ML060580340: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:[ d Vito -Fwd: S II - VePa 1 From: Scott Barber (To: A. Randolph Blough; Daniel Holody; David Vito; Eileen Neff; Ernest Wilson;Theodore Wingfield Date: 1/28/04 3:09PM  
{{#Wiki_filter:[II
_0 - d Vito - Fwd: SM-Ty,                                                                              VePa 1 From:           Scott Barber (
To:             A. Randolph Blough; Daniel Holody; David Vito; Eileen Neff; Ernest Wilson; Theodore Wingfield Date:           1/28/04 3:09PM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Fwd: synergy survey FYI A)
Fwd: synergy survey FYI A)
David Vito-synergy sve Page 1-From: George Malone To: Glenn Meyer Date: 1/28/04 12:25PM  
 
David Vito-synergy sve                                                                                         Page 1-From:             George Malone To:               Glenn Meyer Date:             1/28/04 12:25PM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
synergy survey Small Update.Chris Bakken just stopped in to say hello, Marc and I were here.He mentioned the synergy survey results (prelim) were 'not good'.He also mentioned that the results would not be finalized for 2 weeks.The analysts are currently reviewing/analyzing the essay part of the survey (survey was a combo of multiple choice/survey).
synergy survey Small Update.
He mentioned that he didnt want the survey on the docket but that he knew we were interested in the results and would provide them.CC: Daniel Orr; Marc Ferdas: Mel Gray; Scott Barber}}
Chris Bakken just stopped in to say hello, Marc and I were here.
He mentioned the synergy survey results (prelim) were 'not good'.
He also mentioned that the results would not be finalized for 2 weeks.
The analysts are currently reviewing/analyzing the essay part of the survey (survey was a combo of multiple choice/survey).
He mentioned that he didnt want the survey on the docket but that he knew we were interested in the results and would provide them.
CC:               Daniel Orr; Marc Ferdas: Mel Gray; Scott Barber}}

Latest revision as of 21:58, 23 November 2019

E-mail from S. Barber of USNRC to Various, Regarding Synergy Survey
ML060580340
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Hope Creek  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 01/28/2004
From: Barber G
NRC Region 1
To: Blough A, Holody D, Neff E, Vito D, Elizabeth Wilson, Ted Wingfield
NRC Region 1
References
FOIA/PA-2005-0194
Download: ML060580340 (2)
v • d • e


Text

[II

_0 - d Vito - Fwd: SM-Ty, VePa 1 From: Scott Barber (

To: A. Randolph Blough; Daniel Holody; David Vito; Eileen Neff; Ernest Wilson; Theodore Wingfield Date: 1/28/04 3:09PM

Subject:

Fwd: synergy survey FYI A)

David Vito-synergy sve Page 1-From: George Malone To: Glenn Meyer Date: 1/28/04 12:25PM

Subject:

synergy survey Small Update.

Chris Bakken just stopped in to say hello, Marc and I were here.

He mentioned the synergy survey results (prelim) were 'not good'.

He also mentioned that the results would not be finalized for 2 weeks.

The analysts are currently reviewing/analyzing the essay part of the survey (survey was a combo of multiple choice/survey).

He mentioned that he didnt want the survey on the docket but that he knew we were interested in the results and would provide them.

CC: Daniel Orr; Marc Ferdas: Mel Gray; Scott Barber

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML060580340&oldid=2195965"