ML100770100: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML100770100 | | number = ML100770100 | ||
| issue date = 03/11/2010 | | issue date = 03/11/2010 | ||
| title = | | title = NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000528-09-005, 05000529-09-005, and 05000530-09-005, and Notice of Violation, Dated February 9, 2010 | ||
| author name = Mims D | | author name = Mims D | ||
| author affiliation = Arizona Public Service Co | | author affiliation = Arizona Public Service Co | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| document type = Letter, Licensee Response to Notice of Violation | | document type = Letter, Licensee Response to Notice of Violation | ||
| page count = 6 | | page count = 6 | ||
| project = | |||
| stage = Other | |||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:10 CFR 2.201 EA-09-330 L A MA | {{#Wiki_filter:10 CFR 2.201 EA-09-330 L A MA subsidiaryof Pinnacle West CapitalCorporation Dwight C. Mims Mail Station 7605 Palo Verde Nuclear Vice President Tel. 623-393-5403 P.O. Box 52034 Generating Station Regulatory Affairs and Plant Improvement Fax 623-393-6077 Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034 102-06149-DCM/MLLJDCE March 11, 2010 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 | ||
==Reference:== | |||
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station - NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000528/2009005, 05000529/2009005, and 05000530/2009005, and Notice of Violation, dated February 9, 2010 | |||
Tel. 623-393-5403 | ==Subject:== | ||
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS) | |||
Units 1, 2 and 3 Docket Nos. STN 50-628, 50-529, and 50-530 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 | |||
102-06149-DCM/MLLJDCE | |||
March 11, 2010 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory | ==Dear Sirs:== | ||
Commission | |||
Washington, DC 20555-0001 | In the above referenced letter to Arizona Public Service (APS), the NRC identified that APS failed to ensure that an adequate procedure was available to control essential spray pond missile hazards and ensure operability of the ultimate heat sink. | ||
Reference: | Pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201 and Notice of Violation (NOV) EA-09-330, attached to the above referenced letter, APS hereby submits its reply to the NOV. | ||
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating | Enclosure I to this letter contains a restatement of the violation. Enclosure 2 contains the APS reply to the NOV. | ||
Station -NRC Integrated | D1 A member of the STARS (Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing) Alliance Callaway | ||
Inspection | * Comanche Peak - Diablo Canyon | ||
Report 05000528/2009005, 05000529/2009005, and 05000530/2009005, and Notice of Violation, dated February 9, 2010 Subject: Palo Verde Nuclear Generating | * Palo Verde | ||
Station (PVNGS)Units 1, 2 and 3 Docket Nos. STN 50-628, 50-529, and 50-530 Reply to Notice of Violation | * San Onofre - South Texas | ||
EA-09-330 Dear Sirs: In the above referenced | * Wolf Creek | ||
letter to Arizona Public Service (APS), the NRC identified | |||
that APS failed to ensure that an adequate procedure | ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 Page 2 The following commitment is being made to the NRC by this letter: | ||
was available | Full compliance with Criterion V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B with respect to establishing adequate potential tornado borne missile control procedures will be achieved by June 30, 2010, by implementing a stand alone site-wide procedure and a tracking system to evaluate, approve, and track potential tornado borne missiles in outside areas within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds. | ||
to control essential | If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Webb, Regulatory Affairs,. | ||
spray pond missile hazards and ensure operability | Compliance Section Leader, at (623) 393-5730. | ||
of the ultimate heat sink.Pursuant to the requirements | Sincerely, DCM/MNW/DCE/gat | ||
of 10 CFR 2.201 and Notice of Violation (NOV) EA-09-330, attached to the above referenced | |||
letter, APS hereby submits its reply to the NOV.Enclosure | ==Enclosures:== | ||
I to this letter contains a restatement | : 1. Restatement of Violation EA-09-330 | ||
of the violation. | : 2. Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 cc: E. E. Collins Jr. NRC Region IV Regional Administrator J. R. Hall NRC NRR Project Manager R. I. Treadway NRC Senior Resident Inspector for PVNGS | ||
Enclosure | |||
2 contains the APS reply to the NOV.D1 A member of the STARS (Strategic | Enclosure 1 Restatement of Notice of Violation EA-09-330 During an NRC inspection conducted on October 1 through December 31, 2009, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the violation is listed below: | ||
Teaming and Resource Sharing) Alliance Callaway * Comanche Peak -Diablo Canyon * Palo Verde * San Onofre -South Texas * Wolf Creek | 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, "Instructions, Procedures,, and Drawings," requires, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings. | ||
ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory | Contrary to the above, from July 11, 2008 through December 31, 2009, the licensee failed to prescribe adequate procedures for the essential spray ponds. Specifically, the licensee failed to ensure an adequate procedure was available to control essential spray pond missile hazards and ensure operability of the ultimate heat sink. | ||
Commission | This violation is associated with a Green Significance Determination Process finding. | ||
Reply to Notice of Violation | I | ||
EA-09-330 Page 2 The following | |||
commitment | Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station concurs with the violation. The NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000528/2009005, 05000529/2009005, and 05000530/2009005, noted prior non-cited violations with respect-to control of potential tornado borne missile hazards. A root cause investigation of recurrent examples of failure to control potential tornado borne hazards was initiated on December 18, 2009, and completed on February 17, 2010. The investigation concluded that the root cause was inadequacies in the potential tornado borne missile control process with respect to work control processes and the clarity of procedure requirements. This root cause is consistent with the cited violation. | ||
is being made to the NRC by this letter: Full compliance | The Reason for the Violation Several reasons resulted in the recurrence of the failure to control potential tornado borne missile hazards: | ||
with Criterion | * Weak ownership of the potential tornado borne missile control program resulted in the inconsistent implementation of program requirements. | ||
V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B with respect to establishing | * Ineffective use of trending and ineffective corrective, actions in the corrective action program resulted in a failure to identify and correct recurrent non-compliance with the potential tornado borne missile control program. | ||
adequate potential | " A lack of knowledge existed among station personnel regarding the potential tornado borne missile control program, the requirements of the program, and where existing information is located. | ||
tornado borne missile control procedures | A lack of sensitivity existed among station personnel regarding the safety significance of the spray ponds and associated spray nozzles used for heat removal during normal and post-accident conditions. | ||
will be achieved by June 30, 2010, by implementing | * Weak standards existed among station personnel in the implementation of the requirements relative to controlling potential tornado borne missiles. | ||
a stand alone site-wide procedure | The Corrective Steps that Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved A site-wide communication has been issued in the station newsletter entitled "Tornado Borne Missile Hazards Require Vigilance to Ensure Spray Ponds Remain Operable." Additional communication on this subject was provided by Executive Management in All Hands meetings. | ||
and a tracking system to evaluate, approve, and track potential tornado borne missiles in outside areas within 400 ft. of the essential | The station's potential tornado borne missile control specification and the housekeeping procedure have been revised to specify only three acceptable methods for storing unattended transient potential tornado borne missile hazards 1 | ||
spray ponds.If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Webb, Regulatory | |||
Affairs,.Compliance | Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 within missile zones when they are not being actively used for work in progress. | ||
Section Leader, at (623) 393-5730.Sincerely, DCM/MNW/DCE/gat | These three approved methods are: | ||
Enclosures: | " Storage within "safe zones," i.e., areas within 50 ft. of designated structures. | ||
1. Restatement | " Storage inside enclosed C-Vans that weigh more than 4000 pounds when empty. | ||
of Violation | " Storage within an approved shielded configuration, such as within the area bounded by C-Vans in an approved horseshoe configuration. | ||
EA-09-330 2. Reply to Notice of Violation | A Palo Verde Missile Mitigation Team has been created to establish ownership areas for walkdowns and enforcement strategy. A Charter has been developed to document the Mitigation Team composition. Initial clean-up and control actions for tornado missile hazards have been performed. | ||
EA-09-330 cc: E. E. Collins Jr. NRC Region IV Regional Administrator | Weekly walkdowns of missile zones within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds have been initiated. The intent of these walkdowns is to enforce the existing housekeeping procedure standards for control of transient potential tornado borne missiles to ensure missile density margins for operability are not challenged. Identified non-compliance with the missile control housekeeping standards will be documented and tracked via the corrective action program. | ||
