ML043080281: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 10/29/2004
| issue date = 10/29/2004
| title = Letter to Court Providing Technical Correction to a Citation, Dated 10/29/04
| title = Letter to Court Providing Technical Correction to a Citation, Dated 10/29/04
| author name = Fehst G R
| author name = Fehst G
| author affiliation = NRC/OGC
| author affiliation = NRC/OGC
| addressee name = Mackechnie R B, Wilder-Hope T
| addressee name = Mackechnie R, Wilder-Hope T
| addressee affiliation = US Federal Judiciary, Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
| addressee affiliation = US Federal Judiciary, Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
| docket = 05000336
| docket = 05000336
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ntus Hf UNITED STATES )so NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 29, 2004 OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL Roseann B. MacKechnie, Clerk United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit United States Court House 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Attention:
{{#Wiki_filter:ntus   Hf                             UNITED STATES                     )
Tynetta Wilder-Hope, Deputy Clerk RE: Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone  
so               NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 29, 2004 OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL Roseann B. MacKechnie, Clerk United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit United States Court House 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Attention:       Tynetta Wilder-Hope, Deputy Clerk RE:     Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. NRC, Case No. 04-0109 VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL
: v. NRC, Case No. 04-0109 VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL  


==Dear Ms. MacKechnie:==
==Dear Ms. MacKechnie:==


This letter is to provide a small technical correction to a citation found in this Court's October 14, 2004 Summary Order in the above-referenced case. At page five of the Summary Order, the Court cited 10 C.F.R. §2.309(c) as the NRC regulation governing the admission of late-filed contentions in NRC proceedings.
This letter is to provide a small technical correction to a citation found in this Court's October 14, 2004 Summary Order in the above-referenced case. At page five of the Summary Order, the Court cited 10 C.F.R. §2.309(c) as the NRC regulation governing the admission of late-filed contentions in NRC proceedings. However, section 2.309(c) appears in recently enacted NRC rules not applicable to this case. The equivalent NRC rule applicable at the time this case was filed, and the citation that should be used in place of 10 C.F.R. §2.309(c), is 10 C.F.R. §2.714(a)(2004).
However, section 2.309(c) appears in recently enacted NRC rules not applicable to this case. The equivalent NRC rule applicable at the time this case was filed, and the citation that should be used in place of 10 C.F.R. §2.309(c), is 10 C.F.R. §2.714(a)(2004).
As the Commission noted at p. 4, Footnote 1, in its brief to the Court, the Commission earlier this year recodified and modified a number of its procedural regulations, including the procedural regulations covering late-filed contentions. See Final Rule: Changes To Adjudicatory Process, 69 Fed. Reg. 2182 (Jan. 14,2004). This newly numbered section now governing untimely requests to intervene in NRC proceedings merely added some additional factors for consideration of late-filed contentions to those already found in the old 10 C.F.R.
As the Commission noted at p. 4, Footnote 1, in its brief to the Court, the Commission earlier this year recodified and modified a number of its procedural regulations, including the procedural regulations covering late-filed contentions.
  §2.714(a)(2004).
See Final Rule: Changes To Adjudicatory Process, 69 Fed. Reg. 2182 (Jan. 14,2004).
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
This newly numbered section now governing untimely requests to intervene in NRC proceedings merely added some additional factors for consideration of late-filed contentions to those already found in the old 10 C.F.R.§2.714(a)(2004).
Respectfully submitted, eraldine R. Fehst Attorney (301) 415-1614 GRF@NRC.GOV cc:       Service List}}
Thank you for your attention to this matter.Respectfully submitted, eraldine R. Fehst Attorney (301) 415-1614 GRF@NRC.GOV cc: Service List}}

Latest revision as of 00:50, 24 November 2019

Letter to Court Providing Technical Correction to a Citation, Dated 10/29/04
ML043080281
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 10/29/2004
From: Fehst G
NRC/OGC
To: Mackechnie R, Wilder-Hope T
US Federal Judiciary, Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
References
04-0109
Download: ML043080281 (1)


Text

ntus Hf UNITED STATES )

so NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 29, 2004 OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL Roseann B. MacKechnie, Clerk United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit United States Court House 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Attention: Tynetta Wilder-Hope, Deputy Clerk RE: Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. NRC, Case No. 04-0109 VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL

Dear Ms. MacKechnie:

This letter is to provide a small technical correction to a citation found in this Court's October 14, 2004 Summary Order in the above-referenced case. At page five of the Summary Order, the Court cited 10 C.F.R. §2.309(c) as the NRC regulation governing the admission of late-filed contentions in NRC proceedings. However, section 2.309(c) appears in recently enacted NRC rules not applicable to this case. The equivalent NRC rule applicable at the time this case was filed, and the citation that should be used in place of 10 C.F.R. §2.309(c), is 10 C.F.R. §2.714(a)(2004).

As the Commission noted at p. 4, Footnote 1, in its brief to the Court, the Commission earlier this year recodified and modified a number of its procedural regulations, including the procedural regulations covering late-filed contentions. See Final Rule: Changes To Adjudicatory Process, 69 Fed. Reg. 2182 (Jan. 14,2004). This newly numbered section now governing untimely requests to intervene in NRC proceedings merely added some additional factors for consideration of late-filed contentions to those already found in the old 10 C.F.R.

§2.714(a)(2004).

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Respectfully submitted, eraldine R. Fehst Attorney (301) 415-1614 GRF@NRC.GOV cc: Service List