ML15201A137: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML15201A137
| number = ML15201A137
| issue date = 07/20/2015
| issue date = 07/20/2015
| title = 2015/07/20 Indian Point Lr Hearing - (External_Sender) FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA
| title = Lr Hearing - (External_Sender) FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
| author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 IPRenewal NPEmails From: Louie, Richard [rlouie@entergy.com]
{{#Wiki_filter:IPRenewal NPEmails From:                         Louie, Richard [rlouie@entergy.com]
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 8:32 AM To: Wentzel, Michael
Sent:                         Monday, July 20, 2015 8:32 AM To:                           Wentzel, Michael


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] RE: RE: FW: Dra ft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRAMike, Thanks, I'll forward this to Andy and let you know if there are any other questions.  
[External_Sender] RE: RE: FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA
 
: Mike, Thanks, Ill forward this to Andy and let you know if there are any other questions.
Rich From: Wentzel, Michael [mailto:Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov] Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 7:50 AM To: Louie, Richard  
Rich From: Wentzel, Michael [mailto:Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov]
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 7:50 AM To: Louie, Richard


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: RE: FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA  
RE: RE: FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA
: Rich,  
: Rich, Sorry for the delay in responding, but I wanted to confirm with tech staff before I did so. Relative to Andys question below, there is no explicit statement in the ISG that states that high-temperature environments are not evaluated to be bounding. However, the scope of AMP XI.M42 states:
 
Scope of Program: The scope of the program is internal coatings/linings for in-scope piping, piping components, heat exchangers, and tanks exposed to closed-cycle cooling water, raw water, treated water, treated borated water, waste water, fuel oil, and lubricating oil where loss of coating or lining integrity could prevent satisfactory accomplishment of any of the components or downstream components CLB intended functions identified under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1), (a)(2),
Sorry for the delay in responding, but I wanted to confirm with tech staff before I did so. Relative to Andy's question below, there is no explicit statement in the ISG that states that high-temperature environments are not evaluated to be bounding. However, the scope of AMP XI.M42 states:  
or (a)(3).
 
If high-temperature environments were included, it would have listed environments such as Treated water >60°C
Scope of Program:
(>140°F) or Closed-cycle cooling water >60°C (>140°F) from GALL Report Section IX.D and the GALL Report AMT line item tables.
The scope of the program is internal coatings/linings for in-scope piping, piping components, heat exchangers, and tanks exposed to closed-cycle cooling water, raw water, treated water, treated borated water, waste water, fuel oil, and lubricating oil where loss of coating or lining integrity could prevent satisfactory accomplishment of any of the component's or downstream component's CLB intended functions identified under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3).
 
If high-temperature environments were included, it would have listed environments such as Treated water >60°C (>140°F) or Closed-cycle cooling water >60°C (>140°F) from GALL Report Section IX.D and the GALL Report AMT line item tables.  
 
I have been holding issuance of the phone call summary. I will add the above discussion to the phone call summary for that particular RAI. If you have any other questions, please let me know.
I have been holding issuance of the phone call summary. I will add the above discussion to the phone call summary for that particular RAI. If you have any other questions, please let me know.
Thanks, Mike From: Louie, Richard [mailto:rlouie@entergy.com
: Thanks, Mike From: Louie, Richard [mailto:rlouie@entergy.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 7:01 AM To: Wentzel, Michael  
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 7:01 AM To: Wentzel, Michael


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] RE: FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA Ok, thanks.  
[External_Sender] RE: FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA Ok, thanks.
 
From: Wentzel, Michael [mailto:Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov]
From: Wentzel, Michael [mailto:Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 3:22 PM To: Louie, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 3:22 PM To: Louie, Richard  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA 2 Rich, I'll try to get some clarification on this and get back to you.  
RE: FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA 1
: Thanks, Mike From: Louie, Richard [mailto:rlouie@entergy.com
: Rich, Ill try to get some clarification on this and get back to you.
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 6:57 AM To: Wentzel, Michael  
: Thanks, Mike From: Louie, Richard [mailto:rlouie@entergy.com]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 6:57 AM To: Wentzel, Michael


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA Importance:
[External_Sender] FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA Importance: High
High
: Mike, Please note below, a comment regarding the attached phone call summary.
: Mike, Please note below, a comment regarding the attached phone call summary.  
Rich From: TAYLOR, ANDREW C Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 1:28 AM To: Louie, Richard Cc: Lach, David J
 
Rich From: TAYLOR, ANDREW C Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 1:28 AM To: Louie, Richard Cc: Lach, David J  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA Importance:
FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA Importance: High Rich -
High Rich -
After further review, we have determined that we do have comments on this phone call summary.
After further review, we have determined that we do have comments on this phone call summary.  
We need NRC to specify which statement in LR-ISG-2013-01 indicates that Environments with high temperatures are not evaluated to be bounding within the assumptions of GALL AMP XI.M42 as claimed in DRAFT- RAI 3.0.3-16 Andy Andrew Taylor, P.E.
 
Acting Manager Entergy Nuclear License Renewal Services 479-858-3531 From: Louie, Richard Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 7:58 AM To: TAYLOR, ANDREW C
We need NRC to specify which statement in LR-ISG-2013-01 indicates that "Environments with high temperatures are not evaluated to be bounding within the assumptions of GALL AMP XI.M42
" as claimed in DRAFT- RAI 3.0.3-16  
 
Andy  
 
Andrew Taylor, P.E. Acting Manager Entergy Nuclear License Renewal Services 479-858-3531  
 
From: Louie, Richard Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 7:58 AM To: TAYLOR, ANDREW C  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
FW: Draft Phone Call Summary  
FW: Draft Phone Call Summary
: Andy,  
: Andy, 2


3Let me know if you have any comments.  
Let me know if you have any comments.
 
