ML14120A003: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML14120A003
| number = ML14120A003
| issue date = 04/28/2014
| issue date = 04/28/2014
| title = Draft RAI for McGuire 1 Steam Generator Report
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - Draft RAI for McGuire 1 Steam Generator Report
| author name = Miller E
| author name = Miller E
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Miller, Ed Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 3:17 PM To: 'kay.crane@duke-energy.com'
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                     Miller, Ed Sent:                     Monday, April 28, 2014 3:17 PM To:                       'kay.crane@duke-energy.com'


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Draft RAI for McGuire 1 Steam Generator Report Attachments:Draft RAI.docxKay, The NRC staff's draft RAI for the subject report is attached to this e-mail. The draft RAI is not an official NRC staff request and is being provided to you to facilitate a subsequent conference call to determine: 1) If the questions clearly convey the NRC staff information needs; 2) Whether the regulatory basis for the questions is understood; and 3) Whether the information is already available in existing, docketed, correspondence. After you've had a chance to review the draft information request, please contact me to schedule the conference call. Thanks.  
Draft RAI for McGuire 1 Steam Generator Report Attachments:               Draft RAI.docx
: Kay, The NRC staffs draft RAI for the subject report is attached to this e-mail. The draft RAI is not an official NRC staff request and is being provided to you to facilitate a subsequent conference call to determine: 1) If the questions clearly convey the NRC staff information needs; 2) Whether the regulatory basis for the questions is understood; and 3) Whether the information is already available in existing, docketed, correspondence. After youve had a chance to review the draft information request, please contact me to schedule the conference call. Thanks.
Ed Miller (301) 415-2481 1


Ed Miller
Hearing Identifier:   NRR_PMDA Email Number:         1258 Mail Envelope Properties   (9C2386A0C0BC584684916F7A0482B6CAF9BC2D492B)
 
(301) 415-2481
 
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1258   Mail Envelope Properties   (9C2386A0C0BC584684916F7A0482B6CAF9BC2D492B)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Draft RAI for McGuire 1 Steam Generator Report Sent Date:   4/28/2014 3:17:03 PM Received Date: 4/28/2014 3:17:00 PM From:   Miller, Ed Created By:   Ed.Miller@nrc.gov Recipients:     "'kay.crane@duke-energy.com'" <kay.crane@duke-energy.com> Tracking Status: None  
Draft RAI for McGuire 1 Steam Generator Report Sent Date:           4/28/2014 3:17:03 PM Received Date:       4/28/2014 3:17:00 PM From:                 Miller, Ed Created By:           Ed.Miller@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
"'kay.crane@duke-energy.com'" <kay.crane@duke-energy.com>
Post Office:   HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   624     4/28/2014 3:17:00 PM Draft RAI.docx   27717 Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:
Tracking Status: None Post Office:         HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files                         Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                       624                   4/28/2014 3:17:00 PM Draft RAI.docx                 27717 Options Priority:                     Standard Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               No Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:
DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 STEAM GENERATOR INSPECTION REPORT EOC 22 DOCKET NO. 50-369
Recipients Received:


By letter dated July 11, 2013, (Agenc ywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML13205A469), Duke Energy Carolinas (Duke) submitted an in-service inspection report for the McGuire Unit 1 end of cycle 22 steam generator inspection. In order for the NRC staff to complete its review of the report, the following additional information is requested.
DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 STEAM GENERATOR INSPECTION REPORT EOC 22 DOCKET NO. 50-369 By letter dated July 11, 2013, (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML13205A469), Duke Energy Carolinas (Duke) submitted an in-service inspection report for the McGuire Unit 1 end of cycle 22 steam generator inspection. In order for the NRC staff to complete its review of the report, the following additional information is requested.
: 1. Please discuss the scope and results of any inspections (other than the steam generator tube plug inspections) performed in the SG primary channel heads. 2. In section "a" of the report, the acronym TWD is used; please define and clarify if this is referring to new wear indications. 3. In section "g" of the report, seven indications of wear due to foreign objects were noted, four with no evidence of a foreign object remaining and three with evidence of a foreign object remaining. Please reconcile these numbers against what was provided in the Attachment 1 tables of the report, which seem to indicate that there are four indications of wear with possible loose parts present (LPIs). 4. Please clarify the statement in section "e" of your report. Did all the tubes that were plugged have wear attributed to a loose part that could not be removed?
: 1. Please discuss the scope and results of any inspections (other than the steam generator tube plug inspections) performed in the SG primary channel heads.
Please clarify which tubes were plugged. Also, please discuss whether a visual inspection was performed at the location of the LPIs in SG D (since all four indications appear to be in the same general vicinity). 5. Please provide the effective full power years of operation for each refueling outage since 2008.}}
: 2. In section a of the report, the acronym TWD is used; please define and clarify if this is referring to new wear indications.
: 3. In section g of the report, seven indications of wear due to foreign objects were noted, four with no evidence of a foreign object remaining and three with evidence of a foreign object remaining. Please reconcile these numbers against what was provided in the Attachment 1 tables of the report, which seem to indicate that there are four indications of wear with possible loose parts present (LPIs).
: 4. Please clarify the statement in section e of your report. Did all the tubes that were plugged have wear attributed to a loose part that could not be removed?
Please clarify which tubes were plugged. Also, please discuss whether a visual inspection was performed at the location of the LPIs in SG D (since all four indications appear to be in the same general vicinity).
: 5. Please provide the effective full power years of operation for each refueling outage since 2008.}}

Latest revision as of 07:36, 5 December 2019

NRR E-mail Capture - Draft RAI for McGuire 1 Steam Generator Report
ML14120A003
Person / Time
Site: Mcguire, McGuire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/28/2014
From: Ed Miller
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
To: Crane K
Duke Energy Corp
References
Download: ML14120A003 (3)
v • d • e


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Miller, Ed Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 3:17 PM To: 'kay.crane@duke-energy.com'

Subject:

Draft RAI for McGuire 1 Steam Generator Report Attachments: Draft RAI.docx

Kay, The NRC staffs draft RAI for the subject report is attached to this e-mail. The draft RAI is not an official NRC staff request and is being provided to you to facilitate a subsequent conference call to determine: 1) If the questions clearly convey the NRC staff information needs; 2) Whether the regulatory basis for the questions is understood; and 3) Whether the information is already available in existing, docketed, correspondence. After youve had a chance to review the draft information request, please contact me to schedule the conference call. Thanks.

Ed Miller (301) 415-2481 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1258 Mail Envelope Properties (9C2386A0C0BC584684916F7A0482B6CAF9BC2D492B)

Subject:

Draft RAI for McGuire 1 Steam Generator Report Sent Date: 4/28/2014 3:17:03 PM Received Date: 4/28/2014 3:17:00 PM From: Miller, Ed Created By: Ed.Miller@nrc.gov Recipients:

"'kay.crane@duke-energy.com'" <kay.crane@duke-energy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 624 4/28/2014 3:17:00 PM Draft RAI.docx 27717 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 STEAM GENERATOR INSPECTION REPORT EOC 22 DOCKET NO. 50-369 By letter dated July 11, 2013, (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML13205A469), Duke Energy Carolinas (Duke) submitted an in-service inspection report for the McGuire Unit 1 end of cycle 22 steam generator inspection. In order for the NRC staff to complete its review of the report, the following additional information is requested.

1. Please discuss the scope and results of any inspections (other than the steam generator tube plug inspections) performed in the SG primary channel heads.
2. In section a of the report, the acronym TWD is used; please define and clarify if this is referring to new wear indications.
3. In section g of the report, seven indications of wear due to foreign objects were noted, four with no evidence of a foreign object remaining and three with evidence of a foreign object remaining. Please reconcile these numbers against what was provided in the Attachment 1 tables of the report, which seem to indicate that there are four indications of wear with possible loose parts present (LPIs).
4. Please clarify the statement in section e of your report. Did all the tubes that were plugged have wear attributed to a loose part that could not be removed?

Please clarify which tubes were plugged. Also, please discuss whether a visual inspection was performed at the location of the LPIs in SG D (since all four indications appear to be in the same general vicinity).

5. Please provide the effective full power years of operation for each refueling outage since 2008.
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14120A003&oldid=2234812"