ML18240A159

301 Exam Administrative Items (ADAMS-2D)

ML18240A159
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	08/28/2018
From:	NRC/RGN-II
To:	Duke Energy Progress
References
50-400/18-301 50/400/OL-18
Download: ML18240A159 (28)

Text

LWT W0k?iTE 6i7 S4I4PLE hAJ vt ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:

5 Date of Examination:

2 Initials Item Task Description

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. 41)

W b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with ti R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

/4

c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. .

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. Af4 ti

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major S transients.

M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and U mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, Specific Instructions for the Simulator Operating Test, of ES-301 (including overlap).

3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W among the safety functions as specified on the form.

A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.

L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s).

K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.

T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.

R j b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

U (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.

G (2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.

H (3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.

c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. I

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. j1L

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

.14 R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams. A L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. /%

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). 1 *J* * *

a. Author b Facility Reviewer ( * ) I A , ,.,.

A/,4 f#) ti.

c. NRCs Chief Examiner L / it-ti42

)f I 7

d. NRC Supervisor 5 41.. fl 4..

/ 5)1 Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.

1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column c; the chief examiners concurrence is required.

ES-201, Page 30 of 32 i3Fr W,/TT&O EXtl Snif1E ti,t/

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES.201-2 Facility: Harris Nuclear Plant Date of Examination: March 5, 2018 Item Initials Task Description

1. a. Verifythatthe outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N.

W b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with N R

Section Dl of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

X 2.

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of 7

normal evolutions instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major S transients. >at.

M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with [he expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the r applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. t. ( .-

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix U and in Section D.5, Specific Instructions for the Simulator Operating Test. of ES-301 (including overlap). (

. L

3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

Ii) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W among the safety functions as specified on Ihe form.

A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.

L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s).

K t4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.

T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.

R

çj b. Verify that the administrative cutline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

u (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.

(2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.

H (3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations. C

.>cL

c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. >fr.

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

G Q..

E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams. z S-L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f.__Assess_whether_the_exam_fits_the_appropriate_job_level_(RO_or_SRO).

Pdptpd Name/Signature,. Date

a. Author AtehieLucky/ 2-2g -s

b. Facility Reviewer f) Q Scott Rue I 2.-Z i

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

U. NRC Supervisor Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.

The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column c the chief examiners concurrence is required.

Written Exam outline provided by the NRC (Dan Bacon)on 6/6/2017 Harris NuClear Plant 2018 NRC Operating Exam Submittal 228-2O18 I Rev FINAL

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Harris Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: March 5, 2018 Operating Test No.: 05000400/2018301

1. General Criteria lnItLals____

a b c

a. The operating test conierms to the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with ,. ,-

sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45. operational importance, safety function distribution).

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination, L

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s) (see Section D.1.aj. _

U. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.

e. It appears that the operating test wilt differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level. / .

2. Walkthrough Criteria -- --

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

• initial conditions initiating cues

• references and tools, including associated procedures

• reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee

• operationally important specific performance criteria that include detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards Y ç restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walkthrough outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and ES-301-2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distnbution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations) soecified on those forms and Form ES-201-2. .7S I1.

3. SImulator Criteria -- .- --

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4. and a copy is attached. I Printed Name/Signature Date a Author Archie Lucky I ii-4. .,% v 2 r /j

b. Facility Reviewer tj (

Scott RuaI - ...

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) Do.,t, tt. i Q OI

d. NRC Supervisor The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column c: the chief examiner concurrence is required.

Harris Nuclear Plant 2018 NRC Operating Exam Submittal 2-28-2018 I Rev FINAL

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 I Facility. Harris Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: March 5, 2018 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3/4 Operating Test No 0500040012018301 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES als a b c I The initial conditions are realistic in that sonic equipment and/or instrumentati on may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. ,,,

o.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

3. Each event description consists of the following:

• the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

• the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event

. the symptomslcues that will be visible to the crew

• the expected operator actions (by shift position)

• the event termination point (it applicable)

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

5. SequencIng and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

..°

7. The simulator modeling is not altered.

T

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained white running the planned scenarios.

9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES301. C,

10. Alt individual operator campotoncies can be evaluated, as verified using Form 25-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

-e-

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) ,_,,

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios),

..< .>tle.

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when possible. c 1 a, The level of difficulty is appropriate to suaport licensing decisions for each crew position.

Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario tSee Section D.5.d)

Actual Attributes

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (12)

2. Abnormal events (24) 2 / 212! 3 tb 4 14 1 4 I 4

3. Major transients (12) 1 11 1 1 I2 4.

5.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (12)

Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions 2/3/3/4 .:? L dt

(> 1 per scenario set) 1 /0/ 1 I I .z_.

6, Pre-identified critical tasks (> 2) 2/2/ 2/4 The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC.developed tests.

1. An indeoendent NRC reviewer initials items in crtumn c: chief examiner concurrence is required.

Harris Nuclear Plant 2018 NRC Operating Exam Submittal 2-28-2018/

Rev FINAL

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Harris Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: March 5, 2018 Operating Test No.: 05000400/2018301 A E Scenarios P V 1 3 2 T M P E O I L N CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T N I T I

C A S A B S A B S A B M A T L R T O R T O R T O U N Y O C P O C P O C P M(*)

T P E R I U RO-1 RX R1 1 1 NOR N1 1 1 SRO-I I/C C3, C4 I2, C6 4 4 SRO-U MAJ M6 M7 2 2 TS 0 0 RO-2 RX R1 1 1 NOR N1 1 1 SRO-I I/C C3, C4 I2, C6 4 4 SRO-U MAJ M6 M7 2 2 TS 0 0 RO-3 RX R1 1 1 NOR N1 N1 2 1 SRO-I I/C C3, C4 I2, C6 I2, C4 6 4 SRO-U MAJ M6 M7 M6 3 2 TS 0 0 RO-4 RX R1 1 1 NOR N1 1 1 SRO-I I/C I3, C5 C3, I5 4 4 SRO-U MAJ M7 M6 2 2 TS 0 0 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

4. For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

Harris Nuclear Plant 2018 NRC Operating Exam Submittal 2-28-2018 / Rev FINAL

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Harris Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: March 5, 2018 Operating Test No.: 05000400/2018301 A E Scenarios P V 1 3 2 T M P E O I L N CREW CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T N I T POSITION I

C A M

A T S A B S A B S A B L U N Y R T O R T O R T O M(*)

T P O C P O C P O C P E R I U RO RX R1 R1 2 1 NOR N1 1 1 SRO-I-1 I/C I2, I3 C2, C5 C5, C6 6 4 SRO-U MAJ M6 M7 2 2 TS T3, T5 2 2 RO RX R1 R1 2 1 NOR N1 1 1 SRO-I-2 I/C I2, I3 C2, C5 C5, C6 6 4 SRO-U MAJ M6 M7 2 2 TS T3, T5 2 2 RO RX R1 R1 2 1 NOR N1 1 1 SRO-I-3 I/C I2, I3 C2, C5 C5, C6 6 4 SRO-U MAJ M6 M7 2 2 TS T3, T5 2 2 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

4. For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

Harris Nuclear Plant 2018 NRC Operating Exam Submittal 2-28-2018 / Rev FINAL

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Harris Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: March 5, 2018 Operating Test No.: 05000400/2018301 A E Scenarios P V 1 3 2 T M P E O I L N CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T N I T I

C A S A B S A B S A B M A T L R T O R T O R T O U N Y O C P O C P O C P M(*)

T P E R I U RO RX R1 1 0 NOR N1 1 1 SRO-I I/C C2, C3, C4, C5 4 2 SRO-U1 MAJ M6 1 1 TS T3, T5 2 2 RO RX R1 1 0 NOR N1 1 1 SRO-I I/C C2, C3, C4, C5 4 2 SRO-U2 MAJ M6 1 1 TS T3, T5 2 2 RO RX R1 1 0 NOR N1 N1 2 1 SRO-I I/C C2, C3, C4, C5 I3, C5 6 2 SRO-U3 MAJ M6 M7 2 1 TS T3, T5 2 2 RO RX R1 1 0 NOR N1 N1 2 1 SRO-I I/C I2, C3 2 I3, C5 6 SRO-U4 C4, I5 MAJ M7 2 1 M6 TS T2, T3 2 2 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

4. For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

Harris Nuclear Plant 2018 NRC Operating Exam Submittal 2-28-2018 / Rev FINAL

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Harris Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: March 5, 2018 Operating Test No.: 05000400/2018301 A E Scenarios P V P E 4 (SPARE) T M L N O I I T CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T N C I A

A T M S A B L U N Y R T O M(*)

T P E O C P R I U RO RX R1 1 1 1 0 NOR N1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C C2, I3 C4, I5 4 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ M6, M8 2 2 2 1 TS T2, T3 T4, T5 4 0 2 2 RO RX R1 1 1 1 0 NOR 0 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C C2, I5 2 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ M6, M8 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RO RX 0 1 1 0 NOR N1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C I3, C4 2 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ M6, M8 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 Instructions

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES D 1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at the controls (ATC) and balance of plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one for one basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right hand columns.

