ML14261A300: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML14261A300 | | number = ML14261A300 | ||
| issue date = 09/08/2014 | | issue date = 09/08/2014 | ||
| title = | | title = NRC Comments on Draft Licensee-Developed Exam (Operating) (Folder 2) | ||
| author name = Fish T | | author name = Fish T | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OB | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OB | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| document type = License-Operator, Part 55 Examination Related Material | | document type = License-Operator, Part 55 Examination Related Material | ||
| page count = 2 | | page count = 2 | ||
| project = TAC:U01887 | |||
| stage = Draft Other | |||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:James A. Fitzpatrick September 2014 NRC Examination Examination Changes Since Initial Submittal The following changes were made to the examination based on NRC comment following the draft examination submittal: | {{#Wiki_filter:James A. Fitzpatrick September 2014 NRC Examination Examination Changes Since Initial Submittal The following changes were made to the examination based on NRC comment following the draft examination submittal: | ||
* Scenario #1 -Added note regarding what instrumentation is used to judge CT-2. Added role play to ensure Event #5 proceeds as desired. | * Scenario #1 -Added note regarding what instrumentation is used to judge CT-2. Added role play to ensure Event #5 proceeds as desired. | ||
* Scenario #2 -Deleted Event #3. Revised initial conditions to ensure new Event #4 flows well without being preceded by the deleted event. Combined Events #4 and #5 on outline. Revised one malfunction to allow momentary success for an operator action. | * Scenario #2 - Deleted Event #3. Revised initial conditions to ensure new Event #4 flows well without being preceded by the deleted event. Combined Events #4 and #5 on outline. Revised one malfunction to allow momentary success for an operator action. | ||
* Scenario #3 -Revised Event #3 to give BOP credit for actions. Revised Event #6 to use further degradation as same component as Event #5 | * Scenario #3 - Revised Event #3 to give BOP credit for actions. Revised Event #6 to use further degradation as same component as Event #5 | ||
* Scenario #4-Re-classified Event #8 as an additional "Major". Re-distributed parts of original Event #8 into Events #9 and #1 0. | * Scenario #4- Re-classified Event #8 as an additional "Major". Re-distributed parts of original Event #8 into Events #9 and #1 0. | ||
* All JPMs-Deleted "CRS directs you to ... " in initiating cues. | * All JPMs- Deleted "CRS directs you to ... " in initiating cues. | ||
* Simulator JPM F-Changed which procedure sections will be performed to better streamline JPM while still testing the same manipulations. | * Simulator JPM F- Changed which procedure sections will be performed to better streamline JPM while still testing the same manipulations. | ||
* Simulator JPM G -Deleted first part of JPM and added additional actions to the end of the JPM to test manipulations that are different from those demonstrated in some scenario events. | * Simulator JPM G - Deleted first part of JPM and added additional actions to the end of the JPM to test manipulations that are different from those demonstrated in some scenario events. | ||
* Simulator JPM H -Too much repetition of actions already demonstrated during scenarios, in particular scram actions. Replaced this JPM. | * Simulator JPM H -Too much repetition of actions already demonstrated during scenarios, in particular scram actions. Replaced this JPM. | ||
* Plant JPM I -Added two initial conditions to cue sheet. Revised JPM cue and steps such that candidate starts at later point in procedure. | * Plant JPM I -Added two initial conditions to cue sheet. Revised JPM cue and steps such that candidate starts at later point in procedure. | ||
* Plant JPM J-Added "flashlight" as required equipment for JPM. | * Plant JPM J- Added "flashlight" as required equipment for JPM. | ||
* Plant JPM K-Added "flashlight" as required equipment for JPM. | * Plant JPM K- Added "flashlight" as required equipment for JPM. | ||
* Admin JPM RO C001 -Added one initial condition to cue sheet. | * Admin JPM RO C001 -Added one initial condition to cue sheet. | ||
* Admin JPM RO C002-Revised dates in JPM handout. | * Admin JPM RO C002- Revised dates in JPM handout. | ||
* Admin JPM SRO C002-Revised dates in JPM handout. | * Admin JPM SRO C002- Revised dates in JPM handout. | ||
* Admin JPM SRO EC-Revised cue to get more consistent responses from candidates. | * Admin JPM SRO EC- Revised cue to get more consistent responses from candidates. | ||
* Admin JPM SRO EP -Revised cue to get desired interaction between candidate and examiner. | * Admin JPM SRO EP - Revised cue to get desired interaction between candidate and examiner. Fixed one JPM step to match key.}} | ||
Fixed one JPM step to match key.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 00:07, 4 November 2019
| ML14261A300 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | FitzPatrick  |
| Issue date: | 09/08/2014 |
| From: | Todd Fish Operations Branch I |
| To: | FitzPatrick |
| Shared Package | |
| ML14101A125 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC U01887 | |
| Download: ML14261A300 (2) | |
Text
James A. Fitzpatrick September 2014 NRC Examination Examination Changes Since Initial Submittal The following changes were made to the examination based on NRC comment following the draft examination submittal:
- Scenario #1 -Added note regarding what instrumentation is used to judge CT-2. Added role play to ensure Event #5 proceeds as desired.
- Scenario #2 - Deleted Event #3. Revised initial conditions to ensure new Event #4 flows well without being preceded by the deleted event. Combined Events #4 and #5 on outline. Revised one malfunction to allow momentary success for an operator action.
- Scenario #3 - Revised Event #3 to give BOP credit for actions. Revised Event #6 to use further degradation as same component as Event #5
- Scenario #4- Re-classified Event #8 as an additional "Major". Re-distributed parts of original Event #8 into Events #9 and #1 0.
- Simulator JPM F- Changed which procedure sections will be performed to better streamline JPM while still testing the same manipulations.
- Simulator JPM G - Deleted first part of JPM and added additional actions to the end of the JPM to test manipulations that are different from those demonstrated in some scenario events.
- Simulator JPM H -Too much repetition of actions already demonstrated during scenarios, in particular scram actions. Replaced this JPM.