ML100770100: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:10 CFR 2.201 EA-09-330 L A MA | {{#Wiki_filter:10 CFR 2.201 EA-09-330 L A MA subsidiaryof Pinnacle West CapitalCorporation Dwight C. Mims Mail Station 7605 Palo Verde Nuclear Vice President Tel. 623-393-5403 P.O. Box 52034 Generating Station Regulatory Affairs and Plant Improvement Fax 623-393-6077 Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034 102-06149-DCM/MLLJDCE March 11, 2010 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 | ||
==Reference:== | ==Reference:== | ||
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station - NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000528/2009005, 05000529/2009005, and 05000530/2009005, and Notice of Violation, dated February 9, 2010 | |||
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station -NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000528/2009005, 05000529/2009005, and 05000530/2009005, and Notice of Violation, dated February 9, 2010 | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)Units 1, 2 and 3 Docket Nos. STN 50-628, 50-529, and 50-530 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 | Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS) | ||
Units 1, 2 and 3 Docket Nos. STN 50-628, 50-529, and 50-530 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 | |||
==Dear Sirs:== | ==Dear Sirs:== | ||
In the above referenced letter to Arizona Public Service (APS), the NRC identified that APS failed to ensure that an adequate procedure was available to control essential spray pond missile hazards and ensure operability of the ultimate heat sink.Pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201 and Notice of Violation (NOV) EA-09-330, attached to the above referenced letter, APS hereby submits its reply to the NOV.Enclosure I to this letter contains a restatement of the violation. | |||
Enclosure 2 contains the APS reply to the NOV.D1 A member of the STARS (Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing) Alliance Callaway | In the above referenced letter to Arizona Public Service (APS), the NRC identified that APS failed to ensure that an adequate procedure was available to control essential spray pond missile hazards and ensure operability of the ultimate heat sink. | ||
* Comanche Peak -Diablo Canyon | Pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201 and Notice of Violation (NOV) EA-09-330, attached to the above referenced letter, APS hereby submits its reply to the NOV. | ||
Enclosure I to this letter contains a restatement of the violation. Enclosure 2 contains the APS reply to the NOV. | |||
D1 A member of the STARS (Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing) Alliance Callaway | |||
* Comanche Peak - Diablo Canyon | |||
* Palo Verde | * Palo Verde | ||
* San Onofre -South Texas | * San Onofre - South Texas | ||
* Wolf Creek ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 Page 2 The following commitment is being made to the NRC by this letter: Full compliance with Criterion V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B with respect to establishing adequate potential tornado borne missile control procedures will be achieved by June 30, 2010, by implementing a stand alone site-wide procedure and a tracking system to evaluate, approve, and track potential tornado borne missiles in outside areas within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds.If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Webb, Regulatory Affairs,.Compliance Section Leader, at (623) 393-5730.Sincerely, DCM/MNW/DCE/gat | * Wolf Creek | ||
ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 Page 2 The following commitment is being made to the NRC by this letter: | |||
Full compliance with Criterion V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B with respect to establishing adequate potential tornado borne missile control procedures will be achieved by June 30, 2010, by implementing a stand alone site-wide procedure and a tracking system to evaluate, approve, and track potential tornado borne missiles in outside areas within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds. | |||
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Webb, Regulatory Affairs,. | |||
Compliance Section Leader, at (623) 393-5730. | |||
Sincerely, DCM/MNW/DCE/gat | |||
==Enclosures:== | ==Enclosures:== | ||
: 1. Restatement of Violation EA-09-330 2. Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 cc: E. E. Collins Jr. NRC Region IV Regional Administrator J. R. Hall NRC NRR Project Manager R. I. Treadway NRC Senior Resident Inspector for PVNGS Enclosure 1 Restatement of Notice of Violation EA-09-330 During an NRC inspection conducted on October 1 through December 31, 2009, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. | : 1. Restatement of Violation EA-09-330 | ||
In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the violation is listed below: 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, "Instructions, Procedures,, and Drawings," requires, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.Contrary to the above, from July 11, 2008 through December 31, 2009, the licensee failed to prescribe adequate procedures for the essential spray ponds. Specifically, the licensee failed to ensure an adequate procedure was available to control essential spray pond missile hazards and ensure operability of the ultimate heat sink.This violation is associated with a Green Significance Determination Process finding.I Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station concurs with the violation. | : 2. Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 cc: E. E. Collins Jr. NRC Region IV Regional Administrator J. R. Hall NRC NRR Project Manager R. I. Treadway NRC Senior Resident Inspector for PVNGS | ||
The NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000528/2009005, 05000529/2009005, and 05000530/2009005, noted prior non-cited violations with respect-to control of potential tornado borne missile hazards. A root cause investigation of recurrent examples of failure to control potential tornado borne hazards was initiated on December 18, 2009, and completed on February 17, 2010. The investigation concluded that the root cause was inadequacies in the potential tornado borne missile control process with respect to work control processes and the clarity of procedure requirements. | |||
This root cause is consistent with the cited violation. | Enclosure 1 Restatement of Notice of Violation EA-09-330 During an NRC inspection conducted on October 1 through December 31, 2009, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the violation is listed below: | ||
The Reason for the Violation Several reasons resulted in the recurrence of the failure to control potential tornado borne missile hazards:* Weak ownership of the potential tornado borne missile control program resulted in the inconsistent implementation of program requirements. | 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, "Instructions, Procedures,, and Drawings," requires, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings. | ||
* Ineffective use of trending and ineffective corrective, actions in the corrective action program resulted in a failure to identify and correct recurrent non-compliance with the potential tornado borne missile control program." A lack of knowledge existed among station personnel regarding the potential tornado borne missile control program, the requirements of the program, and where existing information is located.A lack of sensitivity existed among station personnel regarding the safety significance of the spray ponds and associated spray nozzles used for heat removal during normal and post-accident conditions. | Contrary to the above, from July 11, 2008 through December 31, 2009, the licensee failed to prescribe adequate procedures for the essential spray ponds. Specifically, the licensee failed to ensure an adequate procedure was available to control essential spray pond missile hazards and ensure operability of the ultimate heat sink. | ||
* Weak standards existed among station personnel in the implementation of the requirements relative to controlling potential tornado borne missiles.The Corrective Steps that Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved A site-wide communication has been issued in the station newsletter entitled"Tornado Borne Missile Hazards Require Vigilance to Ensure Spray Ponds Remain Operable." Additional communication on this subject was provided by Executive Management in All Hands meetings.The station's potential tornado borne missile control specification and the housekeeping procedure have been revised to specify only three acceptable methods for storing unattended transient potential tornado borne missile hazards 1 Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 within missile zones when they are not being actively used for work in progress.These three approved methods are: " Storage within "safe zones," i.e., areas within 50 ft. of designated structures." Storage inside enclosed C-Vans that weigh more than 4000 pounds when empty." Storage within an approved shielded configuration, such as within the area bounded by C-Vans in an approved horseshoe configuration. | This violation is associated with a Green Significance Determination Process finding. | ||
A Palo Verde Missile Mitigation Team has been created to establish ownership areas for walkdowns and enforcement strategy. | I | ||
A Charter has been developed to document the Mitigation Team composition. | |||
Initial clean-up and control actions for tornado missile hazards have been performed. | Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station concurs with the violation. The NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000528/2009005, 05000529/2009005, and 05000530/2009005, noted prior non-cited violations with respect-to control of potential tornado borne missile hazards. A root cause investigation of recurrent examples of failure to control potential tornado borne hazards was initiated on December 18, 2009, and completed on February 17, 2010. The investigation concluded that the root cause was inadequacies in the potential tornado borne missile control process with respect to work control processes and the clarity of procedure requirements. This root cause is consistent with the cited violation. | ||
Weekly walkdowns of missile zones within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds have been initiated. | The Reason for the Violation Several reasons resulted in the recurrence of the failure to control potential tornado borne missile hazards: | ||
The intent of these walkdowns is to enforce the existing housekeeping procedure standards for control of transient potential tornado borne missiles to ensure missile density margins for operability are not challenged. | * Weak ownership of the potential tornado borne missile control program resulted in the inconsistent implementation of program requirements. | ||
Identified non-compliance with the missile control housekeeping standards will be documented and tracked via the corrective action program.These walkdowns will continue until the actions needed to restore full compliance are completed and determined to be effective. | * Ineffective use of trending and ineffective corrective, actions in the corrective action program resulted in a failure to identify and correct recurrent non-compliance with the potential tornado borne missile control program. | ||
