|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20217E1551999-09-28028 September 1999 Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR50 Re Elimination of Requirement for Licensees to Revise ISI & IST Programs Beyond Baseline Edition & Addenda of ASME B&PV Code ML17313B0651999-07-30030 July 1999 Comment on Draft Rg DG-1076, Service Level I,Ii & III Protective Coatings Applied to Npps. ML17313B0161999-07-0101 July 1999 Comment on Draft Rg DG-1074, SG Tube Integrity. ML20196K5631999-06-29029 June 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.55a Re Elimination of 120-month Requirement to Update ASME Code ISI & Inservice Testing Program ML17313A9791999-05-20020 May 1999 Comment Opposing Draft Reg Guide DG-1084, Qualification & Training of Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants. as General Comment,Util Believes That Many of Proposed Changes Will Limit Ability to cross-train Mgt Level Personnel ML20207D1591999-05-20020 May 1999 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR21,50 & 54 Re Use of Alternative Source Terms at Operating Reactors ML20205A4271999-03-18018 March 1999 Comment on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-64 Which Requested Greater Clarification by NRC Re Possible Financial Obligations of NPP Licensees as Reflected in NRC Final Policy Statement on Restructuring & Economic Deregulation ML17313A8521999-03-0505 March 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Change to NRC Enforcement Policy.Suggested Rewording of Sections Provided ML17313A8191999-02-24024 February 1999 Comment Supporting Secy 99-007, Recommendation for Reactor Oversight Process Improvements, & Comments Provided by NEI & Regional Utility Group Iv.Offers Comments on NRC Approach to Using Performance Indicators in Assessment Process ML20198J4031998-12-11011 December 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirement for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at NPPs ML20217B9761998-04-0909 April 1998 Comment Re Draft RG DG-1029, Guidelines for Evaluating Electromagnetic & Radio-Frequency Interference in Safey-Related Instrumentation & Control Sys ML20216A9091998-04-0303 April 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.55a Re Industry Codes & Stds ML17313A3361998-03-27027 March 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed GL Re Lab Testing on Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal. Believes That Proposed 60 Day Implementation Schedule Would Severely Challenge Resources of Limited Number of Qualified Vendors ML20217E8781998-03-27027 March 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed GL, Lab Testing of Nuclear- Grade Activated Charcoal ML20216F5591998-03-13013 March 1998 Application for Review of Combustion Engineering Ssar Design Certification Amend X, in Matter of C-E,Inc Std Plant Design ML17313A2511998-03-0303 March 1998 Comment on Proposed GL 98-XX Re Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. ML20203L5521998-02-25025 February 1998 Forwards Comments on Draft Reg Guide DG-5008, Reporting of Safeguards Events ML20202E4251998-01-30030 January 1998 Comment on Draft RG DG-1070, Sampling Plans Used for Dedicating Simple Metallic Commercial Grade Items for Use in Npps. Draft RG Should Be Revised to Clarify That Alloy Analyzer Can Be Used Consistent W/Guidance in EPRI NP-5652 ML20199E0871998-01-17017 January 1998 Comment Opposing PRM 50-63A by Pg Crane Re Amending Emergency Planning Regulations to Require Consideration of Prophylactic Use of Potassium Iodide for General Public ML20202G4461997-12-0101 December 1997 Comment on Proposed Final Rule 10CFR50.Licensee Requests That Effective Date Be Delayed from 980101 to 0601,in Order to Provide Enough Time to Request & Obtain NRC Review of Exemption from Rule ML20212D1391997-10-17017 October 1997 Comment on Pr 10CFR55 Re NUREG-1021,Interim Rev 8, Operator Licensing Exam Stds for Power Reactors ML17312B4241997-04-23023 April 1997 Comment Supporting Draft Rg DG-1068 (Proposed Rev 3 to Rg 1.134, Medical Evaluation of Licensing Personnel at Npps) ML20134J9671997-02-0606 February 1997 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Draft Policy Statement on Restructuring & Economic Deregulation of Electric Util Industry ML20133D1201996-12-16016 December 1996 Requests Authorization for GE to Conduct narrowly-focused Review of Design Certification Rule for ABWR Before It Is Sent to Ofr & to Urge That Staff Rule Issuance Activities Be Expedited to Max Extent Feasible,All Re 10CFR52 ML20134N2521996-11-14014 November 1996 Comment on Draft RG DG-1012,proposed Rev 3 to RG 1.8, Qualification & Training of Personnel for Npp ML20117E3871996-08-0707 August 1996 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mod to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements ML20116C3331996-07-25025 July 1996 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Draft Final Design Certification Rules for ABWR & Sys 80+ Std Designs