ML18166A340: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML18166A340
| number = ML18166A340
| issue date = 07/17/2018
| issue date = 07/17/2018
| title = 06/05/18 DG-1327 Enclosure 3 - Public Meeting NEI Presentation
| title = DG-1327 Enclosure 3 - Public Meeting NEI Presentation
| author name = Eichenberg T W
| author name = Eichenberg T
| author affiliation = Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)
| author affiliation = Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = PROJ0689
| docket = PROJ0689
|| license number =  
|| license number =  
| contact person = O'Donnell E M
| contact person = O'Donnell E
| case reference number = DG-1327
| case reference number = DG-1327
| package number = ML18115A073
| package number = ML18115A073
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:DG-1327 Public Comment Disposition T. W. Eichenberg EPRI Fuel Reliability Program, Reg-TAC Chair Sr. Specialist Reactor Safety Analysis, TVA July 17, 2018
 
Issue Overview
* Dose
* Comment Resolution
* Forward Fit
* Work Scope
© 2018 NEI. All rights reserved.
 
Dose Assessment
* Changes to Non-LOCA Dose Assessment - Not Appropriate to DG-1327 Fission Product Release Fraction in DG-1327 should only be applicable to CRE/CRDA Revise other regulatory guidance as appropriate, such as RG 1.183 or 1.195
* Changes to AST Governed by 10CFR50.67(b)
New CRE/CRDA calculation creates 10CFR50.67 potential AST issues
© 2018 NEI. All rights reserved.
 
Comment Resolution
* Section C.1.2 Comment C Comment D Prompt vs. 5% power threshold issue.
What does at power limits becomes questionable mean?
* Section C.1.3 Comment C Dismissing the transition temperature phenomenon (PWR vs BWR)
© 2018 NEI. All rights reserved.
 
Comment Resolution
* Section C.2.1.1 Comment A Test are Inherently Conservative; not representative of actual operation. Recent changes to curve fits of Figures 2 & 4 in DG-1327 adds conservatism at lower Hydrogen levels. Revised technical basis for DG-1327 is missing.
Comment B Is Non-LOCA Realistic/Best Estimate Allowed or Not?
* Section C.2.2.3 Comment A-F Additional Workshop to flesh out Work Scope
© 2018 NEI. All rights reserved.
 
Comment Resolution
* Section C.2.3.4 Comment C How can we reference a Draft Reg. Guide 1.224
* Section C.2.3.5 Comment B Hydride reorientation, imposing beyond existing analyses
* Section 3.1 Comment C, E Additional Workshop to flesh out Work Scope
© 2018 NEI. All rights reserved.
 
Comment Resolution
* Section 3.2 Comment F, H-K Mechanical Properties vs. In-Pile
* Section 3.3 Comment A-B Fuel cladding failure is conservatively presumed.
© 2018 NEI. All rights reserved.
 
Dose Assessment
* Page 53 comment table Comment F, H-K No Response Provided
© 2018 NEI. All rights reserved.
 
Forward Fit / Implementation
* When Should Forward Fit Be Applied?
Possible Areas - When 50.59 indicates an LAR in needed, and touches:
* NUREG-800, SRP-4.2 (Fuel System Design) (Sans PAD5 related stuff)
* NUREG-800, SRP-15.4.8, (Spectrum of Rod Ejection Accidents (PWR))
* NUREG-800, SRP-15.4.8.A, (Radiological Consequences of Rod Ejection Accident (PWR))
* NUREG-800, SRP-15.4.9, (Spectrum of Rod Drop Accidents (BWR))
* NUREG-800, SRP-15.4.9.A, (Radiological Consequence of Rod Drop Accident (BWR))
* Reg. Guide 1.183; 1.195
* Example LAR Fuel Transition with a Specific Change of Methodology (i.e., 3D methods)
* Availability of Approved Methods Not every vendor in the same position right now
© 2018 NEI. All rights reserved.
 
