ML13252A153

Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 2 of 7

ML13252A153
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	09/04/2013
From:	Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML13252A148	List: ML13252A150 ML13252A151 ML13252A153 ML13252A154 ML13252A155 ML13252A156 ML13252A157 ML13252A159 NL-13-1555, Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 1 of 7 NL-13-1555, Enclosure 2: Updated Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic NL-13-1555, Joseph M. Farley Unit 2, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report Requested by NRC Letter, Request for Information Re Recommendations 2.1, 2.3 & 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai Ichi Accident
References
NL-13-1555
Download: ML13252A153 (102)

Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 F2., 2A Sheet i of 3 Status: YVNOIN UI[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. Q2E16H05B Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP ROOM COOLER 2B Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 2 ] ?#,7-Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD N8 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YgNE-' UD N/AEI

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YR(N- UD N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y NI'-I]UD N/AD 7

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YD ND UD N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO'- U[]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 69 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 SheSa2 Of 3 Status: Y;* NEI- U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E16HOO5B Equip.

Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP ROOM COOLER 2B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y/N[E UE1 /W

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YUKNEI IE1 N/AE-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZN I]UE N/Ao'4,4)

Toe. uf-- Sep eLbr4 -8 (ojT see r)o~.. --M .L OY-Q

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[-NE) U0-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YIýE" UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 04/y Evaluated by: Scýf --

• " J I/.-.

1 Date: P. 21. ,*o 2_.

cl/l /2:/-

Page 70 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 71 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

'A S Sheet I of -

Status: Y/N'D UEI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E16H007 Equip. Class, 10 Equipment Description MCC 2A ROOM COOLER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 2-.'

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yl] N21 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[O/N4 " Ul- N/Al]

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ý'NO Ul] N/A[]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN-N[J Ul- N/Al-

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO- NO" UI- N/AGY (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y N-] Un1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 72 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

-A Sheet 2 ofX/-

Status: Y[*N-- UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E16HO07 Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description MCC 2A ROOM COOLER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YEAEI UE] N/AD Y[RNlf'I UEI N/AE-'

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YI/N4- U0I N/A[

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YEl'NEI UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[/NEI Ul--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: .YUAA L.. Date: 6-29-144-

0. Xr" ~-1 Page 73 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 74 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 75 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

('2-. Sheet i of,'4 Status: YZ N[] Ur]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E16H008 Equip. Class, 10 Equipment Description 121'MCC2B Room ACU Location: Bldg. Aux bldo Floor El. 121' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the resulls of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ Ni of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage configuration was based on SEWS for Q2E16H008-B and Q2E16H007-A, dated 07-03-93 and 07-01-93 respectively.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UD N/AD Welded to embedded steel

3. Is the anchorage free of cortosion that is more than mild surface YN NO UD N/AD oxidation?

Very minorsurface corrosionand cracked paintobserved. No degradationof weld observed. Condition has no adverse seismic impact.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ N' UD N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN ND UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NO UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name fsom Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 76 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of* 4 Status: YCK NEI uF"]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E16H008 Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description 121'MCC 2B Room ACU Interaction Effecs

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NE UO N/AO

8. Are overhead equipmoent, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO Ur N/AQ1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Component is adjacentto a block wall. The wall was seismically qualified as part of the response to NRC t. E.Bulletin 80-11, as documented in Report No FTG-C-002, RO, and on drawing D-206004, R 16.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y13 NO UD N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NO UMI of potentially adverse seisnic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y9 NO UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) t,"Y P ,G ly2& -/I Evaluated by: P._Miktus~~tDt:0.31 Date: 08-23-12 08-23-12 Page 77 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 78 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 79 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i ofýi 'I(I Status: Y1* NO] Ui-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21FT0943 Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description HIGH HEAD SAFETY INJECTION FLOW TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 17 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YId NO UEI N/AO

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yd~ NEI UO N/AE oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[J NEI U- N/AO

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE U- N/A[v/

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

NO1,V0~ O45 ApeQewo :3 00%c A#J 4lq8CJ4D2A6iE V&AiFICATro&) ib Por

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS'NEI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 80 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of)' ,

Y"[f N -- U W- A" S tatus:

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment M1No. Q2E21FT0943 Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description HIGH HEAD SAFETY INJECTION FLOW TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM/N'- UC] N/AC-]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NO- U[:] N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto tite equipment?

