ML12236A094: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Wengert, Thomas Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 1:24 PM To: Adams, Glenn D.
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                     Wengert, Thomas Sent:                     Thursday, August 16, 2012 1:24 PM To:                       Adams, Glenn D.
Cc: Eckholt, Gene F.; Frankl, Istvan
Cc:                       Eckholt, Gene F.; Frankl, Istvan


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Prairie Island NGP Unit 2  
Prairie Island NGP Unit 2 - Acceptance Review of LAR for Exception to Technical Specification 5.5.14 Testing Requirement Associated With Unit 2 Steam Generator Replacement (TAC No. ME9141)
- Acceptance Review of LAR for Exception to Technical Specification 5.5.14 Testing Requirement Associated With Unit 2 Steam Generator Replacement (TAC No. ME9141)
By letter dated July 25, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12207A523), Northern States Power Company - Minnesota, doing business as Xcel Energy, submitted a license amendment request (LAR) to revise Technical Specification (TS) 5.5.14, Containment Leakage Rate Testing, for Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit 2. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of the LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
By letter dated July 25, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12207A523), Northern States Power Company  
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed license amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
- Minnesota, doing business as Xcel Energy, submitted a license amendment request (LAR) to revise Technical Specification (TS) 5.5.14, "Containment Leakage Rate Testing," for Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit 2.
The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of the LAR.
The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review.
The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed license amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment.
Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review.
If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
 
Tom Wengert Senior Project Manager U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR/DORL/LPL3-1 (301) 415-4037}}
Tom Wengert Senior Project Manager U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR/DORL/LPL3
-1 (301) 415-4037}}

Latest revision as of 00:26, 12 November 2019

Ngp Unit 2 - Acceptance Review of LAR for Exception to Technical Specification 5.5.14 Testing Requirement Associated with Unit 2 Steam Generator Replacement
ML12236A094
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/16/2012
From: Thomas Wengert
Plant Licensing Branch III
To: George Adams
Northern States Power Co
Wengert T
References
TAC ME9141
Download: ML12236A094 (1)
v • d • e


Text

From: Wengert, Thomas Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 1:24 PM To: Adams, Glenn D.

Cc: Eckholt, Gene F.; Frankl, Istvan

Subject:

Prairie Island NGP Unit 2 - Acceptance Review of LAR for Exception to Technical Specification 5.5.14 Testing Requirement Associated With Unit 2 Steam Generator Replacement (TAC No. ME9141)

By letter dated July 25, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12207A523), Northern States Power Company - Minnesota, doing business as Xcel Energy, submitted a license amendment request (LAR) to revise Technical Specification (TS) 5.5.14, Containment Leakage Rate Testing, for Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit 2. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of the LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed license amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Tom Wengert Senior Project Manager U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR/DORL/LPL3-1 (301) 415-4037

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12236A094&oldid=2095993"