|
|
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | number = ML11159A003 | | | number = ML11159A003 |
| | issue date = 05/06/2011 | | | issue date = 05/06/2011 |
| | title = 2011/05/06 NRR E-mail Capture - Millstone Power Station Units 1, 2, and 3 - Preliminary RAIs for 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (D) Exemption Request | | | title = NRR E-mail Capture - Millstone Power Station Units 1, 2, and 3 - Preliminary RAIs for 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (D) Exemption Request |
| | author name = Wiebe J S | | | author name = Wiebe J |
| | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL | | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL |
| | addressee name = Miller G D | | | addressee name = Miller G |
| | addressee affiliation = Dominion Generation | | | addressee affiliation = Dominion Generation |
| | docket = 05000336, 05000423 | | | docket = 05000336, 05000423 |
Line 12: |
Line 12: |
| | document type = E-Mail | | | document type = E-Mail |
| | page count = 2 | | | page count = 2 |
| | | project = |
| | | stage = RAI |
| }} | | }} |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Wiebe, Joel Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 11:25 AM To: 'Gary.D.Miller@dom.com'; | | {{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Wiebe, Joel Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 11:25 AM To: 'Gary.D.Miller@dom.com'; 'David.Sommers@dom.com' |
| 'David.Sommers@dom.com' | |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| Millstone Power Station Units 1, 2, and 3 - | | Millstone Power Station Units 1, 2, and 3 - Preliminary RAIs for 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) |
| Preliminary RAIs for 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) | | Exemption Request Here are the preliminary Millstone RAIs regarding your February 10, 2011, exemption request. The purpose of sending preliminary RAIs is to ensure the RAIs are clear and understandable. If clarification is needed, I will arrange for a teleconference to discuss them. |
| Exemption RequestHere are the preliminary Millstone RAIs regarding your February 10, 2011, exemption request. The purpose of sending preliminary RAIs is to ensure the RAIs are clear and understandable. If clarification is needed, I will arrange for a teleconference to discuss them. | | By letter dated February 10, 2011, Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., the licensee for Millstone Power Station Units 1, 2, and 3 requested an exemption from certain requirements of the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue. Specifically, the letter requested an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205 (c) and (d) for meeting work hour controls during declarations of severe weather conditions involving tropical storm or hurricane-force winds. |
| | The staff determined that additional information is required to complete its review. In order for the staff to meet its schedule for completing the review, a response is requested by May 20, 2011. |
| | : 1) The exemption request discusses a need to sequester individuals onsite to perform preparation, response and recovery actions associated with a severe weather event. The exemption request also discusses the fact that the local area where Millstone is sited was crossed by five hurricanes in the past eighty-four years. |
| | However, the supplied Millstone site procedures do not specify the need to sequester individuals. The supplied procedures also do not specify the specific job duty groups to be sequestered. |
| | a) Provide specific procedural references that control the sequestering of individuals onsite during a severe weather event, or describe how the need to sequester individuals will be incorporated into current procedures. |
| | b) With respect to the applicability of the exemption request, provide a breakdown of the various job duty groups and numbers of individuals in each group who will be sequestered. |
| | : 2) AOP 3569 Severe Weather Conditions indicates that entry conditions into the AOP include a hurricane advisory. There is no mention of a tropical storm watch or warning. Describe how this procedure, or other procedure, will be revised to reflect the conditions requested in the exemption. |
| | : 3) Lessons learned from NUREG-1474 include that as much as possible, site preparation for a hurricane should occur prior to the need to sequester individuals. What is the time period that is allocated for personnel to prepare the site for a storm, prior to the arrival of hurricane force winds on-site? Be as precise as possible with respect to the number of days or hours prior to the arrival of severe winds. |
| | : 4) Many factors contribute to fatigue. One of these factors is inconsistent start times. In order to manage fatigue during the sequester, will shift start times be pre-planned and consistent? Explain the rational for organizing current shift start times during the sequester. |
| | : 5) Time at work is one of the major contributors to fatigue; another is lack of restorative rest. What are the expected typical shift durations for the various job duty groups that will be sequestered? Will any individuals be required to work shifts longer than 12 hours? |
| | : 6) Licensees are expected to provide an opportunity for restorative rest to mitigate the fatigue that is possible under a sequester for hurricane force winds. Describe the methods to be used and the specific proceduralized actions that govern housing and bunking of the sequestered individuals. |
| | : 7) NRC staff is not only concerned with fatigue management prior to and during the requested exemption, staff is equally concerned with site individuals fatigue when returning to work hour controls such that the resumption of work hour controls is prudently implemented and individuals are not fatigued on the first day on work hour controls. Describe the general criteria that plant management will consider when making the determination to resume work hour controls. |
| | 1 |
|
| |
|
| By letter dated February 10, 2011, Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., the licensee for Millstone Power Station Units 1, 2, and 3 requested an exemption from certain requirements of the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue. Specifically, the letter requested an ex emption from the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205 (c) and (d) for meeting work hour controls during declarations of severe weather conditions involving tropical storm or hurricane-force winds.
| | Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 68 Mail Envelope Properties (F371D08C516DE74F81193E6D891DC4AF3BEC016A1C) |
| | |
| The staff determined that additional information is required to complete its review. In order for the staff to meet its schedule for completing the review, a response is requested by May 20, 2011.
| |
| : 1) The exemption request discusses a need to sequester individuals onsite to perform preparation, response and recovery actions associated with a severe weather event. The exemption request also discusses the fact that the local area where Millstone is sited was crossed by five hurricanes in the past eighty-four years. However, the supplied Millstone site procedures do not specify the need to sequester individuals. The supplied procedures also do not specify the specific job duty groups to be sequestered.
| |
| a) Provide specific procedural references that control the sequestering of individuals onsite during a severe weather event, or describe how the need to sequester individuals will be incorporated into current procedures. b) With respect to the applicability of the exemption request, provide a breakdown of the various job duty groups and numbers of individuals in each group who will be sequestered. 2) AOP 3569 "Severe Weather Conditions" indicates that entry conditions into the AOP include a hurricane advisory. There is no mention of a tropical storm watch or warning. Describe how this procedure, or other procedure, will be revised to reflect the conditions requested in the exemption. 3) Lessons learned from NUREG-1474 include that as much as possible, site preparation for a hurricane should occur prior to the need to sequester individuals. What is the time period that is allocated for personnel to prepare the site for a storm, prior to the arrival of hurricane force winds on-site? Be as precise as possible with respect to the number of days or hours prior to the arrival of severe winds. 4) Many factors contribute to fatigue. One of these factors is inconsistent start times. In order to manage fatigue during the sequester, will shift start times be pre-planned and consistent? Explain the rational for organizing current shift start times during the sequester. 5) Time at work is one of the major contributors to fatigue; another is lack of restorative rest. What are the expected typical shift durations for the various job duty groups that will be sequestered? Will any individuals be required to work shifts longer than 12 hours? 6) Licensees are expected to provide an opportunity for restorative rest to mitigate the fatigue that is possible under a sequester for hurricane force winds. Describe the methods to be used and the specific proceduralized actions that govern housing and bunking of the sequestered individuals. 7) NRC staff is not only concerned with fatigue management prior to and during the requested exemption, staff is equally concerned with site individuals' fatigue when returning to work hour controls such that the resumption of work hour controls is prudently implemented and individuals are not fatigued on the first day on work hour controls. Describe the general criteria that plant management will consider when making the determination to resume work hour controls.
