ML19309D786: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML19309D786
| number = ML19309D786
| issue date = 10/31/2019
| issue date = 10/31/2019
| title = Reconciliation - NRR Response to Acrs' September 20 2019 Letter on Nuscale Stability Analysis Topical Report
| title = Reconciliation - NRR Response to Acrs' September 20 2019 Letter on NuScale Stability Analysis Topical Report
| author name = Taylor R
| author name = Taylor R
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR

Latest revision as of 01:42, 1 December 2019

Reconciliation - NRR Response to Acrs' September 20 2019 Letter on NuScale Stability Analysis Topical Report
ML19309D786
Person / Time
Site: NuScale
Issue date: 10/31/2019
From: Renee Taylor
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Riccardella P
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
Snodderly M
References
TR-0516-49417-P, Rev 0
Download: ML19309D786 (1)


Text

From: Taylor, Robert To: Riccardella, Peter Cc: Moore, Scott; Burkhart, Larry; Snodderly, Michael; Bradford, Anna; Nieh, Ho; Caldwell, Bob; Dudek, Michael; Cranston, Greg; Bavol, Bruce

Subject:

Response to ACRS" September 20, 2019 Letter on NuScale Topical Report TR-0516-49417-P Date: Thursday, October 31, 2019 8:31:59 AM

Dear Chairman Riccardella,

In your letter dated September 20, 2019 (ML19266A463), ACRS reported on the Committees review of the staffs safety evaluation for the NuScale topical report TR-0516-49417-P, Revision 0, Evaluation Methodology for Stability Analysis of the NuScale Power Module.

Your letter contained the following two conclusions and recommendations:

(1) When used in compliance with the 16 limitations imposed by the staff, the methods documented in this stability topical report are acceptable for performing stability analyses of the NuScale power module (NPM). The safety evaluation (SE) should be issued.

(2) Prototypical steam generator tests and scoping staff analyses show that two phase density-wave flow oscillations inside the tubes are possible with the current design, which could challenge thermal fatigue limits. NuScale and the staff are aware of the issue and are committed to resolving it prior to completion of the review.

The NRC staff appreciates the ACRSs review and recommendations and plans to issue the approved version of the topical report by mid-January 2020. Additionally, the NRC staff agrees with conclusion and recommendation (2). The staff and NuScale will work to ensure that the design basis includes the density-wave oscillations phenomenon, so that it is captured and will be completed as part of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers code design requirements for the steam generator tubes.

The NRC staff appreciates your review of this safety evaluation and looks forward to future interactions with the Committee as part of its NuScale review activities.

Best regards, Rob Robert M. Taylor Deputy Director for New Reactors Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (office) 301-415-1270