ML17310B204: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY DOCKET NOS.STN 50-528, 50-529, and 50-530 PETITION TO INTERVENE OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS The Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT), pursuant to 10 C.F.R.$2.714, hereby files its petition to intervene in the above proceeding.
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ARIZONAPUBLIC SERVICE                                       DOCKET NOS. STN 50-528, COMPANY                                                    50-529, and 50-530 PETITION TO INTERVENE OF PUBLIC UTILITYCOMMISSION OF TEXAS The Public UtilityCommission    of Texas (PUCT), pursuant to   10 C.F.R. $ 2.714, hereby files its petition to intervene in the above proceeding.
1.Nature of proceeding.
: 1. Nature of proceeding. Pursuant to the terms of an agreement between El Paso Electric Company (EPEC) and Central and So'uth West Corporation (CSW) to merge, Arizona Public Service Company and EPEC have filed the above proceedings.
Pursuant to the terms of an agreement between El Paso Electric Company (EPEC)and Central and So'uth West Corporation (CSW)to merge, Arizona Public Service Company and EPEC have filed the above proceedings.
They are requests that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC): (1) consent to the indirect transfer of control of EPEC's     interest in certain operating licenses; and (2) amend two     of those operating licenses to delete provisions relating to previous sale-leaseback arrangements. By notice published March     14, 1994 at page 11S13, Volume 59, No. 49,   of the Federal Register, the NRC has requested comment on the proposed transfer of control and the staff has requested comment on the antitrust issues raised by the proposed transactions.
They are requests that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC): (1)consent to the indirect transfer of control of EPEC's interest in certain operating licenses;and (2)amend two of those operating licenses to delete provisions relating to previous sale-leaseback arrangements.
: 2. Representative.     The Attorney General       of Texas is authorized to represent the PUCT before federal agencies that regulate public utilities. Public   Utility 9404iS02iS 9404i2 PDR     ADOCK OS000528 P                       PDR
By notice published March 14, 1994 at page 11S13, Volume 59, No.49, of the Federal Register, the NRC has requested comment on the proposed transfer of control and the staff has requested comment on the antitrust issues raised by the proposed transactions.
2.Representative.
The Attorney General of Texas is authorized to represent the PUCT before federal agencies that regulate public utilities.
Public Utility 9404iS02iS 9404i2 PDR ADOCK OS000528 P PDR  
,~I n l~~V Regulatory Act (PURA), Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann.art.1446c, g 15 (Vernon Supp.1994).Service can be made on the following assistant attorneys general appearing on behalf of the PUCT: Norma K.Scogin Liz Bills Steven Baron Administrative Law Section Energy Division P.O.Box 12548, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-2548 (512)463-2003 Telecopier:
(512)320-0911 3.Interested party.The above counsel appear on behalf of: Public Utility Commission of Texas 7800 Shoal Creek Blvd., Suite 400-N Austin, Texas 78757 (512)458-0213 Telecopier:
(512)458-8340 4.Interest.The above proceedings are a prerequisite to the proposed merger of EPEC and CSW.The PUCT regulates public utilities in Texas to assure rates, operations, and services that are just'and reasonable to consumers and utilities.
PURA$2.The PUCT is charged with protecting the public interest inherent in the rates and services of public utilities in Texas.Id.Five public utilities that provide electricity to retail customers in Texas will be directly affected by the proposed merger.
II L'J<<I I h P' The PUCT has jurisdiction over the utilities'exas retail rates and services.PURA$g 2, 16.There is currently pending before the PUCT an application under PURA g 63 for a finding that the merger is in the public interest and a request to increase EPEC's rates.As stated above, the NRC has requested public comment on possible antitrust implications of the proposed merger.If the NRC denies the requested relief, the merger'!will not take place.If the NRC conditions approval on some change in the terms of the merger, the PUCT's evaluation of the public interest question may be affected.The PUCT has a duty to participate in the above proceeding to ensure that the public interest is served.5.Request for Notice.The PUCT hereby requests that copies of notices in this matter be provided to the its attorneys and that they be included on the official service list of this proceeding.
Respectfully submitted, DAN MORALES Attorney General of Texas JORGE VEGA First Assistant Attorney General JAMES M.PHILLIPS Chief, Energy Division