Rich From: Wentzel, Michael [mailto:Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov]
Rich From: Wentzel, Michael [mailto:Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 8:42 AM To: Louie, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 8:42 AM To: Louie, Richard  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Draft Phone Call Summary  
Draft Phone Call Summary
: Rich, Attached is a draft of the phone call summary from our phone call last week. Please let me know if you have any comments.  
: Rich, Attached is a draft of the phone call summary from our phone call last week. Please let me know if you have any comments.
: Thanks, Mike Michael Wentzel Project Manager NRR/DLR/RPB2 (301) 415-6459 michael.wentzel@nrc.gov
: Thanks, Mike Michael Wentzel Project Manager NRR/DLR/RPB2 (301) 415-6459 michael.wentzel@nrc.gov 3


Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 5239   Mail Envelope Properties   (CB159DC717B797428E92782CE3B5F40B0F173112)
Hearing Identifier:   IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:         5239 Mail Envelope Properties     (CB159DC717B797428E92782CE3B5F40B0F173112)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
  [External_Sender] RE: RE: FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA Sent Date:   7/20/2015 8:32:02 AM Received Date: 7/20/2015 8:32:05 AM From:   Louie, Richard Created By:   rlouie@entergy.com Recipients:     "Wentzel, Michael" <Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov>
[External_Sender] RE: RE: FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA Sent Date:             7/20/2015 8:32:02 AM Received Date:         7/20/2015 8:32:05 AM From:                 Louie, Richard Created By:           rlouie@entergy.com Recipients:
Tracking Status: None  
"Wentzel, Michael" <Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov>
 
Tracking Status: None Post Office:           JDCXMETSP003.etrsouth.corp.entergy.com Files                         Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                       3546                   7/20/2015 8:32:05 AM Options Priority:                     Standard Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               No Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:
Post Office:   JDCXMETSP003.etrsouth.corp.entergy.com Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   3546     7/20/2015 8:32:05 AM
Recipients Received:}}
 
Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 22:32, 4 December 2019

Lr Hearing - (External_Sender) FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA
ML15201A137
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/20/2015
From:
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Division of License Renewal
References
Download: ML15201A137 (4)


Text

IPRenewal NPEmails From: Louie, Richard [rlouie@entergy.com]

Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 8:32 AM To: Wentzel, Michael

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: RE: FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA

Mike, Thanks, Ill forward this to Andy and let you know if there are any other questions.

Rich From: Wentzel, Michael [1]

Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 7:50 AM To: Louie, Richard

Subject:

RE: RE: FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA

Rich, Sorry for the delay in responding, but I wanted to confirm with tech staff before I did so. Relative to Andys question below, there is no explicit statement in the ISG that states that high-temperature environments are not evaluated to be bounding. However, the scope of AMP XI.M42 states:

Scope of Program: The scope of the program is internal coatings/linings for in-scope piping, piping components, heat exchangers, and tanks exposed to closed-cycle cooling water, raw water, treated water, treated borated water, waste water, fuel oil, and lubricating oil where loss of coating or lining integrity could prevent satisfactory accomplishment of any of the components or downstream components CLB intended functions identified under 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1), (a)(2),

or (a)(3).

If high-temperature environments were included, it would have listed environments such as Treated water >60°C

(>140°F) or Closed-cycle cooling water >60°C (>140°F) from GALL Report Section IX.D and the GALL Report AMT line item tables.

I have been holding issuance of the phone call summary. I will add the above discussion to the phone call summary for that particular RAI. If you have any other questions, please let me know.

Thanks, Mike From: Louie, Richard [2]

Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 7:01 AM To: Wentzel, Michael

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA Ok, thanks.

From: Wentzel, Michael [3]

Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 3:22 PM To: Louie, Richard

Subject:

RE: FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA 1

Rich, Ill try to get some clarification on this and get back to you.
Thanks, Mike From: Louie, Richard [4]

Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 6:57 AM To: Wentzel, Michael

Subject:

[External_Sender] FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA Importance: High

Mike, Please note below, a comment regarding the attached phone call summary.

Rich From: TAYLOR, ANDREW C Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 1:28 AM To: Louie, Richard Cc: Lach, David J

Subject:

FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA Importance: High Rich -

After further review, we have determined that we do have comments on this phone call summary.

We need NRC to specify which statement in LR-ISG-2013-01 indicates that Environments with high temperatures are not evaluated to be bounding within the assumptions of GALL AMP XI.M42 as claimed in DRAFT- RAI 3.0.3-16 Andy Andrew Taylor, P.E.

Acting Manager Entergy Nuclear License Renewal Services 479-858-3531 From: Louie, Richard Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 7:58 AM To: TAYLOR, ANDREW C

Subject:

FW: Draft Phone Call Summary

Andy, 2

Let me know if you have any comments.

Rich From: Wentzel, Michael [5]

Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 8:42 AM To: Louie, Richard

Subject:

Draft Phone Call Summary

Rich, Attached is a draft of the phone call summary from our phone call last week. Please let me know if you have any comments.
Thanks, Mike Michael Wentzel Project Manager NRR/DLR/RPB2 (301) 415-6459 michael.wentzel@nrc.gov 3

Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 5239 Mail Envelope Properties (CB159DC717B797428E92782CE3B5F40B0F173112)

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: RE: FW: Draft Phone Call Summary - IPEC LRA Sent Date: 7/20/2015 8:32:02 AM Received Date: 7/20/2015 8:32:05 AM From: Louie, Richard Created By: rlouie@entergy.com Recipients:

"Wentzel, Michael" <Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: JDCXMETSP003.etrsouth.corp.entergy.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3546 7/20/2015 8:32:05 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: