ML16138A106: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Attachment 6 OBDI 202 - I OLE Process Rev 1 DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Facility: South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 First Exam Date:
{{#Wiki_filter:DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS South Texas Project, Facility:                                                    First Exam Date:             May 4, 2016 Units 1 and 2 Written Exam Outline (Revision 1)
May 4, 2016 Written Exam Outline (Revision 1
Comment                                         Resolution RO Exam Outline Tier 1/Group 1, Question #7: Before the       Licensee staff performed this verification.
) Comment Resolution RO Exam Outline 1 Tier 1/Group 1, Question  
K/A statement is changed, verify whether     Based on the review, there are no internal there are any reporting responsibilities to   organizational reporting requirements 1
#7: Before the K/A statement is changed, verify whether there are any reporting responsibilities to internal organizations that a RO may have. This is part of the scope of the original K/A statement (G2.4.30).
internal organizations that a RO may         associated with the RO position. Therefore, have. This is part of the scope of the       the proposed change in the written exam original K/A statement (G2.4.30).             outline is acceptable.
Licensee staff performed this verification. Based on the review, there are no internal organizational reporting requirements associated with the RO position. Therefore, the proposed change in the written exam outline is acceptable.
Tier 2/Group 1, Question #53: Editorial -    Outline editorial change made.
2 Tier 2/Group 1, Question  
2  In the Form ES-401-4, the As in the K/A statements discussed should be Ks.
#53: Editorial  
Tier 2/Group 2, Question #61: Do ROs        Based on licensee review, there are no RO have a responsibility to monitor remote       responsibilities with this task. The licensees handling or operations involving             maintenance department has responsibility 3  containment iodine filters? Recognize         for this activity.
- In the Form ES
there may be no tasks in the control room, but are there oversight                 The proposed written exam outline change is responsibilities of others?                  acceptable.
-401-4, the A's in the K/A statements discussed should be K's
Tier 3/Category 2, Question #68: Do           Based on licensee review, there are no job ROs have any responsibilities with          task responsibilities for ROs on this topic.
. Outline editorial change made.
preparation/evaluation of risk                Transmission dispatcher coordination is 4  assessments, work prioritization, or          handled at the SRO level.
3 Tier 2/Group 2, Question  
coordination with transmission system operators?                                    The proposed written exam outline change is acceptable.
#61: Do RO's have a responsibility to monitor remote handling or operations involving containment iodine filters? Recognize there may be no tasks in the control room, but are there oversight responsibilities of others?
SRO Outline Tier 2/Group 2, Question #18: Area           The subject matter for this proposed K/A radiation monitoring is addressed in         closely matches that of Tier 2/Group 2, Section 12.3.4.1 of the UFSAR. It says       Question #10. It would be best to develop a that the Reactor Control Building high       question on another topic.
Based on licensee review, there are no RO responsibilities with this task. The licensee's maintenance department has responsibility for this activity.
range radiation monitors are safety-related for their post-accident monitoring   The outline was changed to match G2.2.38 capabilities. They are discussed in           with Tier 2/Group 2, 068 Liquid Radwaste.
The proposed written exam outline change is acceptable.
UFSAR Chapter 15. Other area 1  radiation monitors are given in tables associated with Section 12.3.4.1 as well.
4 Tier 3/Category 2, Question #6 8: Do RO's have any responsibilities with preparation/evaluation of risk assessments, work prioritization, or coordination with transmission system operators?
It is unclear if the credited ventilation radiation monitor for control room ventilation is within this group as well. If it is, this is controlled within the Technical Specifications (TS 3/4.7.7).                         OBDI 202 - IOLE Process                                  Rev 1
Based on licensee review, there are no job task responsibilities for ROs on this topic. Transmission dispatcher coordination is handled at the SRO level.
The proposed written exam outline change is acceptable.
SRO Outline 1 Tier 2/Group 2, Question #
18: Area radiation monitoring is addressed in Section 12.3.4.1 of the UFSAR. It says that the Reactor Control Building high range radiation monitors are safety
-related for their post
-accident monitoring capabilities. They are discussed in UFSAR Chapter 15. Other area radiation monitors are given in tables associated with Section 12.3.4.1 as well.
It is unclear if the credited ventilation radiation monitor for control room ventilation is within this group as well. If it is, this is controlled within the Technical Specifications (TS 3/4.7.7).
The subject matter for this proposed K/A closely matches that of Tier 2/Group 2, Question #10. It would be best to develop a question on another topic.
The outline was changed to match G2.2.38 with Tier 2/Group 2, 068 Liquid Radwaste.