J. R. Hall NRC NRR Project Manager R. I. Treadway NRC Senior Resident Inspector | These walkdowns will continue until the actions needed to restore full compliance are completed and determined to be effective. | ||
for PVNGS | The most recent engineering verification of missile density, completed on March 4, 2010, confirmed that the missile density was less than the maximum density that could be sustained to consider the essential spray ponds OPERABLE. | ||
Enclosure | The Corrective Steps That Will Be Taken To Avoid FurtherViolations The potential tornado borne missile control program procedure will identify the program owner and stakeholders and identify corresponding responsibilities. | ||
1 Restatement | This action will anchor ownership and establish standards for implementation of the program. | ||
of Notice of Violation | The station will implement an interactive automated trending program to facilitate identification of developing trends at both line and site levels, enabling program owners to identify issues and lagging performance. I To improve knowledge of the program requirements for implementation of potential tornado borne missile controls, training will be provided to targeted populations of the station's work force. A training needs analysis will identify the population and the needed objectives. Additionally, a communication plan will be 2 | ||
EA-09-330 During an NRC inspection | |||
conducted | Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 implemented to raise the station's overall awareness of the need to control potential tornado borne missiles and the program's requirements. | ||
on October 1 through December 31, 2009, a violation | The station will implement a performance indicator to provide the potential tornado borne missile control program health indication. The potential tornado borne missile density will be included in the station's 06:30 am Teamwork and Communication Meeting report. The objectives of these actions are to improve the visibility of the program among the staff and raise the sensitivity to potential tornado borne missiles and their impact on the essential spray ponds and nuclear safety. | ||
of NRC requirements | The Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved Until full compliance with Criterion V is established, weekly monitoring of existing housekeeping standards for control of transient potential tornado borne missiles, as described above, will ensure that non-compliances that may have an adverse impact on spray pond operability are identified and corrected in a timely manner. | ||
was identified. | Full compliance with Criterion V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B with respect to establishing adequate potential tornado borne missile control procedures will be achieved by June 30, 2010, by implementing a stand alone site-wide procedure and a tracking system to evaluate, approve, and track potential tornado borne missiles in outside areas within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds. | ||
In accordance | 3}} | ||
with the NRC Enforcement | |||
Policy, the violation | |||
is listed below: 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion | |||
V, "Instructions, Procedures,, and Drawings," requires, in part, that activities | |||
affecting | |||
quality shall be prescribed | |||
by documented | |||
instructions, procedures, or drawings, and shall be accomplished | |||
in accordance | |||
with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.Contrary to the above, from July 11, 2008 through December 31, 2009, the licensee failed to prescribe | |||
adequate procedures | |||
for the essential spray ponds. Specifically, the licensee failed to ensure an adequate procedure | |||
was available | |||
to control essential | |||
spray pond missile hazards and ensure operability | |||
of the ultimate heat sink.This violation | |||
is associated | |||
with a Green Significance | |||
Determination | |||
Process finding.I | |||
Enclosure | |||
2 Reply to Notice of Violation | |||
EA-09-330 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating | |||
Station concurs with the violation. | |||
The NRC Integrated | |||
Inspection | |||
Report 05000528/2009005, 05000529/2009005, and 05000530/2009005, noted prior non-cited | |||
violations | |||
with respect-to | |||
control of potential | |||
tornado borne missile hazards. A root cause investigation | |||
of recurrent examples of failure to control potential | |||
tornado borne hazards was initiated | |||
on December 18, 2009, and completed | |||
on February 17, 2010. The investigation | |||
concluded | |||
that the root cause was inadequacies | |||
in the potential | |||
tornado borne missile control process with respect to work control processes | |||
and the clarity of procedure | |||
requirements. | |||
This root cause is consistent | |||
with the cited violation. | |||
The Reason for the Violation Several reasons resulted in the recurrence | |||
of the failure to control potential tornado borne missile hazards:* Weak ownership | |||
of the potential | |||
tornado borne missile control program resulted in the inconsistent | |||
implementation | |||
of program requirements. | |||
* Ineffective | |||
use of trending and ineffective | |||
corrective, actions in the corrective | |||
action program resulted in a failure to identify and correct recurrent | |||
non-compliance | |||
with the potential | |||
tornado borne missile control program." A lack of knowledge | |||
existed among station personnel | |||
regarding | |||
the potential tornado borne missile control program, the requirements | |||
of the program, and where existing information | |||
is located.A lack of sensitivity | |||
existed among station personnel | |||
regarding | |||
the safety significance | |||
of the spray ponds and associated | |||
spray nozzles used for heat removal during normal and post-accident | |||
conditions. | |||
* Weak standards | |||
existed among station personnel | |||
in the implementation | |||
of the requirements | |||
relative to controlling | |||
potential | |||
tornado borne missiles.The Corrective | |||
Steps that Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved A site-wide | |||
communication | |||
has been issued in the station newsletter | |||
entitled"Tornado Borne Missile Hazards Require Vigilance | |||
to Ensure Spray Ponds Remain Operable." Additional | |||
communication | |||
on this subject was provided by Executive | |||
Management | |||
in All Hands meetings.The station's | |||
potential | |||
tornado borne missile control specification | |||
and the housekeeping | |||
procedure | |||
have been revised to specify only three acceptable | |||
methods for storing unattended | |||
transient | |||
potential | |||
tornado borne missile hazards 1 | |||
Enclosure | |||
2 Reply to Notice of Violation | |||
EA-09-330 within missile zones when they are not being actively used for work in progress.These three approved methods are: " Storage within "safe zones," i.e., areas within 50 ft. of designated | |||
structures." Storage inside enclosed C-Vans that weigh more than 4000 pounds when empty." Storage within an approved shielded configuration, such as within the area bounded by C-Vans in an approved horseshoe | |||
configuration. | |||
A Palo Verde Missile Mitigation | |||
Team has been created to establish | |||
ownership areas for walkdowns | |||
and enforcement | |||
strategy. | |||
A Charter has been developed to document the Mitigation | |||
Team composition. | |||
Initial clean-up and control actions for tornado missile hazards have been performed. | |||
Weekly walkdowns | |||
of missile zones within 400 ft. of the essential | |||
spray ponds have been initiated. | |||
The intent of these walkdowns | |||
is to enforce the existing housekeeping | |||
procedure | |||
standards | |||
for control of transient | |||
potential | |||
tornado borne missiles to ensure missile density margins for operability | |||
are not challenged. | |||
Identified | |||
non-compliance | |||
with the missile control housekeeping | |||
standards | |||
will be documented | |||
and tracked via the corrective | |||
action program.These walkdowns | |||
will continue until the actions needed to restore full compliance | |||
are completed | |||
and determined | |||
to be effective. | |||
The most recent engineering | |||
verification | |||
of missile density, completed | |||
on March 4, 2010, confirmed | |||
that the missile density was less than the maximum density that could be sustained | |||
to consider the essential | |||
spray ponds OPERABLE.The Corrective | |||
Steps That Will Be Taken To Avoid FurtherViolations | |||
The potential | |||
tornado borne missile control program procedure | |||
will identify the program owner and stakeholders | |||
and identify corresponding | |||
responsibilities. | |||
This action will anchor ownership | |||
and establish | |||
standards | |||
for implementation | |||
of the program.The station will implement | |||
an interactive | |||
automated | |||
trending program to facilitate | |||
identification | |||
of developing | |||
trends at both line and site levels, enabling program owners to identify issues and lagging performance. | |||
I To improve knowledge | |||
of the program requirements | |||
for implementation | |||
of potential | |||
tornado borne missile controls, training will be provided to targeted populations | |||
of the station's | |||
work force. A training needs analysis will identify the population | |||
and the needed objectives. | |||
Additionally, a communication | |||
plan will be 2 | |||
Enclosure | |||
2 Reply to Notice of Violation | |||
EA-09-330 implemented | |||
to raise the station's | |||
overall awareness | |||
of the need to control potential | |||
tornado borne missiles and the program's | |||
requirements. | |||
The station will implement | |||
a performance | |||
indicator | |||