ML20116C2501996-07-24024 July 1996 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certification for Us Advanced BWR & Sys 80+ Std Designs ML20115J6731996-07-23023 July 1996 Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR52 Re Design Certification for Sys 80+ Std Plant Design ML20115J6831996-07-23023 July 1996 Comment on Supplementary Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Design Certification of ABWR Under 10CFR52.GE Concerned About Lack of Design Finality Inherent in Identified Draft Rule Provisions ML20113C6981996-06-24024 June 1996 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors. Cautions NRC Not to Adopt Rules That Are Too Restrictive & Could Lead to Premature Decommissioning ML20117P1261996-06-24024 June 1996 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors. Urges NRC to Approach Rulemaking Re Decommissioning Costs in Manner That Will Facilitate Federal Legislative Solution ML20095A8461995-11-28028 November 1995 Comment on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-62 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50.54.Util Endorses Industry Petition & Response Provided by NEI ML17311B2931995-11-27027 November 1995 Comment Opposing Draft NUREG/CR-6354, Performance Testing of Electronic Personnel Dosimeters. ML17311B1601995-08-31031 August 1995 Comment Opposing Review of Revised NRC SALP ML20092B5721995-08-31031 August 1995 Comment Supporting Pr 52 60FR17902 Re Standard Design Certification for Us Advanced BWR Design ML20087H7241995-08-16016 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Comment on Revision of NRC Enforcement Policy ML20087H8501995-08-15015 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for Us ABWR Design & Sys 80+ Design. Supports NEI Comments L-95-015, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re ABWR Design & Sys 80+ Design1995-08-15015 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re ABWR Design & Sys 80+ Design ML20087F8181995-08-12012 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for Us Advanced Boiling Water Reactor Design. Recommends That Staff Require Use of Armored Electrical Cable in Advanced LWRs ML20092D2691995-08-10010 August 1995 Corrected Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Proposed Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors.Supports NEI Comments ML20087H8301995-08-10010 August 1995 Comment on Proposed 10CFR52 Re Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors.Supports NEI Comments ML20087H8221995-08-10010 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors.Supports NEI Comments ML20092D2961995-08-10010 August 1995 Correction to Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Proposed Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors.Supports NEI Comments ML20087C0411995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certifications for Us Advanced BWR & Sys 80+ Designs ML20087F9161995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Proposed Advanced Reactor Design Certification Rules ML20087F7951995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for Us Boiling Water Reactor Design & Standard Designing Certification for Sys 80+ Design ML20087C1971995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certifications for Us Advanced Boiling Water Reactor & Sys 80+ Designs.Doe Believes That Such Designs Can Significantly Complement Nation Energy Strategy ML20087F8201995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 52 Re Standard Design Certification for Us ABWR Design & Standard Design Certification for Sys 80+ Design ML20087F7611995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment Opposing Pr 10CFR52 Re Proposed Advanced Reactor Design Certification Rules 1999-09-28
[Table view] Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML20217E1551999-09-28028 September 1999 Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR50 Re Elimination of Requirement for Licensees to Revise ISI & IST Programs Beyond Baseline Edition & Addenda of ASME B&PV Code ML17313B0651999-07-30030 July 1999 Comment on Draft Rg DG-1076, Service Level I,Ii & III Protective Coatings Applied to Npps. ML17313B0161999-07-0101 July 1999 Comment on Draft Rg DG-1074, SG Tube Integrity. ML20196K5631999-06-29029 June 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.55a Re Elimination of 120-month Requirement to Update ASME Code ISI & Inservice Testing Program ML17313A9791999-05-20020 May 1999 Comment Opposing Draft Reg Guide DG-1084, Qualification & Training of Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants. as General Comment,Util Believes That Many of Proposed Changes Will Limit Ability to cross-train Mgt Level Personnel ML20207D1591999-05-20020 May 1999 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR21,50 & 54 Re Use of Alternative Source Terms at Operating Reactors ML20205A4271999-03-18018 March 1999 Comment on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-64 Which Requested