| |
| Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 68 Mail Envelope Properties (F371D08C516DE74F81193E6D891DC4AF3BEC016A1C) | |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| Millstone Power Station Units 1, 2, and 3 - Preliminary RAIs for 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) Exemption Request Sent Date: 5/6/2011 11:24:48 AM Received Date: 5/6/2011 11:24:00 AM From: Wiebe, Joel Created By: Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov Recipients: "'Gary.D.Miller@dom.com'" <Gary.D.Miller@dom.com> Tracking Status: None | | Millstone Power Station Units 1, 2, and 3 - Preliminary RAIs for 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) Exemption Request Sent Date: 5/6/2011 11:24:48 AM Received Date: 5/6/2011 11:24:00 AM From: Wiebe, Joel Created By: Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov Recipients: |
| "'David.Sommers@dom.com'" <David.Sommers@dom.com> Tracking Status: None | | "'Gary.D.Miller@dom.com'" <Gary.D.Miller@dom.com> |
| | | Tracking Status: None |
| Post Office: HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3936 5/6/2011 11:24:00 AM | | "'David.Sommers@dom.com'" <David.Sommers@dom.com> |
| | | Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3936 5/6/2011 11:24:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: |
| Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:}} | | Recipients Received:}} |
|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML24213A2602024-07-31031 July 2024 Request for Additional Information LAR to Support Implementation of Framatome Gaia Fuel ML24116A0112024-04-25025 April 2024 Acceptance Review Determination for Proposed Alternative Request IR-4-13 Regarding Steam Generator Channel Head Drain Modification ML24115A2622024-04-24024 April 2024 Acceptance Review Determination for Proposed Alternative Request IR-4-14 Regarding Pressurizer and Steam Generator Pressure-Retaining Welds and Full-Penetration Welded Nozzles ML24114A3192024-04-23023 April 2024 Acceptance Review Determination LAR to Extend Inspection Interval for Reactor Coolant Pump Flywheels (TSTF-421) Using the CLIIP ML24113A2502024-04-22022 April 2024 Request for Additional Information (e-mail 4/22/2024) License Renewal Commitment for Aging Management Program of Alloy 600 Components ML24092A1082024-04-0101 April 2024 3R22 RFO ISI Owners Activity Report Extension - NRC Staff Acknowledgement Email (4/1/2024) ML24065A3112024-03-0505 March 2024 Request for Additional Information (Redacted) (03/05/2025 E-mail from R. Guzman to S. Sinha) Framatome Gaia Fuel LOCA LAR ML24058A2322024-02-27027 February 2024 2/27/2024 E-mail from S. Sinha to R. Guzman P-8 Instrument Uncertainty in Support of LAR Framatome Gaia Fuel ML24032A4702024-02-0101 February 2024 Change in Estimated Review Schedule Revision to TS Design Features Section to Remove the Nine Mile Point Unit 3 Nuclear Project, LLC ML24024A2452024-01-24024 January 2024 1/24/2024 E-mail from R.Guzman to S.Sinha - Acknowledgement of Error in SE for Amendment No. 288 - Revision to Applicability Term for RCS Heatup and Cooldown Pressure-Temperature Limitations Figures ML24024A0202024-01-24024 January 2024 Correction to Safety Evaluation Associated Wit Amendment No. 288 - Revision to Applicability Term for RCS Heat-Up and Cooldown Pressure-Temperature Limitations Figures ML23326A0132023-11-22022 November 2023 Acceptance Review Determination LAR to Support Implementation of Framatome Gaia Fuel ML23318A0952023-11-14014 November 2023 Request for Additional Information (E-mail Dated 11/14/2023) LAR to Revise TSs Related to Framatome Gaia Fuel ML23317A0732023-11-13013 November 2023 Acceptance Review Determination - License Amendment Request Modification of TS SR 4.3.6.a ML23297A2312023-10-24024 October 2023 E-mail to File - Summary of September 13, 2023, Meeting with Dominion to Discuss Proposed LAR to Support Cycle Reloads Using Framatome Gaia Fuel ML23265A2302023-09-22022 September 2023 Acceptance Review Determination - License Amendment Request Revision to TS Design Features Section to Remove the Nine Mile Point Unit 3 Nuclear Project, LLC ML23258A0552023-08-31031 August 2023 Setup of Online Reference Portal and Audit Plan for the NRC Staff'S Review of LAR to Use Framatome Small Break and Realistic Large Break LOCA Methodologies (08/31/2023 e-mail) ML23199A2832023-07-18018 July 2023 Request for Additional Information (E-mail Dated 7/18/2023) LAR to Revise the Pressure-Temperature Limits ML23172A0752023-06-21021 June 2023 Acceptance Review Determination LAR to Revise TSs for Reactor Core Safety Limits, Fuel Assemblies, and COLR Related to Framatome Gaia Fuel ML23171B0522023-06-20020 June 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - RAI for Review of Appendix F to DOM-NAF-2-P (Redacted) ML23145A0052023-05-25025 May 2023 Acceptance Review Determination Exemption to Use Framatome Gaia Fuel Assemblies Containing Fuel Rods Fabricated with M5 Fuel Rod Cladding ML23145A0042023-05-25025 May 2023 Acceptance Review Determination LAR to Use Framatome Small Break and Realistic Large Break LOCA Methodologies ML23115A3022023-04-24024 April 2023 4/24/2023 E-mail from R.Guzman to S.Sinha - Acknowledgement of Error in Issuance of Amendments Adoption of TSTF-359, Increase Flexibility in Mode Restraints ML23089A1882023-03-29029 March 2023 Request for Additional Information (E-mail Dated 3/29/2023) Spring 2022 Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report ML23067A2162023-03-0707 March 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - RAI for North Anna, 1 & 2, Surry 1 & 2, Millstone, 2 & 3, Request for Approval of App. F Fleet Report DOM-NAF-2-P, Qual of the Framatome ORFEO-GAIA and ORFEO-NMGRID CHF Correlations in the Dominion VIPRE-D Computer Code ML23038A0152023-02-0707 February 2023 Acceptance Review Determination LAR to Revise the Applicability Term for RCS Heatup and Cooldown Pressure-Temperature Limitations Figures ML23024A1522023-01-24024 January 2023 Acceptance Review Determination LAR to Supplement Burnup Credit of Criticality Safety Analysis ML23018A0352023-01-17017 January 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review for Fleet Report Re Appendix F of DOM-NAF-2-P (L-2022-LLT-0003) ML22320A5752022-11-16016 November 2022 E-mail to File - Summary of October 18, 2022, Meeting with Dominion to Discuss Requested Actions for Implementing Framatome Gaia Fuel ML22298A2052022-10-25025 October 2022 Acceptance Review Determination for Alternative Request for Extension of Examination Interval for Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetration Nozzles ML22292A3212022-10-19019 October 2022 Acceptance Review Determination for Alternative Request for Containment RSS Pump Periodic Verification Testing Program ML22297A1802022-10-0707 October 2022 Email Acknowledgement to Dominion Energy Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Fund Disbursement 30 Day Notification for Millstone Power Station Unit 1: Docket No 50-245 ML22278A0932022-10-0505 October 2022 E-mail to File - Summary of September 7, 2022, Meeting with Dominion to Discuss Proposed Supplement to the Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Safety Analysis (EPID L-2022-LRM-0059 ML22272A0332022-09-29029 September 2022 Memo E-mail to File - Summary of August 29, 2022, Meeting with Dominion to Discuss Proposed Alternative Request Post-peening follow-up Volumetric Exam of RPV Head Penetration Nozzle ML22252A1772022-09-0909 September 2022 Memo E-mail to File - Summary of August 9, 2022, Meeting with Dominion to Discuss Proposed Alternative Reqeust Recirculation Spray Pump Flow Testing (EPID L:2022-LRM-0057) ML22242A0452022-08-23023 August 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Dominion GL 04-02 Response Draft RAIs (L-2017-LRC-0000) ML22174A3552022-06-23023 June 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review for Dominion Fleet LAR to Implement TSTF-554 (L-2022-LLA-0078) ML22123A0812022-05-0303 May 2022 Acceptance Review Determination for Proposed LAR for TS Change Applicable to TSTF-359, Increase Flexibility in Mode Restraints ML22069A7192022-03-10010 March 2022 E-mail from R. Guzman to S. Sinha - Millstone Unit 3 Steam Generator Outage Conference Call ML22020A4122022-01-11011 January 2022 1/11/2022 State Consultation E-mail, R. Guzman to J. Semancik Millstone Power Station, Unit 3 Planned Issuance of Amendment to Clarify Shutdown Bank TS and Add Alternate Control Rod Position Monitoring Requirements ML21348A7392021-12-14014 December 2021 E-mail - Acceptance Review Determination Alternative Request IR-4-09 for Use Alternative Brazed Joint Assessment Methodology for Class 3 Moderate Energy Piping ML21347A9412021-12-13013 December 2021 E-mail from R.Guzman to S.Sinha - Acknowledgement of Error in Safety Evaluation for Amendment No. 280 Measurement Uncertainy Recapture Power Uprate ML21334A1922021-11-30030 November 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Audit Plan for Reactor Core Thermal-Hydraulics Using the VIPRE-D Appendix E Review ML21326A1502021-11-22022 November 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review for Relocation of Unit Staff Requirements to the QAPD LAR (L-2021-LLA-0195) ML21306A3302021-11-0202 November 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review for TSTF-569 LAR ML21297A0072021-10-19019 October 2021 E-mail from R. Guzman to S. Sinha - Acknowledgemnt of Error in SE for Millstone Power Station, Unit 3, Amendment No. 279 Addition of Analytical Methodology to the COLR for LBLOCA ML21286A7372021-10-13013 October 2021 Additional Element Included in the Implementation Plan for the Surry Fuel Melt Safety Limit (SL) LAR ML21223A3042021-08-11011 August 2021 Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure Proposed LAR to Add an Analytical Methodology to the COLR for a Large Break LOCA ML21200A2562021-07-19019 July 2021 7/19/2021 E-mail Pressurizer Steam Space Line Classification ML21195A2442021-07-13013 July 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Draft RAI Appendix E to Topical Report DOM-NAF-2 Qualification of the Framatome BWU-I CHF Correlation in the Dominion Energy VIPRE-D Computer Code 2024-07-31
[Table view] |
Text
NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Wiebe, Joel Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 11:25 AM To: 'Gary.D.Miller@dom.com'; 'David.Sommers@dom.com'
Subject:
Millstone Power Station Units 1, 2, and 3 - Preliminary RAIs for 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d)
Exemption Request Here are the preliminary Millstone RAIs regarding your February 10, 2011, exemption request. The purpose of sending preliminary RAIs is to ensure the RAIs are clear and understandable. If clarification is needed, I will arrange for a teleconference to discuss them.
