ML042570082

Pre-Argument Statement, Dated 6/25/04

ML042570082
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	06/25/2004
From:	Burton N Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, US Federal Judiciary, Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
References
04-3577-AG
Download: ML042570082 (1)

Text

Form C-A (for Agency Cases)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT USN1RC - OGC

° APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT PETITIONFORRt3JUL-Ad PMI1:0O PRE-ARGUMENT STATEMENT SEE NOTICE ON REVERSE PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT. ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY.

NAMEOFAGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissioifENCY DOCKET NO.: 50-423-A3 TTLEINCFULLConnecticut Coalition Against Millstone v..U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ORDER NUMBER_ DATE ENTERED: My 4a 9 n04 APPROXIMATE NO. OF PAGES IN RECORD. Fewer than J. IJ NO. OF EXHIBITS: Non0e1 JURISDICTION OF COURT OF APPEALS: uS3-CO. A)2-,-344 USCA HAS THIS MATTER BEEN BEFORE THIS COURT PREVIOUSLY? C Yes X No IF YES. STATE CASE NAME: .CITATION: DOCKET NO.:

-~----ATTORNEYtS ) FOR PETTIONER(S). --- -_

NAME 147 Cross Highway, Redding Ridge CT 06876/203-938-395 ADDRESS TELEPHONE ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT(S): Office of General Counsel, US NRC NAME Washington DC 20555-0001 ADDRESS TELEPHONE APPEAL TAKEN: f AS OF RIGHT O BY DISCRETION (SPECIFY STATUTES UNDER WHICH APPEAL IS TAKEN): USCA PETITIONER'APPLICANT IS 0 AGENCY ROTHER PARTY O NON-PARTY.. SPECIFY STANDING:PropnoPs(d Tntervenor FACTSUPONWHICHVENUEISBASED: Petitioner located in Connecticut; subject of petition (Millstone Nuclear Power Plant) located in Connecticut NATURE OF ORDER ON WHICH REVIEW OR ENFORCEMENT IS SOUGHT:

Dismissal of Petition to Intervene and Request for Hearing

= ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONIRULEMAKING 0 BENEFITS REVIEW 0 UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE C ROUTES: _ HEALTH & SAFETY _ EMPLOYER

_ COMMUNICATIONS _ IMMIGRATION _ UNION

_ COMMERCE _ TARIFFS

_ OTHER (SPECIFY)

CONCISE DESCRIPTION OF PROCEEDINGS BELOW AND ORDER TO BE REVIEWED OR ENFORCED (NOTE THOSE PARTS OF THE ORDER FROM WHICH RELIEF IS SOUGHT): The agency dismissed Petitioner's Petition to Intervene in II T&F5Rw v relieffrom entire ofder. ought.1 RELIEF SOUGHT: ____ , _ _ hin..w- cs pn i TO YOUR KNOWig triE Ar??iOA?4QA'PPENDING ORABOUTTO BE BROUGHT BEFORE THIS COURT OR ANY OTHERCOURT CR ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY WHICH:

(A) ARISES FROM SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME CASE OR CONTROVERSY AS THIS APPEAL? 'RYESO NO (B) INVOLVES AN ISSUE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME. SIMILAR. OR RELATED TO AN ISSUE IN THIS APPEAL? CKYESO NO (IF YES. STATE WHETHER -A- OR "8" OR BOTH AND PROVIDE:

DOCKET: fl-33(-T.R CASENAME: Tn rp- nominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.

3 COURT OR MENs LR 11 S. N.AgC. CITATION: N. -A NUMBER: N.A.

FOR PETITIONER OR APPLICANT:

CT Coalition Against Millstone Nancy Burton, Esq. 203-938-3952 (PRINT) NAME OF PETITIONER NAMEOFCOUNSEL OF RECORDE--,

June 25, 2004 DATE SI URE OF COUNSEL OF RECORD