.oeK WAIJ-L5 e'j rNE We6r Oe V* e_.,.LVA ArE)P 9.NDo ac ed l T Fea t-(2-e ex , to -F.dN-ZoaN5og.

DW4

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y]* NO] U[- N/A[:

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y/NO UC]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YU NEI UC-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/Mote 1-274-Evaluated by:

3.M'TVS 2 Date:

Page 81 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 82 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 83 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i off3 Status: YA NO UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21LCVO115B Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description RWST TO CHARGING PUMP SUCTION VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 2-.1-7 2.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE N[l of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline Corry.rw-ht, rlc ctchot-jo.cd

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEr NEI UE N/Ap

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NE UE N/A[I oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE" NEI UiE N/Ap

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEVNE3 UEI N/AJA (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of ANE UDE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

ý Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 84 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 O 3f Status: Y11 NF] [IE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21LCVO115B Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description RWST TO CHARGING PUMPSUCTION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y? N] UM] N/AO eqimnsses tdes-.-tand-, sc*rt'a~x"acbt

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NO] U!- N/AD e1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YP NE] U!] N/A7

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YINE] U!]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions l1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: r I!ga- / T"+/-+/-* .,r4 -',"A"JY1~ Date: _ i ~W 12--

V U'- /

An illol (06-d LLktm MaQdL~a o i Page 85 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 86 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2,0 i lif Page 87 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: Y[VN- UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21LT112 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description VCT LEVEL TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 2 - 21, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? "NO"UE N/AE[

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y1$EN" U0 N/AE oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? \TNE" UE N/AE"

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE UE] N/A/

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y"/ND UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 88 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sh t Of 3 Status: Y;['N[- Un-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ED No. 02E21LT112 Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description VCT LEVEL TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO/ND UE1 N/AE3 S. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE-týfl UE] N/AE1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[E)NEI UrI N/A0-

-1 -r. ,) o * ,

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y-" NEI U of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no otiler seismic conditions that could 'YEýN-I UE]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

'I Evaluated by: -__________ Date:

Date J J Page 89 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 90 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

-This 'cqof: A iS, ,

css c, -n,.- a'S Sheet i ofXAt Status: Yd NO UUJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) QQ E a2 I Va 4* 3 Equipment ID No. 02E21MOV8100 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description RCP SEAL WATER RETURN ISOLATION Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area ,?Q Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraoe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y" Ne of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NM U171 N/Adf

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UO N/A@/

oxidation?

w, ,k' ,tq . e_.\,

QU,q- ?.V\

• ,,x Y4 , Y* (O,, \ z ýct - o-12 .

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO No UiE N/An'

\-

k V rit

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NE Uti N/AX' (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0"N0 uC potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 91 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of3 l Status: Y[Z- NE-] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8100 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description RCP SEAL WATER RETURN ISOLATION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y2 NEI UI- N/A[l

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y5ý/1- UEI N/A5 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y(NE] UE3 N/AEI

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE]N1 E3Uu of potentially adverse seismic interactiou effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Ye NEl UFI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: I.,* Date: ~ 3 l~

/ j Page 92 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 93 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 94 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 T Ci_ r\l -' s qlso ,

o-5 She71of 3

.* E & \'"/, t% Status: 7 NEl UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment D No. Q2E21MOV8108 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMP TO RCS ISOLATION Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area Q69a Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YOI N%

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO] NEI UO N/AE9-

3. Isthe anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y(:] NI- UF] N/A2-oxidation?

4'.I sta ch e o s, c 4f-re k t c _ocrc hO-

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YI-] N-I U-i] N/Az']

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YOI NI] UI0 N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YR NI] U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

1ý1- `ýý A-ýý is -ý-ctze ý:P Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 95 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZI NEI UE"]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment lD No. Q2E21MOV8108 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMP TO RCS ISOLATION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Ya NO U- N/A-