Dated: April 12, 1994 NORMA K.SCOG LIZ BILLS STEVEN BARON Assistant Attorney General Administrative Law Section Energy Division P.O.Box 12548, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-2548 (512)463-2003 Telecopier:
  , ~
(512)320-0911 ATTORNEYS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS 0 a~~C I II II ,F 1 I certify that on this 12th day of April, 1994, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Appearance of Public Utility Commission of Texas has been sent by United States mail, postage prepaid, to all persons listed on the attached service list.N RMAK.SCOGIN  
I n
~g~, I Steve Olea Arizona Corporation Commission 1200 W.Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Jack R.Newman Newman&Holtzinger 1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 1000 Washington, D.C.20036 James A.Beoletto Southern California Edison Company P.O.Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 Senior Resident Inspector Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station 5951 S.Wintersburg Road Tonopah, Arizona 85354-7537 Regional Administrator, Region V U.S.Nuclear Regulatory commission 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Charles B.Brinkman, Manager Washington Nuclear Operations ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Power 12300 Twinbrook Parkway, Suite 330 Rockville, Maryland 20852 Aubrey V.Godwin, Director Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency 4814 South 40 Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040 Mark D.Roberson Federal Case Director El Paso Transition Team Central and South West Corp.P.O.Box 660164.Dallas, Texas 75266-0164 Curtis Hoskins Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Operating Officer El Paso Electric Company 303 North Oregon Street El Paso, Texas 79901 Roy P.Lessy, Jr.Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer and Feld 1333 New Hampshire Ave., Ste.400 Washington, D,C.20036 Ronald J.Stevens, Director Nuclear Regulatory Affairs Arizona Public Service Company P.O.Box 52034 Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034 Eduardo A.Rodriguez Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel El Paso Electric Company 303 North Oregon Street EI Paso, Texas 79901 Chairman Maricopa County Board of Supervisors 111 South Third Ave.Phoenix, Arizona 85003 Clark Evans Downs Jones, Day Reavis&Pogue 1450 G Street, N.W.Washington, D.C.20005-2088  
l
~0~I 4~g}}
      ~ ~
V
 
Regulatory Act (PURA), Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. art. 1446c,          g 15  (Vernon Supp.
1994). Service can be made on the following assistant attorneys general appearing on behalf of the PUCT:
Norma K. Scogin Liz Bills Steven Baron Administrative Law Section Energy Division P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-2548 (512) 463-2003 Telecopier: (512) 320-0911
: 3.      Interested party. The above counsel appear on behalf of:
Public UtilityCommission of Texas 7800 Shoal Creek Blvd., Suite 400-N Austin, Texas 78757 (512) 458-0213 Telecopier: (512) 458-8340
: 4.      Interest. The above proceedings are a prerequisite to the proposed merger  of EPEC    and CSW.      The PUCT regulates public utilities in Texas to assure rates, operations, and services that are just'and reasonable to consumers and utilities.
PURA    $ 2. The PUCT is charged with protecting the public interest inherent in the rates and services    of public utilities in Texas. Id. Five public utilities that provide electricity to retail customers in Texas will be directly affected by the proposed merger.
 
L II J
        <<I I
h P'
 
The PUCT has jurisdiction over the    utilities'exas retail rates  and services. PURA    $g 2, 16.
There is currently pending before the PUCT an application under PURA g 63 for a finding that the merger is in the public interest and a request to increase EPEC's rates.
As stated above, the NRC has requested            public comment on possible antitrust implications  of the  proposed merger. Ifthe NRC denies      the requested relief, the merger will not take place. Ifthe NRC conditions  approval on some change in the terms      of the merger, the PUCT's evaluation      of the public  interest question may be affected.      The PUCT has a duty to participate in the above proceeding to ensure that the public interest is served.
: 5.      Request for Notice. The PUCT hereby requests that copies        of notices in this matter be provided to the its attorneys and that they be included on the official service list of this proceeding.
Respectfully submitted, DAN MORALES Attorney General of Texas JORGE VEGA First Assistant Attorney General JAMES M. PHILLIPS Chief, Energy Division
 
