ML040500586

Pre-Argument Statement (Petition for Review), Dated 01/15/04

ML040500586
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	01/12/2004
From:	Burton N Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone
To:	NRC/OGC, US Federal Judiciary, Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
References
04-0109, 50-336-LA-2, CLI-03-14, CLI-03-18
Download: ML040500586 (1)

Text

• q -, C)( 9 Form C-A (for Agency Cases) gC UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT XC C APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT i PETITION FOR -JAN 1 5 PRE-ARGUMENT STATEMENT -PI SEE NOTICE ON REVERSE PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT. ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NEC Sde 0 OND C NAME OF AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission AGENCY DOCKET NO.: 50-336 LA-2 TITLE IN FULL: Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ORDERNUMBER rT.T A-14-_^,TLn3-38 DATEENTERED' I1I- 3;12/16/03 APPROXIMATE NO. OF PAGES IN RECORD: NO. OF E(HIBITS:

JURISDICTION OF COURT OF APPEALS: _____9_______ _ __A HAS THIS MATTER BEEN BEFORETHIS COURT PREVIOUSLY? 3 Yes X No IF YES, STATE CASE NAME CITATION: DOCKET NO.:

ATTORNEY(S) FOR PETITIONER(S): Nancy Bhurton, r,fAME 147 Cross Highway, Redding Ridge CT OfR87f7n39IRg952 ADDRESS TELEPHONE ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT(S): Office of General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Reg-.Comm Washington DC 20NW-0001 ADDRESS TELEPHONE APPEAL TAKEN: A AS OF RIGHT O BY DISCRETION (SPECIFY STATUTES UNDER WHICH APPEAL IS TAKEN): _2gUSCA 2342 PETITIONERIAPPLICANT IS 0 AGENCY X OTHER PARTY 0 NON-PARTY. SPECIFY STANDING: Tn1-tprxynnr FACTS UPON WHICH VENUE IS BASED: This matter involves the Millstone Nuclear Power Station, located in Waterford, Connecticut;Petitioner is CT-based NATURE OF ORDER ON WHICH REVIEW OR ENFORCEMENT IS SOUGHT:

Order dismissing petition for:hearing and denying evidentiary hearing o ADMINISTRATIVEREGULATION/RULEMAKING 0 BENEFITS REVIEW 0 UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE.

o ROUTES: HEALTH &SAFETY _ EMPLOYER

_ COMMUNICATIONS _ IMMIGRATION _ UNION COMMERCE TARIFFS

= OTHER (SPECIFY)

CONCISE DESCRIPTION OF PROCEEDINGS BELOW AND ORDER TO BE REVIEWED OR ENFORCED (NOTE THOSE PARTS OF THE ORDER FROM WHICH RELIEF IS SOUGHT): Petitioner intervened in licensing proceedings; its petition for evidentiaryq wamsm desnied.

ISSUES PROPOSED TO BE RAISE ON PETITION OyR AFLl 1 s

_om Srrer sion in r

m1C!42p1"ii RELIEFSOUGHT

Pf itirnner seeks a n order vacating the deitsio. and e dfL emad further poceedinqs TO YOUR KNOWLEDGEISTHEREpArNY CASE NO'W gNDING OR ABOUT TO BE BROUGHT BEFORE THIS COURT OR ANY OTHER COURT OR ADMINISTRATIVEAGENCY WHICH:

(A) ARISES FROM SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME CASE OR CONTROVERSY AS THIS APPEAL? 0 YESA NO (B) INVOLVES AN ISSUE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME, SIMILAR, OR RELATED TO AN ISSUE IN THIS APPEAL? 0 YEXO NO (IF YES, STATE WHETHER -A- OR*Be OR BOTH AND PROVIDE DOCKET: CASE NAME:

COURT OR AGENCY: CITATION: NUMBER:_

FOR PETITIONER OR APPLICANT:

CT Coalition Against Millstone Nancy Burton, Esq. 2. -938-3952 (PRINT) NAME OF PETITIONER NAME OF COUbNSEL OF RECORD TE E i January 12, 2004 a.

DATE NATURE OF COUNSEL OF RECORD GS3