The most recent engineering verification of missile density, completed on March 4, 2010, confirmed that the missile density was less than the maximum density that could be sustained to consider the essential spray ponds OPERABLE.The Corrective Steps That Will Be Taken To Avoid FurtherViolations The potential tornado borne missile control program procedure will identify the program owner and stakeholders and identify corresponding responsibilities. | " A lack of knowledge existed among station personnel regarding the potential tornado borne missile control program, the requirements of the program, and where existing information is located. | ||
This action will anchor ownership and establish standards for implementation of the program.The station will implement an interactive automated trending program to facilitate identification of developing trends at both line and site levels, enabling program owners to identify issues and lagging performance. | A lack of sensitivity existed among station personnel regarding the safety significance of the spray ponds and associated spray nozzles used for heat removal during normal and post-accident conditions. | ||
I To improve knowledge of the program requirements for implementation of potential tornado borne missile controls, training will be provided to targeted populations of the station's work force. A training needs analysis will identify the population and the needed objectives. | * Weak standards existed among station personnel in the implementation of the requirements relative to controlling potential tornado borne missiles. | ||
Additionally, a communication plan will be 2 Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 implemented to raise the station's overall awareness of the need to control potential tornado borne missiles and the program's requirements. | The Corrective Steps that Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved A site-wide communication has been issued in the station newsletter entitled "Tornado Borne Missile Hazards Require Vigilance to Ensure Spray Ponds Remain Operable." Additional communication on this subject was provided by Executive Management in All Hands meetings. | ||
The station will implement a performance indicator to provide the potential tornado borne missile control program health indication. | The station's potential tornado borne missile control specification and the housekeeping procedure have been revised to specify only three acceptable methods for storing unattended transient potential tornado borne missile hazards 1 | ||
The potential tornado borne missile density will be included in the station's 06:30 am Teamwork and Communication Meeting report. The objectives of these actions are to improve the visibility of the program among the staff and raise the sensitivity to potential tornado borne missiles and their impact on the essential spray ponds and nuclear safety.The Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved Until full compliance with Criterion V is established, weekly monitoring of existing housekeeping standards for control of transient potential tornado borne missiles, as described above, will ensure that non-compliances that may have an adverse impact on spray pond operability are identified and corrected in a timely manner.Full compliance with Criterion V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B with respect to establishing adequate potential tornado borne missile control procedures will be achieved by June 30, 2010, by implementing a stand alone site-wide procedure and a tracking system to evaluate, approve, and track potential tornado borne missiles in outside areas within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds.3}} | |||
Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 within missile zones when they are not being actively used for work in progress. | |||
These three approved methods are: | |||
" Storage within "safe zones," i.e., areas within 50 ft. of designated structures. | |||
" Storage inside enclosed C-Vans that weigh more than 4000 pounds when empty. | |||
" Storage within an approved shielded configuration, such as within the area bounded by C-Vans in an approved horseshoe configuration. | |||
A Palo Verde Missile Mitigation Team has been created to establish ownership areas for walkdowns and enforcement strategy. A Charter has been developed to document the Mitigation Team composition. Initial clean-up and control actions for tornado missile hazards have been performed. | |||
Weekly walkdowns of missile zones within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds have been initiated. The intent of these walkdowns is to enforce the existing housekeeping procedure standards for control of transient potential tornado borne missiles to ensure missile density margins for operability are not challenged. Identified non-compliance with the missile control housekeeping standards will be documented and tracked via the corrective action program. | |||
These walkdowns will continue until the actions needed to restore full compliance are completed and determined to be effective. | |||
The most recent engineering verification of missile density, completed on March 4, 2010, confirmed that the missile density was less than the maximum density that could be sustained to consider the essential spray ponds OPERABLE. | |||
The Corrective Steps That Will Be Taken To Avoid FurtherViolations The potential tornado borne missile control program procedure will identify the program owner and stakeholders and identify corresponding responsibilities. | |||
This action will anchor ownership and establish standards for implementation of the program. | |||
The station will implement an interactive automated trending program to facilitate identification of developing trends at both line and site levels, enabling program owners to identify issues and lagging performance. I To improve knowledge of the program requirements for implementation of potential tornado borne missile controls, training will be provided to targeted populations of the station's work force. A training needs analysis will identify the population and the needed objectives. Additionally, a communication plan will be 2 | |||
Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 implemented to raise the station's overall awareness of the need to control potential tornado borne missiles and the program's requirements. | |||
The station will implement a performance indicator to provide the potential tornado borne missile control program health indication. The potential tornado borne missile density will be included in the station's 06:30 am Teamwork and Communication Meeting report. The objectives of these actions are to improve the visibility of the program among the staff and raise the sensitivity to potential tornado borne missiles and their impact on the essential spray ponds and nuclear safety. | |||
The Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved Until full compliance with Criterion V is established, weekly monitoring of existing housekeeping standards for control of transient potential tornado borne missiles, as described above, will ensure that non-compliances that may have an adverse impact on spray pond operability are identified and corrected in a timely manner. | |||
Full compliance with Criterion V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B with respect to establishing adequate potential tornado borne missile control procedures will be achieved by June 30, 2010, by implementing a stand alone site-wide procedure and a tracking system to evaluate, approve, and track potential tornado borne missiles in outside areas within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds. | |||
3}} |
Latest revision as of 20:42, 13 November 2019
ML100770100 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Palo Verde |
Issue date: | 03/11/2010 |
From: | Mims D Arizona Public Service Co |
To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
102-06149-DCM/MLL/DCE, EA-09-330, IR-09-005 | |
Download: ML100770100 (6) | |
Text
10 CFR 2.201 EA-09-330 L A MA subsidiaryof Pinnacle West CapitalCorporation Dwight C. Mims Mail Station 7605 Palo Verde Nuclear Vice President Tel. 623-393-5403 P.O. Box 52034 Generating Station Regulatory Affairs and Plant Improvement Fax 623-393-6077 Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034 102-06149-DCM/MLLJDCE March 11, 2010 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Reference:
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station - NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000528/2009005, 05000529/2009005, and 05000530/2009005, and Notice of Violation, dated February 9, 2010
Subject:
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)
Units 1, 2 and 3 Docket Nos. STN 50-628, 50-529, and 50-530 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330
Dear Sirs:
In the above referenced letter to Arizona Public Service (APS), the NRC identified that APS failed to ensure that an adequate procedure was available to control essential spray pond missile hazards and ensure operability of the ultimate heat sink.
Pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201 and Notice of Violation (NOV) EA-09-330, attached to the above referenced letter, APS hereby submits its reply to the NOV.
Enclosure I to this letter contains a restatement of the violation. Enclosure 2 contains the APS reply to the NOV.
D1 A member of the STARS (Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing) Alliance Callaway
- Comanche Peak - Diablo Canyon
- Palo Verde
- San Onofre - South Texas
- Wolf Creek
ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 Page 2 The following commitment is being made to the NRC by this letter:
Full compliance with Criterion V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B with respect to establishing adequate potential tornado borne missile control procedures will be achieved by June 30, 2010, by implementing a stand alone site-wide procedure and a tracking system to evaluate, approve, and track potential tornado borne missiles in outside areas within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds.
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Webb, Regulatory Affairs,.
Compliance Section Leader, at (623) 393-5730.
Sincerely, DCM/MNW/DCE/gat
Enclosures:
- 1. Restatement of Violation EA-09-330
- 2. Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 cc: E. E. Collins Jr. NRC Region IV Regional Administrator J. R. Hall NRC NRR Project Manager R. I. Treadway NRC Senior Resident Inspector for PVNGS
Enclosure 1 Restatement of Notice of Violation EA-09-330 During an NRC inspection conducted on October 1 through December 31, 2009, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the violation is listed below:
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, "Instructions, Procedures,, and Drawings," requires, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.
Contrary to the above, from July 11, 2008 through December 31, 2009, the licensee failed to prescribe adequate procedures for the essential spray ponds. Specifically, the licensee failed to ensure an adequate procedure was available to control essential spray pond missile hazards and ensure operability of the ultimate heat sink.
This violation is associated with a Green Significance Determination Process finding.
I
Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station concurs with the violation. The NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000528/2009005, 05000529/2009005, and 05000530/2009005, noted prior non-cited violations with respect-to control of potential tornado borne missile hazards. A root cause investigation of recurrent examples of failure to control potential tornado borne hazards was initiated on December 18, 2009, and completed on February 17, 2010. The investigation concluded that the root cause was inadequacies in the potential tornado borne missile control process with respect to work control processes and the clarity of procedure requirements. This root cause is consistent with the cited violation.
The Reason for the Violation Several reasons resulted in the recurrence of the failure to control potential tornado borne missile hazards:
- Weak ownership of the potential tornado borne missile control program resulted in the inconsistent implementation of program requirements.
- Ineffective use of trending and ineffective corrective, actions in the corrective action program resulted in a failure to identify and correct recurrent non-compliance with the potential tornado borne missile control program.
" A lack of knowledge existed among station personnel regarding the potential tornado borne missile control program, the requirements of the program, and where existing information is located.
A lack of sensitivity existed among station personnel regarding the safety significance of the spray ponds and associated spray nozzles used for heat removal during normal and post-accident conditions.
- Weak standards existed among station personnel in the implementation of the requirements relative to controlling potential tornado borne missiles.
The Corrective Steps that Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved A site-wide communication has been issued in the station newsletter entitled "Tornado Borne Missile Hazards Require Vigilance to Ensure Spray Ponds Remain Operable." Additional communication on this subject was provided by Executive Management in All Hands meetings.
The station's potential tornado borne missile control specification and the housekeeping procedure have been revised to specify only three acceptable methods for storing unattended transient potential tornado borne missile hazards 1
Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 within missile zones when they are not being actively used for work in progress.
These three approved methods are:
" Storage within "safe zones," i.e., areas within 50 ft. of designated structures.
" Storage inside enclosed C-Vans that weigh more than 4000 pounds when empty.
" Storage within an approved shielded configuration, such as within the area bounded by C-Vans in an approved horseshoe configuration.
A Palo Verde Missile Mitigation Team has been created to establish ownership areas for walkdowns and enforcement strategy. A Charter has been developed to document the Mitigation Team composition. Initial clean-up and control actions for tornado missile hazards have been performed.
Weekly walkdowns of missile zones within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds have been initiated. The intent of these walkdowns is to enforce the existing housekeeping procedure standards for control of transient potential tornado borne missiles to ensure missile density margins for operability are not challenged. Identified non-compliance with the missile control housekeeping standards will be documented and tracked via the corrective action program.
These walkdowns will continue until the actions needed to restore full compliance are completed and determined to be effective.
The most recent engineering verification of missile density, completed on March 4, 2010, confirmed that the missile density was less than the maximum density that could be sustained to consider the essential spray ponds OPERABLE.
The Corrective Steps That Will Be Taken To Avoid FurtherViolations The potential tornado borne missile control program procedure will identify the program owner and stakeholders and identify corresponding responsibilities.
This action will anchor ownership and establish standards for implementation of the program.
The station will implement an interactive automated trending program to facilitate identification of developing trends at both line and site levels, enabling program owners to identify issues and lagging performance. I To improve knowledge of the program requirements for implementation of potential tornado borne missile controls, training will be provided to targeted populations of the station's work force. A training needs analysis will identify the population and the needed objectives. Additionally, a communication plan will be 2
Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 implemented to raise the station's overall awareness of the need to control potential tornado borne missiles and the program's requirements.
The station will implement a performance indicator to provide the potential tornado borne missile control program health indication. The potential tornado borne missile density will be included in the station's 06:30 am Teamwork and Communication Meeting report. The objectives of these actions are to improve the visibility of the program among the staff and raise the sensitivity to potential tornado borne missiles and their impact on the essential spray ponds and nuclear safety.
The Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved Until full compliance with Criterion V is established, weekly monitoring of existing housekeeping standards for control of transient potential tornado borne missiles, as described above, will ensure that non-compliances that may have an adverse impact on spray pond operability are identified and corrected in a timely manner.
Full compliance with Criterion V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B with respect to establishing adequate potential tornado borne missile control procedures will be achieved by June 30, 2010, by implementing a stand alone site-wide procedure and a tracking system to evaluate, approve, and track potential tornado borne missiles in outside areas within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds.
3