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y~f/N- U] N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE(NI U- N/AI

/

YV*NC UC I0. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO'NO U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Gac*

• Evaluated by: .._*\k*(j, 3 ,Q...1&cVX Date:

Page 96 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 97 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 V2" 1P Sheet i of ¢*

Status: Y5 NEI U1-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8109C Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMPPO02C MINIFLOW VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 102 Room, Area M 2ý1ýý Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checldist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE Njt of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Irtitpr ac arx*er*' hO oCboro,-cue.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YED NE UE N/AC&

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE UE N/Ap oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE N/A0

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI UE N/A4 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0 NO UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 98 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of" 4 Status: Y[5 NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8109C Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMP PO02C MINIFLOW VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YEA NO UD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yg NDI UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YV NEI UD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YP NO UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yy ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: .GoAMAa o-- 1(W Loolut o\AC'tUA/ Date: _ -_ ___ __

Page 99 of 467

3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 100 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 101 of 467 IPage

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i °fz¢43 A Status: Yf NO UE $1011" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8130A Equip. Classw 8 Equipment Description CHG PUMP SUCTION HDR ISOLATION Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI Nd of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI UE- N/A[R

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NE UE N/AG oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NE UE N/A[?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEr NEI UE] N/Ad (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[* N[- UE-potentiafly adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

I Page 102 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of42 Status: Y NEI U[Jltjl? v Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02E21MOV8130A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description CHG PUMP SUCTION HDR ISOLA TION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[dNI-- U-J N/AE1

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[4 NE UE- N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Siva Vag 0 ' ME y0 d,4 oF 1e PAw r £-'AI-imKegeeALLJA-T" tV4,o&V- &619'2r FTý-c!.-,94Z, 1-4. DaAiWtA tI-20b?2,IP9.

9. Do aitached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YQ NE UI-1 N/AE1

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yd NIE- UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yd NEI UE-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by Pn~R5 Date: __ "_ 7-/___

Page 103 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 104 of 467

S ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 105 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 II

&II Sheetttsd.:YuE%

Status: YZ*N[D U[71 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8133A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description CHG PUMP DISCHARGE HDR ISOLATION Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area ZI1_

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other conmnents.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[3N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[3 N[3 uE N/UD(

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE- NE UCI N/A[/

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NE- UC- N/A[v'

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE[ NEI U['-D (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y4NC UEI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 106 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 F! -3q Sheet 2n*f *,

Status: Y0- NEI U[:[ ,lDl'l Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8133A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description CHG PUMPDISCHARGE HDR ISOLATION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YW"ND U'- N/AC]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YNr"NC] UC) N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

JA01- RF-,,2- FrA,-C.-0,,0.-

16L&CI -WAL Tl VALLtA1Tj ' 1W 9-2 PPi T-

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibiltty to avoi damage? YC"Nr UC- N/AC

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[2j NCI UC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEY NCI UCD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) dIatJI Fvalutaedtby

.......... 2.

PIMIRM) Date: 11274-r 5 IVA .. S 7-f 7, Page 107 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 108 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 109 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

/

Sheet i ofl Jf Status: YP NEI Uj-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8885 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description HHSI TO RCS COLD LEG ISOLATION Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 2., A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO] No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

il-%lrxr coirn~ctx-,t, no~ a.nr,ý

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NE] UE] N/AI9

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE] UE] N/Ag oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] UE] N/A0

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] UE] N/A0 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of k potentially adverse seismic conditions? Y'rNEI U50Ie*

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 110 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 oft Status: Y54! NF'- U#J Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8885 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description HHSt TO RCS COLD LEG ISOLATPON Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y ' NE] UF] N/A[]

i,ý IIx' ýq-'1/2 4 't %3F- - j ,, s'j tý,cj Mcqcgosc

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U[E] N/AE[

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage'? Ye NE] U[3 N/A]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[A NE] U[E of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked fbr and found no other seismic conditions that could Y*N]- U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: L.acixg Mctc~lcxf Date: -2Z VZ-"

Page 111 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 112 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 113 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheets of 16 Status;: YJ'No Ut]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02E21PO02 - Equip.

