|
|
Line 22: |
Line 22: |
| ) | | ) |
| ~- | | ~- |
| y | | y SCOTH CARCCNA ET2CTRIC & GAS ) , |
| '
| |
| SCOTH CARCCNA ET2CTRIC & GAS ) , | |
| '
| |
| CCMPANY ) DocketNo.50-39.y (Virgil C. Su:xmer Nuclear Station, L- . | | CCMPANY ) DocketNo.50-39.y (Virgil C. Su:xmer Nuclear Station, L- . |
| Unit 1) ) % f Secretay N | | Unit 1) ) % f Secretay N |
Line 43: |
Line 40: |
| : 11. Please specify the policy to be used to declare a state of emergency. | | : 11. Please specify the policy to be used to declare a state of emergency. |
| : 12. What are the plans for educating the population in the emergency :cne about emergency procedures? - | | : 12. What are the plans for educating the population in the emergency :cne about emergency procedures? - |
| -
| |
| : 13. Please provide copies *of literature that will be used to educate the gene- ) | | : 13. Please provide copies *of literature that will be used to educate the gene- ) |
| ral population about emergency plans. | | ral population about emergency plans. |
Line 50: |
Line 46: |
| 8012220 52 c? S . .- . . | | 8012220 52 c? S . .- . . |
|
| |
|
| - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - . - .
| |
| . .
| |
| '
| |
| J | | J |
| ~2- | | ~2- |
Line 60: |
Line 53: |
| : 18. Please provide copies of messages that will be conveyed to the public in the event of various levels of emergencies. | | : 18. Please provide copies of messages that will be conveyed to the public in the event of various levels of emergencies. |
| : 19. Who will be responsible !cr release of aessages to the public in the event of an emergency? | | : 19. Who will be responsible !cr release of aessages to the public in the event of an emergency? |
| '
| |
| . : .
| |
| . .
| |
| : 20. Please identify and describe the Energency O!!-site Eacility. | | : 20. Please identify and describe the Energency O!!-site Eacility. |
| : 21. Please describe the availability of transportation in the event of an off-site emergency that would be. require 1 to e!!ectively evacuate civilians in the Emergency Planning 'one. | | : 21. Please describe the availability of transportation in the event of an off-site emergency that would be. require 1 to e!!ectively evacuate civilians in the Emergency Planning 'one. |
| ..
| |
| : 22. Please' identify and ' describe the '"Mear Site Emergency-Operations Faci $lty". ' | | : 22. Please' identify and ' describe the '"Mear Site Emergency-Operations Faci $lty". ' |
| .
| |
| : 23. Please prcvide a detailed description of the qualifications of any and all-persons involved in preparing any and all emergency literature designed to educate the public. Include an exact description of the role each per-plays in preparing this laterature. | | : 23. Please prcvide a detailed description of the qualifications of any and all-persons involved in preparing any and all emergency literature designed to educate the public. Include an exact description of the role each per-plays in preparing this laterature. |
| : 24. Provide the factual scurce material for each peice of emergency literature that will be used. | | : 24. Provide the factual scurce material for each peice of emergency literature that will be used. |
| .
| |
| l t | | l t |
| l I | | l I |
| I i | | I i |
| ,
| |
| I l | | I l |
| r e}} | | r e}} |
|
---|
Category:INTERROGATORIES; RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
MONTHYEARML20126M1001981-05-29029 May 1981 Supplemental Answers to Ba Bursey Interrogatories,Listing Key Personnel Involved in Editing & Production of Info Brochures for General Public.Prof Qualifications,Emergency Brochure & Certificate of Svc Encl.W/O Brochure ML19341C2671980-12-24024 December 1980 Answers to Intervenor Ba Bursey Interrogatories Re Emergency Plans.Certificate of Svc & Ltr to Bursey Encl ML19347C6051980-12-24024 December 1980 Answers to Ba Bursey Interrogatories 1-24 Re Emergency Planning.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19345D9771980-12-0202 December 1980 Interrogatories to Applicant Requesting Info Re Participation of Local Agencies in Emergency Planning, Resident Inspector Authority & Emergency Offsite Facility ML20147F4661978-10-0202 October 1978 Applicant Response to Intervenor Ba Bursey 1981-05-29
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARRC-99-0172, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Ep.Stockpile of Ki Not Effective as Immediate & Suppl Measure of Protection1999-08-24024 August 1999 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Ep.Stockpile of Ki Not Effective as Immediate & Suppl Measure of Protection ML20207E4181999-05-17017 May 1999 Comment Supporting Recommended Improvements to Oversight Processes for Nuclear Power Reactors Noted in SECY-99-007A ML20206G3351999-05-0303 May 1999 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171 Re Proposed Revs to Fee schedules;100% Fee recovery,FY99.Util Fully Endorses Comments Prepared & Submitted on Behalf of Commercial Nuclear Power Industry by NEI & Submits Addl Comments RC-99-0088, Comment on Draft RG DG-1083 Re Content of UFSAR IAW 10CFR50.71(e).Believes That Inclusion of Statement in DG, Unnecessary1999-04-28028 April 1999 Comment on Draft RG DG-1083 Re Content of UFSAR IAW 10CFR50.71(e).Believes That Inclusion of Statement in DG, Unnecessary RC-99-0060, Comment on Proposed Rule PRM 50-64 Re Joint & Several Liability of non-operating co-owners of Nuclear