17181A219 (24)

Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: OO/V6E t6/ SW7iJIJ Date of Examination:

Developed by: Written - Facility NRC LI ii Operating - Facility NRCD Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiners Initials

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1 a; C.2.a and b)

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (CA .d; C.2.e)

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2d)

[-90] [5. Reference material due (C.1 e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)]

{-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-ls, ES-401-112, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1 .e and f; C3.d)

{-ZO} {Z Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}

{-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, 1, g and h; C.3.d)

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (Cli; C.2.g;

1. Zy ES-202)

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (Cli; C.2.i; ES-202)

-14 11 . Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) ,

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1J; C.2fand h; C.3.g)

-7 13 Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3h)

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; I or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)

-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C3k)

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) .

Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies onlyJ {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

, Page 25 of 28

- WRITTEN EXAM SAMPLE PLAN ONLY -

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES201-2 Facility: OCONEE Date of Examination: DECEMBER 2014 Initials Item Task Description

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 . N/A R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with N/A

• I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

T T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. N/A E

N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. N/A

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number N/A N/A N/A of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, S and major transients.

M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number N/A N/A N/A U and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation L schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be A tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are T duplicated from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on 0 subsequentdays.

R

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative N/A N/A N/A and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3. a. Verify thatthe systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: N/A N/A N/A (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form

/ (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify thatthe administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1 : N/A N/A N/A (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix N/A N/A N/A of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered N/A in the appropriate exam sections. Hf

b. Assess whether the rn CFR 55A1/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N/A E c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. N/A y R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

A N/A N/A WA L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. N/A 7

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

-y N/A (J4

a. Author Michael K. Meeks / 03/10/2014

b. Facility Reviewer (*) N/A A Pt.

. . vi JpQ P1.

c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) £ea /LIFIAJ

d. NRC Supervisor ttfJdt4  %?<4 I

( %:77A6 ) fo,? .

1vtII/,gA/A/

Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines

- WRITTEN EXAM SAMPLE PLAN ONLY -

ES-201 ExaminationOutline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 FacUlty: Oconee Nuclear Station Date of Examination: 12/8/2014 Initials Item Task Description a b* c#

1 . a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 .

• Z w

A b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with ç I Section Di of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

T T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.

2. a. Using Form ES-301 -5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, S andmajortransients.

M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number U and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. (OL c c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301 -4 and described in Appendix D.

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria ontheform. j)

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -1 : -

S (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. 127 L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. b)

1. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

a. Author ccc% ffri414

b. Facility Reviewer (*) Zi/% ,VC/6It /

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) #1JCW/1E 4IEEI</ 1fo%pgiy

d. NRC Supervisor GC(.ALt Rc.L I XQ kJ..4>-

Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines 5cLA 2ckv 10 &

ILT2 Form ES-201-3 Examination Security Agreement ES-201 1 . Pre-Examination 2014 as of the date spec ializ ed know ledg e abou t the NRC licen sing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 12/081 I acknowledge that have acqu ired not been authorized by the e that I will not knowi ngly divu lge any inform ation about these examinations to any persons who have of my signature. I agre e applicants scheduled to be administered iner. I unde rstan d that I am not to instr uct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to thos NRC chief exam ifically noted below and authorized by the NRC sing exam inati ons from this date until com pleti on of examination administration, except as spec these licen t the training content or provide direct or indirect g as a simu lator boot h oper ator or com mun icator is acceptable if the individual does not selec (e.g., actin mented in the facility licensees procedures) and back ). Furt herm ore, I am awar e of the phys ical security measures and requirements (as docu n against me or feed may resul t in canc ellat ion of the examinations and/or an enforcement actio s of this agre emen t examination security understand that violation of the condition agem ent or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that ely repo rt to facility man the facility licensee. I will immediat may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination g the NRC licensing examinations administered best of my know ledg e, I did not divu lge to any unauthorized persons any information concernin ration, I did not To the ed into this secu rity agre ement until the completion of examination administ the date that I enter except as specifically noted during the week(s) of 12/0W2014. From appl icant s who were administered these licensing examinations, rman ce feed back to thos e instruct, evaluate, or provide perfo below and authorized by the NRC.

DATE SIGNATURE(2) DATE NOTE JOB TITLE I RESPO NSIBI LITY SIGNATURE (1)

PRINTED NAME 4L 5:

1 .

2. Lyc*t ,9:)+L10, r

3. sV2% ábMi 6u;

4. Ati1Q1 Ft5k, P/&f ifC Lx %;,ec, 5JVv ti/Cl/i S

S

• 4 I

\j -

c 2

6. (e v- !1JIot/IL/

7. <Or er tJ\1 7tfo/N Cc% l2 22(L 8.]4iCS GtLJT NI7IlLktRc(j r j Cf 1 U It Sc,Jvtpq N t T L6 St.1oi

9. Ia.e, io:-rais L J4L A-itn 1 n 1 i I i Wk1

/%

1j_ R1k_ i2J)%14F I2 t

Zftfiy 1 2. 7Zi,\ Va4- Vt, stnl S4W# (L/ I ,

_? f2Yf 13i3;1 Rf)5+r-V-- c4AS%h ,J,4)j((

1 4. )t47 6 5%\ rccdL ,/s,

-oX :2 I 1 5 1:::El TA CLcP6 c;6

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1 . Pre-Examination I acknow!edge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 12108/2014 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 1210812014. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE(2) DATE NOTE

1. :s;e7 Slp3R+ 1)29/iq, 2f33ti

2. J4/4t5 iL!. iA iq f/a//cW? vi /

3. 35 %p ! .

7INM t

4. rn-c- AdfP7i . ,/g4 /22? /

5. trhc )o /v-rcs q5f/  %(2 I OY /S

6. L%u i i %ii,j tcVitr, 7- c 1 --- /5

7. ci1rcL C:; so I

8. \-7.-3-4 L / %_

9. t?k#, f?N Etvi JfC.rV 5

____/

1o.o Ffki( MAJS 2cThw-11 . mcpec qb_.Th,g J4 Sm % /%4 %6rii*/%

12C(-IW__DIYHLtZib dIt?J I jri

,y

13. siP 1n&__ 9 -, 9 H 1-r) /Lf 1 4. c2415 gc, 4LIL -

15. ck.4eiic c_fl.,tL i2 /z/1zL_

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1 . Pre-Examination acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 12/08/2014 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g, acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 12/08/2014. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY (1) DATE , SIGNATIjRE(2) DATE NOTE iSwt LAk iE)ckn ALrdP izAsiist 2OAQJI Jfts 1kr 1:ditL&t

,t%1 I L1;:;E2E t b4J _q/30i,14 1 I 27/9

,/4Lf

• 7_ _øSy / ,%/

ioe.. 0vqt I:o __:/sojit I ttztis

, ]jJs to-t--tV

_)O-Pq .

7. Jo \1Q 1IalJt1 8.-VVV(c.1t JoIY4y ,

9. /VÜ foqct *d 5f1av 0 r7-ir io.t;. fy

11. ?;ic 1 2Cb S. LCZ-(

13.5r 6. I)oLi 5O IA 1, w 1 4. 4AFt( A - 1%L ,e0 to z/f7f4-

/. r t3(1(z:

15.5LjCesL 5g to1ztfZ /;2tKJ7

/

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1 . Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinaflons scheduled for the week(s) of 12108/2014 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 1210812014. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE(2) DATE NOTE 1 . f LJftSfJ Sf4 JJ11 ,

r%i1rc, -

i,-

2. i b SWA A)L7 Y /p - tt5tg4%iJ 3.btf i:-. CIetiiA zo 70ff s:/dP/V/-#- tfrtO.

p )Lt1_)/

4. \9LvS zo 5 & ,av4- 7 /J/)o/ &%1ACi

6. 1 LOA)5: r NLO Tca nij (i. jf-jZ-P4 I2.-t:;4q

7. c( OAw ,z1ltebf 8.7frl1 Cri)O SIW lz 2)-if

9. C Lfl  %: 1

10. 1(A) itifmsii .Ifrzq_1y I j1._c_ Pw6 S4i, /,1JluckfrV- - , - 1b - *

)2-/p-iq.

5LtSy --

12. RtAV Zc?Cf /i45r1 1fJi4____

13. frtiI c 2: , 2-;r-/_

7.1 ,

14. --

F. F %g

15. fHOUkt A.e 05 t,v,cT, 1,c To& ,%2%4frL 7E ( am

I ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1 . Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 12/08/2014 as of the date of my signature. I agree that i will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 1210812014. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE DATE NOTE 1 /2-/111____

W?tt4-A15 -

2.f2k/ mffi -

It:7 z fvL4C QC jzfL7L 7/isfi+

(Z tr-,-?

3jT 2tt//L 4&M  ??,4tJ /1C,  ; #-,c 4.4& c::Es TLT Sc) PJ9I( :r)%/11Lf J4 jjl9

. ZL7 .2:43?;;-u c- tz

5. d.ityvc ,&L4Cgo 4rC _tz%A7*1 -K 6.I(C2(Ry /%PE F r & rYi -

/2//tL/ )lr(4 /t2-/

7. IIH/tts -3D- /Z:r (ArLLL-k AA 8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Date of Examination: Operating Test Number:

Initials 1 . General Criteria a b* c#

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safetyfunction distribution).

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audittest(s). (see Section D.1 a.)

L

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.

2. Walk-Through Criteria --

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

. initial conditions

. initiating cues

. references and tools, including associated procedures

. reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee

. operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

$)

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301 -1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria --

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

\

PrintedName/Signature

/ Date

a. Author \IU(c\ t-o i L-i

b. Facility Reviewer(*) JW7 //I!1 / Cj,j ,i jJp/,

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) //CNI1EL

d. NRC Supervisor Q2f2)C) 1 kLC4 ) kX.u_ t2JocJ/2oJf NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c chief examiner concurrence required

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Oconee Date of Exam: 72108/74 Scenario Numbers: 1 I 2 I 3 Operating Test No.: 1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES InWals a b* c#

1 . The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

3. Each event description consists of

. the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

. the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event

. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

. the expected operator actions (by shift position)

. the event termination point (if applicable) -

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g. pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5J

5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. U \

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cuesaregiven.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered.

9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 1 0 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

1 0. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301 .

11 . All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number oftransients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submitthe form with the simulator scenarios).

1 3. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) ActualAttributes -- --

1 . Total malfunctions (58) 8 7 6

2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (12) 2 1 2 4

3. Abnormal events (24) 4 2 2

4. Major transients (12) 1 2 1

5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (12) 2 1 1

6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (02) 2 1 1

7. Critical tasks (23) 3 2 2

(/

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES3O1-5 Facility: Oconee Date of Exam: 12/08/14 Operating Test No.: 1 t

A E Scenarios P V P E 2 3 4 T M 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW N T

I T POSrflON POSIrION POSrflON POSITION A C S A B S A B S A B S A BL A T R T 0 P T 0 R T 0 R I 0 M*)

N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P RU T P E

RO RX 1 110 NOR 3 111 SRO-I I/C D

SRO-U 2,6 7

2,4 5

3,5 4 4 2 D MAJ 8 7,8 6,7 221 TS 022 RX RO x NOR 1 111 1OI I/C 4,5 1,3,6 2,3,4 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 8 7,8 6,7 2 2 1 D TS NOR SROI D I/C 2,4,5 6,7 1,2,3 4,5,6 2,3,4 5

4 4 2 SRO-U x MAJ 8 7,8 6,7 221 TS 4,5,6 2,3,5 2,3,4 0 2 2 Instructions:

1 . Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionallyserves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1 -for-i basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301 -6 Facility: Oconee Date of Examination: 12/08/14 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS RO X RO X RO D RO SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I El SRO-U El SRO-U El SRO-U X SRO-U El Competencies SCENARK CEJO_ JO_ CENARO 1234123412341234 Interpret/Diagnose Events 2,3, 2,4, 1,3, 1,4, 1,3, 2,3, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2,

. . 67 57 56 58 56 45 34 34 34 and Conditions 8 8 7 7,8 6,7 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 7,8 7,8 7 Comply With and 2,3, 2,4, 1,3, 1,4, 1,3, 2,3, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 67 57 56 56 56 45 34 34 34 Use Procedures (1) 8 8 7 8 78 67 56 56 56 7,8 7,8 7 Operate Control 2,3, 2,4, 1,3, 1,4, 1,3, 2,3, ID ,.i Ii\ 6,7, 5,7 5,6, 5,6 5,6, 4,5 Doarus ) 8 8 7 8 7,8 6,7 Communicate 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 and Interact 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 7,8 7,8 7 7,8 7,8 7 7,8 7,8 7 Demonstrate Supervisory 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 34 34 34 Ability (3) 5,6, 5,6 5,6, 8 7,8 7 Comply With and 5, 2,3 2,3 Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: OCoAJE Date of Exam: f7/// Exam Level: RO B SRO L Initials Item Description a b c 1 . Clean answer sheets copied before grading L9/ %i %2

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified ,, ,t.i and documented (W (4

3. Applicants scores checked for addition errors ,

,.I,y (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) (4

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, ,

,,/

as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail (A

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades arejustified (4

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training ,

deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity (7 of questions missed by half or more of the applicants .

/,

Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader D iJ i) ic

b. Facility Reviewer(*) /

c. NRCChiefExaminer(*) ///#%EL

d. NRC Supervisor (*) GEAu 3 )

(*) The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

(IIb) DUKE Scott L. Batson ENERGY Wce President Oconee Nuclear Station ONS-201 4-1 25 Duke Energy ONOIVP I 7800 Rochester Hwy Seneca, SC 29672 September 19, 2014 0: 864.873.3274 Mr. Victor McCree Regional Administrator f: 864.873. 4208 ScotLBatsonduke-energy.com us. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Marquis One lower 245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite I 200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Subject:

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION Operating Exam Outlines 75 day submittal

Dear Mr. McCree:

In accordance with the provisions of NUREG-1021, Duke Energy is submitting the operating exam outlines, quality checklists, and other documentation as required for the initial license operating exam scheduled for the week of December 8, 2014 at the Oconee Training Center, Oconee Nuclear Site. Submitted for review are:

. Form ES-201-2, Examination Outline Quality Checklist

. Form ES-201-3, Examination Security Agreement

. Form ES-301-1, RO Administrative Topics Outline

. Form ES-301 -1 SRO Administrative Topics Outline

. Form ES-301-2, RO Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline

. Form ES-301-2, SRO (U) Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline

. Form ES-301-2, SRO (I) Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline

. Form ES-301-5, Transient and Event Checklist

. Form ES-D-1 Scenario outline (three)

. Form ES-401 -4, Record of Rejected K/As If you require any additional information, or have any questions, please contact Cliff Witherspoon at (864) 873-4330 or Gabriel Washburn at (864) 873-4490.

Sincerely, Scott L. Batson Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station Attachments www.duke-energy.com

us. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II September 19, 2014 Page 2 cc: Mr. Eugene F. Guthrie, Chief U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Division of Reactor Safety Operations Branch Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 Mr. Michael Meeks U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Division of Reactor Safety Operations Branch Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

-% DUKE ENERGY Scott L Batson Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station ONS-201 4-129 Duke Energy ONOIVP I 7800 Rochester Hwy Seneca, SC 29672 October2, 2014 0: 8648733274 n 864873. 4208 ScatLBatsonduke-energy corn Mr. Victor McCree, Regional Administrator uPs. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree CenterAve., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Subject:

Oconee Nuclear Station Written Exam 45 day submittal

Dear Mr. McCree:

In accordance with the provisions of NUREG-1 021 Duke Energy is submitting the written exam, quality checklists, and other documentation as required for the initial license written exam scheduled for December 17, 2014 atthe Operatorlraining Center, Oconee Nuclear Station. Submitted for review are:

. Form ES-201-3, Examination Security Agreement

. Form ES-401 -4, Record of Rejected K/As

. Form ES-401-6, Written Examination Quality Checklist

. RO written exam (with reference package)

. RO written exam key

. SRO written exam (with reference package)

. SRO written exam key

. Reference material on a DVD If you require any additional information, or have any questions, please contact Cliff Witherspoon at (864) 873-4330.

Sincerely, Scott L. Batson Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station wwwduke-energy.com

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II October 2, 2014 Page 2 cc: Gerald J. McCoy, Chief us. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Division of Reactor Safety Operations Branch Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 Michael Meeks US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Division of Reactor Safety Operations Branch Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite I 200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

-% DUKE ENERGY Scott L. Batson Wce President Oconee Nuclear Station QNS-2014-1 39 Duke Energy ONOIVP I 7800 Rochester Hwy Seneca, SC 29672 October 22, 2014 o: 864.873.3274 I 864.873. 4208 Mr. Victor McCree, Regional Administrator ScoftBatsonduke-energy.com us. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Subject:

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION 1LT46 Operating Exam 45 day submittal

Dear Mr. McCree:

In accordance with the provisions of NUREG-1 021 Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Duke Energy is submitting the operating exam, quality checklists, and other documentation as required for the initial license exam scheduled for the week of December 8, 2014 at the Operator Training Center, Oconee Nuclear Site.

Submitted for review are:

. One set of Administrative JPMs with handouts

. One set of Control Room/In-Plant JPMs with handouts

. Form ES-201-2, Examination Outline Quality Checklist

. Form ES-201-3, Examination Security Agreement

. Form ES-301-1, RO Administrative Topics Outline

. Form ES-301-1, SRO Administrative Topics Outline

. Form ES-301-2, RO Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline

. Form ES-301-2, SRO (U) Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline

. Form ES-301-2, SRO (I) Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline

. Form ES-301-3, Operating Test Quality Checklist

. Form ES-301-4, Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist

. Form ES-301-5, Transient and Event Checklist

. Form ES-301-6, Competencies Checklist

. Form ES-DI for Three Simulator Scenarios

. Form ES-D2 for Three Simulator Scenarios wwwduke-energy.com

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II October 22, 2014 Page 2 If you require any additional information, or have any questions, please contact Cliff Witherspoon at (864) 873-4330 or Sam Lark at (864) 873-3642.

Sincerely, j >e,--

Scott L. Batson Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station Attachments

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II October22, 2014 Page 3 cc: Mr. Gerald J. McCoy, Chief U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Division of Reactor Safety Operations Branch Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 Mr. Michael Meeks U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Division of Reactor Safety Operations Branch Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

w(*: DUKE Scott L.

ENERGY ce Wce President Oconee Nuclear Station ONS-201 4-1 52 Duke Energy ONOIVP I 7800 Rochester Hwy Seneca, SC 29612 November25, 2014 0: 864.873.3274 t 864.873. 4208 ScoftBatson@duke-energy.com Mr. Victor McCree, Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree CenterAve., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Subject:

Oconee Nuclear Station ILT46 Final Submittal

Dear Mr. McCree:

In accordance with the provisions of NUREG-1 021 Duke Energy is submitting the written exam, operating exam, quality checklists, and other documentation as required for the initial license exam scheduled for the weeks of December 8, 201 4, and December 1 5, 201 4, at the Operator Training Center, Oconee Nuclear Station. Submitted for review are:

. One set of Administrative JPMs with handouts

. One set of Control Room/In-Plant JPMs with handouts

. Form ES-DI for Three Simulator Scenarios

. Form ES-D2 for Three Simulator Scenarios

. Form ES-201-2, Examination Outline Quality Checklist

. Form ES-201-3, Examination Security Agreement

. Form ES-301-1, RO Administrative Topics Outline

. Form ES-301 -1 SRO Administrative Topics Outline

. Form ES-301-2, RO Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline

. Form ES-301-2, SRO (U) Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline

. Form ES-301-2, SRO (I) Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline

. Form ES-301 -3, Operating Test Quality Checklist

. Form ES-301-4, Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist

. Form ES-301-5, Transient and Event Checklist

. Form ES-301-6, Competencies Checklist

. Form ES-401 -4, Record of Rejected K/As

. Form ES-401-6, Written Examination Quality Checklist

. RO written exam

. RO written exam key

. SRO written exam (with reference package)

. SRO written exam key www.duke-enetgy.com

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II November25, 2014 Page 2 If you require any additional information, or have any questions, please contact Cliff Witherspoon at (864) 873-4330.

Sincerely, Scott L. Batson Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station cc: Gerald J. McCoy, Chief U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Division of Reactor Safety Operations Branch Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 Michael Meeks U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Division of Reactor Safety Operations Branch Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree CenterAve., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

DUKE Scott L. Batson ENERGY Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station Duke Energy ONOIVP I 7800 Rochester Hwy Seneca, SC 29672 ONS-201 4-1 58 o 864.873.3274 I 864.873.4208 ScotLBatsonduke-energy.com December 19, 2014 Mr. Victor McCree, Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree CenterAve., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Subject:

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATlQf 1LT46 Post Exam Submittal

Dear Mr. McCree:

An NRC initial license operating exam was administered the week of December 8, 2014.

The associated written exam was administered on December 17, 2014. Oconee has two post exam comments included with this submittal letter as Attachment I Enclosed for your review as directed by NUREG-1021 are the following:

. A student seating chart,

. The original student answer sheets,

. The original signed exam cover sheets,

. Two clean copies of the student answer sheets,

. A copy of the RO exam,

. A copy of the SRO exam,

. An RO exam key,

. An SRO exam key,

. A compiled list of student comments and proctor answers.

If you require any additional information or have any questions, please contact Cliff Witherspoon at (864) 873-4330 or Sam Lark at (864) 873-3642.

Sincerely, Scott L. Batson Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station Attachment (1)

Enclosures (9) www.duke-energy.com DEC 29 2014

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II December 19, 2014 Page 2 cc: Gerald J. McCoy, Chief U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Division of Reactor Safety Operations Branch Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree CenterAve., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 Mr. Michael Meeks U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Division of Reactor Safety Operations Branch Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree CenterAve., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257