Equipment Description CHARGING/HHSI PUMP P002B SWING PUMP Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 7"11-4 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end ofthis checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y10 No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free ofbent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y'ND ULID N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[1N- UO N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage fe of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YINO Uf N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y'/NO UQ N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verfication is required.)

~a 5N~.05e jI 4v k IE-Z I 9,907A

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YG(NO U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnt=i the equipment class name from Appendix B: Claones of Equipment Page 114 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of rS Status: Yf NO] U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21PO02B Equip. Class, 5 Equipment Description CHARGING/I"/HSI PUMP P00219 SWING PUMP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y&ýNO UC N/AQ3

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[/N0 U[:] N/At and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YI'NQ UD N/AQ

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YL NC UQ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YG/N[] UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

C60k 0j0 r 6 r 01~t~M1 T V- A6 ýM4fiOme pýýD Evaluated by:_ P-MIXTO ad"9" Date: 27-11.

6.- 7-1'/,

Page 115 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 116 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 NJ Page 117 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 (AJ

-,,J "c1 Page 118 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet ovY4 11 Status: Y) NO UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2F16LT0501 Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description RWST LEVEL TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 155 Room, Area RWST Manufacturer, Model. Etc. (optional but recontmended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.. is the item one YEI N52" of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y*"N"E! UE- N/AEr

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO '"NDN UEI N/AEr oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YR.NE-I UEJ N/AE

_a,,,j,;',/d 07" -'5*10.¢ " o

( 5. Isthe anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YE3 NEI UE" N/AAI-'"

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YkNiE UEr potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name front Appendix B: Classes uf Equpnment.

Page 119 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Shee. of (,/WLj Status: YM NEI U['-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2F16LT0501 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description RWST LEVEL TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y6frEi5UD N/AD

8. Are. overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, *ý NNo U'] N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? 6N*" UEI-'N/AD ofBased on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y ND UD of potentially adverse seismidc interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: (2- . Date: o.

V. 2- ./

uzo/20/Z Page 120 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 121 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 122 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 3ý4 Status: YP -] UF]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2G31HOO1B Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description SFP HEAT EXCHANGER TRAIN A Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 165 Room, Area Z4La7 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO/NE) of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

1--b 2.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YkýNEI UE] N/AE

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YP'NE] UO N/AM oxiOation?

4shean the- convret aor 4ea Y[p<c ] otheN

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YONE] UE] N/ACI

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? 4K*NE] UE1 N/AE1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of 'ýi0/N UEI potentially adverse seistmic conditions?

Enter the equipment class natne from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 123 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Cleo Sheet 2 of/ I Status: Y[t NE- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2G31HOO1B Equip. ClassI 21 Equipment Description SFP HEAT EXCHANGER TRAIN A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YPAE] U[- N/A12

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y~1\JE U0 N/AEI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yt]-Nf Uij of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could O-NE] UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

,fb Af &

Evaluated Date: -

'2~

Page 124 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 125 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 126 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 rý- 41 Sheet i ofNu/j '*$

Status: Y2* NEI UE-- '4111" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H11NGASC2506D Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description AUX SAFEGUARDS CABINET D Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155 Room, Area 471 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora2e I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yd NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEl NEI UO N/AO

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE/N- UI- N/A7]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[ NOI UFJ N/A]

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YfNO Ul] N/Al]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

h4M .ollgjý 06jF167tY 4rigiV 0.2&lr/9// A61A vsr

" -5 Qz UithYOA 50 2 ,5-o& A-q2' 4P 0 PIUPC 216o54-)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y9~ NO Ul potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 127 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of X 5 7(jdy ,

Status: Y9NE- U[-- O'll Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) 1 Equipment ID No. Q2H1INGASC2506D Equip. Class *v Equipment Description AUX SAFEGUARDS CABINET L Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[2(N[E UE1 N/AE]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE3'NEJ Ul1 N/AE1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YD/NE) UEI N/AQl

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y2( NEI UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE'N"I Uf adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) rMi- A/cI Mg-,9 " FZ -  ;;70,'TA , 'k.°,VA.II" :t ,-.-

Evaluated by: 0

,VL). Date: __ __ _- __ __

Al(-

//

Page 128 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 129 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 130 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 131 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I ' "..

Sheet s of"4e &

Status: YE NO U["] Xji*1' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H1 1NGB2504K Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description BOP INSTRUMENTATION CABINET K Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 155 Room, Area 0471 Manufacturer, Model. Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NM of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI UErN/AEf

3. Is the anchorage free of conrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UE" N/Ar-oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI ur- N/AE

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NE] UEI N/A['-

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Panel is welded to embedded plate in floor. Welds are on the outside of the panel. The welds were confirmed to be consistent with the welds identified and evaluatedin the SEWS package for this component dated 7/1/93. All welds were determinedto be free from adverse conditions and to match plant documentation. See pages,t3'for pictures of typical welds 4. "-t9 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 132 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC Effects WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of,-r (g M Status: Y[ NEI U[] 4"* '*

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2HI INGB254KU Equip. Class, 20 Equipmient Description BOP INSTRUMENTATION CABINET K

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YED NEI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UI N/AO

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting. YZ NO U[O N/Ar and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Isolated cases were found where some of the east-west spanning runners were not clipped to the north south spanning runners.

However, all north south spanning runners are supportedfrom the roof and are prevented from lateral motion. The lights, vents and other items are supportedfrom the structure independently from the ceiling tile system. The overall configurationis consistent with the configurationidentified and evaluated in the SEWS walkdown performed on 7/1/93. Due to the fact that the unclipped runners occur only in isolatedcases and the fact that all tiles are supported on at least three sides, the ceiling tiles will not fall and adversely impact the panels. There are no ceiling tiles directly over any panels and the panels are all closed on the top. A corrective action reporthas been issued to reattach the loose runners.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YG3 NO Ufi N/AO

10. Based on the above seistmtic interaction evaluations, is equipment fiee YZ NO U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Page 133 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of,4/0 JW Status: Y1 N'-' UE" 11011.

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipmenl ID No. Q2H11NGB2504K Equip. ClassI 20 Equipment Description BOP INSTRUMENTATION CABINET K Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: hamIKWt' (,* l,* Date: f-7_.- 7-S -23 - I -)-.

Page 134 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 135 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 136 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 137 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YE] NE] UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2HI1NGNIS2503A Equip. Class 20 Equipment Description NIS EXCORE DETECTOR CAB Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155' Room, Area 416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE[: NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

See note in question #6

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEO NOI UZ N/AE

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEI UO N/AE oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NE UO N/AE

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE UO N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Some anchorages(welds) of this cabinet are under a vinyl kick plate at its base. The FNP Ops Shift Sup was uncomfortable authorizing the removal of the kick plate due to the potential to bump the cabinet during removal. Review of the anchorages(and of this component overall) were therefore marked Undetermined.See Comments pg 2.

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 138 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YE] NEl] U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H11NGNIS2503A Equip. Class' 20 INET Equipment Description NIS EXCORE DETECTOR CAB Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE] Ur- N/A2

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] Ur- N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE! UE N/AC]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI NEI UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

This SWC was originally completed on 8-28-12 and retyped for clarity on 8-27-13. The subject component was removed from the SWEL since the anchorages could not be verified. This is discussed in the note in Question 6 on pg 1. However, the conclusions of the 8-28-12 walkdown, in response to Questions 7 through 11 above are valid. The Area Walk By for this component, i.e., for Room 416 is documented in AWC package FI-091.

Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 08-28-12 PaulA. Miktus kw, Aa 08-28-12 Page 139 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 140 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 3

Page 141 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet t ofA t*b Status; YEE NO UF]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. O2HI1NGPIC2505D Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description Process ProtectionCabinetChannel 4 Location: Bldg. Aux. Bldq Floor El. 155' Room. Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorag$.

I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.. is the item one YZ NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent. broken. missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UD N/AD Cabinet is welded to embedded steel in the floor.

3. Is the anchorage fiee of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NO UE N/AO oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NI UQ N/AE

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NO Uf N/A" (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage documentation was obtainedfrom SEWS package for this component, dated 7/1/93. Anchorage consists of welds to an embedded plate located on outside of cabinet. Carpetingwas partially removed to verify that welds match documented condition and that they have no adverse seismic conditions.

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 142 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2ofkfg 1[$.[ V Status: YN NEI U["]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02HI 1NGPIC2505D Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description ProcessProtection Cabinet Channel4

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YI ND UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NEI U- N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment. distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse Onto the equipment?

Suspended ceiling and fixtures (lights, vents, etc) inspected and determined to be seismically adequate. Isolated cases found where runners were not clipped at both ends. See walkdown package for 02H I1NGB2504K (package F2-42)and CR506358 for additional information on the control room ceiling.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NO UD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y0 NO U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Verified the adequacy of welds as perSEWS for O2H 11NGBR2504K-B and Q2H11 NGPIC2505A-I, dated 7-1-93. The Area Walk By is includedin package F2-42.

Page 143 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4-'.i Evaluated by: P. Miktus Date: 08-23-12 S. Yuan 08-23-12 Page 144 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 145 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 146 of 467

S ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 147 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 11 IJ Page 148 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

-i Page 149 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 150 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 151 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 152 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 153 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

~~1 Page 154 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 FZ-4. Sheet i feIt 0's Status: YZ NrD UEI1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2HI1NGPIC2505H Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description Process Control Cabinet Channel 4 Location: Bldg. Aux. Bldg Floor El. 155' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YED NDI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UD N/AD Cabinet is welded to embedded steel in the floor.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y0 ND UD N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[ NDI UD N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ ND UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage documentation was obtained from SEWS package for this component, dated 7/1/93. Anchorage consists of welds to an embedded plate located on outside of cabinet. Carpetingwas partially removed to verify that welds match documented condition and that they have no adverse seismic conditions.

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 155 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 OfI74t~trA Status: YZ NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2HI1NGPIC2505H Equip. Class, Equipment Description Process Control Cabinet Channet14

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free froom impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE N/AQ

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U0 N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Suspended ceiling and fixtures (lights, vents, etc) inspectedand determined to be seismically adequate. Isolated cases found where runners were not clipped at both ends. See walkdown package for 02H11 NGB2504K (package F2-42) and CR506358 for additional information on the control room ceiling.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEl UE- N/AE

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NC UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UEi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Verified the adequacy of welds as per SEWS for Q2H 11NGBR2504K-B and Q2HI1NGPIC2505A-1, dated 7-1-93. The Area Walk By package in included in package F2-42 Page 156 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 Of"3 it Eva Iu akdby: P. Miktu J-1 92 Date: 08.23-12 S. Yzian 08-23-12 Page 157 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 158 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 159 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 160 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 161 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 162 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 163 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 164 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 165 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 S heetNof U status: y[f1" NE] uE' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H1 INGSSP2506N Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description SOLID STATE PROTECTION TEST CABINET Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY FloorEl. 155 Room, Area 4-1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

An chorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y2/ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[-I(NE] UED N/AE1

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YM/N[] UE3 N/A[s oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yt9INE] UE1 N/AEI

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI* N[l U[' N/AE3 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Re-..70 5[pW* Pok2 Q2HaI00G5P~Z5064-.A,VATet> 7-1 -4, eu -

Ao0 D -5E- -

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y.N[ Urn potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 166 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 JSheet 2 6f,!ý"ý Status: YIgNE[ U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H11NGSSP2506N Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SOLID STATE PROTECTION TEST CABINET Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipmcnt or structures? YEZ NEI UE3 N/AE3

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YPýINEI UIII N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[E]NEI UEI N/ACI

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YEI'NE1 UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Hlave you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE]. 'NrE UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) idj0ýP Evaluated by: 'PAý) A Date: - "

.&:3$ -' A,

,.:s Page 167 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

!v Page 168 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 169 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 170 of 467