Attachment 6 OBDI 202 - I OLE Process Rev 1 Are there any of these that have conditions/limitations associated with the facility license?
Are there any of these that have conditions/limitations associated with the facility license?
Tier 3/Category 1, Question 19: In most cases, ROs make the plant announcements. However, do SRO's evaluate criteria that require them to direct others to make announcements? If so, the existing K/A statement may be used. Based on secondary licensee review, the licensee will return back to writing a question based on the original K/A statement (2.1.14).
Tier 3/Category 1, Question 19: In most Based on secondary licensee review, the cases, ROs make the plant                 licensee will return back to writing a question announcements. However, do SROs          based on the original K/A statement (2.1.14).
Administrative JPM Outline Comment Resolution 1 Not applicable.
evaluate criteria that require them to direct others to make announcements?
Control Room / In
If so, the existing K/A statement may be used.
-Plant System JPM Outline Comme nt Resolution 1 Not applicable.
Administrative JPM Outline Comment                                       Resolution 1   Not applicable.
2   3     Simulator Scenario Outline Comments Comment Resolution 1 Not applicable.
Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline Comment                                        Resolution 1   Not applicable.
2   3   4   5   6}}
2 3
Simulator Scenario Outline Comments Comment                                       Resolution 1   Not applicable.
2 3
4 5
6                       OBDI 202 - IOLE Process                                Rev 1}}

Latest revision as of 18:56, 30 October 2019

2016-05 Draft Outline Comments
ML16138A106
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 05/04/2016
From: Vincent Gaddy
Operations Branch IV
To:
References
Download: ML16138A106 (2)
v • d • e


Text

DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS South Texas Project, Facility: First Exam Date: May 4, 2016 Units 1 and 2 Written Exam Outline (Revision 1)

Comment Resolution RO Exam Outline Tier 1/Group 1, Question #7: Before the Licensee staff performed this verification.

K/A statement is changed, verify whether Based on the review, there are no internal there are any reporting responsibilities to organizational reporting requirements 1

internal organizations that a RO may associated with the RO position. Therefore, have. This is part of the scope of the the proposed change in the written exam original K/A statement (G2.4.30). outline is acceptable.

Tier 2/Group 1, Question #53: Editorial - Outline editorial change made.

2 In the Form ES-401-4, the As in the K/A statements discussed should be Ks.

Tier 2/Group 2, Question #61: Do ROs Based on licensee review, there are no RO have a responsibility to monitor remote responsibilities with this task. The licensees handling or operations involving maintenance department has responsibility 3 containment iodine filters? Recognize for this activity.

there may be no tasks in the control room, but are there oversight The proposed written exam outline change is responsibilities of others? acceptable.

Tier 3/Category 2, Question #68: Do Based on licensee review, there are no job ROs have any responsibilities with task responsibilities for ROs on this topic.

preparation/evaluation of risk Transmission dispatcher coordination is 4 assessments, work prioritization, or handled at the SRO level.

coordination with transmission system operators? The proposed written exam outline change is acceptable.

SRO Outline Tier 2/Group 2, Question #18: Area The subject matter for this proposed K/A radiation monitoring is addressed in closely matches that of Tier 2/Group 2, Section 12.3.4.1 of the UFSAR. It says Question #10. It would be best to develop a that the Reactor Control Building high question on another topic.

range radiation monitors are safety-related for their post-accident monitoring The outline was changed to match G2.2.38 capabilities. They are discussed in with Tier 2/Group 2, 068 Liquid Radwaste.

UFSAR Chapter 15. Other area 1 radiation monitors are given in tables associated with Section 12.3.4.1 as well.

It is unclear if the credited ventilation radiation monitor for control room ventilation is within this group as well. If it is, this is controlled within the Technical Specifications (TS 3/4.7.7). OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Rev 1

Are there any of these that have conditions/limitations associated with the facility license?

Tier 3/Category 1, Question 19: In most Based on secondary licensee review, the cases, ROs make the plant licensee will return back to writing a question announcements. However, do SROs based on the original K/A statement (2.1.14).

evaluate criteria that require them to direct others to make announcements?

If so, the existing K/A statement may be used.

Administrative JPM Outline Comment Resolution 1 Not applicable.

Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline Comment Resolution 1 Not applicable.

2 3

Simulator Scenario Outline Comments Comment Resolution 1 Not applicable.

2 3

4 5

6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Rev 1

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16138A106&oldid=2020283"