Work Scope
* Additional Public Workshop to Discuss Scope Everyone on the same page
© 2018 NEI. All rights reserved.
 
Questions?? / Discussion}}

Latest revision as of 12:23, 30 November 2019

DG-1327 Enclosure 3 - Public Meeting NEI Presentation
ML18166A340
Person / Time
Site: Nuclear Energy Institute
Issue date: 07/17/2018
From: Eichenberg T
Nuclear Energy Institute
To:
NRC/RES/DE
O'Donnell E
Shared Package
ML18115A073 List:
References
DG-1327
Download: ML18166A340 (11)
v • d • e


Text

DG-1327 Public Comment Disposition T. W. Eichenberg EPRI Fuel Reliability Program, Reg-TAC Chair Sr. Specialist Reactor Safety Analysis, TVA July 17, 2018

Issue Overview

  • Dose
  • Comment Resolution
  • Forward Fit
  • Work Scope

© 2018 NEI. All rights reserved.

Dose Assessment

  • Changes to Non-LOCA Dose Assessment - Not Appropriate to DG-1327 Fission Product Release Fraction in DG-1327 should only be applicable to CRE/CRDA Revise other regulatory guidance as appropriate, such as RG 1.183 or 1.195

New CRE/CRDA calculation creates 10CFR50.67 potential AST issues

© 2018 NEI. All rights reserved.

Comment Resolution

  • Section C.1.2 Comment C Comment D Prompt vs. 5% power threshold issue.

What does at power limits becomes questionable mean?

  • Section C.1.3 Comment C Dismissing the transition temperature phenomenon (PWR vs BWR)

© 2018 NEI. All rights reserved.

Comment Resolution

  • Section C.2.1.1 Comment A Test are Inherently Conservative; not representative of actual operation. Recent changes to curve fits of Figures 2 & 4 in DG-1327 adds conservatism at lower Hydrogen levels. Revised technical basis for DG-1327 is missing.

Comment B Is Non-LOCA Realistic/Best Estimate Allowed or Not?

  • Section C.2.2.3 Comment A-F Additional Workshop to flesh out Work Scope

© 2018 NEI. All rights reserved.

Comment Resolution

  • Section C.2.3.5 Comment B Hydride reorientation, imposing beyond existing analyses
  • Section 3.1 Comment C, E Additional Workshop to flesh out Work Scope

© 2018 NEI. All rights reserved.

Comment Resolution

  • Section 3.2 Comment F, H-K Mechanical Properties vs. In-Pile
  • Section 3.3 Comment A-B Fuel cladding failure is conservatively presumed.

© 2018 NEI. All rights reserved.

Dose Assessment

  • Page 53 comment table Comment F, H-K No Response Provided

© 2018 NEI. All rights reserved.

Forward Fit / Implementation

  • When Should Forward Fit Be Applied?

Possible Areas - When 50.59 indicates an LAR in needed, and touches:

  • NUREG-800, SRP-4.2 (Fuel System Design) (Sans PAD5 related stuff)
  • NUREG-800, SRP-15.4.8, (Spectrum of Rod Ejection Accidents (PWR))
  • NUREG-800, SRP-15.4.8.A, (Radiological Consequences of Rod Ejection Accident (PWR))
  • NUREG-800, SRP-15.4.9, (Spectrum of Rod Drop Accidents (BWR))
  • NUREG-800, SRP-15.4.9.A, (Radiological Consequence of Rod Drop Accident (BWR))
  • Example LAR Fuel Transition with a Specific Change of Methodology (i.e., 3D methods)
  • Availability of Approved Methods Not every vendor in the same position right now

© 2018 NEI. All rights reserved.

Work Scope

  • Additional Public Workshop to Discuss Scope Everyone on the same page

© 2018 NEI. All rights reserved.

Questions?? / Discussion

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18166A340&oldid=2217430"