NORMA K. SCOG LIZ BILLS STEVEN BARON Assistant Attorney General Administrative Law Section Energy Division P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-2548 (512) 463-2003 Telecopier: (512) 320-0911 ATTORNEYS         FOR     PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS Dated: April 12, 1994
 
a 0         ~ ~
C I
II II
    ,F 1
 
I certify that on this 12th day of April,   1994, a true and correct copy   of the foregoing Notice   of Appearance of Public Utility Commission of Texas       has been sent by United States mail, postage prepaid, to all persons listed on the attached service list.
N RMAK. SCOGIN
 
    ~ g
~, I
 
Steve Olea                         Jack R. Newman Arizona Corporation Commission     Newman & Holtzinger 1200 W. Washington Street           1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 1000 Phoenix, Arizona 85007              Washington, D.C. 20036 James A. Beoletto                 Curtis Hoskins Southern California Edison Company Executive Vice President and P. O. Box 800                               Chief Executive Operating Officer Rosemead, California 91770         El Paso Electric Company 303 North Oregon Street Senior Resident Inspector          El Paso, Texas 79901 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station                      Roy P. Lessy, Jr.
5951 S. Wintersburg Road            Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer and Feld Tonopah, Arizona 85354-7537        1333 New Hampshire Ave., Ste. 400 Washington, D,C. 20036 Regional Administrator, Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory commission  Ronald J. Stevens, Director 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210          Nuclear Regulatory Affairs Walnut Creek, California 94596      Arizona Public Service Company P. O. Box 52034 Charles B. Brinkman, Manager        Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034 Washington Nuclear Operations ABB Combustion Engineering          Eduardo A. Rodriguez Nuclear Power                Vice President, Secretary and 12300 Twinbrook Parkway, Suite 330          General Counsel Rockville, Maryland 20852          El Paso Electric Company 303 North Oregon Street Aubrey V. Godwin, Director          EI Paso, Texas 79901 Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency 4814 South 40 Street                Chairman Phoenix, Arizona 85040              Maricopa County Board   of Supervisors 111 South Third Ave.
Mark D. Roberson                    Phoenix, Arizona 85003 Federal Case Director El Paso Transition Team            Clark Evans Downs Central and South West Corp.        Jones, Day Reavis & Pogue P. O. Box 660164.                  1450 G Street, N.W.
Dallas, Texas 75266-0164            Washington, D.C. 20005-2088
 
  ~   0 ~ I 4 ~ g}}

Latest revision as of 04:05, 4 February 2020

Petition to Intervene of Public Utility Commission of Tx
ML17310B204
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 04/12/1994
From: Scogin N
TEXAS, STATE OF
To:
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML17310B203 List:
References
NUDOCS 9404150215
Download: ML17310B204 (12)
v • d • e


Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ARIZONAPUBLIC SERVICE DOCKET NOS. STN 50-528, COMPANY 50-529, and 50-530 PETITION TO INTERVENE OF PUBLIC UTILITYCOMMISSION OF TEXAS The Public UtilityCommission of Texas (PUCT), pursuant to 10 C.F.R. $ 2.714, hereby files its petition to intervene in the above proceeding.

1. Nature of proceeding. Pursuant to the terms of an agreement between El Paso Electric Company (EPEC) and Central and So'uth West Corporation (CSW) to merge, Arizona Public Service Company and EPEC have filed the above proceedings.

They are requests that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC): (1) consent to the indirect transfer of control of EPEC's interest in certain operating licenses; and (2) amend two of those operating licenses to delete provisions relating to previous sale-leaseback arrangements. By notice published March 14, 1994 at page 11S13, Volume 59, No. 49, of the Federal Register, the NRC has requested comment on the proposed transfer of control and the staff has requested comment on the antitrust issues raised by the proposed transactions.

2. Representative. The Attorney General of Texas is authorized to represent the PUCT before federal agencies that regulate public utilities. Public Utility 9404iS02iS 9404i2 PDR ADOCK OS000528 P PDR

, ~

I n

l

~ ~

V

Regulatory Act (PURA), Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. art. 1446c, g 15 (Vernon Supp.

1994). Service can be made on the following assistant attorneys general appearing on behalf of the PUCT:

Norma K. Scogin Liz Bills Steven Baron Administrative Law Section Energy Division P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-2548 (512) 463-2003 Telecopier: (512) 320-0911

3. Interested party. The above counsel appear on behalf of:

Public UtilityCommission of Texas 7800 Shoal Creek Blvd., Suite 400-N Austin, Texas 78757 (512) 458-0213 Telecopier: (512) 458-8340

4. Interest. The above proceedings are a prerequisite to the proposed merger of EPEC and CSW. The PUCT regulates public utilities in Texas to assure rates, operations, and services that are just'and reasonable to consumers and utilities.

PURA $ 2. The PUCT is charged with protecting the public interest inherent in the rates and services of public utilities in Texas. Id. Five public utilities that provide electricity to retail customers in Texas will be directly affected by the proposed merger.

L II J

<<I I

h P'

The PUCT has jurisdiction over the utilities'exas retail rates and services. PURA $g 2, 16.

There is currently pending before the PUCT an application under PURA g 63 for a finding that the merger is in the public interest and a request to increase EPEC's rates.

As stated above, the NRC has requested public comment on possible antitrust implications of the proposed merger. Ifthe NRC denies the requested relief, the merger will not take place. Ifthe NRC conditions approval on some change in the terms of the merger, the PUCT's evaluation of the public interest question may be affected. The PUCT has a duty to participate in the above proceeding to ensure that the public interest is served.

5. Request for Notice. The PUCT hereby requests that copies of notices in this matter be provided to the its attorneys and that they be included on the official service list of this proceeding.

Respectfully submitted, DAN MORALES Attorney General of Texas JORGE VEGA First Assistant Attorney General JAMES M. PHILLIPS Chief, Energy Division

NORMA K. SCOG LIZ BILLS STEVEN BARON Assistant Attorney General Administrative Law Section Energy Division P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-2548 (512) 463-2003 Telecopier: (512) 320-0911 ATTORNEYS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS Dated: April 12, 1994

a 0 ~ ~

C I

II II

,F 1

I certify that on this 12th day of April, 1994, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Appearance of Public Utility Commission of Texas has been sent by United States mail, postage prepaid, to all persons listed on the attached service list.

N RMAK. SCOGIN

~ g

~, I

Steve Olea Jack R. Newman Arizona Corporation Commission Newman & Holtzinger 1200 W. Washington Street 1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 1000 Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Washington, D.C. 20036 James A. Beoletto Curtis Hoskins Southern California Edison Company Executive Vice President and P. O. Box 800 Chief Executive Operating Officer Rosemead, California 91770 El Paso Electric Company 303 North Oregon Street Senior Resident Inspector El Paso, Texas 79901 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Roy P. Lessy, Jr.

5951 S. Wintersburg Road Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer and Feld Tonopah, Arizona 85354-7537 1333 New Hampshire Ave., Ste. 400 Washington, D,C. 20036 Regional Administrator, Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory commission Ronald J. Stevens, Director 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Nuclear Regulatory Affairs Walnut Creek, California 94596 Arizona Public Service Company P. O. Box 52034 Charles B. Brinkman, Manager Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034 Washington Nuclear Operations ABB Combustion Engineering Eduardo A. Rodriguez Nuclear Power Vice President, Secretary and 12300 Twinbrook Parkway, Suite 330 General Counsel Rockville, Maryland 20852 El Paso Electric Company 303 North Oregon Street Aubrey V. Godwin, Director EI Paso, Texas 79901 Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency 4814 South 40 Street Chairman Phoenix, Arizona 85040 Maricopa County Board of Supervisors 111 South Third Ave.

Mark D. Roberson Phoenix, Arizona 85003 Federal Case Director El Paso Transition Team Clark Evans Downs Central and South West Corp. Jones, Day Reavis & Pogue P. O. Box 660164. 1450 G Street, N.W.

Dallas, Texas 75266-0164 Washington, D.C. 20005-2088

~ 0 ~ I 4 ~ g

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17310B204&oldid=2427970"