Plants.Sce&G Endorses Comments Submitted by Winston & Strawn & NEI1999-03-22022 March 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule PRM 50-64 Re Joint & Several Liability of non-operating co-owners of Nuclear Plants.Sce&G Endorses Comments Submitted by Winston & Strawn & NEI RC-98-0230, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes, Tests & Experiments1998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes, Tests & Experiments RC-98-0224, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps.Encourages NRC to Continue Cooperative Effort with NEI & Nuclear Industry to Focus on Risk Significant Issues1998-12-14014 December 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps.Encourages NRC to Continue Cooperative Effort with NEI & Nuclear Industry to Focus on Risk Significant Issues RC-98-0181, Comment Supporting Comments Submitted by NEI Re NRC Proposed Integrated Review of Assessment Process for Commercial NPPs (Irap)1998-10-0606 October 1998 Comment Supporting Comments Submitted by NEI Re NRC Proposed Integrated Review of Assessment Process for Commercial NPPs (Irap) RC-98-0176, Comment on Draft Reg Guide DG-8022, Acceptable Programs for Respiratory Protection1998-09-28028 September 1998 Comment on Draft Reg Guide DG-8022, Acceptable Programs for Respiratory Protection RC-98-0169, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Proposed Improvements to Current Reporting Requirements Would Have Significant & Positive Impact on Regulatory Burden to VC Summer Nuclear Station1998-09-18018 September 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Proposed Improvements to Current Reporting Requirements Would Have Significant & Positive Impact on Regulatory Burden to VC Summer Nuclear Station RC-98-0165, Comment on Draft NUREG-1633, Assessment of Use of Potassium Iodide (Ki) as Protective Action During Severe Reactor Accidents. Where Evacuations Are Performed,Ki Would Not Add Any Measures of Safety to Approach & Could Complicate Er1998-09-14014 September 1998 Comment on Draft NUREG-1633, Assessment of Use of Potassium Iodide (Ki) as Protective Action During Severe Reactor Accidents. Where Evacuations Are Performed,Ki Would Not Add Any Measures of Safety to Approach & Could Complicate Er RC-98-0022, Comment Opposing Proposed GL 98-XX, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps1998-02-0202 February 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed GL 98-XX, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps RC-97-0279, Comment Opposing Draft RG DG-1070, Sampling Plans Used for Dedicating Simple Metallic Commercial Grade Items for Use in Npps1997-12-0808 December 1997 Comment Opposing Draft RG DG-1070, Sampling Plans Used for Dedicating Simple Metallic Commercial Grade Items for Use in Npps RC-97-0243, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rule Change to Incorporate IEEE 603 Standard1997-11-26026 November 1997 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rule Change to Incorporate IEEE 603 Standard RC-97-0219, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Initial Operator Exam Requirements1997-10-24024 October 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Initial Operator Exam Requirements RC-97-0134, Comment Supporting NUREG-1606, Proposed Regulatory Guidance Related to Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Changes, Tests or Experiments)1997-07-0707 July 1997 Comment Supporting NUREG-1606, Proposed Regulatory Guidance Related to Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Changes, Tests or Experiments) ML20148N0861997-06-19019 June 1997 Comment Opposing NRC Draft Suppl 1 to Bulletin 96-001 Which Proposes Actions to Be Taken by Licensees of W & B&W Designed Plants to Ensure Continued Operability of CR RC-97-0096, Comment Discussing Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to Nuclear Power Plant Security Requirements1997-05-0202 May 1997 Comment Discussing Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to Nuclear Power Plant Security Requirements RC-97-0055, Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Loss of Reactor Coolant Inventory & Associated Potential for Loss of Emergency Mitigation Functions While in Shuddown Condition1997-03-12012 March 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Loss of Reactor Coolant Inventory & Associated Potential for Loss of Emergency Mitigation Functions While in Shuddown Condition ML20136H9531997-03-0505 March 1997 Comment Opposing Draft Regulatory Guide 1068, Medical Evaluation of Licensed Personnel at Nuclear Power Plants RC-97-0024, Comment on Proposed Generic Communication, Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Testing Sys in Inservice Inspection Programs. GL Seems to Approach Mandating Implementation of App Viii Requirements1997-02-25025 February 1997 Comment on Proposed Generic Communication, Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Testing Sys in Inservice Inspection Programs. GL Seems to Approach Mandating Implementation of App Viii Requirements ML20135C4911997-02-17017 February 1997 Comment on NRC Draft NUREG 1560, IPE Program:Perspectives on Reactor Safety & Plant Performance;Vols 1 & 2. Comment Provided to Enhance Accuracy of Nureg,Per Request ML20113C1881996-06-24024 June 1996 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors RC-96-0154, Comment on DRG,DG-5007,re Proposed Rev 3 to RG 5.441996-06-17017 June 