ML070710562: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML070710562
| number = ML070710562
| issue date = 03/09/2007
| issue date = 03/09/2007
| title = 2007/03/09-Comment (31) Submitted by Richard C. Diprima on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10, Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51
| title = Comment (31) Submitted by Richard C. Diprima on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10, Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51
| author name = DiPrima R C
| author name = Diprima R
| author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
| author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:PRM-51-10       DOCKETED 03/12/07 (71FR64169)
{{#Wiki_filter:PRM-51-10                                                                   DOCKETED 03/12/07 (71FR64169)
Comment No. 31
Comment No. 31 From:               "Rocky" <rockydux@gmail.com>
 
To:                 <SECY@nrc.gov>
From: "Rocky" <rockydux@gmail.com> To: <SECY@nrc.gov> Date: Fri, Mar 9, 2007 9:25 PM  
Date:               Fri, Mar 9, 2007 9:25 PM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
PRM-51-10  
PRM-51-10 I am writing in regards to the importance that the NRC consider the spent fuel pool as an environmental hazard and great public health risk when considering a 20 year license renewal for the Pilgrim Power Station.
 
The NRC has allowed the spent fuel pool to be "double racked" which is a prime terrorist target because the loss of coolant could result in a catastrophic radioactive fire. This has been well researched by Mr. David Lochbaum of the Union of Concerned Scientists http://www.ucsusa.org/news/experts/experts-at-ucs-david-lochbaum.html and others. I can't think of bigger and higher risk environmental threat than a fire that is releasing Cesium 137 http://www.epa.gov/radiation/radionuclides/cesium.htm into the atmosphere and surrounding terrain.
I am writing in regards to the importance that the NRC consider the spent fuel pool as an environmental hazard and great public health risk when considering a 20 year license renewal for the Pilgrim Power Station.  
There is also, as with anything, the risk of human error or mechanical failure that could have the same consequences. I believe all these environmental threats should be included in any analysis. There are ways of minimizing this risk that could be discussed if a review is allowed.
 
I urge you to do all that you can to see to it that this be considered in the NRC's re-license criteria.
The NRC has allowed the spent fuel pool to be "double racked" which is a prime terrorist target because the loss of coolant could result in a catastrophic radioactive fire. This has been well researched by Mr. David Lochbaum of the Union of Concerned Scientists http://www.ucsusa.org/news/experts/experts-at-ucs-david-lochbaum.html and others. I can't think of bigger and higher risk environmental threat than a fire that is releasing Cesium 137 http://www.epa.gov/radiation/radionuclides/cesium.htm into the atmosphere and surrounding terrain.  
Respectfully, Richard C. DiPrima 31 Cove St.
 
Duxbury, MA 02332
There is also, as with anything, the risk of human error or mechanical failure that could have the same consequences. I believe all these environmental threats should be included in any analysis. There are ways of minimizing this risk that could be discussed if a review is allowed.  
 
I urge you to do all that you can to see to it that this be considered in the NRC's re-license criteria.  
 
Respectfully, Richard C. DiPrima        
 
31 Cove St.
 
Duxbury, MA 02332  


Mail Envelope Properties (45F216ED.792 : 23 : 30610)  
Mail Envelope Properties       (45F216ED.792 : 23 : 30610)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
 
PRM-51-10 Creation Date           Fri, Mar 9, 2007 9:24 PM From:                   "Rocky" <rockydux@gmail.com>
PRM-51-10 Creation Date Fri, Mar 9, 2007 9:24 PM From: "Rocky" <rockydux@gmail.com>  
Created By:             rockydux@gmail.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 SECY (SECY)
 
Post Office                                                             Route TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01                                                       nrc.gov Files                             Size               Date & Time MESSAGE                         1240               Friday, March 9, 2007 9:24 PM TEXT.htm                         4612 Mime.822                         8685 Options Expiration Date:                 None Priority:                       Standard ReplyRequested:                 No Return Notification:             None Concealed  
Created By: rockydux@gmail.com Recipients nrc.gov   TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01  
 
SECY (SECY)  
 
Post Office Route TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1240 Friday, March 9, 2007   9:24 PM TEXT.htm 4612 Mime.822 8685  
 
Options Expiration Date:
None Priority:
Standard ReplyRequested:
No Return Notification:
None Concealed  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
 
No Security:                       Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled}}
No Security:
Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled}}

Latest revision as of 13:35, 7 December 2019

Comment (31) Submitted by Richard C. Diprima on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10, Re Amend 10 CFR Part 51
ML070710562
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 03/09/2007
From: Diprima R
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/SECY
SECY RAS
References
71FR64169 00031, PRM-51-10
Download: ML070710562 (2)
v • d • e


Text

PRM-51-10 DOCKETED 03/12/07 (71FR64169)

Comment No. 31 From: "Rocky" <rockydux@gmail.com>

To: <SECY@nrc.gov>

Date: Fri, Mar 9, 2007 9:25 PM

Subject:

PRM-51-10 I am writing in regards to the importance that the NRC consider the spent fuel pool as an environmental hazard and great public health risk when considering a 20 year license renewal for the Pilgrim Power Station.

The NRC has allowed the spent fuel pool to be "double racked" which is a prime terrorist target because the loss of coolant could result in a catastrophic radioactive fire. This has been well researched by Mr. David Lochbaum of the Union of Concerned Scientists http://www.ucsusa.org/news/experts/experts-at-ucs-david-lochbaum.html and others. I can't think of bigger and higher risk environmental threat than a fire that is releasing Cesium 137 http://www.epa.gov/radiation/radionuclides/cesium.htm into the atmosphere and surrounding terrain.

There is also, as with anything, the risk of human error or mechanical failure that could have the same consequences. I believe all these environmental threats should be included in any analysis. There are ways of minimizing this risk that could be discussed if a review is allowed.

I urge you to do all that you can to see to it that this be considered in the NRC's re-license criteria.

Respectfully, Richard C. DiPrima 31 Cove St.

Duxbury, MA 02332

Mail Envelope Properties (45F216ED.792 : 23 : 30610)

Subject:

PRM-51-10 Creation Date Fri, Mar 9, 2007 9:24 PM From: "Rocky" <rockydux@gmail.com>

Created By: rockydux@gmail.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 SECY (SECY)

Post Office Route TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1240 Friday, March 9, 2007 9:24 PM TEXT.htm 4612 Mime.822 8685 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML070710562&oldid=2251718"