Greater Clarification by NRC Re Possible Financial Obligations of NPP Licensees as Reflected in NRC Final Policy Statement on Restructuring & Economic Deregulation ML17313A8521999-03-0505 March 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Change to NRC Enforcement Policy.Suggested Rewording of Sections Provided ML17313A8191999-02-24024 February 1999 Comment Supporting Secy 99-007, Recommendation for Reactor Oversight Process Improvements, & Comments Provided by NEI & Regional Utility Group Iv.Offers Comments on NRC Approach to Using Performance Indicators in Assessment Process ML20198J4031998-12-11011 December 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirement for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at NPPs ML20217B9761998-04-0909 April 1998 Comment Re Draft RG DG-1029, Guidelines for Evaluating Electromagnetic & Radio-Frequency Interference in Safey-Related Instrumentation & Control Sys ML20216A9091998-04-0303 April 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.55a Re Industry Codes & Stds ML17313A3361998-03-27027 March 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed GL Re Lab Testing on Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal. Believes That Proposed 60 Day Implementation Schedule Would Severely Challenge Resources of Limited Number of Qualified Vendors ML20217E8781998-03-27027 March 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed GL, Lab Testing of Nuclear- Grade Activated Charcoal ML17313A2511998-03-0303 March 1998 Comment on Proposed GL 98-XX Re Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. ML20203L5521998-02-25025 February 1998 Forwards Comments on Draft Reg Guide DG-5008, Reporting of Safeguards Events ML20202E4251998-01-30030 January 1998 Comment on Draft RG DG-1070, Sampling Plans Used for Dedicating Simple Metallic Commercial Grade Items for Use in Npps. Draft RG Should Be Revised to Clarify That Alloy Analyzer Can Be Used Consistent W/Guidance in EPRI NP-5652 ML20199E0871998-01-17017 January 1998 Comment Opposing PRM 50-63A by Pg Crane Re Amending Emergency Planning Regulations to Require Consideration of Prophylactic Use of Potassium Iodide for General Public ML20202G4461997-12-0101 December 1997 Comment on Proposed Final Rule 10CFR50.Licensee Requests That Effective Date Be Delayed from 980101 to 0601,in Order to Provide Enough Time to Request & Obtain NRC Review of Exemption from Rule ML20212D1391997-10-17017 October 1997 Comment on Pr 10CFR55 Re NUREG-1021,Interim Rev 8, Operator Licensing Exam Stds for Power Reactors ML17312B4241997-04-23023 April 1997 Comment Supporting Draft Rg DG-1068 (Proposed Rev 3 to Rg 1.134, Medical Evaluation of Licensing Personnel at Npps) ML20134J9671997-02-0606 February 1997 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Draft Policy Statement on Restructuring & Economic Deregulation of Electric Util Industry ML20133D1201996-12-16016 December 1996 Requests Authorization for GE to Conduct narrowly-focused Review of Design Certification Rule for ABWR Before It Is Sent to Ofr & to Urge That Staff Rule Issuance Activities Be Expedited to Max Extent Feasible,All Re 10CFR52 ML20134N2521996-11-14014 November 1996 Comment on Draft RG DG-1012,proposed Rev 3 to RG 1.8, Qualification & Training of Personnel for Npp ML20117E3871996-08-0707 August 1996 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mod to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements ML20116C3331996-07-25025 July 1996 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Draft Final Design Certification Rules for ABWR & Sys 80+ Std Designs ML20116C2501996-07-24024 July 1996 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certification for Us Advanced BWR & Sys 80+ Std Designs ML20115J6731996-07-23023 July 1996 Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR52 Re Design Certification for Sys 80+ Std Plant Design ML20115J6831996-07-23023 July 1996 Comment on Supplementary Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Design Certification of ABWR Under 10CFR52.GE Concerned About Lack of Design Finality Inherent in Identified Draft Rule Provisions ML20117P1261996-06-24024 June 1996 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors. Urges NRC to Approach Rulemaking Re Decommissioning Costs in Manner That Will Facilitate Federal Legislative Solution ML20113C6981996-06-24024 June 1996 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors. Cautions NRC Not to Adopt Rules That Are Too Restrictive & Could Lead to Premature Decommissioning ML20095A8461995-11-28028 November 1995 Comment on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-62 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50.54.Util Endorses Industry Petition & Response Provided by NEI ML17311B2931995-11-27027 November 1995 Comment Opposing Draft NUREG/CR-6354, Performance Testing of Electronic Personnel Dosimeters. ML20092B5721995-08-31031 August 1995 Comment Supporting Pr 52 60FR17902 Re Standard