1996 Comment on DRG,DG-5007,re Proposed Rev 3 to RG 5.44 ML20096F1991996-01-15015 January 1996 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-63 Re Use of Ki as Insurance Against Nuclear Accidents RC-95-0236, Comment Opposing Draft RG DG-1043,Proposed Rev 2 to RG 1.49, NPP Simulation Facilities for Use in Operator Exams1995-09-13013 September 1995 Comment Opposing Draft RG DG-1043,Proposed Rev 2 to RG 1.49, NPP Simulation Facilities for Use in Operator Exams RC-95-0178, Comment on Proposed Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style1995-06-28028 June 1995 Comment on Proposed Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style ML20086A8611995-06-13013 June 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control ML20083N4761995-04-26026 April 1995 Comment Re Proposed GL Concerning Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of SR Power Operated Gate Valves.Believes That Full Backfit Analysis Should Be Performed to Enable Utils to Perform cost-benefit Analysis to Be Utilized RC-95-0009, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR21 Re inter-utility Transfer1995-01-0909 January 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR21 Re inter-utility Transfer ML20077M7131995-01-0303 January 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operations.Believes That Pr Totally Unnecessary & Represents Addl Regulatory Burden Not Fully Cost Justified RC-94-0292, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Frequency of Medical Exams for Use of Respiratory Protection Equipment. Util Agrees That Frequency of Medical Exams Should Be Determined by Physician1994-11-11011 November 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Frequency of Medical Exams for Use of Respiratory Protection Equipment. Util Agrees That Frequency of Medical Exams Should Be Determined by Physician ML20072B1771994-07-29029 July 1994 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-9-2 to Change Rules Re Public Access to Info,Per 10CFR9 ML20071H4111994-07-0606 July 1994 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Change to Frequency of Independent Reviews & Audits of Safeguards Contingency Plan & Security Program ML20071H1091994-06-22022 June 1994 Comment Supporting PRM 50-60 Re Proposed Changes to Frequency W/Which Licensee Conducts Independent Reviews of EP Program from Annually to Biennially RC-94-0107, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule Change to 10CFR50.55 That Would Include Containment Requirements in Inservice Insp Programs1994-04-21021 April 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule Change to 10CFR50.55 That Would Include Containment Requirements in Inservice Insp Programs RC-94-0057, Comment Supporting NUREG-1488, Revised Livermore Seismic Hazard Estimates for 69 NPP Sites East of Rocky Mountains1994-02-28028 February 1994 Comment Supporting NUREG-1488, Revised Livermore Seismic Hazard Estimates for 69 NPP Sites East of Rocky Mountains RC-93-0314, Comment Supporting NUMARC Position on Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Protection Against Malevolent Use of Vehicles at Nuclear Power Plants1993-12-28028 December 1993 Comment Supporting NUMARC Position on Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Protection Against Malevolent Use of Vehicles at Nuclear Power Plants ML20046D5271993-07-30030 July 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Proposed Amend to 10CFR55 ML20045G8541993-06-22022 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. Provides Recommendations RC-93-0127, Comment Concurring W/Numarc Comments on Draft NRC Insp Procedure 38703, Commercial Grade Procurement Insp1993-05-21021 May 1993 Comment Concurring W/Numarc Comments on Draft NRC Insp Procedure 38703, Commercial Grade Procurement Insp ML20118B8431992-09-29029 September 1992 Comments on Review of Reactor Licensee Reporting Requirements ML20095L2681992-04-27027 April 1992 Comments on NUREG-1449, Shutdown & Low Power Operation at Commercial Nuclear Power Plants in Us. Endorses NUMARC Comments ML20096A4541992-04-27027 April 1992 Comment Endorsing Comments Made by NUMARC Re Proposed Rule Misc (92-1), Conversion to Metric Sys. Concurs W/Nrc Position That Staff Will Not Allow Licensees to Convert Sys of Units Where Conversion Might Be Detrimental to Health ML20096D4661992-04-27027 April 1992 Comments Supporting Proposed Rule Re Conversion to Metric Sys ML20079E0981991-09-20020 September 1991 Submits Comments on NRC Proposed Resolution of Generic Issue 23, Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Failure, & Draft Reg Guide DG-1008 ML20073B2021991-04-15015 April 1991 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.55a Endorsing Later Addenda & Editions of ASME Code Sections III & XI W/Noted Exceptions.Util Also Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC ML20070D9091991-02-21021 February 1991 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-73-9 Re Rev to 10CFR73.1.Util Disagrees W/Petitioners Contention That Purported Increased Terrorist Threats Necessitate Need to Revise Design Basis Threat for Radiological Sabotage ML20024G0211990-12-0303 December 1990 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Response Data Sys (Erds).Nrc Intends to Make ERDS Info Available to State Govts ML20058G5721990-10-24024 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Programs 1999-08-24
[Table view] |
Text
, .
g LI Na t,.4++ s~. e C?lITED STATES OF AMERICA NCCT AR REGULA CRY CCMMISSICN BEFCRE THE ATCMIC SAFETY AND ?ICENSING 3 CARD .,-.-
- M,
'h 5 Ir In the Matter of ) / ~
)
~-
y SCOTH CARCCNA ET2CTRIC & GAS ) ,
CCMPANY ) DocketNo.50-39.y (Virgil C. Su:xmer Nuclear Station, L- .
Unit 1) ) % f Secretay N
- m. , 5 :ernes INTERRCGA2 CRIES FCR A??LICANT y ?
a
- 1. Please provide an up-to-date list of all county, state and governmental, agencies participating in the emergency planning for the 7. C. Summer nuclear station. Include contact personnel, phone numbers, and the tasks they are expected to perform to prepare snd implement the emergency plans.
- 2. What are the plans to educate participating county agencies as to their emergency responsibilities? .
- 3. What are SCE&G management responsibilities during an off-site emergency?
What are the responsible officials?
- 4. Who are the par:Lcipating governmental officials who will be contacted in case of an off-site emergency? How long will it take to contact them?
- 5. Please provide copies of letters of agreement from participating governmental-agencies.
- 6. Please comment on the measures necessary for participating government agencies to fulfill their responsibilities in an off-site emergency.
- 7. What arrangements are being made to provide for 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> contact with participating governmental agancies?
- 8. What are the protective actions for each class of emergencies?
- 9. What are the specific means for notifying 100% of the population in the 10 mile radius emergency zone in case of an o!!-site., emergency?
- 10. Does the NRC resident inspector have authority to declare a state of emergency?
- 11. Please specify the policy to be used to declare a state of emergency.
- 12. What are the plans for educating the population in the emergency :cne about emergency procedures? -
- 13. Please provide copies *of literature that will be used to educate the gene- )
ral population about emergency plans.
- 14. Does the applicant intend to include emergency plan information in utility Q l
bills for utility customers in the Emergency Planning tone? Have arrange- Q ments been made with the various electric cooperatives in the Emergency Planning :one for such enclosures in the bills?
8012220 52 c? S . .- . .
J
~2-
- 15. Who has ultimate responsibilley to activate the emergency pains? Rcw wculd conflicts over the need to activate be resolved?
- 16. ? lease provide copies of all correspondence with participating governmental agencies.
- 17. Please provide copies of messages that will be conveyed to Participating Governmental Agencies in the event of various levels of emergencies.
- 18. Please provide copies of messages that will be conveyed to the public in the event of various levels of emergencies.
- 19. Who will be responsible !cr release of aessages to the public in the event of an emergency?
- 20. Please identify and describe the Energency O!!-site Eacility.
- 21. Please describe the availability of transportation in the event of an off-site emergency that would be. require 1 to e!!ectively evacuate civilians in the Emergency Planning 'one.
- 22. Please' identify and ' describe the '"Mear Site Emergency-Operations Faci $lty". '
- 23. Please prcvide a detailed description of the qualifications of any and all-persons involved in preparing any and all emergency literature designed to educate the public. Include an exact description of the role each per-plays in preparing this laterature.
- 24. Provide the factual scurce material for each peice of emergency literature that will be used.
l t
l I
I i
I l
r e