ML040500586
| ML040500586 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 01/12/2004 |
| From: | Burton N Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone |
| To: | NRC/OGC, US Federal Judiciary, Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit |
| References | |
| 04-0109, 50-336-LA-2, CLI-03-14, CLI-03-18 | |
| Download: ML040500586 (1) | |
Text
- q -, C)( 9 Form C-A (for Agency Cases) gC UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT XC C APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT i
PETITION FOR
-JAN 1 5 PRE-ARGUMENT STATEMENT
-PI SEE NOTICE ON REVERSE PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT. ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NEC Sde 0 OND C NAME OF AGENCY:
AGENCY DOCKET NO.:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 50-336 LA-2 TITLE IN FULL: Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ORDERNUMBER rT.T A-14-_^,TLn3-38 DATEENTERED' I1I-3;12/16/03 APPROXIMATE NO. OF PAGES IN RECORD:
NO. OF E(HIBITS:
JURISDICTION OF COURT OF APPEALS:
_____9_______
__A HAS THIS MATTER BEEN BEFORETHIS COURT PREVIOUSLY?
3 Yes X No IF YES, STATE CASE NAME CITATION:
DOCKET NO.:
ATTORNEY(S) FOR PETITIONER(S):
Nancy Bhurton, r,
fAME 147 Cross Highway, Redding Ridge CT OfR87f7n39IRg952 ADDRESS TELEPHONE ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT(S):
Office of General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Reg-.Comm Washington DC 20NW-0001 ADDRESS TELEPHONE APPEAL TAKEN:
A AS OF RIGHT O BY DISCRETION (SPECIFY STATUTES UNDER WHICH APPEAL IS TAKEN): _2gUSCA 2342 PETITIONERIAPPLICANT IS 0 AGENCY X OTHER PARTY 0 NON-PARTY. SPECIFY STANDING: Tn1-tprxynnr FACTS UPON WHICH VENUE IS BASED:
This matter involves the Millstone Nuclear Power Station, located in Waterford, Connecticut;Petitioner is CT-based NATURE OF ORDER ON WHICH REVIEW OR ENFORCEMENT IS SOUGHT:
Order dismissing petition for:hearing and denying evidentiary hearing o ADMINISTRATIVEREGULATION/RULEMAKING 0 BENEFITS REVIEW 0 UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE.
o ROUTES:
HEALTH & SAFETY EMPLOYER COMMUNICATIONS IMMIGRATION UNION COMMERCE TARIFFS
=
OTHER (SPECIFY)
CONCISE DESCRIPTION OF PROCEEDINGS BELOW AND ORDER TO BE REVIEWED OR ENFORCED (NOTE THOSE PARTS OF THE ORDER FROM WHICH RELIEF IS SOUGHT): Petitioner intervened in licensing proceedings; its petition for evidentiaryq wamsm desnied.
ISSUES PROPOSED TO BE RAISE ON PETITION OyR AFLl 1
_om s sion Srrer in r
- m1C!42p1"ii RELIEFSOUGHT
- Pf itirnner seeks a n order vacating the deitsio. and e
emad dfL further poceedinqs TO YOUR KNOWLEDGEISTHEREpArNY CASE NO'W gNDING OR ABOUT TO BE BROUGHT BEFORE THIS COURT OR ANY OTHER COURT OR ADMINISTRATIVEAGENCY WHICH:
(A)
ARISES FROM SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME CASE OR CONTROVERSY AS THIS APPEAL?
0 YESA NO (B)
INVOLVES AN ISSUE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME, SIMILAR, OR RELATED TO AN ISSUE IN THIS APPEAL?
0 YEXO NO (IF YES, STATE WHETHER -A-OR*Be OR BOTH AND PROVIDE DOCKET:
CASE NAME:
COURT OR AGENCY:
CITATION:
NUMBER:_
FOR PETITIONER OR APPLICANT:
CT Coalition Against Millstone Nancy Burton, Esq.
- 2. -938-3952 (PRINT)
NAME OF PETITIONER NAME OF COUbNSEL OF RECORD TE E
i January 12, 2004 a.
DATE GS3 NATURE OF COUNSEL OF RECORD