Design Certification for Us Advanced BWR Design ML17311B1601995-08-31031 August 1995 Comment Opposing Review of Revised NRC SALP ML20087H7241995-08-16016 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Comment on Revision of NRC Enforcement Policy ML20087H8501995-08-15015 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for Us ABWR Design & Sys 80+ Design. Supports NEI Comments L-95-015, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re ABWR Design & Sys 80+ Design1995-08-15015 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re ABWR Design & Sys 80+ Design ML20087F8181995-08-12012 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for Us Advanced Boiling Water Reactor Design. Recommends That Staff Require Use of Armored Electrical Cable in Advanced LWRs ML20087H8301995-08-10010 August 1995 Comment on Proposed 10CFR52 Re Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors.Supports NEI Comments ML20092D2961995-08-10010 August 1995 Correction to Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Proposed Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors.Supports NEI Comments ML20092D2691995-08-10010 August 1995 Corrected Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Proposed Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors.Supports NEI Comments ML20087H8221995-08-10010 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors.Supports NEI Comments ML20087C1971995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certifications for Us Advanced Boiling Water Reactor & Sys 80+ Designs.Doe Believes That Such Designs Can Significantly Complement Nation Energy Strategy ML20087C0411995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certifications for Us Advanced BWR & Sys 80+ Designs ML20087F7611995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment Opposing Pr 10CFR52 Re Proposed Advanced Reactor Design Certification Rules ML20087F8201995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 52 Re Standard Design Certification for Us ABWR Design & Standard Design Certification for Sys 80+ Design ML20087F7951995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for Us Boiling Water Reactor Design & Standard Designing Certification for Sys 80+ Design ML20087F9161995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Proposed Advanced Reactor Design Certification Rules ML20087C7671995-08-0606 August 1995 Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR42 Re Std Design Certification for Us Advanced BWR Design & for Sys 80+ Design 1999-09-28
[Table view] |
Text
5
00CKETED USNRC Arizona Public Service Company P O BOX 53999 . PHOENIX. ARIZON A 85072 3999
% AUG 15 P2 :34 102-03437-WLS/AKK/ACR I
wwAM L STEWAAT August 4' 1995 mcunv4vgysom 0FFICE OF SECRETARY I DOCKEllNG & SERVICE l BRANCH i Mr. John C. Hoyle '
Secretary of the Commission '
Attention: Docketing and Service Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission DOC m W E g Washington, DC 20555-0001 PROPOSED RULE _
(kbFR M%4.)
Dear Mr. Hoyle:
g
Subject:
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)
Units 1,2, and 3 . . .
Dockets Nos. STN 50-528/529/530 Comments on Proposed Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors (60 FederalRegister17902)
On Apri 7,1995, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued for public comment the first proposed rules under 10 CFR Part 52 for design certification.
The notices in the Federal Register pertained to the Standard Design Certification for the U. S. Advanced Boiling Water Reactor Design and the Standard Design Certification for the System 80+ Design. Arizona Public Service Company (APS) appreciates the NRC's efforts in striving to achieve an improved process for licensing future nuclear power plants. The NRC's efforts are to be commended.
APS has reviewed the Federal Register Notices, the ABB-CE comments, and a summary of the process deficiencies and recommendations raised by NEl following the industry review of the rule making notices. APS concurs with the ABB-CE comments and endorses the NEl/ industry recommendations. It is fundamental that the licensing process be stable if utilities are to be able to consider nuclear as an option in the future. Please carefully review the ABB-CE comments and the NEl recommendations in this light. It is most important that the rules, when implemented, achiev'e sufficient licensing stability to convince utilities and their Boards of Directors that the new process is workable, allowing nuclear to be a viable option.
l 950818o201 950804 PDR PR 52 60FR17924 PDR
w . .
k 3
Mr. John C. Hoyle U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Proposed Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors Page 2 Should you have any questions, please contact Ms. Angie Krainik at (602) 393-5421. -
Sincerely, l
WLS/AKK/ACR/dpr
,~ j cc: W. H. Rasin - NEl ,
I
. _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - - - _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ -