ML060580322: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:g:\alleg\panel\200301 1OarblO.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2003-A-01 10 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer Site/Facility: | {{#Wiki_filter:g:\alleg\panel\200301 1OarblO.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2003-A-01 10 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer Site/Facility: Salem/Hope Creek Acknowledged: Yes ARB Date: 01/26/2004 Confidentiality Granted: No Issue discussed: Proposal to issue of letter to PSEG regarding work environment problem. | ||
Salem/Hope Creek Acknowledged: | Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee?------------------------------------------ | ||
Yes ARB Date: 01/26/2004 Confidentiality Granted: No Issue discussed: | ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees: Chair - Blough Branch Chief (AOC) - Meyer SAC - Vito 01 Rep. - Neff. Wilson. Teator RI Counsel - Farrar Others - Holody. Eichenholz, Lanning. Urban, Barber. H Miller DISPOSITION ACTIONS: | ||
Proposal to issue of letter to PSEG regarding work environment problem.Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee?------------------------------------------ | : 1) ARB concurred that engagement of licensee is appropriate at this time, based on interim results of SCWE review at Salem/HC. ARB decision is to complete development of letter to PSEG CEO requesting an action plan for an in-depth internal SCWE review and a meeting with the licensee shortly after they provide their action plan in order to discuss the planned actions in more detail. | ||
ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees: | Responsible Person: Meyer/SAC ECD: 1/27/04 Closure Documentation: Completed: 1/28/04 | ||
Chair -Blough Branch Chief (AOC) -Meyer SAC -Vito 01 Rep. -Neff. Wilson. Teator RI Counsel -Farrar Others -Holody. Eichenholz, Lanning. Urban, Barber. H Miller DISPOSITION ACTIONS: 1) ARB concurred that engagement of licensee is appropriate at this time, based on interim results of SCWE review at Salem/HC. | : 2) Discuss status of NRC review during next scheduled allegation update meeting (1/29/04) | ||
ARB decision is to complete development of letter to PSEG CEO requesting an action plan for an in-depth internal SCWE review and a meeting with the licensee shortly after they provide their action plan in order to discuss the planned actions in more detail.Responsible Person: Meyer/SAC ECD: 1/27/04 Closure Documentation: | Responsible Person: ARB ECD: 1/29/04 Closure Documentation: _ Completed: | ||
Completed: | SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT: SCWE Review PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION: | ||
1/28/04 2) Discuss status of NRC review during next scheduled allegation update meeting (1/29/04)Responsible Person: ARB ECD: 1/29/04 Closure Documentation: | |||
_ Completed: | |||
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT: | |||
SCWE Review PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION: | |||
If potential discrimination or wrongdoing and 01 is not opening a case, provide rationale here (e.g., no prima facie, lack of specific indication of wrongdoing): | If potential discrimination or wrongdoing and 01 is not opening a case, provide rationale here (e.g., no prima facie, lack of specific indication of wrongdoing): | ||
Rationale used to defer 01 discrimination case (DOL case in progress): | Rationale used to defer 01 discrimination case (DOL case in progress): | ||
ENFORCEMENT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CONSIDERATION (only applies to wrongdoing matters (including discrimination issues) that are under investigation by 01, DOL, or DOJ): What is the potential violation and regulatory requirement?_ | ENFORCEMENT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CONSIDERATION (only applies to wrongdoing matters (including discrimination issues) that are under investigation by 01, DOL, or DOJ): | ||
When did the potential violation occur?__(Assign action to determine date, if unknown)Once date of potential violation is established, SAC will assign AMS action to have another ARB at four (4) years from that date, to discuss enforcement statute of limitations issues.NOTES: (Include other pertinent commenl:s. | What is the potential violation and regulatory requirement?_ | ||
Also include considerations related to licensee referral, if appropriate. | When did the potential violation occur?__ | ||
Identify any potential generic issues)Distribution: | (Assign action to determine date, if unknown) | ||
Panel Attendees, Regional Counsel, 01, Responsible Individuals (original to SAC)ARB MINUTES ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AT THE ARB}} | Once date of potential violation is established, SAC will assign AMS action to have another ARB at four (4) years from that date, to discuss enforcement statute of limitations issues. | ||
NOTES: (Include other pertinent commenl:s. Also include considerations related to licensee referral, if appropriate. Identify any potential generic issues) | |||
Distribution: Panel Attendees, Regional Counsel, 01, Responsible Individuals (original to SAC) | |||
ARB MINUTES ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AT THE ARB}} |
Latest revision as of 22:58, 23 November 2019
ML060580322 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Salem, Hope Creek ![]() |
Issue date: | 01/26/2004 |
From: | Meyer G NRC Region 1 |
To: | |
References | |
FOIA/PA-2005-0194, RI-2003-A-0110 | |
Download: ML060580322 (1) | |
Text
g:\alleg\panel\200301 1OarblO.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2003-A-01 10 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer Site/Facility: Salem/Hope Creek Acknowledged: Yes ARB Date: 01/26/2004 Confidentiality Granted: No Issue discussed: Proposal to issue of letter to PSEG regarding work environment problem.
Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee?------------------------------------------
ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees: Chair - Blough Branch Chief (AOC) - Meyer SAC - Vito 01 Rep. - Neff. Wilson. Teator RI Counsel - Farrar Others - Holody. Eichenholz, Lanning. Urban, Barber. H Miller DISPOSITION ACTIONS:
- 1) ARB concurred that engagement of licensee is appropriate at this time, based on interim results of SCWE review at Salem/HC. ARB decision is to complete development of letter to PSEG CEO requesting an action plan for an in-depth internal SCWE review and a meeting with the licensee shortly after they provide their action plan in order to discuss the planned actions in more detail.
Responsible Person: Meyer/SAC ECD: 1/27/04 Closure Documentation: Completed: 1/28/04
- 2) Discuss status of NRC review during next scheduled allegation update meeting (1/29/04)
Responsible Person: ARB ECD: 1/29/04 Closure Documentation: _ Completed:
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT: SCWE Review PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION:
If potential discrimination or wrongdoing and 01 is not opening a case, provide rationale here (e.g., no prima facie, lack of specific indication of wrongdoing):
Rationale used to defer 01 discrimination case (DOL case in progress):
ENFORCEMENT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CONSIDERATION (only applies to wrongdoing matters (including discrimination issues) that are under investigation by 01, DOL, or DOJ):
What is the potential violation and regulatory requirement?_
When did the potential violation occur?__
(Assign action to determine date, if unknown)
Once date of potential violation is established, SAC will assign AMS action to have another ARB at four (4) years from that date, to discuss enforcement statute of limitations issues.
NOTES: (Include other pertinent commenl:s. Also include considerations related to licensee referral, if appropriate. Identify any potential generic issues)
Distribution: Panel Attendees, Regional Counsel, 01, Responsible Individuals (original to SAC)