By letter dated February 10, 2011, Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., the licensee for Millstone Power Station Units 1, 2, and 3 requested an exemption from certain requirements of the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue. Specifically, the letter requested an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205 (c) and (d) for meeting work hour controls during declarations of severe weather conditions involving tropical storm or hurricane-force winds.
The staff determined that additional information is required to complete its review. In order for the staff to meet its schedule for completing the review, a response is requested by May 20, 2011.
- 1) The exemption request discusses a need to sequester individuals onsite to perform preparation, response and recovery actions associated with a severe weather event. The exemption request also discusses the fact that the local area where Millstone is sited was crossed by five hurricanes in the past eighty-four years.
However, the supplied Millstone site procedures do not specify the need to sequester individuals. The supplied procedures also do not specify the specific job duty groups to be sequestered.
a) Provide specific procedural references that control the sequestering of individuals onsite during a severe weather event, or describe how the need to sequester individuals will be incorporated into current procedures.
b) With respect to the applicability of the exemption request, provide a breakdown of the various job duty groups and numbers of individuals in each group who will be sequestered.
- 2) AOP 3569 Severe Weather Conditions indicates that entry conditions into the AOP include a hurricane advisory. There is no mention of a tropical storm watch or warning. Describe how this procedure, or other procedure, will be revised to reflect the conditions requested in the exemption.
- 3) Lessons learned from NUREG-1474 include that as much as possible, site preparation for a hurricane should occur prior to the need to sequester individuals. What is the time period that is allocated for personnel to prepare the site for a storm, prior to the arrival of hurricane force winds on-site? Be as precise as possible with respect to the number of days or hours prior to the arrival of severe winds.
- 4) Many factors contribute to fatigue. One of these factors is inconsistent start times. In order to manage fatigue during the sequester, will shift start times be pre-planned and consistent? Explain the rational for organizing current shift start times during the sequester.
- 5) Time at work is one of the major contributors to fatigue; another is lack of restorative rest. What are the expected typical shift durations for the various job duty groups that will be sequestered? Will any individuals be required to work shifts longer than 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />?
- 6) Licensees are expected to provide an opportunity for restorative rest to mitigate the fatigue that is possible under a sequester for hurricane force winds. Describe the methods to be used and the specific proceduralized actions that govern housing and bunking of the sequestered individuals.
- 7) NRC staff is not only concerned with fatigue management prior to and during the requested exemption, staff is equally concerned with site individuals fatigue when returning to work hour controls such that the resumption of work hour controls is prudently implemented and individuals are not fatigued on the first day on work hour controls. Describe the general criteria that plant management will consider when making the determination to resume work hour controls.
1
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 68 Mail Envelope Properties (F371D08C516DE74F81193E6D891DC4AF3BEC016A1C)
Subject:
Millstone Power Station Units 1, 2, and 3 - Preliminary RAIs for 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) Exemption Request Sent Date: 5/6/2011 11:24:48 AM Received Date: 5/6/2011 11:24:00 AM From: Wiebe, Joel Created By: Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov Recipients:
"'Gary.D.Miller@dom.com'" <Gary.D.Miller@dom.com>
Tracking Status: None
"'David.Sommers@dom.com'" <David.Sommers@dom.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3936 5/6/2011 11:24:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: