ML14321A249: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project =
| stage = Acceptance Review
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Wall, Scott Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 8:36 AM To: Anderson, Jon S.; Vincent, Dale M.
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                         Wall, Scott Sent:                         Monday, November 17, 2014 8:36 AM To:                           Anderson, Jon S.; Vincent, Dale M.
Cc: Tsao, John; Alley, David; Pelton, David
Cc:                           Tsao, John; Alley, David; Pelton, David


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review of MF4839 and MF4840 - 10 CFR 50.55a Requests Associated with Pad Reinforcement of Class 2 and 3 M oderate Energy Carbon Steel PipingBy letter dated September 15, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML14258A073), as supplemented by letter dated October 20, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14293A458), Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, doing business as Xcel Energy (NSPM or the licensee), submitted relief requests for Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP), Units 1 and 2. The 10 CFR 50.55a requests numbered 1-RR-5-1, 2-RR-5-1, 1-RR-5-2, 2-RR-5-2, 1-RR-5-3, 2-RR-5-3, 1-RR-5-5, 2-RR-5-5, 1-RR-5-6, and 2-RR-5-6 are in support of the fifth ten-year interval for the PINGP, Units 1 and 2, lnservice Inspection Program. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of relief requests numbered 1-RR-5-5 and 2-RR-5-5. Your applications for re lief requests numbered 1-RR-5-1, 2-RR-5-1, 1-RR-5-2, 2-RR-5-2, 1-RR-5-3, 2-RR-5-3, 1-RR-5-6, and 2-RR-5-6 are being reviewed separately. The acceptance review for relief requests numbered 1-RR-5-5 and 2-RR-5-5 was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) and 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.
Acceptance Review of MF4839 and MF4840 - 10 CFR 50.55a Requests Associated with Pad Reinforcement of Class 2 and 3 Moderate Energy Carbon Steel Piping By letter dated September 15, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application for relief requests numbered 1-RR-5-5 and 2-RR-5-5 and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed evaluation in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
ML14258A073), as supplemented by letter dated October 20, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14293A458), Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, doing business as Xcel Energy (NSPM or the licensee), submitted relief requests for Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP), Units 1 and 2. The 10 CFR 50.55a requests numbered 1-RR-5-1, 2-RR-5-1, 1-RR-5-2, 2-RR-5-2, 1-RR-5-3, 2-RR-5-3, 1-RR-5-5, 2-RR-5-5, 1-RR-5-6, and 2-RR-5-6 are in support of the fifth ten-year interval for the PINGP, Units 1 and 2, lnservice Inspection Program. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of relief requests numbered 1-RR-5-5 and 2-RR-5-5. Your applications for relief requests numbered 1-RR-5-1, 2-RR-5-1, 1-RR-5-2, 2-RR 2, 1-RR-5-3, 2-RR-5-3, 1-RR-5-6, and 2-RR-5-6 are being reviewed separately. The acceptance review for relief requests numbered 1-RR-5-5 and 2-RR-5-5 was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) and 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application for relief requests numbered 1-RR-5-5 and 2-RR-5-5 and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed evaluation in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Scott P. Wall, PMP, LSS BB, BSP Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301.415.2855 Scott.Wall@nrc.gov 1


If you have any questions, please contact me.
Hearing Identifier:     NRR_PMDA Email Number:           1691 Mail Envelope Properties       (Scott.Wall@nrc.gov20141117083537)
 
Scott P. Wall, PMP, LSS BB, BSP Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
 
301.415.2855
 
Scott.Wall@nrc.gov
 
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1691   Mail Envelope Properties   (Scott.Wall@nrc.gov20141117083537)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review of MF4839 and MF4840 - 10 CFR 50.55a Requests Associated with Pad Reinforcement of Class 2 and 3 Moderate Energy Carbon Steel Piping Sent Date:   11/17/2014 8:35:37 AM Received Date: 11/17/2014 8:35:37 AM From:   Wall, Scott Created By:   Scott.Wall@nrc.gov Recipients:     "Tsao, John" <John.Tsao@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Alley, David" <David.Alley@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Pelton, David" <David.Pelton@nrc.gov>
Acceptance Review of MF4839 and MF4840 - 10 CFR 50.55a Requests Associated with Pad Reinforcement of Class 2 and 3 Moderate Energy Carbon Steel Piping Sent Date:               11/17/2014 8:35:37 AM Received Date:           11/17/2014 8:35:37 AM From:                   Wall, Scott Created By:             Scott.Wall@nrc.gov Recipients:
Tracking Status: None "Anderson, Jon S." <jon.anderson@xenuclear.com> Tracking Status: None "Vincent, Dale M." <Dale.Vincent@xenuclear.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   3031     11/17/2014 8:35:37 AM
"Tsao, John" <John.Tsao@nrc.gov>
 
Tracking Status: None "Alley, David" <David.Alley@nrc.gov>
Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None "Pelton, David" <David.Pelton@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Anderson, Jon S." <jon.anderson@xenuclear.com>
Tracking Status: None "Vincent, Dale M." <Dale.Vincent@xenuclear.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                           Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                         3031                   11/17/2014 8:35:37 AM Options Priority:                       Standard Return Notification:             No Reply Requested:                 No Sensitivity:                     Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 20:23, 31 October 2019

Acceptance Review of 10 CFR 50.55a Requests Associated with Pad Reinforcement of Class 2 and 3 Moderate Energy Carbon Steel Piping (TACs MF4839 and MF4840)
ML14321A249
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/17/2014
From: Scott Wall
Plant Licensing Branch III
To: James Anderson
Northern States Power Co
References
MF4839, MF4840
Download: ML14321A249 (2)
v • d • e


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Wall, Scott Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 8:36 AM To: Anderson, Jon S.; Vincent, Dale M.

Cc: Tsao, John; Alley, David; Pelton, David

Subject:

Acceptance Review of MF4839 and MF4840 - 10 CFR 50.55a Requests Associated with Pad Reinforcement of Class 2 and 3 Moderate Energy Carbon Steel Piping By letter dated September 15, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No.

ML14258A073), as supplemented by letter dated October 20, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14293A458), Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, doing business as Xcel Energy (NSPM or the licensee), submitted relief requests for Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP), Units 1 and 2. The 10 CFR 50.55a requests numbered 1-RR-5-1, 2-RR-5-1, 1-RR-5-2, 2-RR-5-2, 1-RR-5-3, 2-RR-5-3, 1-RR-5-5, 2-RR-5-5, 1-RR-5-6, and 2-RR-5-6 are in support of the fifth ten-year interval for the PINGP, Units 1 and 2, lnservice Inspection Program. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of relief requests numbered 1-RR-5-5 and 2-RR-5-5. Your applications for relief requests numbered 1-RR-5-1, 2-RR-5-1, 1-RR-5-2, 2-RR 2, 1-RR-5-3, 2-RR-5-3, 1-RR-5-6, and 2-RR-5-6 are being reviewed separately. The acceptance review for relief requests numbered 1-RR-5-5 and 2-RR-5-5 was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) and 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application for relief requests numbered 1-RR-5-5 and 2-RR-5-5 and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed evaluation in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Scott P. Wall, PMP, LSS BB, BSP Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301.415.2855 Scott.Wall@nrc.gov 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1691 Mail Envelope Properties (Scott.Wall@nrc.gov20141117083537)

Subject:

Acceptance Review of MF4839 and MF4840 - 10 CFR 50.55a Requests Associated with Pad Reinforcement of Class 2 and 3 Moderate Energy Carbon Steel Piping Sent Date: 11/17/2014 8:35:37 AM Received Date: 11/17/2014 8:35:37 AM From: Wall, Scott Created By: Scott.Wall@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Tsao, John" <John.Tsao@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Alley, David" <David.Alley@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Pelton, David" <David.Pelton@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Anderson, Jon S." <jon.anderson@xenuclear.com>

Tracking Status: None "Vincent, Dale M." <Dale.Vincent@xenuclear.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3031 11/17/2014 8:35:37 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14321A249&oldid=2040840"