to provide the potential tornado borne missile control program health indication. | |||
The potential | |||
tornado borne missile density will be included in the station's | |||
06:30 am Teamwork and Communication | |||
Meeting report. The objectives | |||
of these actions are to improve the visibility | |||
of the program among the staff and raise the sensitivity | |||
to potential tornado borne missiles and their impact on the essential | |||
spray ponds and nuclear safety.The Date When Full Compliance | |||
Will Be Achieved Until full compliance | |||
with Criterion | |||
V is established, weekly monitoring | |||
of existing housekeeping | |||
standards | |||
for control of transient | |||
potential | |||
tornado borne missiles, as described | |||
above, will ensure that non-compliances | |||
that may have an adverse impact on spray pond operability | |||
are identified | |||
and corrected | |||
in a timely manner.Full compliance | |||
with Criterion | |||
V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B with respect to establishing | |||
adequate potential | |||
tornado borne missile control procedures | |||
will be achieved by June 30, 2010, by implementing | |||
a stand alone site-wide | |||
procedure and a tracking system to evaluate, approve, and track potential | |||
tornado borne missiles in outside areas within 400 ft. of the essential | |||
spray ponds.3 | |||
}} |
Latest revision as of 20:42, 13 November 2019
ML100770100 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Palo Verde |
Issue date: | 03/11/2010 |
From: | Mims D Arizona Public Service Co |
To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
102-06149-DCM/MLL/DCE, EA-09-330, IR-09-005 | |
Download: ML100770100 (6) | |
Text
10 CFR 2.201 EA-09-330 L A MA subsidiaryof Pinnacle West CapitalCorporation Dwight C. Mims Mail Station 7605 Palo Verde Nuclear Vice President Tel. 623-393-5403 P.O. Box 52034 Generating Station Regulatory Affairs and Plant Improvement Fax 623-393-6077 Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034 102-06149-DCM/MLLJDCE March 11, 2010 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Reference:
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station - NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000528/2009005, 05000529/2009005, and 05000530/2009005, and Notice of Violation, dated February 9, 2010
Subject:
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)
Units 1, 2 and 3 Docket Nos. STN 50-628, 50-529, and 50-530 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330
Dear Sirs:
In the above referenced letter to Arizona Public Service (APS), the NRC identified that APS failed to ensure that an adequate procedure was available to control essential spray pond missile hazards and ensure operability of the ultimate heat sink.
Pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201 and Notice of Violation (NOV) EA-09-330, attached to the above referenced letter, APS hereby submits its reply to the NOV.
Enclosure I to this letter contains a restatement of the violation. Enclosure 2 contains the APS reply to the NOV.
D1 A member of the STARS (Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing) Alliance Callaway
- Comanche Peak - Diablo Canyon
- Palo Verde
- San Onofre - South Texas
- Wolf Creek
ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 Page 2 The following commitment is being made to the NRC by this letter:
Full compliance with Criterion V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B with respect to establishing adequate potential tornado borne missile control procedures will be achieved by June 30, 2010, by implementing a stand alone site-wide procedure and a tracking system to evaluate, approve, and track potential tornado borne missiles in outside areas within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds.
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Webb, Regulatory Affairs,.
Compliance Section Leader, at (623) 393-5730.
Sincerely, DCM/MNW/DCE/gat
Enclosures:
- 1. Restatement of Violation EA-09-330
- 2. Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 cc: E. E. Collins Jr. NRC Region IV Regional Administrator J. R. Hall NRC NRR Project Manager R. I. Treadway NRC Senior Resident Inspector for PVNGS
Enclosure 1 Restatement of Notice of Violation EA-09-330 During an NRC inspection conducted on October 1 through December 31, 2009, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the violation is listed below:
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, "Instructions, Procedures,, and Drawings," requires, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.
Contrary to the above, from July 11, 2008 through December 31, 2009, the licensee failed to prescribe adequate procedures for the essential spray ponds. Specifically, the licensee failed to ensure an adequate procedure was available to control essential spray pond missile hazards and ensure operability of the ultimate heat sink.
This violation is associated with a Green Significance Determination Process finding.
I
Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station concurs with the violation. The NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000528/2009005, 05000529/2009005, and 05000530/2009005, noted prior non-cited violations with respect-to control of potential tornado borne missile hazards. A root cause investigation of recurrent examples of failure to control potential tornado borne hazards was initiated on December 18, 2009, and completed on February 17, 2010. The investigation concluded that the root cause was inadequacies in the potential tornado borne missile control process with respect to work control processes and the clarity of procedure requirements. This root cause is consistent with the cited violation.
The Reason for the Violation Several reasons resulted in the recurrence of the failure to control potential tornado borne missile hazards:
- Weak ownership of the potential tornado borne missile control program resulted in the inconsistent implementation of program requirements.
- Ineffective use of trending and ineffective corrective, actions in the corrective action program resulted in a failure to identify and correct recurrent non-compliance with the potential tornado borne missile control program.
" A lack of knowledge existed among station personnel regarding the potential tornado borne missile control program, the requirements of the program, and where existing information is located.
A lack of sensitivity existed among station personnel regarding the safety significance of the spray ponds and associated spray nozzles used for heat removal during normal and post-accident conditions.
- Weak standards existed among station personnel in the implementation of the requirements relative to controlling potential tornado borne missiles.
The Corrective Steps that Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved A site-wide communication has been issued in the station newsletter entitled "Tornado Borne Missile Hazards Require Vigilance to Ensure Spray Ponds Remain Operable." Additional communication on this subject was provided by Executive Management in All Hands meetings.
The station's potential tornado borne missile control specification and the housekeeping procedure have been revised to specify only three acceptable methods for storing unattended transient potential tornado borne missile hazards 1
Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 within missile zones when they are not being actively used for work in progress.
These three approved methods are:
" Storage within "safe zones," i.e., areas within 50 ft. of designated structures.
" Storage inside enclosed C-Vans that weigh more than 4000 pounds when empty.
" Storage within an approved shielded configuration, such as within the area bounded by C-Vans in an approved horseshoe configuration.
A Palo Verde Missile Mitigation Team has been created to establish ownership areas for walkdowns and enforcement strategy. A Charter has been developed to document the Mitigation Team composition. Initial clean-up and control actions for tornado missile hazards have been performed.
Weekly walkdowns of missile zones within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds have been initiated. The intent of these walkdowns is to enforce the existing housekeeping procedure standards for control of transient potential tornado borne missiles to ensure missile density margins for operability are not challenged. Identified non-compliance with the missile control housekeeping standards will be documented and tracked via the corrective action program.
These walkdowns will continue until the actions needed to restore full compliance are completed and determined to be effective.
The most recent engineering verification of missile density, completed on March 4, 2010, confirmed that the missile density was less than the maximum density that could be sustained to consider the essential spray ponds OPERABLE.
The Corrective Steps That Will Be Taken To Avoid FurtherViolations The potential tornado borne missile control program procedure will identify the program owner and stakeholders and identify corresponding responsibilities.
This action will anchor ownership and establish standards for implementation of the program.
The station will implement an interactive automated trending program to facilitate identification of developing trends at both line and site levels, enabling program owners to identify issues and lagging performance. I To improve knowledge of the program requirements for implementation of potential tornado borne missile controls, training will be provided to targeted populations of the station's work force. A training needs analysis will identify the population and the needed objectives. Additionally, a communication plan will be 2
Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 implemented to raise the station's overall awareness of the need to control potential tornado borne missiles and the program's requirements.
The station will implement a performance indicator to provide the potential tornado borne missile control program health indication. The potential tornado borne missile density will be included in the station's 06:30 am Teamwork and Communication Meeting report. The objectives of these actions are to improve the visibility of the program among the staff and raise the sensitivity to potential tornado borne missiles and their impact on the essential spray ponds and nuclear safety.
The Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved Until full compliance with Criterion V is established, weekly monitoring of existing housekeeping standards for control of transient potential tornado borne missiles, as described above, will ensure that non-compliances that may have an adverse impact on spray pond operability are identified and corrected in a timely manner.
Full compliance with Criterion V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B with respect to establishing adequate potential tornado borne missile control procedures will be achieved by June 30, 2010, by implementing a stand alone site-wide procedure and a tracking system to evaluate, approve, and track potential tornado borne missiles in outside areas within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds.
3