4. For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO I in manipulating plant controls.

Harris Nuclear Plant 2018 NRC Operating Exam Submittal 2-28-2018 / Rev FINAL

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Harris Nuclear Plant Date of Examination: March 5, 2018 Operating Test No.:05000400/2018301 APPLICANTS RO (BOP) SRO-I (RO) SRO-U SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO Competencies 1 1 1 Interpret / Diagnose 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 2, 5, 6, 7 2, 3, 4, 5 Events and Conditions 6, 7, 8 Comply With and 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 1, 2, 3, 4 Use Procedures (1) 5, 6, 7, 8 Operate Control 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 0 Boards (2)

Communicate 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 1, 2, 3, 4 and Interact 5, 6, 7, 8 Demonstrate 0 0 1, 2, 3, 4 Supervisory Ability (3) 5, 6, 7, 8 Comply With and 0 0 3, 5 Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

ES-301, Page 27 of 27 Harris Nuclear Plant 2018 NRC Operating Exam Submittal 2-28-2018 / Rev FINAL

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Harris Nuclear Plant Date of Examination: March 5, 2018 Operating Test No.:05000400/2018301 APPLICANTS RO SRO-U RO (BOP)

SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO Competencies 2 2 2 Interpret / Diagnose 3, 5, 6, 8 2, 3, 4, 5 2, 4, 6, 7 Events and Conditions 6, 7, 8 Comply With and 1, 3, 5, 6, 8 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 1, 2, 4, 6, 7 Use Procedures (1) 6, 7, 8 Operate Control 1, 3, 5, 6, 8 0 1, 2, 4, 6, 7 Boards (2)

Communicate 1, 3, 5, 6, 8 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 1, 2, 4, 6, 7 and Interact 6, 7, 8 Demonstrate 0 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 0 Supervisory Ability (3) 6, 7, 8 Comply With and 0 2, 3 0 Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

ES-301, Page 27 of 27 Harris Nuclear Plant 2018 NRC Operating Exam Submittal 2-28-2018 / Rev FINAL

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Harris Nuclear Plant Date of Examination: March 5, 2018 Operating Test No.:05000400/2018301 APPLICANTS RO RO (BOP) SRO-I SRO-U (BOP)

SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO Competencies 3 3 3 3 Interpret / Diagnose 2, 6, 7, 8 3, 5, 7, 9 2, 3, 4, 5 3, 5, 7, 9 Events and Conditions 6, 7, 8, 9 Comply With and 1, 2, 6, 7, 8 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 Use Procedures (1) 6, 7, 8, 9 Operate Control 1, 2, 6, 7, 8 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 0 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 Boards (2)

Communicate 1, 2, 6, 7, 8 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and Interact 6, 7, 8, 9 Demonstrate 0 0 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Supervisory Ability (3) 0 6, 7, 8, 9 Comply With and 0 0 3, 5 0 Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

ES-301, Page 27 of 27 Harris Nuclear Plant 2018 NRC Operating Exam Submittal 2-28-2018 / Rev FINAL

Facility: Harris Nuclear Plant Date of Examination: March 5, 2018 Operating Test No.:05000400/2018301 APPLICANTS SRO-I SRO-I (RO) SRO-I (BOP)

RO RO (BOP)

SRO-U SRO-U (RO) SRO-U (BOP)

SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO Competencies 4 4 4 4 4 Interpret / Diagnose 2, 5, 6, 8 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 2, 3, 4, 5 2, 5, 6, 8 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 Events and Conditions 6, 7, 8, 9 Comply With and 1, 2, 5, 6, 8 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 1, 2, 5, 6, 8 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 Use Procedures (1) 8, 9 8, 9 6, 7, 8, 9 Operate Control 1, 2, 5, 6, 8 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 0 1, 2, 5, 6, 8 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 Boards (2) 8, 9 8, 9 Communicate 1, 2, 5, 6, 8 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 1, 2, 5, 6, 8 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 and Interact 8, 9 8, 9 6, 7, 8, 9 Demonstrate 0 0 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 0 0 Supervisory Ability (3) 6, 7, 8, 9 Comply With and 0 0 2, 3, 4, 5 0 0 Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

SCENARIO # 4 selected as the SPARE Scenario by Chief Examiner Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

Harris Nuclear Plant 2018 NRC Operating Exam Submittal 2-28-2018 / Rev FINAL

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Harris Date of Exam: 3114/2018 Exam Level: RO SRO Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

2. Proposed answer key changes and question deletions N/K (ky justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not required (N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted)

,, N/A

3. Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) ,%9 N/A

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 80%, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only exam) reviewed in detail  % N/K

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified N/K

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants N/K Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader Michael G. Donithan

b. Facility Reviewer(*) N/A N/A

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) Daniel M. Bacon

d. NRC Supervisor (*) Gerald J. McCoy 1t2

(*) The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.